Measuring Psychiatric Symptoms Remotely: a Systematic Review of Remote Measurement-Based Care

Purpose of Review This article systematically reviews studies examining remote measurement-based care (RMBC), defined as using technology to measure patients’ psychiatric symptoms outside the context of a clinical encounter. Recent Findings Thirty-six studies were identified that measured patients’...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current psychiatry reports 2018-10, Vol.20 (10), p.81-81, Article 81
Hauptverfasser: Goldberg, Simon B., Buck, Benjamin, Raphaely, Shiri, Fortney, John C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 81
container_issue 10
container_start_page 81
container_title Current psychiatry reports
container_volume 20
creator Goldberg, Simon B.
Buck, Benjamin
Raphaely, Shiri
Fortney, John C.
description Purpose of Review This article systematically reviews studies examining remote measurement-based care (RMBC), defined as using technology to measure patients’ psychiatric symptoms outside the context of a clinical encounter. Recent Findings Thirty-six studies were identified that measured patients’ psychiatric symptoms remotely and provided feedback to treatment providers. The majority were single group designs. There was evidence supporting the short-term feasibility and acceptability of RMBC, although long-term sustainability was less clear. Thirteen randomized controlled trials were identified. RMBC was typically implemented as part of a multicomponent intervention (e.g., internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with feedback to provider). Three studies experimentally isolated the clinical effects of RMBC, with two reporting no statistically significant differences between the RMBC and control conditions and one reporting greater symptom improvement associated with RMBC. Summary RMBC appears feasible and acceptable and may be a promising intervention for improving mental health care, but additional experimental studies are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11920-018-0958-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2096551687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2422903814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3c6d686fee0b083b92d03a6e5b2037f33c515bfc4da37ea75bb6d806c24564ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAURYMofv8AN1Jw4yb6kjRp604Hv0BRRl1KSNNXrUynY9IqnV9vho4KgquE5Nz7HoeQPQZHDCA59oxlHCiwlEImUzpfIZtMCkmZiuXq4s4FFSnjG2TL-zcADpDydbIhgEmZxNkmeb5F4ztXTV-ie9_b18q0rrLRQ1_P2qb20RjrpsVJfxKZ8OhbrE0b_sf4UeFn1JRLIBpqsMZpS8-MxyIaGYc7ZK00E4-7y3ObPF2cP46u6M3d5fXo9IZakfCWCqsKlaoSEXJIRZ7xAoRRKHMOIimFsJLJvLRxYUSCJpF5rooUlOWxVLGxYpscDr0z17x36FtdV97iZGKm2HRec8iUlEylSUAP_qBvTeemYTvNY84zCL7iQLGBsq7x3mGpZ66qjes1A71wrwf3OrjXC_d6HjL7y-Yur7H4SXzLDgAfAD9bCEf3O_r_1i_b2I9y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2422903814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Psychiatric Symptoms Remotely: a Systematic Review of Remote Measurement-Based Care</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Goldberg, Simon B. ; Buck, Benjamin ; Raphaely, Shiri ; Fortney, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Simon B. ; Buck, Benjamin ; Raphaely, Shiri ; Fortney, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose of Review This article systematically reviews studies examining remote measurement-based care (RMBC), defined as using technology to measure patients’ psychiatric symptoms outside the context of a clinical encounter. Recent Findings Thirty-six studies were identified that measured patients’ psychiatric symptoms remotely and provided feedback to treatment providers. The majority were single group designs. There was evidence supporting the short-term feasibility and acceptability of RMBC, although long-term sustainability was less clear. Thirteen randomized controlled trials were identified. RMBC was typically implemented as part of a multicomponent intervention (e.g., internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with feedback to provider). Three studies experimentally isolated the clinical effects of RMBC, with two reporting no statistically significant differences between the RMBC and control conditions and one reporting greater symptom improvement associated with RMBC. Summary RMBC appears feasible and acceptable and may be a promising intervention for improving mental health care, but additional experimental studies are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-3812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11920-018-0958-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30155749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Psychiatry ; Public Policy and Public Health (G Norquist ; Section Editor ; Systematic review ; Telemedicine ; Topical Collection on Public Policy and Public Health</subject><ispartof>Current psychiatry reports, 2018-10, Vol.20 (10), p.81-81, Article 81</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018</rights><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3c6d686fee0b083b92d03a6e5b2037f33c515bfc4da37ea75bb6d806c24564ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3c6d686fee0b083b92d03a6e5b2037f33c515bfc4da37ea75bb6d806c24564ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11920-018-0958-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11920-018-0958-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155749$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Simon B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raphaely, Shiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortney, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Psychiatric Symptoms Remotely: a Systematic Review of Remote Measurement-Based Care</title><title>Current psychiatry reports</title><addtitle>Curr Psychiatry Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Psychiatry Rep</addtitle><description>Purpose of Review This article systematically reviews studies examining remote measurement-based care (RMBC), defined as using technology to measure patients’ psychiatric symptoms outside the context of a clinical encounter. Recent Findings Thirty-six studies were identified that measured patients’ psychiatric symptoms remotely and provided feedback to treatment providers. The majority were single group designs. There was evidence supporting the short-term feasibility and acceptability of RMBC, although long-term sustainability was less clear. Thirteen randomized controlled trials were identified. RMBC was typically implemented as part of a multicomponent intervention (e.g., internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with feedback to provider). Three studies experimentally isolated the clinical effects of RMBC, with two reporting no statistically significant differences between the RMBC and control conditions and one reporting greater symptom improvement associated with RMBC. Summary RMBC appears feasible and acceptable and may be a promising intervention for improving mental health care, but additional experimental studies are needed.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public Policy and Public Health (G Norquist</subject><subject>Section Editor</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Topical Collection on Public Policy and Public Health</subject><issn>1523-3812</issn><issn>1535-1645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAURYMofv8AN1Jw4yb6kjRp604Hv0BRRl1KSNNXrUynY9IqnV9vho4KgquE5Nz7HoeQPQZHDCA59oxlHCiwlEImUzpfIZtMCkmZiuXq4s4FFSnjG2TL-zcADpDydbIhgEmZxNkmeb5F4ztXTV-ie9_b18q0rrLRQ1_P2qb20RjrpsVJfxKZ8OhbrE0b_sf4UeFn1JRLIBpqsMZpS8-MxyIaGYc7ZK00E4-7y3ObPF2cP46u6M3d5fXo9IZakfCWCqsKlaoSEXJIRZ7xAoRRKHMOIimFsJLJvLRxYUSCJpF5rooUlOWxVLGxYpscDr0z17x36FtdV97iZGKm2HRec8iUlEylSUAP_qBvTeemYTvNY84zCL7iQLGBsq7x3mGpZ66qjes1A71wrwf3OrjXC_d6HjL7y-Yur7H4SXzLDgAfAD9bCEf3O_r_1i_b2I9y</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Goldberg, Simon B.</creator><creator>Buck, Benjamin</creator><creator>Raphaely, Shiri</creator><creator>Fortney, John C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Measuring Psychiatric Symptoms Remotely: a Systematic Review of Remote Measurement-Based Care</title><author>Goldberg, Simon B. ; Buck, Benjamin ; Raphaely, Shiri ; Fortney, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3c6d686fee0b083b92d03a6e5b2037f33c515bfc4da37ea75bb6d806c24564ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public Policy and Public Health (G Norquist</topic><topic>Section Editor</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Topical Collection on Public Policy and Public Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Simon B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raphaely, Shiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortney, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current psychiatry reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldberg, Simon B.</au><au>Buck, Benjamin</au><au>Raphaely, Shiri</au><au>Fortney, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Psychiatric Symptoms Remotely: a Systematic Review of Remote Measurement-Based Care</atitle><jtitle>Current psychiatry reports</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychiatry Rep</stitle><addtitle>Curr Psychiatry Rep</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>81-81</pages><artnum>81</artnum><issn>1523-3812</issn><eissn>1535-1645</eissn><abstract>Purpose of Review This article systematically reviews studies examining remote measurement-based care (RMBC), defined as using technology to measure patients’ psychiatric symptoms outside the context of a clinical encounter. Recent Findings Thirty-six studies were identified that measured patients’ psychiatric symptoms remotely and provided feedback to treatment providers. The majority were single group designs. There was evidence supporting the short-term feasibility and acceptability of RMBC, although long-term sustainability was less clear. Thirteen randomized controlled trials were identified. RMBC was typically implemented as part of a multicomponent intervention (e.g., internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with feedback to provider). Three studies experimentally isolated the clinical effects of RMBC, with two reporting no statistically significant differences between the RMBC and control conditions and one reporting greater symptom improvement associated with RMBC. Summary RMBC appears feasible and acceptable and may be a promising intervention for improving mental health care, but additional experimental studies are needed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30155749</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11920-018-0958-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-3812
ispartof Current psychiatry reports, 2018-10, Vol.20 (10), p.81-81, Article 81
issn 1523-3812
1535-1645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2096551687
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Psychiatry
Public Policy and Public Health (G Norquist
Section Editor
Systematic review
Telemedicine
Topical Collection on Public Policy and Public Health
title Measuring Psychiatric Symptoms Remotely: a Systematic Review of Remote Measurement-Based Care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A35%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Psychiatric%20Symptoms%20Remotely:%20a%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Remote%20Measurement-Based%20Care&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychiatry%20reports&rft.au=Goldberg,%20Simon%20B.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=81-81&rft.artnum=81&rft.issn=1523-3812&rft.eissn=1535-1645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11920-018-0958-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2422903814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2422903814&rft_id=info:pmid/30155749&rfr_iscdi=true