A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is performed in patients with prostate cancer. Unfortunately, 10–46% of patients may still suffer from limited erectile function (EF) after RARP. This study aimed to develop a prediction model based on the extent of fascia preservation (FP) and postoperati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of robotic surgery 2019-06, Vol.13 (3), p.455-462 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 462 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 455 |
container_title | Journal of robotic surgery |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | KleinJan, G. H. Sikorska, K. Korne, C. M. Brouwer, O. R. Buckle, T. Tillier, C. van der Roest, R. C. M. de Jong, J. van Leeuwen, F. W. B. van der Poel, H. G. |
description | Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is performed in patients with prostate cancer. Unfortunately, 10–46% of patients may still suffer from limited erectile function (EF) after RARP. This study aimed to develop a prediction model based on the extent of fascia preservation (FP) and postoperative EF after RARP. A previously developed FP score quantizing the extent and regions of nerve-preservation was determined in a cohort of 1241 patients who underwent RARP. The predictive value of the FP score for post-prostatectomy EF (following the international index erectile function (IIEF) score, EF domain) was analyzed. To increase the predictive value of the scoring system, the FP regions were related to postoperative EF, nerve distribution and co-morbidity factors. Finally, a prediction model for EF was developed based on the studied cohort. When corrected for the preoperative IIEF-EF, the FP score was shown to be a significant denominator for IIEF (
p
= 2.5 × 10
− 15
) with an
R
2
of 35%. Variable selection performed using the Akaike information criterion led to a final prediction model for postoperative IIEF after nerve-preservation based on the FP score. Furthermore, patient’s age, preoperative IIEF score, CCIS and use of clips for nerve sparing were significantly associated with postoperative IIEF-EF. More anterior fascia preservation was correlated with better EF outcome and age was a strong independent predictor of EF outcome. In older men, the relative benefit of more extensive fascia preservation was at least similar to younger men, despite a lower baseline IIEF-EF score. Quantitative nerve-sparing FP scoring could be related to the postoperative IIEF-EF and integrated into a multivariate prediction model, which includes with age, use of surgical clips, the Charlson Comorbidity Index Score (CCIS), and preoperative IIEF-EF. When further validated the prediction model could provide patients and care-givers a qualitative estimation of EF outcome after RARP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11701-018-0867-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2099433801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918717723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a4cfcf6b03420b25dcdc398dffe9fc5cd91d26023a3feff82977245ce71906bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2O1iAUhonROOPoBbgxJG7cVA_QFlhOJv4lk7jRNaFw0E7aUoFO_C7Ge5XacUxMXEHC8z4ceAl5zuA1A5BvMmMSWANMNaB62XQPyDlTvWh4q9nD-70SZ-RJzjcAnewEe0zOBDCpBMA5-XlJ14R-dGWMC52jx4kmnGwZl6-0fEOKPwouhcZAx6UkG1dM9fAWabDZjXZPZ0y39ne-RIoJq2tC6k85bMvhtaFgokvlsMmrTbs8xSGWxuY85oKeJluHsFP1xVxsqZI4n56SR8FOGZ_drRfky7u3n68-NNef3n-8urxunJC8SloXXOgHEC2HgXfeeSe08iGgDq5zXjPPe-DCioAhKK6l5G3nUDIN_eDFBXl1eOvt3zfMxcxjdjhNdsG4ZcNB61YIBayiL_9Bb-KWljqd4ZopyapaVIodlKvPyQmDWdM423QyDMzenTm6M7U7s3dnupp5cWfehhn9feJPWRXgB5DX_Qcx_b36_9ZfciOpSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918717723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>KleinJan, G. H. ; Sikorska, K. ; Korne, C. M. ; Brouwer, O. R. ; Buckle, T. ; Tillier, C. ; van der Roest, R. C. M. ; de Jong, J. ; van Leeuwen, F. W. B. ; van der Poel, H. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>KleinJan, G. H. ; Sikorska, K. ; Korne, C. M. ; Brouwer, O. R. ; Buckle, T. ; Tillier, C. ; van der Roest, R. C. M. ; de Jong, J. ; van Leeuwen, F. W. B. ; van der Poel, H. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is performed in patients with prostate cancer. Unfortunately, 10–46% of patients may still suffer from limited erectile function (EF) after RARP. This study aimed to develop a prediction model based on the extent of fascia preservation (FP) and postoperative EF after RARP. A previously developed FP score quantizing the extent and regions of nerve-preservation was determined in a cohort of 1241 patients who underwent RARP. The predictive value of the FP score for post-prostatectomy EF (following the international index erectile function (IIEF) score, EF domain) was analyzed. To increase the predictive value of the scoring system, the FP regions were related to postoperative EF, nerve distribution and co-morbidity factors. Finally, a prediction model for EF was developed based on the studied cohort. When corrected for the preoperative IIEF-EF, the FP score was shown to be a significant denominator for IIEF (
p
= 2.5 × 10
− 15
) with an
R
2
of 35%. Variable selection performed using the Akaike information criterion led to a final prediction model for postoperative IIEF after nerve-preservation based on the FP score. Furthermore, patient’s age, preoperative IIEF score, CCIS and use of clips for nerve sparing were significantly associated with postoperative IIEF-EF. More anterior fascia preservation was correlated with better EF outcome and age was a strong independent predictor of EF outcome. In older men, the relative benefit of more extensive fascia preservation was at least similar to younger men, despite a lower baseline IIEF-EF score. Quantitative nerve-sparing FP scoring could be related to the postoperative IIEF-EF and integrated into a multivariate prediction model, which includes with age, use of surgical clips, the Charlson Comorbidity Index Score (CCIS), and preoperative IIEF-EF. When further validated the prediction model could provide patients and care-givers a qualitative estimation of EF outcome after RARP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-2483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0867-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30178300</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Age ; Cancer surgery ; Clips ; Erectile dysfunction ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Nerves ; Original Article ; Patients ; Prediction models ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Regression analysis ; Robots ; Surgery ; Urological surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Journal of robotic surgery, 2019-06, Vol.13 (3), p.455-462</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a4cfcf6b03420b25dcdc398dffe9fc5cd91d26023a3feff82977245ce71906bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a4cfcf6b03420b25dcdc398dffe9fc5cd91d26023a3feff82977245ce71906bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6244-0456</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11701-018-0867-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918717723?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21388,21389,27924,27925,33530,33531,33744,33745,41488,42557,43659,43805,51319,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30178300$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KleinJan, G. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikorska, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korne, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, O. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckle, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tillier, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Roest, R. C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Leeuwen, F. W. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Poel, H. G.</creatorcontrib><title>A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</title><title>Journal of robotic surgery</title><addtitle>J Robotic Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><description>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is performed in patients with prostate cancer. Unfortunately, 10–46% of patients may still suffer from limited erectile function (EF) after RARP. This study aimed to develop a prediction model based on the extent of fascia preservation (FP) and postoperative EF after RARP. A previously developed FP score quantizing the extent and regions of nerve-preservation was determined in a cohort of 1241 patients who underwent RARP. The predictive value of the FP score for post-prostatectomy EF (following the international index erectile function (IIEF) score, EF domain) was analyzed. To increase the predictive value of the scoring system, the FP regions were related to postoperative EF, nerve distribution and co-morbidity factors. Finally, a prediction model for EF was developed based on the studied cohort. When corrected for the preoperative IIEF-EF, the FP score was shown to be a significant denominator for IIEF (
p
= 2.5 × 10
− 15
) with an
R
2
of 35%. Variable selection performed using the Akaike information criterion led to a final prediction model for postoperative IIEF after nerve-preservation based on the FP score. Furthermore, patient’s age, preoperative IIEF score, CCIS and use of clips for nerve sparing were significantly associated with postoperative IIEF-EF. More anterior fascia preservation was correlated with better EF outcome and age was a strong independent predictor of EF outcome. In older men, the relative benefit of more extensive fascia preservation was at least similar to younger men, despite a lower baseline IIEF-EF score. Quantitative nerve-sparing FP scoring could be related to the postoperative IIEF-EF and integrated into a multivariate prediction model, which includes with age, use of surgical clips, the Charlson Comorbidity Index Score (CCIS), and preoperative IIEF-EF. When further validated the prediction model could provide patients and care-givers a qualitative estimation of EF outcome after RARP.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Clips</subject><subject>Erectile dysfunction</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Nerves</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1863-2483</issn><issn>1863-2491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2O1iAUhonROOPoBbgxJG7cVA_QFlhOJv4lk7jRNaFw0E7aUoFO_C7Ge5XacUxMXEHC8z4ceAl5zuA1A5BvMmMSWANMNaB62XQPyDlTvWh4q9nD-70SZ-RJzjcAnewEe0zOBDCpBMA5-XlJ14R-dGWMC52jx4kmnGwZl6-0fEOKPwouhcZAx6UkG1dM9fAWabDZjXZPZ0y39ne-RIoJq2tC6k85bMvhtaFgokvlsMmrTbs8xSGWxuY85oKeJluHsFP1xVxsqZI4n56SR8FOGZ_drRfky7u3n68-NNef3n-8urxunJC8SloXXOgHEC2HgXfeeSe08iGgDq5zXjPPe-DCioAhKK6l5G3nUDIN_eDFBXl1eOvt3zfMxcxjdjhNdsG4ZcNB61YIBayiL_9Bb-KWljqd4ZopyapaVIodlKvPyQmDWdM423QyDMzenTm6M7U7s3dnupp5cWfehhn9feJPWRXgB5DX_Qcx_b36_9ZfciOpSg</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>KleinJan, G. H.</creator><creator>Sikorska, K.</creator><creator>Korne, C. M.</creator><creator>Brouwer, O. R.</creator><creator>Buckle, T.</creator><creator>Tillier, C.</creator><creator>van der Roest, R. C. M.</creator><creator>de Jong, J.</creator><creator>van Leeuwen, F. W. B.</creator><creator>van der Poel, H. G.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6244-0456</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</title><author>KleinJan, G. H. ; Sikorska, K. ; Korne, C. M. ; Brouwer, O. R. ; Buckle, T. ; Tillier, C. ; van der Roest, R. C. M. ; de Jong, J. ; van Leeuwen, F. W. B. ; van der Poel, H. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a4cfcf6b03420b25dcdc398dffe9fc5cd91d26023a3feff82977245ce71906bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Clips</topic><topic>Erectile dysfunction</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Nerves</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KleinJan, G. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikorska, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korne, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, O. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckle, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tillier, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Roest, R. C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Leeuwen, F. W. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Poel, H. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KleinJan, G. H.</au><au>Sikorska, K.</au><au>Korne, C. M.</au><au>Brouwer, O. R.</au><au>Buckle, T.</au><au>Tillier, C.</au><au>van der Roest, R. C. M.</au><au>de Jong, J.</au><au>van Leeuwen, F. W. B.</au><au>van der Poel, H. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Robotic Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>455-462</pages><issn>1863-2483</issn><eissn>1863-2491</eissn><abstract>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is performed in patients with prostate cancer. Unfortunately, 10–46% of patients may still suffer from limited erectile function (EF) after RARP. This study aimed to develop a prediction model based on the extent of fascia preservation (FP) and postoperative EF after RARP. A previously developed FP score quantizing the extent and regions of nerve-preservation was determined in a cohort of 1241 patients who underwent RARP. The predictive value of the FP score for post-prostatectomy EF (following the international index erectile function (IIEF) score, EF domain) was analyzed. To increase the predictive value of the scoring system, the FP regions were related to postoperative EF, nerve distribution and co-morbidity factors. Finally, a prediction model for EF was developed based on the studied cohort. When corrected for the preoperative IIEF-EF, the FP score was shown to be a significant denominator for IIEF (
p
= 2.5 × 10
− 15
) with an
R
2
of 35%. Variable selection performed using the Akaike information criterion led to a final prediction model for postoperative IIEF after nerve-preservation based on the FP score. Furthermore, patient’s age, preoperative IIEF score, CCIS and use of clips for nerve sparing were significantly associated with postoperative IIEF-EF. More anterior fascia preservation was correlated with better EF outcome and age was a strong independent predictor of EF outcome. In older men, the relative benefit of more extensive fascia preservation was at least similar to younger men, despite a lower baseline IIEF-EF score. Quantitative nerve-sparing FP scoring could be related to the postoperative IIEF-EF and integrated into a multivariate prediction model, which includes with age, use of surgical clips, the Charlson Comorbidity Index Score (CCIS), and preoperative IIEF-EF. When further validated the prediction model could provide patients and care-givers a qualitative estimation of EF outcome after RARP.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>30178300</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11701-018-0867-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6244-0456</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1863-2483 |
ispartof | Journal of robotic surgery, 2019-06, Vol.13 (3), p.455-462 |
issn | 1863-2483 1863-2491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2099433801 |
source | ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Age Cancer surgery Clips Erectile dysfunction Medicine Medicine & Public Health Minimally Invasive Surgery Nerves Original Article Patients Prediction models Prostate Prostate cancer Regression analysis Robots Surgery Urological surgery Urology |
title | A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A27%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prediction%20model%20relating%20the%20extent%20of%20intraoperative%20fascia%20preservation%20to%20erectile%20dysfunction%20after%20nerve-sparing%20robot-assisted%20radical%20prostatectomy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20robotic%20surgery&rft.au=KleinJan,%20G.%20H.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=455-462&rft.issn=1863-2483&rft.eissn=1863-2491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11701-018-0867-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918717723%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918717723&rft_id=info:pmid/30178300&rfr_iscdi=true |