Prostate-specific antigen bounce in patients treated before 60 years old by iodine 125 brachytherapy for prostate cancer is frequent and not a prognostic factor
The only prognostic factor of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce in prostate cancer found in several studies is young age but has never been specifically studied in this subset of patients for long-term results. Bounce characteristics, histological, clinical, and dosimetric data in young patient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brachytherapy 2018-11, Vol.17 (6), p.888-894 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The only prognostic factor of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce in prostate cancer found in several studies is young age but has never been specifically studied in this subset of patients for long-term results. Bounce characteristics, histological, clinical, and dosimetric data in young patients were analyzed, as well as their impact on toxicity and survival.
This retrospective study included patients aged ≤60 years treated with exclusive iodine 125 brachytherapy with low or intermediary prostate adenocarcinoma during 1999–2014. Exclusion criteria were a follow-up of ≤24 months. PSA bounce was defined as a ≥0.2-ng/mL increase above the interval PSA nadir, followed by a decrease to nadir or below.
This study analyzed 179 patients. Median age was 56 years (46–59 years). The median follow-up was 79 months (54; 123). The bounce incidence was 56.8% (49.6%; 64.2%) at 5 years, inversely proportional to positive/total biopsies ratio (HR 0.98, 95% CI [0.97, 0.99]). Incidence of biochemical failure was 1.2%, 95% CI (0.3%; 4.7%), at 5 years with no difference between the bounce and no-bounce group (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.25; 3.58]). Bounce is an unfavorable prognostic factor for grade two and three urinary toxicities 6.67 (4.14; 10.76) (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1538-4721 1873-1449 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.07.011 |