Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America
Prioritizing new areas for conservation in the Rocky Mountains of North America is important because the current intensity and scale of human development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity. We identified priority areas for avian biodiversity within a 3200-km corridor from Yellowstone National...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological conservation 2008-04, Vol.141 (4), p.908-924 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 924 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 908 |
container_title | Biological conservation |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Pearce, Jennie L. Kirk, David Anthony Lane, Cynthia P. Mahr, Marguerite H. Walmsley, John Casey, Daniel Muir, Judy E. Hannon, Susan Hansen, Andrew Jones, Kingsford |
description | Prioritizing new areas for conservation in the Rocky Mountains of North America is important because the current intensity and scale of human development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity. We identified priority areas for avian biodiversity within a 3200-km corridor from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, US to the Yukon in Canada (the Y2Y region). We applied the conservation planning tool, MARXAN, to summarize 21 avian values. MARXAN minimizes the area delineated, while simultaneously incorporating multiple criteria (species richness representation, spatial clustering) and biodiversity targets into a single mappable solution. We prioritized avian biodiversity ‘hotspots’ at continental and ecoprovincial scales based on: (1) avian species richness; and (2) habitat associations of 20 focal species. At the continental scale, the single best solution represented 19% of the Y2Y region; 29% of this solution overlapped with existing protected areas. In northern Y2Y, large contiguous areas with high avian value were concentrated on the western edge of the continental divide. In southern Y2Y, contiguous areas were smaller and more numerous than in the north. In contrast to the majority of studies prioritizing conservation areas, we explored the effect of varying the extent of the target region by analyzing data at the scale of the entire Y2Y region and for eight ecoprovinces separately. We found that (1) large contiguous patches characterized only three ecoprovinces, while for the remaining ecoprovinces, numerous single scattered habitat patches of varying sizes were required to meet conservation goals; and (2) generally, only a small percentage of sites was already protected within the existing protected areas network. Our results are important for conservation planners and resource managers in the Y2Y region for incorporating areas of high conservation value for birds at regional and ecoprovincial scales during conservation project design and adaptive planning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20955827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320708000037</els_id><sourcerecordid>20955827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a860fa2d2f3484ece45625451c7b9aa92e6c11ce6da2946283c5abd65f7194993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E2LFDEQBuAgCo6r_0AwF711m-_uXIRl8QsWFXUP6yXUpCuzGWc6u0lmRH-9GXrx6KkoeOqleAl5zlnPGTevt_06Jp_mXjA29Fz0TMoHZMXHQXbC8uEhWTHGTCcFGx6TJ6Vs2zpIo1fkx5ccU441_onzhsIxwkxbUsF8hBrTTCEjFBpSpvUG6TXudulXqWlGWhO9Pvxs5CtuTjIF-inlekPP95ijh6fkUYBdwWf384xcvXv7_eJDd_n5_ceL88vOS8trB6NhAcQkglSjQo9KG6GV5n5YWwAr0HjOPZoJhFVGjNJrWE9Gh4FbZa08I6-W3Nuc7g5YqtvH4tujMGM6FCeY1XoUQ4NqgT6nUjIGd5vjHvJvx5k7Fem2binSnYp0XLhWZDt7eZ8PxcMuZJh9LP9uRTNWc97ci8UFSA42uZmrb4Jxydg4KiVO4s0isNVxjJhd8RFnj1PM6KubUvz_K38BK6SUrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20955827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pearce, Jennie L. ; Kirk, David Anthony ; Lane, Cynthia P. ; Mahr, Marguerite H. ; Walmsley, John ; Casey, Daniel ; Muir, Judy E. ; Hannon, Susan ; Hansen, Andrew ; Jones, Kingsford</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Jennie L. ; Kirk, David Anthony ; Lane, Cynthia P. ; Mahr, Marguerite H. ; Walmsley, John ; Casey, Daniel ; Muir, Judy E. ; Hannon, Susan ; Hansen, Andrew ; Jones, Kingsford</creatorcontrib><description>Prioritizing new areas for conservation in the Rocky Mountains of North America is important because the current intensity and scale of human development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity. We identified priority areas for avian biodiversity within a 3200-km corridor from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, US to the Yukon in Canada (the Y2Y region). We applied the conservation planning tool, MARXAN, to summarize 21 avian values. MARXAN minimizes the area delineated, while simultaneously incorporating multiple criteria (species richness representation, spatial clustering) and biodiversity targets into a single mappable solution. We prioritized avian biodiversity ‘hotspots’ at continental and ecoprovincial scales based on: (1) avian species richness; and (2) habitat associations of 20 focal species. At the continental scale, the single best solution represented 19% of the Y2Y region; 29% of this solution overlapped with existing protected areas. In northern Y2Y, large contiguous areas with high avian value were concentrated on the western edge of the continental divide. In southern Y2Y, contiguous areas were smaller and more numerous than in the north. In contrast to the majority of studies prioritizing conservation areas, we explored the effect of varying the extent of the target region by analyzing data at the scale of the entire Y2Y region and for eight ecoprovinces separately. We found that (1) large contiguous patches characterized only three ecoprovinces, while for the remaining ecoprovinces, numerous single scattered habitat patches of varying sizes were required to meet conservation goals; and (2) generally, only a small percentage of sites was already protected within the existing protected areas network. Our results are important for conservation planners and resource managers in the Y2Y region for incorporating areas of high conservation value for birds at regional and ecoprovincial scales during conservation project design and adaptive planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.033</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>algorithms ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; conservation areas ; Conservation planning ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; decision support systems ; environmental models ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; MARXAN ; national parks ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; planning ; Priority areas – avian biodiversity ; Site selection algorithms ; species diversity ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; wild birds ; wildlife habitats ; wildlife management ; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2008-04, Vol.141 (4), p.908-924</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a860fa2d2f3484ece45625451c7b9aa92e6c11ce6da2946283c5abd65f7194993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a860fa2d2f3484ece45625451c7b9aa92e6c11ce6da2946283c5abd65f7194993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320708000037$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20339511$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Jennie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Cynthia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahr, Marguerite H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walmsley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casey, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, Judy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannon, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kingsford</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>Prioritizing new areas for conservation in the Rocky Mountains of North America is important because the current intensity and scale of human development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity. We identified priority areas for avian biodiversity within a 3200-km corridor from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, US to the Yukon in Canada (the Y2Y region). We applied the conservation planning tool, MARXAN, to summarize 21 avian values. MARXAN minimizes the area delineated, while simultaneously incorporating multiple criteria (species richness representation, spatial clustering) and biodiversity targets into a single mappable solution. We prioritized avian biodiversity ‘hotspots’ at continental and ecoprovincial scales based on: (1) avian species richness; and (2) habitat associations of 20 focal species. At the continental scale, the single best solution represented 19% of the Y2Y region; 29% of this solution overlapped with existing protected areas. In northern Y2Y, large contiguous areas with high avian value were concentrated on the western edge of the continental divide. In southern Y2Y, contiguous areas were smaller and more numerous than in the north. In contrast to the majority of studies prioritizing conservation areas, we explored the effect of varying the extent of the target region by analyzing data at the scale of the entire Y2Y region and for eight ecoprovinces separately. We found that (1) large contiguous patches characterized only three ecoprovinces, while for the remaining ecoprovinces, numerous single scattered habitat patches of varying sizes were required to meet conservation goals; and (2) generally, only a small percentage of sites was already protected within the existing protected areas network. Our results are important for conservation planners and resource managers in the Y2Y region for incorporating areas of high conservation value for birds at regional and ecoprovincial scales during conservation project design and adaptive planning.</description><subject>algorithms</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>conservation areas</subject><subject>Conservation planning</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>decision support systems</subject><subject>environmental models</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>MARXAN</subject><subject>national parks</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>Priority areas – avian biodiversity</subject><subject>Site selection algorithms</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><subject>wildlife management</subject><subject>Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E2LFDEQBuAgCo6r_0AwF711m-_uXIRl8QsWFXUP6yXUpCuzGWc6u0lmRH-9GXrx6KkoeOqleAl5zlnPGTevt_06Jp_mXjA29Fz0TMoHZMXHQXbC8uEhWTHGTCcFGx6TJ6Vs2zpIo1fkx5ccU441_onzhsIxwkxbUsF8hBrTTCEjFBpSpvUG6TXudulXqWlGWhO9Pvxs5CtuTjIF-inlekPP95ijh6fkUYBdwWf384xcvXv7_eJDd_n5_ceL88vOS8trB6NhAcQkglSjQo9KG6GV5n5YWwAr0HjOPZoJhFVGjNJrWE9Gh4FbZa08I6-W3Nuc7g5YqtvH4tujMGM6FCeY1XoUQ4NqgT6nUjIGd5vjHvJvx5k7Fem2binSnYp0XLhWZDt7eZ8PxcMuZJh9LP9uRTNWc97ci8UFSA42uZmrb4Jxydg4KiVO4s0isNVxjJhd8RFnj1PM6KubUvz_K38BK6SUrg</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Pearce, Jennie L.</creator><creator>Kirk, David Anthony</creator><creator>Lane, Cynthia P.</creator><creator>Mahr, Marguerite H.</creator><creator>Walmsley, John</creator><creator>Casey, Daniel</creator><creator>Muir, Judy E.</creator><creator>Hannon, Susan</creator><creator>Hansen, Andrew</creator><creator>Jones, Kingsford</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America</title><author>Pearce, Jennie L. ; Kirk, David Anthony ; Lane, Cynthia P. ; Mahr, Marguerite H. ; Walmsley, John ; Casey, Daniel ; Muir, Judy E. ; Hannon, Susan ; Hansen, Andrew ; Jones, Kingsford</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a860fa2d2f3484ece45625451c7b9aa92e6c11ce6da2946283c5abd65f7194993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>algorithms</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>conservation areas</topic><topic>Conservation planning</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>decision support systems</topic><topic>environmental models</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>MARXAN</topic><topic>national parks</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>Priority areas – avian biodiversity</topic><topic>Site selection algorithms</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><topic>wildlife management</topic><topic>Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Jennie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Cynthia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahr, Marguerite H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walmsley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casey, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, Judy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannon, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kingsford</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearce, Jennie L.</au><au>Kirk, David Anthony</au><au>Lane, Cynthia P.</au><au>Mahr, Marguerite H.</au><au>Walmsley, John</au><au>Casey, Daniel</au><au>Muir, Judy E.</au><au>Hannon, Susan</au><au>Hansen, Andrew</au><au>Jones, Kingsford</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>908</spage><epage>924</epage><pages>908-924</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>Prioritizing new areas for conservation in the Rocky Mountains of North America is important because the current intensity and scale of human development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity. We identified priority areas for avian biodiversity within a 3200-km corridor from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, US to the Yukon in Canada (the Y2Y region). We applied the conservation planning tool, MARXAN, to summarize 21 avian values. MARXAN minimizes the area delineated, while simultaneously incorporating multiple criteria (species richness representation, spatial clustering) and biodiversity targets into a single mappable solution. We prioritized avian biodiversity ‘hotspots’ at continental and ecoprovincial scales based on: (1) avian species richness; and (2) habitat associations of 20 focal species. At the continental scale, the single best solution represented 19% of the Y2Y region; 29% of this solution overlapped with existing protected areas. In northern Y2Y, large contiguous areas with high avian value were concentrated on the western edge of the continental divide. In southern Y2Y, contiguous areas were smaller and more numerous than in the north. In contrast to the majority of studies prioritizing conservation areas, we explored the effect of varying the extent of the target region by analyzing data at the scale of the entire Y2Y region and for eight ecoprovinces separately. We found that (1) large contiguous patches characterized only three ecoprovinces, while for the remaining ecoprovinces, numerous single scattered habitat patches of varying sizes were required to meet conservation goals; and (2) generally, only a small percentage of sites was already protected within the existing protected areas network. Our results are important for conservation planners and resource managers in the Y2Y region for incorporating areas of high conservation value for birds at regional and ecoprovincial scales during conservation project design and adaptive planning.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.033</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3207 |
ispartof | Biological conservation, 2008-04, Vol.141 (4), p.908-924 |
issn | 0006-3207 1873-2917 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20955827 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | algorithms Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Aves Biological and medical sciences conservation areas Conservation planning Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife decision support systems environmental models Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology MARXAN national parks Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking planning Priority areas – avian biodiversity Site selection algorithms species diversity Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution wild birds wildlife habitats wildlife management Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative |
title | Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A43%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritizing%20avian%20conservation%20areas%20for%20the%20Yellowstone%20to%20Yukon%20Region%20of%20North%20America&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Pearce,%20Jennie%20L.&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=908&rft.epage=924&rft.pages=908-924&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20955827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20955827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006320708000037&rfr_iscdi=true |