How Well Do Regional Climate Models Reproduce Radiation and Clouds in the Arctic? An Evaluation of ARCMIP Simulations

Downwelling radiation in six regional models from the Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison (ARCMIP) project is systematically biased negative in comparison with observations from the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) experiment, although the correlations with observations are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied meteorology (1988) 2008-09, Vol.47 (9), p.2405-2422
Hauptverfasser: Tjernström, Michael, Sedlar, Joseph, Shupe, Matthew D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2422
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2405
container_title Journal of applied meteorology (1988)
container_volume 47
creator Tjernström, Michael
Sedlar, Joseph
Shupe, Matthew D.
description Downwelling radiation in six regional models from the Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison (ARCMIP) project is systematically biased negative in comparison with observations from the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) experiment, although the correlations with observations are relatively good. In this paper, links between model errors and the representation of clouds in these models are investigated. Although some modeled cloud properties, such as the cloud water paths, are reasonable in a climatological sense, the temporal correlation of model cloud properties with observations is poor. The vertical distribution of cloud water is distinctly different among the different models; some common features also appear. Most models underestimate the presence of high clouds, and, although the observed preference for low clouds in the Arctic is present in most of the models, the modeled low clouds are too thin and are displaced downward. Practically all models show a preference to locate the lowest cloud base at the lowest model grid point. In some models this happens also to be where the observations show the highest occurrence of the lowest cloud base; it is not possible to determine if this result is just a coincidence. Different factors contribute to model surface radiation errors. For longwave radiation in summer, a negative bias is present both for cloudy and clear conditions, and intermodel differences are smaller when clouds are present. There is a clear relationship between errors in cloud-base temperature and radiation errors. In winter, in contrast, clear-sky cases are modeled reasonably well, but cloudy cases show a very large intermodel scatter with a significant bias in all models. This bias likely results from a complete failure in all of the models to retain liquid water in cold winter clouds. All models overestimate the cloud attenuation of summer solar radiation for thin and intermediate clouds, and some models maintain this behavior also for thick clouds.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/2008jamc1845.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20938885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26172742</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26172742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-44297e60ebc4d60a2d0666565809db8aaafa90cebf71b8707a52c2e198c394943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1P2zAUAPAIgQSUXblNsibBLcV2_JUTigKMTq02dUM7Rq-Os6Vy42InIP77OSvqJC7sZOv5957t95LknOApIZJfUYzVGjaaKMan5CA5IZyrVLGMHu73lB0npyGsMWZMSn6SDPfuGf001qIbh5bmV-s6sKi07QZ6gxauNjbE-Na7etAGLaFuoY8IQVdH5oY6oLZD_W-DCq_7Vl-jokO3T2CHnXMNKpblYvYNfW83g_0bDGfJUQM2mA-v6yR5uLv9Ud6n86-fZ2UxTzUnsk8Zo7k0ApuVZrXAQGsshOCCK5zXKwUADeRYm1UjyUpJLIFTTQ3Jlc5ylrNsklzu6sb3Pw4m9NWmDTr-FjrjhlBlsQs55e9DivNMKcX_AwpOJR_hpzdw7QYfmxsNZYIKnJGIpjukvQvBm6ba-th5_1IRXI1DrcahfikW5TjUaky4eK0KQYNtPHS6DfuseDujRGXRfdy5deid_3cuiKSS0ewPe-ypNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224626031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Well Do Regional Climate Models Reproduce Radiation and Clouds in the Arctic? An Evaluation of ARCMIP Simulations</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tjernström, Michael ; Sedlar, Joseph ; Shupe, Matthew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tjernström, Michael ; Sedlar, Joseph ; Shupe, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><description>Downwelling radiation in six regional models from the Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison (ARCMIP) project is systematically biased negative in comparison with observations from the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) experiment, although the correlations with observations are relatively good. In this paper, links between model errors and the representation of clouds in these models are investigated. Although some modeled cloud properties, such as the cloud water paths, are reasonable in a climatological sense, the temporal correlation of model cloud properties with observations is poor. The vertical distribution of cloud water is distinctly different among the different models; some common features also appear. Most models underestimate the presence of high clouds, and, although the observed preference for low clouds in the Arctic is present in most of the models, the modeled low clouds are too thin and are displaced downward. Practically all models show a preference to locate the lowest cloud base at the lowest model grid point. In some models this happens also to be where the observations show the highest occurrence of the lowest cloud base; it is not possible to determine if this result is just a coincidence. Different factors contribute to model surface radiation errors. For longwave radiation in summer, a negative bias is present both for cloudy and clear conditions, and intermodel differences are smaller when clouds are present. There is a clear relationship between errors in cloud-base temperature and radiation errors. In winter, in contrast, clear-sky cases are modeled reasonably well, but cloudy cases show a very large intermodel scatter with a significant bias in all models. This bias likely results from a complete failure in all of the models to retain liquid water in cold winter clouds. All models overestimate the cloud attenuation of summer solar radiation for thin and intermediate clouds, and some models maintain this behavior also for thick clouds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-8424</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8763</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-8432</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2008jamc1845.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOAMEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Arctic zone ; Atmospheric models ; Bias ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Climatology ; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change ; Clouds ; Correlation ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models ; Heat budget ; Liquids ; Marine ; Meteorology ; Modeling ; Overestimates ; Permissible error ; Precipitation ; Regional ; Solar radiation ; Summer ; Vertical distribution ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied meteorology (1988), 2008-09, Vol.47 (9), p.2405-2422</ispartof><rights>2008 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Sep 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-44297e60ebc4d60a2d0666565809db8aaafa90cebf71b8707a52c2e198c394943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-44297e60ebc4d60a2d0666565809db8aaafa90cebf71b8707a52c2e198c394943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26172742$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26172742$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3679,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20642183$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tjernström, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedlar, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupe, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><title>How Well Do Regional Climate Models Reproduce Radiation and Clouds in the Arctic? An Evaluation of ARCMIP Simulations</title><title>Journal of applied meteorology (1988)</title><description>Downwelling radiation in six regional models from the Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison (ARCMIP) project is systematically biased negative in comparison with observations from the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) experiment, although the correlations with observations are relatively good. In this paper, links between model errors and the representation of clouds in these models are investigated. Although some modeled cloud properties, such as the cloud water paths, are reasonable in a climatological sense, the temporal correlation of model cloud properties with observations is poor. The vertical distribution of cloud water is distinctly different among the different models; some common features also appear. Most models underestimate the presence of high clouds, and, although the observed preference for low clouds in the Arctic is present in most of the models, the modeled low clouds are too thin and are displaced downward. Practically all models show a preference to locate the lowest cloud base at the lowest model grid point. In some models this happens also to be where the observations show the highest occurrence of the lowest cloud base; it is not possible to determine if this result is just a coincidence. Different factors contribute to model surface radiation errors. For longwave radiation in summer, a negative bias is present both for cloudy and clear conditions, and intermodel differences are smaller when clouds are present. There is a clear relationship between errors in cloud-base temperature and radiation errors. In winter, in contrast, clear-sky cases are modeled reasonably well, but cloudy cases show a very large intermodel scatter with a significant bias in all models. This bias likely results from a complete failure in all of the models to retain liquid water in cold winter clouds. All models overestimate the cloud attenuation of summer solar radiation for thin and intermediate clouds, and some models maintain this behavior also for thick clouds.</description><subject>Arctic zone</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</subject><subject>Heat budget</subject><subject>Liquids</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Overestimates</subject><subject>Permissible error</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Regional</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Vertical distribution</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1558-8424</issn><issn>0894-8763</issn><issn>1558-8432</issn><issn>1520-0450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1P2zAUAPAIgQSUXblNsibBLcV2_JUTigKMTq02dUM7Rq-Os6Vy42InIP77OSvqJC7sZOv5957t95LknOApIZJfUYzVGjaaKMan5CA5IZyrVLGMHu73lB0npyGsMWZMSn6SDPfuGf001qIbh5bmV-s6sKi07QZ6gxauNjbE-Na7etAGLaFuoY8IQVdH5oY6oLZD_W-DCq_7Vl-jokO3T2CHnXMNKpblYvYNfW83g_0bDGfJUQM2mA-v6yR5uLv9Ud6n86-fZ2UxTzUnsk8Zo7k0ApuVZrXAQGsshOCCK5zXKwUADeRYm1UjyUpJLIFTTQ3Jlc5ylrNsklzu6sb3Pw4m9NWmDTr-FjrjhlBlsQs55e9DivNMKcX_AwpOJR_hpzdw7QYfmxsNZYIKnJGIpjukvQvBm6ba-th5_1IRXI1DrcahfikW5TjUaky4eK0KQYNtPHS6DfuseDujRGXRfdy5deid_3cuiKSS0ewPe-ypNA</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Tjernström, Michael</creator><creator>Sedlar, Joseph</creator><creator>Shupe, Matthew D.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>How Well Do Regional Climate Models Reproduce Radiation and Clouds in the Arctic? An Evaluation of ARCMIP Simulations</title><author>Tjernström, Michael ; Sedlar, Joseph ; Shupe, Matthew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-44297e60ebc4d60a2d0666565809db8aaafa90cebf71b8707a52c2e198c394943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Arctic zone</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</topic><topic>Heat budget</topic><topic>Liquids</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Overestimates</topic><topic>Permissible error</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Regional</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Vertical distribution</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tjernström, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedlar, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupe, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied meteorology (1988)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tjernström, Michael</au><au>Sedlar, Joseph</au><au>Shupe, Matthew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Well Do Regional Climate Models Reproduce Radiation and Clouds in the Arctic? An Evaluation of ARCMIP Simulations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied meteorology (1988)</jtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2405</spage><epage>2422</epage><pages>2405-2422</pages><issn>1558-8424</issn><issn>0894-8763</issn><eissn>1558-8432</eissn><eissn>1520-0450</eissn><coden>JOAMEZ</coden><abstract>Downwelling radiation in six regional models from the Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison (ARCMIP) project is systematically biased negative in comparison with observations from the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) experiment, although the correlations with observations are relatively good. In this paper, links between model errors and the representation of clouds in these models are investigated. Although some modeled cloud properties, such as the cloud water paths, are reasonable in a climatological sense, the temporal correlation of model cloud properties with observations is poor. The vertical distribution of cloud water is distinctly different among the different models; some common features also appear. Most models underestimate the presence of high clouds, and, although the observed preference for low clouds in the Arctic is present in most of the models, the modeled low clouds are too thin and are displaced downward. Practically all models show a preference to locate the lowest cloud base at the lowest model grid point. In some models this happens also to be where the observations show the highest occurrence of the lowest cloud base; it is not possible to determine if this result is just a coincidence. Different factors contribute to model surface radiation errors. For longwave radiation in summer, a negative bias is present both for cloudy and clear conditions, and intermodel differences are smaller when clouds are present. There is a clear relationship between errors in cloud-base temperature and radiation errors. In winter, in contrast, clear-sky cases are modeled reasonably well, but cloudy cases show a very large intermodel scatter with a significant bias in all models. This bias likely results from a complete failure in all of the models to retain liquid water in cold winter clouds. All models overestimate the cloud attenuation of summer solar radiation for thin and intermediate clouds, and some models maintain this behavior also for thick clouds.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2008jamc1845.1</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1558-8424
ispartof Journal of applied meteorology (1988), 2008-09, Vol.47 (9), p.2405-2422
issn 1558-8424
0894-8763
1558-8432
1520-0450
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20938885
source American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arctic zone
Atmospheric models
Bias
Climate change
Climate models
Climatology
Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change
Clouds
Correlation
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models
Heat budget
Liquids
Marine
Meteorology
Modeling
Overestimates
Permissible error
Precipitation
Regional
Solar radiation
Summer
Vertical distribution
Winter
title How Well Do Regional Climate Models Reproduce Radiation and Clouds in the Arctic? An Evaluation of ARCMIP Simulations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T05%3A33%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Well%20Do%20Regional%20Climate%20Models%20Reproduce%20Radiation%20and%20Clouds%20in%20the%20Arctic?%20An%20Evaluation%20of%20ARCMIP%20Simulations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20meteorology%20(1988)&rft.au=Tjernstr%C3%B6m,%20Michael&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2405&rft.epage=2422&rft.pages=2405-2422&rft.issn=1558-8424&rft.eissn=1558-8432&rft.coden=JOAMEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2008jamc1845.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26172742%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224626031&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26172742&rfr_iscdi=true