Reoperations After Cochlear Implantation
During the 14-year history of cochlear implantation at Semmelweis University, 95 implantations were performed. There were 15 reoperations, and 2 patients had been operated 3 times. All of the reoperated patients received round window or intracochlear MedEl devices. Successful reinsertion of the elec...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta oto-laryngologica 2000-01, Vol.120 (2), p.160-163 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 163 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 160 |
| container_title | Acta oto-laryngologica |
| container_volume | 120 |
| creator | O, Ribari G, Repassy M, Kustel |
| description | During the 14-year history of cochlear implantation at Semmelweis University, 95 implantations were performed. There were 15 reoperations, and 2 patients had been operated 3 times. All of the reoperated patients received round window or intracochlear MedEl devices. Successful reinsertion of the electrode was performed without significant difficulty, though in some cases osteoneogenesis was found in the round window or in the scala tympani. None of the patients suffered any inner ear abnormalities due to the first implant, and even the patient with a third implant in the same ear had excellent results and obtained better discrimination scores with the new device. In the authors' opinion, on the basis of the accumulated experience of nearly 100 implantations and 15 reoperations, replacement of the early generation extracochlear implants is most advisable and can be accomplished without adverse effects. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/000164800750000829 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20939310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20939310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-7c526e4da91f31beb478e279b66cec5f3b08ef92b9ba41eca595a67e19a478cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gAfpSbys5mOzSUAPpfhRKAii55BNJ3TL7qYmu0j_vaktiAh6mhnmeWdeXoTOCb4mWOIbjDEpcomx4KnFkqoDNCQFJxmlnByi4RbIEqEG6CTG1XZUkh-jASEFZqJgQ3T1An4NwXSVb-N44joI46m3yxpMGM-adW3a7mt5io6cqSOc7esIvT3cv06fsvnz42w6mWeWSdllwnJaQL4wijhGSihzIYEKVRaFBcsdK7EEp2ipSpMTsIYrbgoBRJlEWstG6HJ3dx38ew-x000VLdTJCPg-akG5UoKJf0GKFVOM4ATSHWiDjzGA0-tQNSZsNMF6G6T-HWQSXeyv92UDi2_JPrkE3O2AqnU-NObDh3qhO7OpfXDBtLaKmv354PaHfgmm7pbWBNAr34c2ZfyXv0-97pJP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20939310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reoperations After Cochlear Implantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis Online</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><creator>O, Ribari ; G, Repassy ; M, Kustel</creator><creatorcontrib>O, Ribari ; G, Repassy ; M, Kustel</creatorcontrib><description>During the 14-year history of cochlear implantation at Semmelweis University, 95 implantations were performed. There were 15 reoperations, and 2 patients had been operated 3 times. All of the reoperated patients received round window or intracochlear MedEl devices. Successful reinsertion of the electrode was performed without significant difficulty, though in some cases osteoneogenesis was found in the round window or in the scala tympani. None of the patients suffered any inner ear abnormalities due to the first implant, and even the patient with a third implant in the same ear had excellent results and obtained better discrimination scores with the new device. In the authors' opinion, on the basis of the accumulated experience of nearly 100 implantations and 15 reoperations, replacement of the early generation extracochlear implants is most advisable and can be accomplished without adverse effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2251</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/000164800750000829</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11603763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Cochlear Implantation ; Device Removal ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ossification, Heterotopic - surgery ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Reoperation ; Round Window, Ear - surgery ; Scala Tympani - surgery</subject><ispartof>Acta oto-laryngologica, 2000-01, Vol.120 (2), p.160-163</ispartof><rights>2000 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-7c526e4da91f31beb478e279b66cec5f3b08ef92b9ba41eca595a67e19a478cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/000164800750000829$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/000164800750000829$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,59647,59753,60436,60542,61221,61256,61402,61437</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11603763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O, Ribari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>G, Repassy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M, Kustel</creatorcontrib><title>Reoperations After Cochlear Implantation</title><title>Acta oto-laryngologica</title><addtitle>Acta Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>During the 14-year history of cochlear implantation at Semmelweis University, 95 implantations were performed. There were 15 reoperations, and 2 patients had been operated 3 times. All of the reoperated patients received round window or intracochlear MedEl devices. Successful reinsertion of the electrode was performed without significant difficulty, though in some cases osteoneogenesis was found in the round window or in the scala tympani. None of the patients suffered any inner ear abnormalities due to the first implant, and even the patient with a third implant in the same ear had excellent results and obtained better discrimination scores with the new device. In the authors' opinion, on the basis of the accumulated experience of nearly 100 implantations and 15 reoperations, replacement of the early generation extracochlear implants is most advisable and can be accomplished without adverse effects.</description><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ossification, Heterotopic - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Round Window, Ear - surgery</subject><subject>Scala Tympani - surgery</subject><issn>0001-6489</issn><issn>1651-2251</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gAfpSbys5mOzSUAPpfhRKAii55BNJ3TL7qYmu0j_vaktiAh6mhnmeWdeXoTOCb4mWOIbjDEpcomx4KnFkqoDNCQFJxmlnByi4RbIEqEG6CTG1XZUkh-jASEFZqJgQ3T1An4NwXSVb-N44joI46m3yxpMGM-adW3a7mt5io6cqSOc7esIvT3cv06fsvnz42w6mWeWSdllwnJaQL4wijhGSihzIYEKVRaFBcsdK7EEp2ipSpMTsIYrbgoBRJlEWstG6HJ3dx38ew-x000VLdTJCPg-akG5UoKJf0GKFVOM4ATSHWiDjzGA0-tQNSZsNMF6G6T-HWQSXeyv92UDi2_JPrkE3O2AqnU-NObDh3qhO7OpfXDBtLaKmv354PaHfgmm7pbWBNAr34c2ZfyXv0-97pJP</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>O, Ribari</creator><creator>G, Repassy</creator><creator>M, Kustel</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Reoperations After Cochlear Implantation</title><author>O, Ribari ; G, Repassy ; M, Kustel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-7c526e4da91f31beb478e279b66cec5f3b08ef92b9ba41eca595a67e19a478cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ossification, Heterotopic - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Round Window, Ear - surgery</topic><topic>Scala Tympani - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O, Ribari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>G, Repassy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M, Kustel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Acta oto-laryngologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O, Ribari</au><au>G, Repassy</au><au>M, Kustel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reoperations After Cochlear Implantation</atitle><jtitle>Acta oto-laryngologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>160-163</pages><issn>0001-6489</issn><eissn>1651-2251</eissn><abstract>During the 14-year history of cochlear implantation at Semmelweis University, 95 implantations were performed. There were 15 reoperations, and 2 patients had been operated 3 times. All of the reoperated patients received round window or intracochlear MedEl devices. Successful reinsertion of the electrode was performed without significant difficulty, though in some cases osteoneogenesis was found in the round window or in the scala tympani. None of the patients suffered any inner ear abnormalities due to the first implant, and even the patient with a third implant in the same ear had excellent results and obtained better discrimination scores with the new device. In the authors' opinion, on the basis of the accumulated experience of nearly 100 implantations and 15 reoperations, replacement of the early generation extracochlear implants is most advisable and can be accomplished without adverse effects.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>11603763</pmid><doi>10.1080/000164800750000829</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0001-6489 |
| ispartof | Acta oto-laryngologica, 2000-01, Vol.120 (2), p.160-163 |
| issn | 0001-6489 1651-2251 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20939310 |
| source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Online; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN |
| subjects | Cochlear Implantation Device Removal Electrodes, Implanted Humans Male Middle Aged Ossification, Heterotopic - surgery Postoperative Complications - surgery Prosthesis Design Prosthesis Failure Reoperation Round Window, Ear - surgery Scala Tympani - surgery |
| title | Reoperations After Cochlear Implantation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A27%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reoperations%20After%20Cochlear%20Implantation&rft.jtitle=Acta%20oto-laryngologica&rft.au=O,%20Ribari&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=160-163&rft.issn=0001-6489&rft.eissn=1651-2251&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/000164800750000829&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E20939310%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20939310&rft_id=info:pmid/11603763&rfr_iscdi=true |