Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America

Prioritizing new areas for conservation in the Rocky Mountains of North America is important because the current intensity and scale of human development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity. We identified priority areas for avian biodiversity within a 3200-km corridor from Yellowstone National...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological conservation 2008-04, Vol.141 (4), p.908-924
Hauptverfasser: Pearce, Jennie L., Kirk, David Anthony, Lane, Cynthia P., Mahr, Marguerite H., Walmsley, John, Casey, Daniel, Muir, Judy E., Hannon, Susan, Hansen, Andrew, Jones, Kingsford
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 924
container_issue 4
container_start_page 908
container_title Biological conservation
container_volume 141
creator Pearce, Jennie L.
Kirk, David Anthony
Lane, Cynthia P.
Mahr, Marguerite H.
Walmsley, John
Casey, Daniel
Muir, Judy E.
Hannon, Susan
Hansen, Andrew
Jones, Kingsford
description Prioritizing new areas for conservation in the Rocky Mountains of North America is important because the current intensity and scale of human development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity. We identified priority areas for avian biodiversity within a 3200-km corridor from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, US to the Yukon in Canada (the Y2Y region). We applied the conservation planning tool, MARXAN, to summarize 21 avian values. MARXAN minimizes the area delineated, while simultaneously incorporating multiple criteria (species richness representation, spatial clustering) and biodiversity targets into a single mappable solution. We prioritized avian biodiversity ‘hotspots’ at continental and ecoprovincial scales based on: (1) avian species richness; and (2) habitat associations of 20 focal species. At the continental scale, the single best solution represented 19% of the Y2Y region; 29% of this solution overlapped with existing protected areas. In northern Y2Y, large contiguous areas with high avian value were concentrated on the western edge of the continental divide. In southern Y2Y, contiguous areas were smaller and more numerous than in the north. In contrast to the majority of studies prioritizing conservation areas, we explored the effect of varying the extent of the target region by analyzing data at the scale of the entire Y2Y region and for eight ecoprovinces separately. We found that (1) large contiguous patches characterized only three ecoprovinces, while for the remaining ecoprovinces, numerous single scattered habitat patches of varying sizes were required to meet conservation goals; and (2) generally, only a small percentage of sites was already protected within the existing protected areas network. Our results are important for conservation planners and resource managers in the Y2Y region for incorporating areas of high conservation value for birds at regional and ecoprovincial scales during conservation project design and adaptive planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20955827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320708000037</els_id><sourcerecordid>20955827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a860fa2d2f3484ece45625451c7b9aa92e6c11ce6da2946283c5abd65f7194993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E2LFDEQBuAgCo6r_0AwF711m-_uXIRl8QsWFXUP6yXUpCuzGWc6u0lmRH-9GXrx6KkoeOqleAl5zlnPGTevt_06Jp_mXjA29Fz0TMoHZMXHQXbC8uEhWTHGTCcFGx6TJ6Vs2zpIo1fkx5ccU441_onzhsIxwkxbUsF8hBrTTCEjFBpSpvUG6TXudulXqWlGWhO9Pvxs5CtuTjIF-inlekPP95ijh6fkUYBdwWf384xcvXv7_eJDd_n5_ceL88vOS8trB6NhAcQkglSjQo9KG6GV5n5YWwAr0HjOPZoJhFVGjNJrWE9Gh4FbZa08I6-W3Nuc7g5YqtvH4tujMGM6FCeY1XoUQ4NqgT6nUjIGd5vjHvJvx5k7Fem2binSnYp0XLhWZDt7eZ8PxcMuZJh9LP9uRTNWc97ci8UFSA42uZmrb4Jxydg4KiVO4s0isNVxjJhd8RFnj1PM6KubUvz_K38BK6SUrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20955827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pearce, Jennie L. ; Kirk, David Anthony ; Lane, Cynthia P. ; Mahr, Marguerite H. ; Walmsley, John ; Casey, Daniel ; Muir, Judy E. ; Hannon, Susan ; Hansen, Andrew ; Jones, Kingsford</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Jennie L. ; Kirk, David Anthony ; Lane, Cynthia P. ; Mahr, Marguerite H. ; Walmsley, John ; Casey, Daniel ; Muir, Judy E. ; Hannon, Susan ; Hansen, Andrew ; Jones, Kingsford</creatorcontrib><description>Prioritizing new areas for conservation in the Rocky Mountains of North America is important because the current intensity and scale of human development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity. We identified priority areas for avian biodiversity within a 3200-km corridor from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, US to the Yukon in Canada (the Y2Y region). We applied the conservation planning tool, MARXAN, to summarize 21 avian values. MARXAN minimizes the area delineated, while simultaneously incorporating multiple criteria (species richness representation, spatial clustering) and biodiversity targets into a single mappable solution. We prioritized avian biodiversity ‘hotspots’ at continental and ecoprovincial scales based on: (1) avian species richness; and (2) habitat associations of 20 focal species. At the continental scale, the single best solution represented 19% of the Y2Y region; 29% of this solution overlapped with existing protected areas. In northern Y2Y, large contiguous areas with high avian value were concentrated on the western edge of the continental divide. In southern Y2Y, contiguous areas were smaller and more numerous than in the north. In contrast to the majority of studies prioritizing conservation areas, we explored the effect of varying the extent of the target region by analyzing data at the scale of the entire Y2Y region and for eight ecoprovinces separately. We found that (1) large contiguous patches characterized only three ecoprovinces, while for the remaining ecoprovinces, numerous single scattered habitat patches of varying sizes were required to meet conservation goals; and (2) generally, only a small percentage of sites was already protected within the existing protected areas network. Our results are important for conservation planners and resource managers in the Y2Y region for incorporating areas of high conservation value for birds at regional and ecoprovincial scales during conservation project design and adaptive planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.033</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>algorithms ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; conservation areas ; Conservation planning ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; decision support systems ; environmental models ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; MARXAN ; national parks ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; planning ; Priority areas – avian biodiversity ; Site selection algorithms ; species diversity ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; wild birds ; wildlife habitats ; wildlife management ; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2008-04, Vol.141 (4), p.908-924</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a860fa2d2f3484ece45625451c7b9aa92e6c11ce6da2946283c5abd65f7194993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a860fa2d2f3484ece45625451c7b9aa92e6c11ce6da2946283c5abd65f7194993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320708000037$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20339511$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Jennie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Cynthia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahr, Marguerite H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walmsley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casey, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, Judy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannon, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kingsford</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>Prioritizing new areas for conservation in the Rocky Mountains of North America is important because the current intensity and scale of human development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity. We identified priority areas for avian biodiversity within a 3200-km corridor from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, US to the Yukon in Canada (the Y2Y region). We applied the conservation planning tool, MARXAN, to summarize 21 avian values. MARXAN minimizes the area delineated, while simultaneously incorporating multiple criteria (species richness representation, spatial clustering) and biodiversity targets into a single mappable solution. We prioritized avian biodiversity ‘hotspots’ at continental and ecoprovincial scales based on: (1) avian species richness; and (2) habitat associations of 20 focal species. At the continental scale, the single best solution represented 19% of the Y2Y region; 29% of this solution overlapped with existing protected areas. In northern Y2Y, large contiguous areas with high avian value were concentrated on the western edge of the continental divide. In southern Y2Y, contiguous areas were smaller and more numerous than in the north. In contrast to the majority of studies prioritizing conservation areas, we explored the effect of varying the extent of the target region by analyzing data at the scale of the entire Y2Y region and for eight ecoprovinces separately. We found that (1) large contiguous patches characterized only three ecoprovinces, while for the remaining ecoprovinces, numerous single scattered habitat patches of varying sizes were required to meet conservation goals; and (2) generally, only a small percentage of sites was already protected within the existing protected areas network. Our results are important for conservation planners and resource managers in the Y2Y region for incorporating areas of high conservation value for birds at regional and ecoprovincial scales during conservation project design and adaptive planning.</description><subject>algorithms</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>conservation areas</subject><subject>Conservation planning</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>decision support systems</subject><subject>environmental models</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>MARXAN</subject><subject>national parks</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>Priority areas – avian biodiversity</subject><subject>Site selection algorithms</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><subject>wildlife management</subject><subject>Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E2LFDEQBuAgCo6r_0AwF711m-_uXIRl8QsWFXUP6yXUpCuzGWc6u0lmRH-9GXrx6KkoeOqleAl5zlnPGTevt_06Jp_mXjA29Fz0TMoHZMXHQXbC8uEhWTHGTCcFGx6TJ6Vs2zpIo1fkx5ccU441_onzhsIxwkxbUsF8hBrTTCEjFBpSpvUG6TXudulXqWlGWhO9Pvxs5CtuTjIF-inlekPP95ijh6fkUYBdwWf384xcvXv7_eJDd_n5_ceL88vOS8trB6NhAcQkglSjQo9KG6GV5n5YWwAr0HjOPZoJhFVGjNJrWE9Gh4FbZa08I6-W3Nuc7g5YqtvH4tujMGM6FCeY1XoUQ4NqgT6nUjIGd5vjHvJvx5k7Fem2binSnYp0XLhWZDt7eZ8PxcMuZJh9LP9uRTNWc97ci8UFSA42uZmrb4Jxydg4KiVO4s0isNVxjJhd8RFnj1PM6KubUvz_K38BK6SUrg</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Pearce, Jennie L.</creator><creator>Kirk, David Anthony</creator><creator>Lane, Cynthia P.</creator><creator>Mahr, Marguerite H.</creator><creator>Walmsley, John</creator><creator>Casey, Daniel</creator><creator>Muir, Judy E.</creator><creator>Hannon, Susan</creator><creator>Hansen, Andrew</creator><creator>Jones, Kingsford</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America</title><author>Pearce, Jennie L. ; Kirk, David Anthony ; Lane, Cynthia P. ; Mahr, Marguerite H. ; Walmsley, John ; Casey, Daniel ; Muir, Judy E. ; Hannon, Susan ; Hansen, Andrew ; Jones, Kingsford</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a860fa2d2f3484ece45625451c7b9aa92e6c11ce6da2946283c5abd65f7194993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>algorithms</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>conservation areas</topic><topic>Conservation planning</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>decision support systems</topic><topic>environmental models</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>MARXAN</topic><topic>national parks</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>Priority areas – avian biodiversity</topic><topic>Site selection algorithms</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><topic>wildlife management</topic><topic>Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Jennie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Cynthia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahr, Marguerite H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walmsley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casey, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, Judy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannon, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kingsford</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearce, Jennie L.</au><au>Kirk, David Anthony</au><au>Lane, Cynthia P.</au><au>Mahr, Marguerite H.</au><au>Walmsley, John</au><au>Casey, Daniel</au><au>Muir, Judy E.</au><au>Hannon, Susan</au><au>Hansen, Andrew</au><au>Jones, Kingsford</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>908</spage><epage>924</epage><pages>908-924</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>Prioritizing new areas for conservation in the Rocky Mountains of North America is important because the current intensity and scale of human development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity. We identified priority areas for avian biodiversity within a 3200-km corridor from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, US to the Yukon in Canada (the Y2Y region). We applied the conservation planning tool, MARXAN, to summarize 21 avian values. MARXAN minimizes the area delineated, while simultaneously incorporating multiple criteria (species richness representation, spatial clustering) and biodiversity targets into a single mappable solution. We prioritized avian biodiversity ‘hotspots’ at continental and ecoprovincial scales based on: (1) avian species richness; and (2) habitat associations of 20 focal species. At the continental scale, the single best solution represented 19% of the Y2Y region; 29% of this solution overlapped with existing protected areas. In northern Y2Y, large contiguous areas with high avian value were concentrated on the western edge of the continental divide. In southern Y2Y, contiguous areas were smaller and more numerous than in the north. In contrast to the majority of studies prioritizing conservation areas, we explored the effect of varying the extent of the target region by analyzing data at the scale of the entire Y2Y region and for eight ecoprovinces separately. We found that (1) large contiguous patches characterized only three ecoprovinces, while for the remaining ecoprovinces, numerous single scattered habitat patches of varying sizes were required to meet conservation goals; and (2) generally, only a small percentage of sites was already protected within the existing protected areas network. Our results are important for conservation planners and resource managers in the Y2Y region for incorporating areas of high conservation value for birds at regional and ecoprovincial scales during conservation project design and adaptive planning.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.033</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3207
ispartof Biological conservation, 2008-04, Vol.141 (4), p.908-924
issn 0006-3207
1873-2917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20955827
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects algorithms
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
conservation areas
Conservation planning
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
decision support systems
environmental models
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
MARXAN
national parks
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
planning
Priority areas – avian biodiversity
Site selection algorithms
species diversity
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
wild birds
wildlife habitats
wildlife management
Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative
title Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A43%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritizing%20avian%20conservation%20areas%20for%20the%20Yellowstone%20to%20Yukon%20Region%20of%20North%20America&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Pearce,%20Jennie%20L.&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=908&rft.epage=924&rft.pages=908-924&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20955827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20955827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006320708000037&rfr_iscdi=true