No difference found in safety or efficacy of balloon atrial septostomy performed at the bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory

Balloon atrial septostomy is performed in infants with dextro-transposition of the great arteries to improve oxygenation before surgery. It is performed in the catheterisation laboratory with fluoroscopy or at the bedside using echocardiography. It is unclear whether procedural safety and efficacy i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiology in the young 2018-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1421-1425
Hauptverfasser: Savorgnan, Fabio, Zaban, Nicholas B., Elhoff, Justin J., Ross, Michael M., Breinholt, John P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1425
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1421
container_title Cardiology in the young
container_volume 28
creator Savorgnan, Fabio
Zaban, Nicholas B.
Elhoff, Justin J.
Ross, Michael M.
Breinholt, John P.
description Balloon atrial septostomy is performed in infants with dextro-transposition of the great arteries to improve oxygenation before surgery. It is performed in the catheterisation laboratory with fluoroscopy or at the bedside using echocardiography. It is unclear whether procedural safety and efficacy is superior in one location versus the other, although the bedside procedure may improve resource utilisation and present an opportunity for reducing cost. This study compares safety and efficacy of atrial septostomy performed at the patient's bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory. Neonates with dextro-transposition of the great arteries who underwent balloon atrial septostomy from October, 2000 to January, 2014 were included. Medical and procedural records, echocardiograms, and catheterisation data were reviewed. Comparisons between the two procedural locations included patient demographics, pre- and post-procedure oxygen saturations, and outcomes. Complications reviewed included bleeding, arrhythmia, cardiac trauma, stroke, and death. Coronary artery evaluations were recorded. T-tests were used for continuous variables, and Fisher's exact tests were used for all categorical variables. Wilcoxon rank sum and analysis of covariance modelling were used for time variables and oxygen saturation, respectively. A total of 88 infants met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 53 underwent septostomy at the bedside and 35 underwent septostomy in the catheterisation laboratory. No safety or outcome benefit was identified between the two procedural locations. Septostomy performed at the bedside and in the catheterisation laboratory had similar outcomes and efficacy. Further, bedside septostomy has the advantage of no radiation exposure, and obviating risks with patient transfer from the ICU to the catheterisation laboratory.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1047951118001439
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2095523800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1047951118001439</cupid><sourcerecordid>2133405739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5faa34ff28b7b74ad638d06e4a3fa5a2c5d8dd51bc7f80ba12dc1a6714a480b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9uFSEUxonR2D_6AG4MiZtuRjkDM8xdNk1rTRpdqOvJAQ6VZma4BcbkPoDvLbW3mrRxAwfO73yQ72PsDYj3IEB_-ApC6U0HAIMQoOTmGTsE1esGQOjnta7t5q5_wI5yvqmMlCBesgMpoGul6A_Zr8-Ru-A9JVoscR_XxfGw8Iyeyo7HxMn7YNHW2nOD0xTjwrGkgBPPtC0xlzjv-JaSj2kmV3u8_CBuyOXgiP-klNf858piXQulkLGEqjKhiQlLTLtX7IXHKdPr_X7Mvl-cfzu7bK6-fPx0dnrVWKllaTqPKJX37WC00QpdLwcnelIoPXbY2s4NznVgrPaDMAits4C9BoWqngd5zE7udbcp3q6UyziHbGmacKG45rEVm64aU92s6LtH6E1c01J_N7bVRiU6LTeVgnvKpphzIj9uU5gx7UYQ411G45OM6szbvfJqqmF_Jx5CqYDci-JsUnDX9O_t_8v-BpPGna4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2133405739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No difference found in safety or efficacy of balloon atrial septostomy performed at the bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Savorgnan, Fabio ; Zaban, Nicholas B. ; Elhoff, Justin J. ; Ross, Michael M. ; Breinholt, John P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Savorgnan, Fabio ; Zaban, Nicholas B. ; Elhoff, Justin J. ; Ross, Michael M. ; Breinholt, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>Balloon atrial septostomy is performed in infants with dextro-transposition of the great arteries to improve oxygenation before surgery. It is performed in the catheterisation laboratory with fluoroscopy or at the bedside using echocardiography. It is unclear whether procedural safety and efficacy is superior in one location versus the other, although the bedside procedure may improve resource utilisation and present an opportunity for reducing cost. This study compares safety and efficacy of atrial septostomy performed at the patient's bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory. Neonates with dextro-transposition of the great arteries who underwent balloon atrial septostomy from October, 2000 to January, 2014 were included. Medical and procedural records, echocardiograms, and catheterisation data were reviewed. Comparisons between the two procedural locations included patient demographics, pre- and post-procedure oxygen saturations, and outcomes. Complications reviewed included bleeding, arrhythmia, cardiac trauma, stroke, and death. Coronary artery evaluations were recorded. T-tests were used for continuous variables, and Fisher's exact tests were used for all categorical variables. Wilcoxon rank sum and analysis of covariance modelling were used for time variables and oxygen saturation, respectively. A total of 88 infants met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 53 underwent septostomy at the bedside and 35 underwent septostomy in the catheterisation laboratory. No safety or outcome benefit was identified between the two procedural locations. Septostomy performed at the bedside and in the catheterisation laboratory had similar outcomes and efficacy. Further, bedside septostomy has the advantage of no radiation exposure, and obviating risks with patient transfer from the ICU to the catheterisation laboratory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-9511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-1107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1047951118001439</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30152306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Age ; Analysis of Variance ; Arrhythmia ; Arteries ; Balloon treatment ; Bleeding ; Cardiac catheterization ; Cardiac Catheterization - methods ; Complications ; Continuity (mathematics) ; Coronary artery ; Coronary vessels ; Covariance ; Defects ; Demographics ; Demography ; Echocardiography ; Effectiveness ; Female ; Fluoroscopy ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, Pediatric ; Humans ; Indiana ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Laboratories ; Laboratories, Hospital ; Male ; Neonates ; Original Article ; Oxygen ; Oxygen content ; Oxygenation ; Patients' Rooms ; Radiation ; Radiation effects ; Safety ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Systematic review ; Transposition ; Transposition of Great Vessels - diagnostic imaging ; Transposition of Great Vessels - surgery ; Trauma ; Treatment Outcome ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>Cardiology in the young, 2018-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1421-1425</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5faa34ff28b7b74ad638d06e4a3fa5a2c5d8dd51bc7f80ba12dc1a6714a480b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5faa34ff28b7b74ad638d06e4a3fa5a2c5d8dd51bc7f80ba12dc1a6714a480b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047951118001439/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30152306$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Savorgnan, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaban, Nicholas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhoff, Justin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breinholt, John P.</creatorcontrib><title>No difference found in safety or efficacy of balloon atrial septostomy performed at the bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory</title><title>Cardiology in the young</title><addtitle>Cardiol Young</addtitle><description>Balloon atrial septostomy is performed in infants with dextro-transposition of the great arteries to improve oxygenation before surgery. It is performed in the catheterisation laboratory with fluoroscopy or at the bedside using echocardiography. It is unclear whether procedural safety and efficacy is superior in one location versus the other, although the bedside procedure may improve resource utilisation and present an opportunity for reducing cost. This study compares safety and efficacy of atrial septostomy performed at the patient's bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory. Neonates with dextro-transposition of the great arteries who underwent balloon atrial septostomy from October, 2000 to January, 2014 were included. Medical and procedural records, echocardiograms, and catheterisation data were reviewed. Comparisons between the two procedural locations included patient demographics, pre- and post-procedure oxygen saturations, and outcomes. Complications reviewed included bleeding, arrhythmia, cardiac trauma, stroke, and death. Coronary artery evaluations were recorded. T-tests were used for continuous variables, and Fisher's exact tests were used for all categorical variables. Wilcoxon rank sum and analysis of covariance modelling were used for time variables and oxygen saturation, respectively. A total of 88 infants met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 53 underwent septostomy at the bedside and 35 underwent septostomy in the catheterisation laboratory. No safety or outcome benefit was identified between the two procedural locations. Septostomy performed at the bedside and in the catheterisation laboratory had similar outcomes and efficacy. Further, bedside septostomy has the advantage of no radiation exposure, and obviating risks with patient transfer from the ICU to the catheterisation laboratory.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Arrhythmia</subject><subject>Arteries</subject><subject>Balloon treatment</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Cardiac catheterization</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - methods</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Continuity (mathematics)</subject><subject>Coronary artery</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Covariance</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, Pediatric</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indiana</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratories, Hospital</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen content</subject><subject>Oxygenation</subject><subject>Patients' Rooms</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Transposition</subject><subject>Transposition of Great Vessels - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Transposition of Great Vessels - surgery</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>1047-9511</issn><issn>1467-1107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9uFSEUxonR2D_6AG4MiZtuRjkDM8xdNk1rTRpdqOvJAQ6VZma4BcbkPoDvLbW3mrRxAwfO73yQ72PsDYj3IEB_-ApC6U0HAIMQoOTmGTsE1esGQOjnta7t5q5_wI5yvqmMlCBesgMpoGul6A_Zr8-Ru-A9JVoscR_XxfGw8Iyeyo7HxMn7YNHW2nOD0xTjwrGkgBPPtC0xlzjv-JaSj2kmV3u8_CBuyOXgiP-klNf858piXQulkLGEqjKhiQlLTLtX7IXHKdPr_X7Mvl-cfzu7bK6-fPx0dnrVWKllaTqPKJX37WC00QpdLwcnelIoPXbY2s4NznVgrPaDMAits4C9BoWqngd5zE7udbcp3q6UyziHbGmacKG45rEVm64aU92s6LtH6E1c01J_N7bVRiU6LTeVgnvKpphzIj9uU5gx7UYQ411G45OM6szbvfJqqmF_Jx5CqYDci-JsUnDX9O_t_8v-BpPGna4</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Savorgnan, Fabio</creator><creator>Zaban, Nicholas B.</creator><creator>Elhoff, Justin J.</creator><creator>Ross, Michael M.</creator><creator>Breinholt, John P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>No difference found in safety or efficacy of balloon atrial septostomy performed at the bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory</title><author>Savorgnan, Fabio ; Zaban, Nicholas B. ; Elhoff, Justin J. ; Ross, Michael M. ; Breinholt, John P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5faa34ff28b7b74ad638d06e4a3fa5a2c5d8dd51bc7f80ba12dc1a6714a480b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Arrhythmia</topic><topic>Arteries</topic><topic>Balloon treatment</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Cardiac catheterization</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - methods</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Continuity (mathematics)</topic><topic>Coronary artery</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Covariance</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, Pediatric</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indiana</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratories, Hospital</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen content</topic><topic>Oxygenation</topic><topic>Patients' Rooms</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Transposition</topic><topic>Transposition of Great Vessels - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Transposition of Great Vessels - surgery</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Savorgnan, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaban, Nicholas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhoff, Justin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breinholt, John P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cardiology in the young</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Savorgnan, Fabio</au><au>Zaban, Nicholas B.</au><au>Elhoff, Justin J.</au><au>Ross, Michael M.</au><au>Breinholt, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No difference found in safety or efficacy of balloon atrial septostomy performed at the bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory</atitle><jtitle>Cardiology in the young</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiol Young</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1421</spage><epage>1425</epage><pages>1421-1425</pages><issn>1047-9511</issn><eissn>1467-1107</eissn><abstract>Balloon atrial septostomy is performed in infants with dextro-transposition of the great arteries to improve oxygenation before surgery. It is performed in the catheterisation laboratory with fluoroscopy or at the bedside using echocardiography. It is unclear whether procedural safety and efficacy is superior in one location versus the other, although the bedside procedure may improve resource utilisation and present an opportunity for reducing cost. This study compares safety and efficacy of atrial septostomy performed at the patient's bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory. Neonates with dextro-transposition of the great arteries who underwent balloon atrial septostomy from October, 2000 to January, 2014 were included. Medical and procedural records, echocardiograms, and catheterisation data were reviewed. Comparisons between the two procedural locations included patient demographics, pre- and post-procedure oxygen saturations, and outcomes. Complications reviewed included bleeding, arrhythmia, cardiac trauma, stroke, and death. Coronary artery evaluations were recorded. T-tests were used for continuous variables, and Fisher's exact tests were used for all categorical variables. Wilcoxon rank sum and analysis of covariance modelling were used for time variables and oxygen saturation, respectively. A total of 88 infants met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 53 underwent septostomy at the bedside and 35 underwent septostomy in the catheterisation laboratory. No safety or outcome benefit was identified between the two procedural locations. Septostomy performed at the bedside and in the catheterisation laboratory had similar outcomes and efficacy. Further, bedside septostomy has the advantage of no radiation exposure, and obviating risks with patient transfer from the ICU to the catheterisation laboratory.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>30152306</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1047951118001439</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-9511
ispartof Cardiology in the young, 2018-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1421-1425
issn 1047-9511
1467-1107
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2095523800
source MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Age
Analysis of Variance
Arrhythmia
Arteries
Balloon treatment
Bleeding
Cardiac catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization - methods
Complications
Continuity (mathematics)
Coronary artery
Coronary vessels
Covariance
Defects
Demographics
Demography
Echocardiography
Effectiveness
Female
Fluoroscopy
Hospitals
Hospitals, Pediatric
Humans
Indiana
Infant, Newborn
Infants
Laboratories
Laboratories, Hospital
Male
Neonates
Original Article
Oxygen
Oxygen content
Oxygenation
Patients' Rooms
Radiation
Radiation effects
Safety
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Systematic review
Transposition
Transposition of Great Vessels - diagnostic imaging
Transposition of Great Vessels - surgery
Trauma
Treatment Outcome
Veins & arteries
title No difference found in safety or efficacy of balloon atrial septostomy performed at the bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20difference%20found%20in%20safety%20or%20efficacy%20of%20balloon%20atrial%20septostomy%20performed%20at%20the%20bedside%20versus%20the%20catheterisation%20laboratory&rft.jtitle=Cardiology%20in%20the%20young&rft.au=Savorgnan,%20Fabio&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1421&rft.epage=1425&rft.pages=1421-1425&rft.issn=1047-9511&rft.eissn=1467-1107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1047951118001439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2133405739%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2133405739&rft_id=info:pmid/30152306&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1047951118001439&rfr_iscdi=true