Viral discovery as a tool for pandemic preparedness

Emerging diseases are frequently caused by novel or previously unrecognised zoonotic viral pathogens, which tend to originate in and emerge from wildlife. When human or animal cases are first recognised, molecular or serological diagnostic assays specific to them do not yet exist, causing a delay in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics) 2017-08, Vol.36 (2), p.499-512
Hauptverfasser: Epstein, J H, Anthony, S J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 512
container_issue 2
container_start_page 499
container_title Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)
container_volume 36
creator Epstein, J H
Anthony, S J
description Emerging diseases are frequently caused by novel or previously unrecognised zoonotic viral pathogens, which tend to originate in and emerge from wildlife. When human or animal cases are first recognised, molecular or serological diagnostic assays specific to them do not yet exist, causing a delay in the identification of an outbreak's aetiologic agent as well as its source. Preparing for the next virus to emerge is a major public health challenge, impeded by a poor understanding of the diversity of potential candidates that exist in wildlife reservoirs. Characterising the diversity of viruses in key wildlife species will help to reduce the time between detection and response in an outbreak situation, and inform public health strategies that reduce the risk of spillover from animal reservoirs. Pathogen discovery techniques such as consensus polymerase chain reaction (cPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been used to identify known and novel viruses in animals and humans, but have not been widely used in surveillance programmes. Metagenomic studies have identified novel viruses, new strains of known viruses, and have characterised host microbiomes. While NGS represents an unbiased approach to viral sequence detection, it is constrained by lower sensitivity than conventional PCR, requires substantial bioinformatics capabilities, and is cost prohibitive and therefore not widely available in the regions of the world that are most vulnerable to zoonotic disease emergence. In contrast, consensus PCR uses standard and widely available technologies, has greater sensitivity than NGS, and has also been used to identify novel viruses in wildlife, livestock and humans, though it is limited to detecting target genetic sequences conserved across known groups of viruses. The use of cPCR, in combination, if possible, with NGS and serology, can offer a powerful approach to rapidly identifying aetiologic agents in an outbreak and characterising the virome of key wildlife known to carry zoonotic viruses. Here, the authors review pathogen discovery techniques currently being used in human and animal surveillance programmes and the challenges of using viral discovery to identify novel zoonotic pathogens.
doi_str_mv 10.20506/rst.36.2.2669
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2095541378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2095541378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c186t-b6b4e6a0fa716a3b274499832e0803b18f26007729f68540a63eb94492a26d843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1z71PwzAQBXAPIFoKKyPyyJJw9jkXe0QVX1IlFmCNLs1FCkqaYKdI_e-pRJne8tPTe0rdGMgtFED3Mc05Um5zSxTO1BJsgZkJiAt1mdIXAAX0_kItEExhHfmlws8ucq-bLm3HH4kHzUmznsex1-0Y9cS7RoZuq6coE0dpdpLSlTpvuU9yfcqV-nh6fF-_ZJu359f1wybbGk9zVlPthBhaLg0x1rZ0LgSPVsAD1sa3lgDK0oaWfOGACaUOR2PZUuMdrtTdX-8Ux--9pLkajjOl73kn4z5VFkJROIOlP9LbE93XgzTVFLuB46H6P4q_dfZQ6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2095541378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viral discovery as a tool for pandemic preparedness</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Epstein, J H ; Anthony, S J</creator><creatorcontrib>Epstein, J H ; Anthony, S J</creatorcontrib><description>Emerging diseases are frequently caused by novel or previously unrecognised zoonotic viral pathogens, which tend to originate in and emerge from wildlife. When human or animal cases are first recognised, molecular or serological diagnostic assays specific to them do not yet exist, causing a delay in the identification of an outbreak's aetiologic agent as well as its source. Preparing for the next virus to emerge is a major public health challenge, impeded by a poor understanding of the diversity of potential candidates that exist in wildlife reservoirs. Characterising the diversity of viruses in key wildlife species will help to reduce the time between detection and response in an outbreak situation, and inform public health strategies that reduce the risk of spillover from animal reservoirs. Pathogen discovery techniques such as consensus polymerase chain reaction (cPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been used to identify known and novel viruses in animals and humans, but have not been widely used in surveillance programmes. Metagenomic studies have identified novel viruses, new strains of known viruses, and have characterised host microbiomes. While NGS represents an unbiased approach to viral sequence detection, it is constrained by lower sensitivity than conventional PCR, requires substantial bioinformatics capabilities, and is cost prohibitive and therefore not widely available in the regions of the world that are most vulnerable to zoonotic disease emergence. In contrast, consensus PCR uses standard and widely available technologies, has greater sensitivity than NGS, and has also been used to identify novel viruses in wildlife, livestock and humans, though it is limited to detecting target genetic sequences conserved across known groups of viruses. The use of cPCR, in combination, if possible, with NGS and serology, can offer a powerful approach to rapidly identifying aetiologic agents in an outbreak and characterising the virome of key wildlife known to carry zoonotic viruses. Here, the authors review pathogen discovery techniques currently being used in human and animal surveillance programmes and the challenges of using viral discovery to identify novel zoonotic pathogens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0253-1933</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20506/rst.36.2.2669</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30152468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France</publisher><ispartof>Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 2017-08, Vol.36 (2), p.499-512</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c186t-b6b4e6a0fa716a3b274499832e0803b18f26007729f68540a63eb94492a26d843</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30152468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Epstein, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, S J</creatorcontrib><title>Viral discovery as a tool for pandemic preparedness</title><title>Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)</title><addtitle>Rev Sci Tech</addtitle><description>Emerging diseases are frequently caused by novel or previously unrecognised zoonotic viral pathogens, which tend to originate in and emerge from wildlife. When human or animal cases are first recognised, molecular or serological diagnostic assays specific to them do not yet exist, causing a delay in the identification of an outbreak's aetiologic agent as well as its source. Preparing for the next virus to emerge is a major public health challenge, impeded by a poor understanding of the diversity of potential candidates that exist in wildlife reservoirs. Characterising the diversity of viruses in key wildlife species will help to reduce the time between detection and response in an outbreak situation, and inform public health strategies that reduce the risk of spillover from animal reservoirs. Pathogen discovery techniques such as consensus polymerase chain reaction (cPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been used to identify known and novel viruses in animals and humans, but have not been widely used in surveillance programmes. Metagenomic studies have identified novel viruses, new strains of known viruses, and have characterised host microbiomes. While NGS represents an unbiased approach to viral sequence detection, it is constrained by lower sensitivity than conventional PCR, requires substantial bioinformatics capabilities, and is cost prohibitive and therefore not widely available in the regions of the world that are most vulnerable to zoonotic disease emergence. In contrast, consensus PCR uses standard and widely available technologies, has greater sensitivity than NGS, and has also been used to identify novel viruses in wildlife, livestock and humans, though it is limited to detecting target genetic sequences conserved across known groups of viruses. The use of cPCR, in combination, if possible, with NGS and serology, can offer a powerful approach to rapidly identifying aetiologic agents in an outbreak and characterising the virome of key wildlife known to carry zoonotic viruses. Here, the authors review pathogen discovery techniques currently being used in human and animal surveillance programmes and the challenges of using viral discovery to identify novel zoonotic pathogens.</description><issn>0253-1933</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1z71PwzAQBXAPIFoKKyPyyJJw9jkXe0QVX1IlFmCNLs1FCkqaYKdI_e-pRJne8tPTe0rdGMgtFED3Mc05Um5zSxTO1BJsgZkJiAt1mdIXAAX0_kItEExhHfmlws8ucq-bLm3HH4kHzUmznsex1-0Y9cS7RoZuq6coE0dpdpLSlTpvuU9yfcqV-nh6fF-_ZJu359f1wybbGk9zVlPthBhaLg0x1rZ0LgSPVsAD1sa3lgDK0oaWfOGACaUOR2PZUuMdrtTdX-8Ux--9pLkajjOl73kn4z5VFkJROIOlP9LbE93XgzTVFLuB46H6P4q_dfZQ6Q</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Epstein, J H</creator><creator>Anthony, S J</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Viral discovery as a tool for pandemic preparedness</title><author>Epstein, J H ; Anthony, S J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c186t-b6b4e6a0fa716a3b274499832e0803b18f26007729f68540a63eb94492a26d843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Epstein, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, S J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Epstein, J H</au><au>Anthony, S J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viral discovery as a tool for pandemic preparedness</atitle><jtitle>Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Sci Tech</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>499-512</pages><issn>0253-1933</issn><abstract>Emerging diseases are frequently caused by novel or previously unrecognised zoonotic viral pathogens, which tend to originate in and emerge from wildlife. When human or animal cases are first recognised, molecular or serological diagnostic assays specific to them do not yet exist, causing a delay in the identification of an outbreak's aetiologic agent as well as its source. Preparing for the next virus to emerge is a major public health challenge, impeded by a poor understanding of the diversity of potential candidates that exist in wildlife reservoirs. Characterising the diversity of viruses in key wildlife species will help to reduce the time between detection and response in an outbreak situation, and inform public health strategies that reduce the risk of spillover from animal reservoirs. Pathogen discovery techniques such as consensus polymerase chain reaction (cPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been used to identify known and novel viruses in animals and humans, but have not been widely used in surveillance programmes. Metagenomic studies have identified novel viruses, new strains of known viruses, and have characterised host microbiomes. While NGS represents an unbiased approach to viral sequence detection, it is constrained by lower sensitivity than conventional PCR, requires substantial bioinformatics capabilities, and is cost prohibitive and therefore not widely available in the regions of the world that are most vulnerable to zoonotic disease emergence. In contrast, consensus PCR uses standard and widely available technologies, has greater sensitivity than NGS, and has also been used to identify novel viruses in wildlife, livestock and humans, though it is limited to detecting target genetic sequences conserved across known groups of viruses. The use of cPCR, in combination, if possible, with NGS and serology, can offer a powerful approach to rapidly identifying aetiologic agents in an outbreak and characterising the virome of key wildlife known to carry zoonotic viruses. Here, the authors review pathogen discovery techniques currently being used in human and animal surveillance programmes and the challenges of using viral discovery to identify novel zoonotic pathogens.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>30152468</pmid><doi>10.20506/rst.36.2.2669</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0253-1933
ispartof Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 2017-08, Vol.36 (2), p.499-512
issn 0253-1933
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2095541378
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Viral discovery as a tool for pandemic preparedness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A02%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viral%20discovery%20as%20a%20tool%20for%20pandemic%20preparedness&rft.jtitle=Revue%20scientifique%20et%20technique%20(International%20Office%20of%20Epizootics)&rft.au=Epstein,%20J%20H&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=499-512&rft.issn=0253-1933&rft_id=info:doi/10.20506/rst.36.2.2669&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2095541378%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2095541378&rft_id=info:pmid/30152468&rfr_iscdi=true