Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Low-risk syncope accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions; however, inpatient investigations are often not necessary and are rarely diagnostic. Reducing the number of low-risk syncope admissions can likely lower health care resource consumption and overall expenditure. Application of s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of cardiology 2018-09, Vol.34 (9), p.1158-1164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1164 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1158 |
container_title | Canadian journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Deif, Bishoy Kang, Sally Ismail, Abid Vanniyasingam, Thuva Guzman, Juan C. Morillo, Carlos A. |
description | Low-risk syncope accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions; however, inpatient investigations are often not necessary and are rarely diagnostic. Reducing the number of low-risk syncope admissions can likely lower health care resource consumption and overall expenditure. Application of syncope guidelines by physicians in the emergency department provides a standardized approach that may potentially reduce admissions and lead to health care resource utilization savings.
A retrospective chart review of 1229 syncope presentations was conducted at 2 major academic centres spanning 1 year. Three major society guidelines and position statements were applied to determine the effect on admission rates.
A total of 1031 true syncope charts were included in the analysis; 407 (39%) were admitted and 624 (61%) were discharged by the treating physician (MD). There was a significant difference in the mean [standard deviation] age (75 [14] vs 55 [22]) and baseline cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure 51/407 (13%) vs 28/624 (5%), coronary artery disease 125/407 (31%) vs 91/624 (15%), and structural heart disease 36/407 (9%) vs 26/624 (4%), between admitted and not admitted patients, respectively (P < 0.01). All guidelines warranted more low-risk admissions when compared with 19% by the MD: Canadian Cardiovascular Society 34% (P < 0.01), American College of Emergency Physicians 22% (P = 0.03), and European Society of Cardiology 26% (P < 0.01).
In conclusion, application of the current syncope guidelines to an emergency department population is unlikely to reduce low-risk hospital admissions.
La syncope à faible risque représente une forte proportion des hospitalisations, alors que des examens en milieu hospitalier ne sont souvent pas nécessaires et permettent rarement de formuler un diagnostic. La réduction du nombre d’admissions pour une syncope à faible risque pourrait vraisemblablement diminuer la consommation des ressources en santé et les dépenses globales. La mise en application par les urgentologues de lignes directrices concernant la syncope constitue une approche normalisée qui pourrait permettre de réduire le nombre d’admissions et donc, l’utilisation des ressources en soins de santé.
Une analyse rétrospective des dossiers médicaux de 1229 patients qui se sont présentés pour une syncope a été réalisée dans deux grands centres universitaires sur une période d’un an. Les lignes directrices et énoncés de position de trois grandes ass |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2098773371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0828282X18305051</els_id><sourcerecordid>2098773371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1093be56bfa57558fc980032b574964638db4eb63ce381d90f534477f1c242883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9v1DAUxC0EokvhC3BAPnJJ8J_EdhCX1bYUpKqVWir1ZiX2C_UqiYPtVMq3r1dbeuzpHd7MaOaH0GdKSkqo-LYvzd60JSNUlUSWhPA3aEMbKgpJZP0WbYhiqmCK3Z-gDzHuCamolOI9OuGESiIk3aB1O8-DM21yfsK-x7frZPwM-GJxFgY3QcRuwukB8PkI4S9MZsVnMLchjTAlfObxlU_4BuxiAG_t6GI8JN20CeJ3vM2fFHycwST3CHjnH3xI-DYtdv2I3vXtEOHT8z1Fdz_P_-x-FZfXF79328vC8FqkgpKGd1CLrm9rWdeqN43KS1lXy6oRleDKdhV0ghvgitqG9DWvKil7aljFlOKn6Osxdw7-3wIx6VzSwDC0E_glakYaJSXnkmYpO0pN7hwD9HoObmzDqinRB-R6rw_I9QG5JlLnItn05Tl_6UawL5b_jLPgx1EAeeWjg6CjcRkkWBcyF229ey3_Cb24kgU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2098773371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Deif, Bishoy ; Kang, Sally ; Ismail, Abid ; Vanniyasingam, Thuva ; Guzman, Juan C. ; Morillo, Carlos A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Deif, Bishoy ; Kang, Sally ; Ismail, Abid ; Vanniyasingam, Thuva ; Guzman, Juan C. ; Morillo, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Low-risk syncope accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions; however, inpatient investigations are often not necessary and are rarely diagnostic. Reducing the number of low-risk syncope admissions can likely lower health care resource consumption and overall expenditure. Application of syncope guidelines by physicians in the emergency department provides a standardized approach that may potentially reduce admissions and lead to health care resource utilization savings.
A retrospective chart review of 1229 syncope presentations was conducted at 2 major academic centres spanning 1 year. Three major society guidelines and position statements were applied to determine the effect on admission rates.
A total of 1031 true syncope charts were included in the analysis; 407 (39%) were admitted and 624 (61%) were discharged by the treating physician (MD). There was a significant difference in the mean [standard deviation] age (75 [14] vs 55 [22]) and baseline cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure 51/407 (13%) vs 28/624 (5%), coronary artery disease 125/407 (31%) vs 91/624 (15%), and structural heart disease 36/407 (9%) vs 26/624 (4%), between admitted and not admitted patients, respectively (P < 0.01). All guidelines warranted more low-risk admissions when compared with 19% by the MD: Canadian Cardiovascular Society 34% (P < 0.01), American College of Emergency Physicians 22% (P = 0.03), and European Society of Cardiology 26% (P < 0.01).
In conclusion, application of the current syncope guidelines to an emergency department population is unlikely to reduce low-risk hospital admissions.
La syncope à faible risque représente une forte proportion des hospitalisations, alors que des examens en milieu hospitalier ne sont souvent pas nécessaires et permettent rarement de formuler un diagnostic. La réduction du nombre d’admissions pour une syncope à faible risque pourrait vraisemblablement diminuer la consommation des ressources en santé et les dépenses globales. La mise en application par les urgentologues de lignes directrices concernant la syncope constitue une approche normalisée qui pourrait permettre de réduire le nombre d’admissions et donc, l’utilisation des ressources en soins de santé.
Une analyse rétrospective des dossiers médicaux de 1229 patients qui se sont présentés pour une syncope a été réalisée dans deux grands centres universitaires sur une période d’un an. Les lignes directrices et énoncés de position de trois grandes associations professionnelles ont été appliquées à ces cas pour en déterminer l’effet sur les taux d’admission.
Au total, 1031 patients ayant subi une syncope véritable ont été inclus dans l’analyse; 407 (39 %) de ces patients ont été hospitalisés et 624 (61 %) ont reçu leur congé du médecin traitant. On a observé un écart significatif entre les patients admis et les patients non admis (p < 0,01) quant à l’âge moyen [écart-type] (75 [14] vs 55 [22], respectivement) et la maladie cardiovasculaire au départ, y compris l’insuffisance cardiaque congestive (51/407 [13 %] vs 28/624 [5 %]), la coronaropathie (125/407 [31 %] vs 91/624 [15 %]) et la cardiopathie structurelle (36/407 [9 %] vs 26/624 [4 %]). Toutes les lignes directrices préconisaient l’admission de patients présentant un faible risque en plus grand nombre que les médecins traitants (19 %, comparativement à 34 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société canadienne de cardiologie, à 22 % [p = 0,03] pour l’American College of Emergency Physicians et à 26 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société européenne de cardiologie).
En conclusion, il est peu probable que la mise en application des lignes directrices actuelles sur le traitement des syncopes à l’égard de la clientèle des services d’urgence permette de réduire le nombre d’hospitalisations de patients présentant un faible risque.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0828-282X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-7075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30170671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Canada ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Care Management - methods ; Patient Care Management - standards ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Syncope - diagnosis ; Syncope - etiology ; Syncope - therapy</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of cardiology, 2018-09, Vol.34 (9), p.1158-1164</ispartof><rights>2018 Canadian Cardiovascular Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1093be56bfa57558fc980032b574964638db4eb63ce381d90f534477f1c242883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1093be56bfa57558fc980032b574964638db4eb63ce381d90f534477f1c242883</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8500-2763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X18305051$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30170671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deif, Bishoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Abid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanniyasingam, Thuva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Juan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morillo, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><title>Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><title>Canadian journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Can J Cardiol</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Low-risk syncope accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions; however, inpatient investigations are often not necessary and are rarely diagnostic. Reducing the number of low-risk syncope admissions can likely lower health care resource consumption and overall expenditure. Application of syncope guidelines by physicians in the emergency department provides a standardized approach that may potentially reduce admissions and lead to health care resource utilization savings.
A retrospective chart review of 1229 syncope presentations was conducted at 2 major academic centres spanning 1 year. Three major society guidelines and position statements were applied to determine the effect on admission rates.
A total of 1031 true syncope charts were included in the analysis; 407 (39%) were admitted and 624 (61%) were discharged by the treating physician (MD). There was a significant difference in the mean [standard deviation] age (75 [14] vs 55 [22]) and baseline cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure 51/407 (13%) vs 28/624 (5%), coronary artery disease 125/407 (31%) vs 91/624 (15%), and structural heart disease 36/407 (9%) vs 26/624 (4%), between admitted and not admitted patients, respectively (P < 0.01). All guidelines warranted more low-risk admissions when compared with 19% by the MD: Canadian Cardiovascular Society 34% (P < 0.01), American College of Emergency Physicians 22% (P = 0.03), and European Society of Cardiology 26% (P < 0.01).
In conclusion, application of the current syncope guidelines to an emergency department population is unlikely to reduce low-risk hospital admissions.
La syncope à faible risque représente une forte proportion des hospitalisations, alors que des examens en milieu hospitalier ne sont souvent pas nécessaires et permettent rarement de formuler un diagnostic. La réduction du nombre d’admissions pour une syncope à faible risque pourrait vraisemblablement diminuer la consommation des ressources en santé et les dépenses globales. La mise en application par les urgentologues de lignes directrices concernant la syncope constitue une approche normalisée qui pourrait permettre de réduire le nombre d’admissions et donc, l’utilisation des ressources en soins de santé.
Une analyse rétrospective des dossiers médicaux de 1229 patients qui se sont présentés pour une syncope a été réalisée dans deux grands centres universitaires sur une période d’un an. Les lignes directrices et énoncés de position de trois grandes associations professionnelles ont été appliquées à ces cas pour en déterminer l’effet sur les taux d’admission.
Au total, 1031 patients ayant subi une syncope véritable ont été inclus dans l’analyse; 407 (39 %) de ces patients ont été hospitalisés et 624 (61 %) ont reçu leur congé du médecin traitant. On a observé un écart significatif entre les patients admis et les patients non admis (p < 0,01) quant à l’âge moyen [écart-type] (75 [14] vs 55 [22], respectivement) et la maladie cardiovasculaire au départ, y compris l’insuffisance cardiaque congestive (51/407 [13 %] vs 28/624 [5 %]), la coronaropathie (125/407 [31 %] vs 91/624 [15 %]) et la cardiopathie structurelle (36/407 [9 %] vs 26/624 [4 %]). Toutes les lignes directrices préconisaient l’admission de patients présentant un faible risque en plus grand nombre que les médecins traitants (19 %, comparativement à 34 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société canadienne de cardiologie, à 22 % [p = 0,03] pour l’American College of Emergency Physicians et à 26 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société européenne de cardiologie).
En conclusion, il est peu probable que la mise en application des lignes directrices actuelles sur le traitement des syncopes à l’égard de la clientèle des services d’urgence permette de réduire le nombre d’hospitalisations de patients présentant un faible risque.]]></description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Care Management - methods</subject><subject>Patient Care Management - standards</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Syncope - diagnosis</subject><subject>Syncope - etiology</subject><subject>Syncope - therapy</subject><issn>0828-282X</issn><issn>1916-7075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9v1DAUxC0EokvhC3BAPnJJ8J_EdhCX1bYUpKqVWir1ZiX2C_UqiYPtVMq3r1dbeuzpHd7MaOaH0GdKSkqo-LYvzd60JSNUlUSWhPA3aEMbKgpJZP0WbYhiqmCK3Z-gDzHuCamolOI9OuGESiIk3aB1O8-DM21yfsK-x7frZPwM-GJxFgY3QcRuwukB8PkI4S9MZsVnMLchjTAlfObxlU_4BuxiAG_t6GI8JN20CeJ3vM2fFHycwST3CHjnH3xI-DYtdv2I3vXtEOHT8z1Fdz_P_-x-FZfXF79328vC8FqkgpKGd1CLrm9rWdeqN43KS1lXy6oRleDKdhV0ghvgitqG9DWvKil7aljFlOKn6Osxdw7-3wIx6VzSwDC0E_glakYaJSXnkmYpO0pN7hwD9HoObmzDqinRB-R6rw_I9QG5JlLnItn05Tl_6UawL5b_jLPgx1EAeeWjg6CjcRkkWBcyF229ey3_Cb24kgU</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Deif, Bishoy</creator><creator>Kang, Sally</creator><creator>Ismail, Abid</creator><creator>Vanniyasingam, Thuva</creator><creator>Guzman, Juan C.</creator><creator>Morillo, Carlos A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8500-2763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><author>Deif, Bishoy ; Kang, Sally ; Ismail, Abid ; Vanniyasingam, Thuva ; Guzman, Juan C. ; Morillo, Carlos A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1093be56bfa57558fc980032b574964638db4eb63ce381d90f534477f1c242883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Care Management - methods</topic><topic>Patient Care Management - standards</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Syncope - diagnosis</topic><topic>Syncope - etiology</topic><topic>Syncope - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deif, Bishoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Abid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanniyasingam, Thuva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Juan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morillo, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deif, Bishoy</au><au>Kang, Sally</au><au>Ismail, Abid</au><au>Vanniyasingam, Thuva</au><au>Guzman, Juan C.</au><au>Morillo, Carlos A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1158</spage><epage>1164</epage><pages>1158-1164</pages><issn>0828-282X</issn><eissn>1916-7075</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Low-risk syncope accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions; however, inpatient investigations are often not necessary and are rarely diagnostic. Reducing the number of low-risk syncope admissions can likely lower health care resource consumption and overall expenditure. Application of syncope guidelines by physicians in the emergency department provides a standardized approach that may potentially reduce admissions and lead to health care resource utilization savings.
A retrospective chart review of 1229 syncope presentations was conducted at 2 major academic centres spanning 1 year. Three major society guidelines and position statements were applied to determine the effect on admission rates.
A total of 1031 true syncope charts were included in the analysis; 407 (39%) were admitted and 624 (61%) were discharged by the treating physician (MD). There was a significant difference in the mean [standard deviation] age (75 [14] vs 55 [22]) and baseline cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure 51/407 (13%) vs 28/624 (5%), coronary artery disease 125/407 (31%) vs 91/624 (15%), and structural heart disease 36/407 (9%) vs 26/624 (4%), between admitted and not admitted patients, respectively (P < 0.01). All guidelines warranted more low-risk admissions when compared with 19% by the MD: Canadian Cardiovascular Society 34% (P < 0.01), American College of Emergency Physicians 22% (P = 0.03), and European Society of Cardiology 26% (P < 0.01).
In conclusion, application of the current syncope guidelines to an emergency department population is unlikely to reduce low-risk hospital admissions.
La syncope à faible risque représente une forte proportion des hospitalisations, alors que des examens en milieu hospitalier ne sont souvent pas nécessaires et permettent rarement de formuler un diagnostic. La réduction du nombre d’admissions pour une syncope à faible risque pourrait vraisemblablement diminuer la consommation des ressources en santé et les dépenses globales. La mise en application par les urgentologues de lignes directrices concernant la syncope constitue une approche normalisée qui pourrait permettre de réduire le nombre d’admissions et donc, l’utilisation des ressources en soins de santé.
Une analyse rétrospective des dossiers médicaux de 1229 patients qui se sont présentés pour une syncope a été réalisée dans deux grands centres universitaires sur une période d’un an. Les lignes directrices et énoncés de position de trois grandes associations professionnelles ont été appliquées à ces cas pour en déterminer l’effet sur les taux d’admission.
Au total, 1031 patients ayant subi une syncope véritable ont été inclus dans l’analyse; 407 (39 %) de ces patients ont été hospitalisés et 624 (61 %) ont reçu leur congé du médecin traitant. On a observé un écart significatif entre les patients admis et les patients non admis (p < 0,01) quant à l’âge moyen [écart-type] (75 [14] vs 55 [22], respectivement) et la maladie cardiovasculaire au départ, y compris l’insuffisance cardiaque congestive (51/407 [13 %] vs 28/624 [5 %]), la coronaropathie (125/407 [31 %] vs 91/624 [15 %]) et la cardiopathie structurelle (36/407 [9 %] vs 26/624 [4 %]). Toutes les lignes directrices préconisaient l’admission de patients présentant un faible risque en plus grand nombre que les médecins traitants (19 %, comparativement à 34 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société canadienne de cardiologie, à 22 % [p = 0,03] pour l’American College of Emergency Physicians et à 26 % [p < 0,01] pour la Société européenne de cardiologie).
En conclusion, il est peu probable que la mise en application des lignes directrices actuelles sur le traitement des syncopes à l’égard de la clientèle des services d’urgence permette de réduire le nombre d’hospitalisations de patients présentant un faible risque.]]></abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30170671</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8500-2763</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0828-282X |
ispartof | Canadian journal of cardiology, 2018-09, Vol.34 (9), p.1158-1164 |
issn | 0828-282X 1916-7075 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2098773371 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Canada Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Female Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data Humans Male Middle Aged Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data Patient Care Management - methods Patient Care Management - standards Practice Guidelines as Topic Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Syncope - diagnosis Syncope - etiology Syncope - therapy |
title | Application of Syncope Guidelines in the Emergency Department Do Not Reduce Admission Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20Syncope%20Guidelines%20in%20the%20Emergency%20Department%20Do%20Not%20Reduce%20Admission%20Rates:%20A%20Retrospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Deif,%20Bishoy&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1158&rft.epage=1164&rft.pages=1158-1164&rft.issn=0828-282X&rft.eissn=1916-7075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2098773371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2098773371&rft_id=info:pmid/30170671&rft_els_id=S0828282X18305051&rfr_iscdi=true |