Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer
Purpose In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Supportive care in cancer 2019-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1755-1763 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1763 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1755 |
container_title | Supportive care in cancer |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Handforth, Catherine Burkinshaw, Roger Freeman, Jenny Brown, Janet E. Snowden, John A. Coleman, Robert E. Greenfield, Diana M. |
description | Purpose
In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with incurable but manageable disease provides information that would alter a cancer clinician’s intended management plan. Acceptability and feasibility were secondary aims.
Methods
Elderly men with incurable but manageable malignancies (advanced prostate cancer and multiple myeloma) who had previously received at least one line of treatment were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. A CGA was undertaken. Additional parameters measuring pain, fatigue and disease-specific concerns were also recorded, at the recommendation of patient involvement groups. Results were made available to clinicians. Patient and clinician acceptability and changes in subsequent management were recorded.
Results
Forty-eight patients completed the study. The median ages were 70.8 years and 74 years for myeloma and prostate respectively. Most identified concerns are related to disease-specific concerns (93%), pain (91%), frailty (57%) and nutrition (52%). Results altered the clinician’s oncological management plan in nine cases only. Patients found the format and content of CGA acceptable.
Conclusions
Many unmet needs were identified in this population of elderly men with manageable but non curable cancer which led to supportive care referrals and interventions. The CGA, however, did not result in significant changes in clinical oncology treatment plans for the majority of patients. The application of the CGA and other assessments was viewed positively by participants and can feasibly be undertaken in the outpatient oncology setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2093400559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A581343919</galeid><sourcerecordid>A581343919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-8c1603343eff39964627c71ab05514a2bc27c47fe5db014d9848645eed89a4ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFvFCEUxomxsWv1D_BiSLzUAxUGWIZjs7HVpImXeiYMvNmlzsAKMzX2r5fpVhsbDQfyHr_vy3t8CL1h9IxRqj4USmVDCWUtEYJRcvcMrZjgnCjO9XO0olowIriUx-hlKTeUMqVk8wIdc1qxVosVyps07jPsIJZwC3gLOdgpB4dtKVDKCHHCNnrswYUSUiSj_RbiFoeI0-Ah40rgH2Ha1Y6bs-0GwN084dFGu4X78tTtcorBvcfORgf5FTrq7VDg9cN9gr5efLzefCJXXy4_b86viBNcT6R1bE05Fxz6nmu9FutGOcVsR6Vkwjadq7VQPUjf1XW8bkW7FhLAt9oK6_kJOj347nP6PkOZzBiKg2GwEdJcTEM1F_UHpa7ouyfoTZpzrNMtVKMapRh7pLZ2ABNin6Zs3WJqzmXL6qiaLV5n_6Dq8TAGlyL0ofb_ErCDwOVUSobe7HMYbf5pGDVLzuaQs6k5myVnc1c1bx8GnrsR_B_F72Ar0ByAUp9ijfVxo_-7_gI95bHs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2092727711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Handforth, Catherine ; Burkinshaw, Roger ; Freeman, Jenny ; Brown, Janet E. ; Snowden, John A. ; Coleman, Robert E. ; Greenfield, Diana M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Handforth, Catherine ; Burkinshaw, Roger ; Freeman, Jenny ; Brown, Janet E. ; Snowden, John A. ; Coleman, Robert E. ; Greenfield, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with incurable but manageable disease provides information that would alter a cancer clinician’s intended management plan. Acceptability and feasibility were secondary aims.
Methods
Elderly men with incurable but manageable malignancies (advanced prostate cancer and multiple myeloma) who had previously received at least one line of treatment were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. A CGA was undertaken. Additional parameters measuring pain, fatigue and disease-specific concerns were also recorded, at the recommendation of patient involvement groups. Results were made available to clinicians. Patient and clinician acceptability and changes in subsequent management were recorded.
Results
Forty-eight patients completed the study. The median ages were 70.8 years and 74 years for myeloma and prostate respectively. Most identified concerns are related to disease-specific concerns (93%), pain (91%), frailty (57%) and nutrition (52%). Results altered the clinician’s oncological management plan in nine cases only. Patients found the format and content of CGA acceptable.
Conclusions
Many unmet needs were identified in this population of elderly men with manageable but non curable cancer which led to supportive care referrals and interventions. The CGA, however, did not result in significant changes in clinical oncology treatment plans for the majority of patients. The application of the CGA and other assessments was viewed positively by participants and can feasibly be undertaken in the outpatient oncology setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30143894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged patients ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer ; Care and treatment ; Clinical decision making ; Clinics ; Decision Making ; Fatigue - diagnosis ; Fatigue - etiology ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Geriatrics ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mens health ; Middle Aged ; Multiple myeloma ; Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis ; Multiple Myeloma - physiopathology ; Multiple Myeloma - therapy ; Needs Assessment ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Older people ; Oncology ; Oncology, Experimental ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative Care - methods ; Patients ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy ; Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2019-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1755-1763</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Supportive Care in Cancer is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-8c1603343eff39964627c71ab05514a2bc27c47fe5db014d9848645eed89a4ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-8c1603343eff39964627c71ab05514a2bc27c47fe5db014d9848645eed89a4ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5171-4917</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30143894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Handforth, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkinshaw, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snowden, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenfield, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose
In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with incurable but manageable disease provides information that would alter a cancer clinician’s intended management plan. Acceptability and feasibility were secondary aims.
Methods
Elderly men with incurable but manageable malignancies (advanced prostate cancer and multiple myeloma) who had previously received at least one line of treatment were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. A CGA was undertaken. Additional parameters measuring pain, fatigue and disease-specific concerns were also recorded, at the recommendation of patient involvement groups. Results were made available to clinicians. Patient and clinician acceptability and changes in subsequent management were recorded.
Results
Forty-eight patients completed the study. The median ages were 70.8 years and 74 years for myeloma and prostate respectively. Most identified concerns are related to disease-specific concerns (93%), pain (91%), frailty (57%) and nutrition (52%). Results altered the clinician’s oncological management plan in nine cases only. Patients found the format and content of CGA acceptable.
Conclusions
Many unmet needs were identified in this population of elderly men with manageable but non curable cancer which led to supportive care referrals and interventions. The CGA, however, did not result in significant changes in clinical oncology treatment plans for the majority of patients. The application of the CGA and other assessments was viewed positively by participants and can feasibly be undertaken in the outpatient oncology setting.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged patients</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Fatigue - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fatigue - etiology</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple myeloma</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative Care - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFvFCEUxomxsWv1D_BiSLzUAxUGWIZjs7HVpImXeiYMvNmlzsAKMzX2r5fpVhsbDQfyHr_vy3t8CL1h9IxRqj4USmVDCWUtEYJRcvcMrZjgnCjO9XO0olowIriUx-hlKTeUMqVk8wIdc1qxVosVyps07jPsIJZwC3gLOdgpB4dtKVDKCHHCNnrswYUSUiSj_RbiFoeI0-Ah40rgH2Ha1Y6bs-0GwN084dFGu4X78tTtcorBvcfORgf5FTrq7VDg9cN9gr5efLzefCJXXy4_b86viBNcT6R1bE05Fxz6nmu9FutGOcVsR6Vkwjadq7VQPUjf1XW8bkW7FhLAt9oK6_kJOj347nP6PkOZzBiKg2GwEdJcTEM1F_UHpa7ouyfoTZpzrNMtVKMapRh7pLZ2ABNin6Zs3WJqzmXL6qiaLV5n_6Dq8TAGlyL0ofb_ErCDwOVUSobe7HMYbf5pGDVLzuaQs6k5myVnc1c1bx8GnrsR_B_F72Ar0ByAUp9ijfVxo_-7_gI95bHs</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Handforth, Catherine</creator><creator>Burkinshaw, Roger</creator><creator>Freeman, Jenny</creator><creator>Brown, Janet E.</creator><creator>Snowden, John A.</creator><creator>Coleman, Robert E.</creator><creator>Greenfield, Diana M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-4917</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer</title><author>Handforth, Catherine ; Burkinshaw, Roger ; Freeman, Jenny ; Brown, Janet E. ; Snowden, John A. ; Coleman, Robert E. ; Greenfield, Diana M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-8c1603343eff39964627c71ab05514a2bc27c47fe5db014d9848645eed89a4ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged patients</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Fatigue - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fatigue - etiology</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple myeloma</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative Care - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Handforth, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkinshaw, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snowden, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenfield, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Handforth, Catherine</au><au>Burkinshaw, Roger</au><au>Freeman, Jenny</au><au>Brown, Janet E.</au><au>Snowden, John A.</au><au>Coleman, Robert E.</au><au>Greenfield, Diana M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1755</spage><epage>1763</epage><pages>1755-1763</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose
In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with incurable but manageable disease provides information that would alter a cancer clinician’s intended management plan. Acceptability and feasibility were secondary aims.
Methods
Elderly men with incurable but manageable malignancies (advanced prostate cancer and multiple myeloma) who had previously received at least one line of treatment were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. A CGA was undertaken. Additional parameters measuring pain, fatigue and disease-specific concerns were also recorded, at the recommendation of patient involvement groups. Results were made available to clinicians. Patient and clinician acceptability and changes in subsequent management were recorded.
Results
Forty-eight patients completed the study. The median ages were 70.8 years and 74 years for myeloma and prostate respectively. Most identified concerns are related to disease-specific concerns (93%), pain (91%), frailty (57%) and nutrition (52%). Results altered the clinician’s oncological management plan in nine cases only. Patients found the format and content of CGA acceptable.
Conclusions
Many unmet needs were identified in this population of elderly men with manageable but non curable cancer which led to supportive care referrals and interventions. The CGA, however, did not result in significant changes in clinical oncology treatment plans for the majority of patients. The application of the CGA and other assessments was viewed positively by participants and can feasibly be undertaken in the outpatient oncology setting.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>30143894</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-4917</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0941-4355 |
ispartof | Supportive care in cancer, 2019-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1755-1763 |
issn | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2093400559 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Age Factors Aged Aged patients Aged, 80 and over Cancer Care and treatment Clinical decision making Clinics Decision Making Fatigue - diagnosis Fatigue - etiology Geriatric Assessment - methods Geriatrics Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mens health Middle Aged Multiple myeloma Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis Multiple Myeloma - physiopathology Multiple Myeloma - therapy Needs Assessment Nursing Nursing Research Older people Oncology Oncology, Experimental Original Article Pain Medicine Palliative Care - methods Patients Prostate Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy Rehabilitation Medicine |
title | Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A04%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comprehensive%20geriatric%20assessment%20and%20decision-making%20in%20older%20men%20with%20incurable%20but%20manageable%20(chronic)%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Handforth,%20Catherine&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1755&rft.epage=1763&rft.pages=1755-1763&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA581343919%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2092727711&rft_id=info:pmid/30143894&rft_galeid=A581343919&rfr_iscdi=true |