Temperature sensitivities of microbial plankton net growth rates are seasonally coherent and linked to nutrient availability

Summary Recent work suggests that temperature effects on marine heterotrophic bacteria are strongly seasonal, but few attempts have been made to concurrently assess them across trophic levels. Here, we estimated the temperature sensitivities (using activation energies, E) of autotrophic and heterotr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental microbiology 2018-10, Vol.20 (10), p.3798-3810
Hauptverfasser: Morán, Xosé Anxelu G., Calvo‐Díaz, Alejandra, Arandia‐Gorostidi, Nestor, Huete‐Stauffer, Tamara Megan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3810
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3798
container_title Environmental microbiology
container_volume 20
creator Morán, Xosé Anxelu G.
Calvo‐Díaz, Alejandra
Arandia‐Gorostidi, Nestor
Huete‐Stauffer, Tamara Megan
description Summary Recent work suggests that temperature effects on marine heterotrophic bacteria are strongly seasonal, but few attempts have been made to concurrently assess them across trophic levels. Here, we estimated the temperature sensitivities (using activation energies, E) of autotrophic and heterotrophic microbial plankton net growth rates over an annual cycle in NE Atlantic coastal waters. Phytoplankton grew in winter and late autumn (0.41 ± 0.16 SE d−1) and decayed in the remaining months (−0.42 ± 0.10 d−1). Heterotrophic microbes shared a similar seasonality, with positive net growth for bacteria (0.14–1.48 d−1), while nanoflagellates had higher values (> 0.4 d−1) in winter and spring relative to the rest of the year (−0.46 to 0.29 d−1). Net growth rates activation energies showed similar dynamics in the three groups (−1.07 to 1.51 eV), characterized by maxima in winter, minima in summer and resumed increases in autumn. Microbial plankton E values were significantly correlated with nitrate concentrations as a proxy for nutrient availability. Nutrient‐sufficiency (i.e., > 1 μmol l−1 nitrate) resulted in significantly higher activation energies of phytoplankton and heterotrophic nanoflagellates relative to nutrient‐limited conditions. We suggest that only within spatio‐temporal windows of both moderate bottom‐up and top‐down controls will temperature have a major enhancing effect on microbial growth.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1462-2920.14393
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2097595705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2097595705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4123-3ff085e7d542328c2b2ee22712d718a95f316246262c80a1217bca50c02c835f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFvFDEMhSMEoqXtmRuKxIXL0sSZbHaOqCpQqVUv5RxlZjw0bSZZkkyrlfjxeHfLHrhgKUrsfH6S_Rh7L8VnSXEumyUsoAVKG9WqV-z4UHl9eEs4Yu9KeRBCGmXEW3akhNQtxTH7fYfTGrOrc0ZeMBZf_RMdLDyNfPJ9Tp13ga-Di481RR6x8p85Pdd7Tl2EuV2jKym6EDa8T_eYMVbu4sCDj4848Jp4nGv2u_KT88F1Pvi6OWVvRhcKnr3cJ-zH18u7i--L69tvVxdfrhd9I0Et1DiKlUYz6AYUrHroABHASBiMXLlWj0ougWZdQr8SToI0Xe-06AXlin5P2Ke97jqnXzOWaidfegw0E6a5WBCt0a02QhP68R_0Ic2ZRiNKglgaKZqGqPM9RespJeNo19lPLm-sFHZrjN2u3m5tsDtjqOPDi-7cTTgc-L9OEKD3wLMPuPmfnr28udoL_wFkOZiB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2120671044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temperature sensitivities of microbial plankton net growth rates are seasonally coherent and linked to nutrient availability</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Morán, Xosé Anxelu G. ; Calvo‐Díaz, Alejandra ; Arandia‐Gorostidi, Nestor ; Huete‐Stauffer, Tamara Megan</creator><creatorcontrib>Morán, Xosé Anxelu G. ; Calvo‐Díaz, Alejandra ; Arandia‐Gorostidi, Nestor ; Huete‐Stauffer, Tamara Megan</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Recent work suggests that temperature effects on marine heterotrophic bacteria are strongly seasonal, but few attempts have been made to concurrently assess them across trophic levels. Here, we estimated the temperature sensitivities (using activation energies, E) of autotrophic and heterotrophic microbial plankton net growth rates over an annual cycle in NE Atlantic coastal waters. Phytoplankton grew in winter and late autumn (0.41 ± 0.16 SE d−1) and decayed in the remaining months (−0.42 ± 0.10 d−1). Heterotrophic microbes shared a similar seasonality, with positive net growth for bacteria (0.14–1.48 d−1), while nanoflagellates had higher values (&gt; 0.4 d−1) in winter and spring relative to the rest of the year (−0.46 to 0.29 d−1). Net growth rates activation energies showed similar dynamics in the three groups (−1.07 to 1.51 eV), characterized by maxima in winter, minima in summer and resumed increases in autumn. Microbial plankton E values were significantly correlated with nitrate concentrations as a proxy for nutrient availability. Nutrient‐sufficiency (i.e., &gt; 1 μmol l−1 nitrate) resulted in significantly higher activation energies of phytoplankton and heterotrophic nanoflagellates relative to nutrient‐limited conditions. We suggest that only within spatio‐temporal windows of both moderate bottom‐up and top‐down controls will temperature have a major enhancing effect on microbial growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-2912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-2920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14393</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30159999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Activation energy ; Annual variations ; Autumn ; Availability ; Bacteria ; Coastal waters ; Dynamics ; Growth rate ; Heterotrophic bacteria ; Microorganisms ; Mineral nutrients ; Nutrient availability ; Nutrient concentrations ; Phytoplankton ; Plankton ; Seasonal variations ; Seasonality ; Sensitivity analysis ; Temperature effects ; Trophic levels ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Environmental microbiology, 2018-10, Vol.20 (10), p.3798-3810</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Environmental Microbiology published by Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4123-3ff085e7d542328c2b2ee22712d718a95f316246262c80a1217bca50c02c835f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4123-3ff085e7d542328c2b2ee22712d718a95f316246262c80a1217bca50c02c835f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7331-8341 ; 0000-0002-9823-5339 ; 0000-0002-9370-2065</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1462-2920.14393$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1462-2920.14393$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30159999$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morán, Xosé Anxelu G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo‐Díaz, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arandia‐Gorostidi, Nestor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huete‐Stauffer, Tamara Megan</creatorcontrib><title>Temperature sensitivities of microbial plankton net growth rates are seasonally coherent and linked to nutrient availability</title><title>Environmental microbiology</title><addtitle>Environ Microbiol</addtitle><description>Summary Recent work suggests that temperature effects on marine heterotrophic bacteria are strongly seasonal, but few attempts have been made to concurrently assess them across trophic levels. Here, we estimated the temperature sensitivities (using activation energies, E) of autotrophic and heterotrophic microbial plankton net growth rates over an annual cycle in NE Atlantic coastal waters. Phytoplankton grew in winter and late autumn (0.41 ± 0.16 SE d−1) and decayed in the remaining months (−0.42 ± 0.10 d−1). Heterotrophic microbes shared a similar seasonality, with positive net growth for bacteria (0.14–1.48 d−1), while nanoflagellates had higher values (&gt; 0.4 d−1) in winter and spring relative to the rest of the year (−0.46 to 0.29 d−1). Net growth rates activation energies showed similar dynamics in the three groups (−1.07 to 1.51 eV), characterized by maxima in winter, minima in summer and resumed increases in autumn. Microbial plankton E values were significantly correlated with nitrate concentrations as a proxy for nutrient availability. Nutrient‐sufficiency (i.e., &gt; 1 μmol l−1 nitrate) resulted in significantly higher activation energies of phytoplankton and heterotrophic nanoflagellates relative to nutrient‐limited conditions. We suggest that only within spatio‐temporal windows of both moderate bottom‐up and top‐down controls will temperature have a major enhancing effect on microbial growth.</description><subject>Activation energy</subject><subject>Annual variations</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Coastal waters</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Heterotrophic bacteria</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrient availability</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seasonality</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1462-2912</issn><issn>1462-2920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFvFDEMhSMEoqXtmRuKxIXL0sSZbHaOqCpQqVUv5RxlZjw0bSZZkkyrlfjxeHfLHrhgKUrsfH6S_Rh7L8VnSXEumyUsoAVKG9WqV-z4UHl9eEs4Yu9KeRBCGmXEW3akhNQtxTH7fYfTGrOrc0ZeMBZf_RMdLDyNfPJ9Tp13ga-Di481RR6x8p85Pdd7Tl2EuV2jKym6EDa8T_eYMVbu4sCDj4848Jp4nGv2u_KT88F1Pvi6OWVvRhcKnr3cJ-zH18u7i--L69tvVxdfrhd9I0Et1DiKlUYz6AYUrHroABHASBiMXLlWj0ougWZdQr8SToI0Xe-06AXlin5P2Ke97jqnXzOWaidfegw0E6a5WBCt0a02QhP68R_0Ic2ZRiNKglgaKZqGqPM9RespJeNo19lPLm-sFHZrjN2u3m5tsDtjqOPDi-7cTTgc-L9OEKD3wLMPuPmfnr28udoL_wFkOZiB</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Morán, Xosé Anxelu G.</creator><creator>Calvo‐Díaz, Alejandra</creator><creator>Arandia‐Gorostidi, Nestor</creator><creator>Huete‐Stauffer, Tamara Megan</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7331-8341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9823-5339</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9370-2065</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Temperature sensitivities of microbial plankton net growth rates are seasonally coherent and linked to nutrient availability</title><author>Morán, Xosé Anxelu G. ; Calvo‐Díaz, Alejandra ; Arandia‐Gorostidi, Nestor ; Huete‐Stauffer, Tamara Megan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4123-3ff085e7d542328c2b2ee22712d718a95f316246262c80a1217bca50c02c835f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Activation energy</topic><topic>Annual variations</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Coastal waters</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Heterotrophic bacteria</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrient availability</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seasonality</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morán, Xosé Anxelu G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo‐Díaz, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arandia‐Gorostidi, Nestor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huete‐Stauffer, Tamara Megan</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morán, Xosé Anxelu G.</au><au>Calvo‐Díaz, Alejandra</au><au>Arandia‐Gorostidi, Nestor</au><au>Huete‐Stauffer, Tamara Megan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temperature sensitivities of microbial plankton net growth rates are seasonally coherent and linked to nutrient availability</atitle><jtitle>Environmental microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Microbiol</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3798</spage><epage>3810</epage><pages>3798-3810</pages><issn>1462-2912</issn><eissn>1462-2920</eissn><abstract>Summary Recent work suggests that temperature effects on marine heterotrophic bacteria are strongly seasonal, but few attempts have been made to concurrently assess them across trophic levels. Here, we estimated the temperature sensitivities (using activation energies, E) of autotrophic and heterotrophic microbial plankton net growth rates over an annual cycle in NE Atlantic coastal waters. Phytoplankton grew in winter and late autumn (0.41 ± 0.16 SE d−1) and decayed in the remaining months (−0.42 ± 0.10 d−1). Heterotrophic microbes shared a similar seasonality, with positive net growth for bacteria (0.14–1.48 d−1), while nanoflagellates had higher values (&gt; 0.4 d−1) in winter and spring relative to the rest of the year (−0.46 to 0.29 d−1). Net growth rates activation energies showed similar dynamics in the three groups (−1.07 to 1.51 eV), characterized by maxima in winter, minima in summer and resumed increases in autumn. Microbial plankton E values were significantly correlated with nitrate concentrations as a proxy for nutrient availability. Nutrient‐sufficiency (i.e., &gt; 1 μmol l−1 nitrate) resulted in significantly higher activation energies of phytoplankton and heterotrophic nanoflagellates relative to nutrient‐limited conditions. We suggest that only within spatio‐temporal windows of both moderate bottom‐up and top‐down controls will temperature have a major enhancing effect on microbial growth.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30159999</pmid><doi>10.1111/1462-2920.14393</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7331-8341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9823-5339</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9370-2065</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-2912
ispartof Environmental microbiology, 2018-10, Vol.20 (10), p.3798-3810
issn 1462-2912
1462-2920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2097595705
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Activation energy
Annual variations
Autumn
Availability
Bacteria
Coastal waters
Dynamics
Growth rate
Heterotrophic bacteria
Microorganisms
Mineral nutrients
Nutrient availability
Nutrient concentrations
Phytoplankton
Plankton
Seasonal variations
Seasonality
Sensitivity analysis
Temperature effects
Trophic levels
Winter
title Temperature sensitivities of microbial plankton net growth rates are seasonally coherent and linked to nutrient availability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A40%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temperature%20sensitivities%20of%20microbial%20plankton%20net%20growth%20rates%20are%20seasonally%20coherent%20and%20linked%20to%20nutrient%20availability&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20microbiology&rft.au=Mor%C3%A1n,%20Xos%C3%A9%20Anxelu%20G.&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3798&rft.epage=3810&rft.pages=3798-3810&rft.issn=1462-2912&rft.eissn=1462-2920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1462-2920.14393&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2097595705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2120671044&rft_id=info:pmid/30159999&rfr_iscdi=true