Outcomes of Surgical Explantation of Infected Aortic Grafts After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Infection of the vascular graft represents one of the most threatening complications after aortic repair. It is rare and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to present short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of infected aortic grafts after endovascular...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.130-136
Hauptverfasser: Schaefers, Johannes F., Donas, Konstantinos P., Panuccio, Giuseppe, Kasprzak, Bernd, Heine, Benjamin, Torsello, Giovanni B., Osada, Nani, Usai, Marco V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue 1
container_start_page 130
container_title European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery
container_volume 57
creator Schaefers, Johannes F.
Donas, Konstantinos P.
Panuccio, Giuseppe
Kasprzak, Bernd
Heine, Benjamin
Torsello, Giovanni B.
Osada, Nani
Usai, Marco V.
description Infection of the vascular graft represents one of the most threatening complications after aortic repair. It is rare and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to present short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of infected aortic grafts after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Data of all patients affected by aortic graft infection after aneurysm repair who underwent an explantation of a conventional or endovascular aortic graft between January 2008 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent in situ reconstruction using a rifampicin soaked synthetic graft. The primary endpoint of this study was 30 day mortality; secondary endpoints were major post-operative complications. Twenty-six patients were included in the cohort, 16 with an infected endograft (iEVAR) and 10 patients with an infected conventional graft (iOAR). Thirty-day mortality was 23.1% overall, 37.5% for iEVAR and 0% (p = .027) for iOAR. Post-operative major complications occurred in eight (50%) patients from the iEVAR group and in four (40%) patients from the iOAR group (p = .619). The supravisceral clamping rate was higher in patients with infected iEVAR (93.8 vs. 20%, p = .001), furthermore a greater incidence of post-operative acute kidney injury was observed (50 vs. 0%, p = .009). Explantation of the graft and in situ reconstruction for aortic graft infection is accepted as the therapy of choice. However, re-operation for iEVAR is related to significantly higher mortality and morbidity rates. The need for suprarenal aortic clamping seems to be a possible explanation for worse outcomes in iEVAR.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2094429090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078588418304908</els_id><sourcerecordid>2094429090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5d5892183a3e1ef6048e1817cd5bedf5f2b9456c3dadb5c1ca8eee280d47fa3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhk1pSdI0f6CHomMvdkeSZcvQiwmbNBBY6MdZyNKoaLEtR5KX5t_XyyY99jQD87wvzFMUHylUFGjz5VDh4ZgqBlRW0FbA6JviigrOSkYb8XbboZWlkLK-LN6ndAAAQbm4KC450LrhTFwVT_s1mzBhIsGRH2v87Y0eye7PMuo56-zDfDo8zA5NRkv6ELM35D5qlxPpXcZIdrMNR53MOupI9GzJfsGZ9IMNk5-3sn7GNT6niXzHRfv4oXjn9Jjw5mVeF7_udj9vv5WP-_uH2_6xNDVALoUVsmNUcs2RomuglkglbY0VA1onHBu6WjSGW20HYajREhGZBFu3TnPDr4vP594lhqcVU1aTTwbH7TEMa1IMurpmHXSwoeyMmhhSiujUEv2k47OioE6q1UGdVKuTagWt2lRvoU8v_eswof0XeXW7AV_PAG5fHj1GlYzH2aD1cbOpbPD_6_8Lf0SRhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2094429090</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of Surgical Explantation of Infected Aortic Grafts After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Schaefers, Johannes F. ; Donas, Konstantinos P. ; Panuccio, Giuseppe ; Kasprzak, Bernd ; Heine, Benjamin ; Torsello, Giovanni B. ; Osada, Nani ; Usai, Marco V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schaefers, Johannes F. ; Donas, Konstantinos P. ; Panuccio, Giuseppe ; Kasprzak, Bernd ; Heine, Benjamin ; Torsello, Giovanni B. ; Osada, Nani ; Usai, Marco V.</creatorcontrib><description>Infection of the vascular graft represents one of the most threatening complications after aortic repair. It is rare and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to present short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of infected aortic grafts after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Data of all patients affected by aortic graft infection after aneurysm repair who underwent an explantation of a conventional or endovascular aortic graft between January 2008 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent in situ reconstruction using a rifampicin soaked synthetic graft. The primary endpoint of this study was 30 day mortality; secondary endpoints were major post-operative complications. Twenty-six patients were included in the cohort, 16 with an infected endograft (iEVAR) and 10 patients with an infected conventional graft (iOAR). Thirty-day mortality was 23.1% overall, 37.5% for iEVAR and 0% (p = .027) for iOAR. Post-operative major complications occurred in eight (50%) patients from the iEVAR group and in four (40%) patients from the iOAR group (p = .619). The supravisceral clamping rate was higher in patients with infected iEVAR (93.8 vs. 20%, p = .001), furthermore a greater incidence of post-operative acute kidney injury was observed (50 vs. 0%, p = .009). Explantation of the graft and in situ reconstruction for aortic graft infection is accepted as the therapy of choice. However, re-operation for iEVAR is related to significantly higher mortality and morbidity rates. The need for suprarenal aortic clamping seems to be a possible explanation for worse outcomes in iEVAR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30146325</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Device Removal ; EVAR explantation ; Failed EVAR ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular graft infection</subject><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.130-136</ispartof><rights>2018 European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5d5892183a3e1ef6048e1817cd5bedf5f2b9456c3dadb5c1ca8eee280d47fa3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5d5892183a3e1ef6048e1817cd5bedf5f2b9456c3dadb5c1ca8eee280d47fa3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588418304908$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30146325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schaefers, Johannes F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donas, Konstantinos P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panuccio, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasprzak, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heine, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torsello, Giovanni B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osada, Nani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usai, Marco V.</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of Surgical Explantation of Infected Aortic Grafts After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Infection of the vascular graft represents one of the most threatening complications after aortic repair. It is rare and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to present short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of infected aortic grafts after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Data of all patients affected by aortic graft infection after aneurysm repair who underwent an explantation of a conventional or endovascular aortic graft between January 2008 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent in situ reconstruction using a rifampicin soaked synthetic graft. The primary endpoint of this study was 30 day mortality; secondary endpoints were major post-operative complications. Twenty-six patients were included in the cohort, 16 with an infected endograft (iEVAR) and 10 patients with an infected conventional graft (iOAR). Thirty-day mortality was 23.1% overall, 37.5% for iEVAR and 0% (p = .027) for iOAR. Post-operative major complications occurred in eight (50%) patients from the iEVAR group and in four (40%) patients from the iOAR group (p = .619). The supravisceral clamping rate was higher in patients with infected iEVAR (93.8 vs. 20%, p = .001), furthermore a greater incidence of post-operative acute kidney injury was observed (50 vs. 0%, p = .009). Explantation of the graft and in situ reconstruction for aortic graft infection is accepted as the therapy of choice. However, re-operation for iEVAR is related to significantly higher mortality and morbidity rates. The need for suprarenal aortic clamping seems to be a possible explanation for worse outcomes in iEVAR.</description><subject>Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>EVAR explantation</subject><subject>Failed EVAR</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular graft infection</subject><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhk1pSdI0f6CHomMvdkeSZcvQiwmbNBBY6MdZyNKoaLEtR5KX5t_XyyY99jQD87wvzFMUHylUFGjz5VDh4ZgqBlRW0FbA6JviigrOSkYb8XbboZWlkLK-LN6ndAAAQbm4KC450LrhTFwVT_s1mzBhIsGRH2v87Y0eye7PMuo56-zDfDo8zA5NRkv6ELM35D5qlxPpXcZIdrMNR53MOupI9GzJfsGZ9IMNk5-3sn7GNT6niXzHRfv4oXjn9Jjw5mVeF7_udj9vv5WP-_uH2_6xNDVALoUVsmNUcs2RomuglkglbY0VA1onHBu6WjSGW20HYajREhGZBFu3TnPDr4vP594lhqcVU1aTTwbH7TEMa1IMurpmHXSwoeyMmhhSiujUEv2k47OioE6q1UGdVKuTagWt2lRvoU8v_eswof0XeXW7AV_PAG5fHj1GlYzH2aD1cbOpbPD_6_8Lf0SRhw</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Schaefers, Johannes F.</creator><creator>Donas, Konstantinos P.</creator><creator>Panuccio, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Kasprzak, Bernd</creator><creator>Heine, Benjamin</creator><creator>Torsello, Giovanni B.</creator><creator>Osada, Nani</creator><creator>Usai, Marco V.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Outcomes of Surgical Explantation of Infected Aortic Grafts After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair</title><author>Schaefers, Johannes F. ; Donas, Konstantinos P. ; Panuccio, Giuseppe ; Kasprzak, Bernd ; Heine, Benjamin ; Torsello, Giovanni B. ; Osada, Nani ; Usai, Marco V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5d5892183a3e1ef6048e1817cd5bedf5f2b9456c3dadb5c1ca8eee280d47fa3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>EVAR explantation</topic><topic>Failed EVAR</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular graft infection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schaefers, Johannes F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donas, Konstantinos P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panuccio, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasprzak, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heine, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torsello, Giovanni B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osada, Nani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usai, Marco V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schaefers, Johannes F.</au><au>Donas, Konstantinos P.</au><au>Panuccio, Giuseppe</au><au>Kasprzak, Bernd</au><au>Heine, Benjamin</au><au>Torsello, Giovanni B.</au><au>Osada, Nani</au><au>Usai, Marco V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of Surgical Explantation of Infected Aortic Grafts After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>130-136</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>Infection of the vascular graft represents one of the most threatening complications after aortic repair. It is rare and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to present short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of infected aortic grafts after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Data of all patients affected by aortic graft infection after aneurysm repair who underwent an explantation of a conventional or endovascular aortic graft between January 2008 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent in situ reconstruction using a rifampicin soaked synthetic graft. The primary endpoint of this study was 30 day mortality; secondary endpoints were major post-operative complications. Twenty-six patients were included in the cohort, 16 with an infected endograft (iEVAR) and 10 patients with an infected conventional graft (iOAR). Thirty-day mortality was 23.1% overall, 37.5% for iEVAR and 0% (p = .027) for iOAR. Post-operative major complications occurred in eight (50%) patients from the iEVAR group and in four (40%) patients from the iOAR group (p = .619). The supravisceral clamping rate was higher in patients with infected iEVAR (93.8 vs. 20%, p = .001), furthermore a greater incidence of post-operative acute kidney injury was observed (50 vs. 0%, p = .009). Explantation of the graft and in situ reconstruction for aortic graft infection is accepted as the therapy of choice. However, re-operation for iEVAR is related to significantly higher mortality and morbidity rates. The need for suprarenal aortic clamping seems to be a possible explanation for worse outcomes in iEVAR.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30146325</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.021</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-5884
ispartof European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.130-136
issn 1078-5884
1532-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2094429090
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Device Removal
EVAR explantation
Failed EVAR
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis
Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Vascular graft infection
title Outcomes of Surgical Explantation of Infected Aortic Grafts After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A20%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20Surgical%20Explantation%20of%20Infected%20Aortic%20Grafts%20After%20Endovascular%20and%20Open%20Abdominal%20Aneurysm%20Repair&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Schaefers,%20Johannes%20F.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=130-136&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2094429090%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2094429090&rft_id=info:pmid/30146325&rft_els_id=S1078588418304908&rfr_iscdi=true