Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Low-risk syncope accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions; however, inpatient investigations are often not necessary and are rarely diagnostic. Reducing the number of low-risk syncope admissions can likely lower health care resource consumption and overall expenditure. Application of s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of cardiology 2018-09, Vol.34 (9), p.1158-1164
Hauptverfasser: Deif, Bishoy, Kang, Sally, Ismail, Abid, Vanniyasingam, Thuva, Guzman, Juan C., Morillo, Carlos A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1164
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1158
container_title Canadian journal of cardiology
container_volume 34
creator Deif, Bishoy
Kang, Sally
Ismail, Abid
Vanniyasingam, Thuva
Guzman, Juan C.
Morillo, Carlos A.
description Low-risk syncope accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions; however, inpatient investigations are often not necessary and are rarely diagnostic. Reducing the number of low-risk syncope admissions can likely lower health care resource consumption and overall expenditure. Application of syncope guidelines by physicians in the emergency department provides a standardized approach that may potentially reduce admissions and lead to health care resource utilization savings. A retrospective chart review of 1229 syncope presentations was conducted at 2 major academic centres spanning 1 year. Three major society guidelines and position statements were applied to determine the effect on admission rates. A total of 1031 true syncope charts were included in the analysis; 407 (39%) were admitted and 624 (61%) were discharged by the treating physician (MD). There was a significant difference in the mean [standard deviation] age (75 [14] vs 55 [22]) and baseline cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure 51/407 (13%) vs 28/624 (5%), coronary artery disease 125/407 (31%) vs 91/624 (15%), and structural heart disease 36/407 (9%) vs 26/624 (4%), between admitted and not admitted patients, respectively (P < 0.01). All guidelines warranted more low-risk admissions when compared with 19% by the MD: Canadian Cardiovascular Society 34% (P < 0.01), American College of Emergency Physicians 22% (P = 0.03), and European Society of Cardiology 26% (P < 0.01). In conclusion, application of the current syncope guidelines to an emergency department population is unlikely to reduce low-risk hospital admissions. La syncope à faible risque représente une forte proportion des hospitalisations, alors que des examens en milieu hospitalier ne sont souvent pas nécessaires et permettent rarement de formuler un diagnostic. La réduction du nombre d’admissions pour une syncope à faible risque pourrait vraisemblablement diminuer la consommation des ressources en santé et les dépenses globales. La mise en application par les urgentologues de lignes directrices concernant la syncope constitue une approche normalisée qui pourrait permettre de réduire le nombre d’admissions et donc, l’utilisation des ressources en soins de santé. Une analyse rétrospective des dossiers médicaux de 1229 patients qui se sont présentés pour une syncope a été réalisée dans deux grands centres universitaires sur une période d’un an. Les lignes directrices et énoncés de position de trois grandes ass
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2098773371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0828282X18305051</els_id><sourcerecordid>2098773371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1093be56bfa57558fc980032b574964638db4eb63ce381d90f534477f1c242883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9v1DAUxC0EokvhC3BAPnJJ8J_EdhCX1bYUpKqVWir1ZiX2C_UqiYPtVMq3r1dbeuzpHd7MaOaH0GdKSkqo-LYvzd60JSNUlUSWhPA3aEMbKgpJZP0WbYhiqmCK3Z-gDzHuCamolOI9OuGESiIk3aB1O8-DM21yfsK-x7frZPwM-GJxFgY3QcRuwukB8PkI4S9MZsVnMLchjTAlfObxlU_4BuxiAG_t6GI8JN20CeJ3vM2fFHycwST3CHjnH3xI-DYtdv2I3vXtEOHT8z1Fdz_P_-x-FZfXF79328vC8FqkgpKGd1CLrm9rWdeqN43KS1lXy6oRleDKdhV0ghvgitqG9DWvKil7aljFlOKn6Osxdw7-3wIx6VzSwDC0E_glakYaJSXnkmYpO0pN7hwD9HoObmzDqinRB-R6rw_I9QG5JlLnItn05Tl_6UawL5b_jLPgx1EAeeWjg6CjcRkkWBcyF229ey3_Cb24kgU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2098773371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Deif, Bishoy ; Kang, Sally ; Ismail, Abid ; Vanniyasingam, Thuva ; Guzman, Juan C. ; Morillo, Carlos A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Deif, Bishoy ; Kang, Sally ; Ismail, Abid ; Vanniyasingam, Thuva ; Guzman, Juan C. ; Morillo, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Low-risk syncope accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions; however, inpatient investigations are often not necessary and are rarely diagnostic. Reducing the number of low-risk syncope admissions can likely lower health care resource consumption and overall expenditure. Application of syncope guidelines by physicians in the emergency department provides a standardized approach that may potentially reduce admissions and lead to health care resource utilization savings. A retrospective chart review of 1229 syncope presentations was conducted at 2 major academic centres spanning 1 year. Three major society guidelines and position statements were applied to determine the effect on admission rates. A total of 1031 true syncope charts were included in the analysis; 407 (39%) were admitted and 624 (61%) were discharged by the treating physician (MD). There was a significant difference in the mean [standard deviation] age (75 [14] vs 55 [22]) and baseline cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure 51/407 (13%) vs 28/624 (5%), coronary artery disease 125/407 (31%) vs 91/624 (15%), and structural heart disease 36/407 (9%) vs 26/624 (4%), between admitted and not admitted patients, respectively (P < 0.01). All guidelines warranted more low-risk admissions when compared with 19% by the MD: Canadian Cardiovascular Society 34% (P < 0.01), American College of Emergency Physicians 22% (P = 0.03), and European Society of Cardiology 26% (P < 0.01). In conclusion, application of the current syncope guidelines to an emergency department population is unlikely to reduce low-risk hospital admissions. La syncope à faible risque représente une forte proportion des hospitalisations, alors que des examens en milieu hospitalier ne sont souvent pas nécessaires et permettent rarement de formuler un diagnostic. La réduction du nombre d’admissions pour une syncope à faible risque pourrait vraisemblablement diminuer la consommation des ressources en santé et les dépenses globales. La mise en application par les urgentologues de lignes directrices concernant la syncope constitue une approche normalisée qui pourrait permettre de réduire le nombre d’admissions et donc, l’utilisation des ressources en soins de santé. Une analyse rétrospective des dossiers médicaux de 1229 patients qui se sont présentés pour une syncope a été réalisée dans deux grands centres universitaires sur une période d’un an. Les lignes directrices et énoncés de position de trois grandes associations professionnelles ont été appliquées à ces cas pour en déterminer l’effet sur les taux d’admission. Au total, 1031 patients ayant subi une syncope véritable ont été inclus dans l’analyse; 407 (39 %) de ces patients ont été hospitalisés et 624 (61 %) ont reçu leur congé du médecin traitant. On a observé un écart significatif entre les patients admis et les patients non admis (p < 0,01) quant à l’âge moyen [écart-type] (75 [14] vs 55 [22], respectivement) et la maladie cardiovasculaire au départ, y compris l’insuffisance cardiaque congestive (51/407 [13 %] vs 28/624 [5 %]), la coronaropathie (125/407 [31 %] vs 91/624 [15 %]) et la cardiopathie structurelle (36/407 [9 %] vs 26/624 [4 %]). Toutes les lignes directrices préconisaient l’admission de patients présentant un faible risque en plus grand nombre que les médecins traitants (19 %, comparativement à 34 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société canadienne de cardiologie, à 22 % [p = 0,03] pour l’American College of Emergency Physicians et à 26 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société européenne de cardiologie). En conclusion, il est peu probable que la mise en application des lignes directrices actuelles sur le traitement des syncopes à l’égard de la clientèle des services d’urgence permette de réduire le nombre d’hospitalisations de patients présentant un faible risque.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0828-282X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-7075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30170671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Canada ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Admission - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient Care Management - methods ; Patient Care Management - standards ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Syncope - diagnosis ; Syncope - etiology ; Syncope - therapy</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of cardiology, 2018-09, Vol.34 (9), p.1158-1164</ispartof><rights>2018 Canadian Cardiovascular Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1093be56bfa57558fc980032b574964638db4eb63ce381d90f534477f1c242883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1093be56bfa57558fc980032b574964638db4eb63ce381d90f534477f1c242883</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8500-2763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X18305051$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30170671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deif, Bishoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Abid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanniyasingam, Thuva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Juan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morillo, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><title>Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><title>Canadian journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Can J Cardiol</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Low-risk syncope accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions; however, inpatient investigations are often not necessary and are rarely diagnostic. Reducing the number of low-risk syncope admissions can likely lower health care resource consumption and overall expenditure. Application of syncope guidelines by physicians in the emergency department provides a standardized approach that may potentially reduce admissions and lead to health care resource utilization savings. A retrospective chart review of 1229 syncope presentations was conducted at 2 major academic centres spanning 1 year. Three major society guidelines and position statements were applied to determine the effect on admission rates. A total of 1031 true syncope charts were included in the analysis; 407 (39%) were admitted and 624 (61%) were discharged by the treating physician (MD). There was a significant difference in the mean [standard deviation] age (75 [14] vs 55 [22]) and baseline cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure 51/407 (13%) vs 28/624 (5%), coronary artery disease 125/407 (31%) vs 91/624 (15%), and structural heart disease 36/407 (9%) vs 26/624 (4%), between admitted and not admitted patients, respectively (P < 0.01). All guidelines warranted more low-risk admissions when compared with 19% by the MD: Canadian Cardiovascular Society 34% (P < 0.01), American College of Emergency Physicians 22% (P = 0.03), and European Society of Cardiology 26% (P < 0.01). In conclusion, application of the current syncope guidelines to an emergency department population is unlikely to reduce low-risk hospital admissions. La syncope à faible risque représente une forte proportion des hospitalisations, alors que des examens en milieu hospitalier ne sont souvent pas nécessaires et permettent rarement de formuler un diagnostic. La réduction du nombre d’admissions pour une syncope à faible risque pourrait vraisemblablement diminuer la consommation des ressources en santé et les dépenses globales. La mise en application par les urgentologues de lignes directrices concernant la syncope constitue une approche normalisée qui pourrait permettre de réduire le nombre d’admissions et donc, l’utilisation des ressources en soins de santé. Une analyse rétrospective des dossiers médicaux de 1229 patients qui se sont présentés pour une syncope a été réalisée dans deux grands centres universitaires sur une période d’un an. Les lignes directrices et énoncés de position de trois grandes associations professionnelles ont été appliquées à ces cas pour en déterminer l’effet sur les taux d’admission. Au total, 1031 patients ayant subi une syncope véritable ont été inclus dans l’analyse; 407 (39 %) de ces patients ont été hospitalisés et 624 (61 %) ont reçu leur congé du médecin traitant. On a observé un écart significatif entre les patients admis et les patients non admis (p < 0,01) quant à l’âge moyen [écart-type] (75 [14] vs 55 [22], respectivement) et la maladie cardiovasculaire au départ, y compris l’insuffisance cardiaque congestive (51/407 [13 %] vs 28/624 [5 %]), la coronaropathie (125/407 [31 %] vs 91/624 [15 %]) et la cardiopathie structurelle (36/407 [9 %] vs 26/624 [4 %]). Toutes les lignes directrices préconisaient l’admission de patients présentant un faible risque en plus grand nombre que les médecins traitants (19 %, comparativement à 34 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société canadienne de cardiologie, à 22 % [p = 0,03] pour l’American College of Emergency Physicians et à 26 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société européenne de cardiologie). En conclusion, il est peu probable que la mise en application des lignes directrices actuelles sur le traitement des syncopes à l’égard de la clientèle des services d’urgence permette de réduire le nombre d’hospitalisations de patients présentant un faible risque.]]></description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Admission - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Care Management - methods</subject><subject>Patient Care Management - standards</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Syncope - diagnosis</subject><subject>Syncope - etiology</subject><subject>Syncope - therapy</subject><issn>0828-282X</issn><issn>1916-7075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9v1DAUxC0EokvhC3BAPnJJ8J_EdhCX1bYUpKqVWir1ZiX2C_UqiYPtVMq3r1dbeuzpHd7MaOaH0GdKSkqo-LYvzd60JSNUlUSWhPA3aEMbKgpJZP0WbYhiqmCK3Z-gDzHuCamolOI9OuGESiIk3aB1O8-DM21yfsK-x7frZPwM-GJxFgY3QcRuwukB8PkI4S9MZsVnMLchjTAlfObxlU_4BuxiAG_t6GI8JN20CeJ3vM2fFHycwST3CHjnH3xI-DYtdv2I3vXtEOHT8z1Fdz_P_-x-FZfXF79328vC8FqkgpKGd1CLrm9rWdeqN43KS1lXy6oRleDKdhV0ghvgitqG9DWvKil7aljFlOKn6Osxdw7-3wIx6VzSwDC0E_glakYaJSXnkmYpO0pN7hwD9HoObmzDqinRB-R6rw_I9QG5JlLnItn05Tl_6UawL5b_jLPgx1EAeeWjg6CjcRkkWBcyF229ey3_Cb24kgU</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Deif, Bishoy</creator><creator>Kang, Sally</creator><creator>Ismail, Abid</creator><creator>Vanniyasingam, Thuva</creator><creator>Guzman, Juan C.</creator><creator>Morillo, Carlos A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8500-2763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><author>Deif, Bishoy ; Kang, Sally ; Ismail, Abid ; Vanniyasingam, Thuva ; Guzman, Juan C. ; Morillo, Carlos A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1093be56bfa57558fc980032b574964638db4eb63ce381d90f534477f1c242883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Admission - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Care Management - methods</topic><topic>Patient Care Management - standards</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Syncope - diagnosis</topic><topic>Syncope - etiology</topic><topic>Syncope - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deif, Bishoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Abid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanniyasingam, Thuva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Juan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morillo, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deif, Bishoy</au><au>Kang, Sally</au><au>Ismail, Abid</au><au>Vanniyasingam, Thuva</au><au>Guzman, Juan C.</au><au>Morillo, Carlos A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1158</spage><epage>1164</epage><pages>1158-1164</pages><issn>0828-282X</issn><eissn>1916-7075</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Low-risk syncope accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions; however, inpatient investigations are often not necessary and are rarely diagnostic. Reducing the number of low-risk syncope admissions can likely lower health care resource consumption and overall expenditure. Application of syncope guidelines by physicians in the emergency department provides a standardized approach that may potentially reduce admissions and lead to health care resource utilization savings. A retrospective chart review of 1229 syncope presentations was conducted at 2 major academic centres spanning 1 year. Three major society guidelines and position statements were applied to determine the effect on admission rates. A total of 1031 true syncope charts were included in the analysis; 407 (39%) were admitted and 624 (61%) were discharged by the treating physician (MD). There was a significant difference in the mean [standard deviation] age (75 [14] vs 55 [22]) and baseline cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure 51/407 (13%) vs 28/624 (5%), coronary artery disease 125/407 (31%) vs 91/624 (15%), and structural heart disease 36/407 (9%) vs 26/624 (4%), between admitted and not admitted patients, respectively (P < 0.01). All guidelines warranted more low-risk admissions when compared with 19% by the MD: Canadian Cardiovascular Society 34% (P < 0.01), American College of Emergency Physicians 22% (P = 0.03), and European Society of Cardiology 26% (P < 0.01). In conclusion, application of the current syncope guidelines to an emergency department population is unlikely to reduce low-risk hospital admissions. La syncope à faible risque représente une forte proportion des hospitalisations, alors que des examens en milieu hospitalier ne sont souvent pas nécessaires et permettent rarement de formuler un diagnostic. La réduction du nombre d’admissions pour une syncope à faible risque pourrait vraisemblablement diminuer la consommation des ressources en santé et les dépenses globales. La mise en application par les urgentologues de lignes directrices concernant la syncope constitue une approche normalisée qui pourrait permettre de réduire le nombre d’admissions et donc, l’utilisation des ressources en soins de santé. Une analyse rétrospective des dossiers médicaux de 1229 patients qui se sont présentés pour une syncope a été réalisée dans deux grands centres universitaires sur une période d’un an. Les lignes directrices et énoncés de position de trois grandes associations professionnelles ont été appliquées à ces cas pour en déterminer l’effet sur les taux d’admission. Au total, 1031 patients ayant subi une syncope véritable ont été inclus dans l’analyse; 407 (39 %) de ces patients ont été hospitalisés et 624 (61 %) ont reçu leur congé du médecin traitant. On a observé un écart significatif entre les patients admis et les patients non admis (p < 0,01) quant à l’âge moyen [écart-type] (75 [14] vs 55 [22], respectivement) et la maladie cardiovasculaire au départ, y compris l’insuffisance cardiaque congestive (51/407 [13 %] vs 28/624 [5 %]), la coronaropathie (125/407 [31 %] vs 91/624 [15 %]) et la cardiopathie structurelle (36/407 [9 %] vs 26/624 [4 %]). Toutes les lignes directrices préconisaient l’admission de patients présentant un faible risque en plus grand nombre que les médecins traitants (19 %, comparativement à 34 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société canadienne de cardiologie, à 22 % [p = 0,03] pour l’American College of Emergency Physicians et à 26 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société européenne de cardiologie). En conclusion, il est peu probable que la mise en application des lignes directrices actuelles sur le traitement des syncopes à l’égard de la clientèle des services d’urgence permette de réduire le nombre d’hospitalisations de patients présentant un faible risque.]]></abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30170671</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8500-2763</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0828-282X
ispartof Canadian journal of cardiology, 2018-09, Vol.34 (9), p.1158-1164
issn 0828-282X
1916-7075
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2098773371
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Canada
Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration
Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data
Female
Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data
Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data
Patient Care Management - methods
Patient Care Management - standards
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Syncope - diagnosis
Syncope - etiology
Syncope - therapy
title Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20Syncope%20Guidelines%20in%20the%20Emergency%20Department%20Do%20Not%20Reduce%20Admission%20Rates:%20A%20Retrospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Deif,%20Bishoy&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1158&rft.epage=1164&rft.pages=1158-1164&rft.issn=0828-282X&rft.eissn=1916-7075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2098773371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2098773371&rft_id=info:pmid/30170671&rft_els_id=S0828282X18305051&rfr_iscdi=true