Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer

Purpose In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2019-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1755-1763
Hauptverfasser: Handforth, Catherine, Burkinshaw, Roger, Freeman, Jenny, Brown, Janet E., Snowden, John A., Coleman, Robert E., Greenfield, Diana M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1763
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1755
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 27
creator Handforth, Catherine
Burkinshaw, Roger
Freeman, Jenny
Brown, Janet E.
Snowden, John A.
Coleman, Robert E.
Greenfield, Diana M.
description Purpose In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with incurable but manageable disease provides information that would alter a cancer clinician’s intended management plan. Acceptability and feasibility were secondary aims. Methods Elderly men with incurable but manageable malignancies (advanced prostate cancer and multiple myeloma) who had previously received at least one line of treatment were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. A CGA was undertaken. Additional parameters measuring pain, fatigue and disease-specific concerns were also recorded, at the recommendation of patient involvement groups. Results were made available to clinicians. Patient and clinician acceptability and changes in subsequent management were recorded. Results Forty-eight patients completed the study. The median ages were 70.8 years and 74 years for myeloma and prostate respectively. Most identified concerns are related to disease-specific concerns (93%), pain (91%), frailty (57%) and nutrition (52%). Results altered the clinician’s oncological management plan in nine cases only. Patients found the format and content of CGA acceptable. Conclusions Many unmet needs were identified in this population of elderly men with manageable but non curable cancer which led to supportive care referrals and interventions. The CGA, however, did not result in significant changes in clinical oncology treatment plans for the majority of patients. The application of the CGA and other assessments was viewed positively by participants and can feasibly be undertaken in the outpatient oncology setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2093400559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A581343919</galeid><sourcerecordid>A581343919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-8c1603343eff39964627c71ab05514a2bc27c47fe5db014d9848645eed89a4ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFvFCEUxomxsWv1D_BiSLzUAxUGWIZjs7HVpImXeiYMvNmlzsAKMzX2r5fpVhsbDQfyHr_vy3t8CL1h9IxRqj4USmVDCWUtEYJRcvcMrZjgnCjO9XO0olowIriUx-hlKTeUMqVk8wIdc1qxVosVyps07jPsIJZwC3gLOdgpB4dtKVDKCHHCNnrswYUSUiSj_RbiFoeI0-Ah40rgH2Ha1Y6bs-0GwN084dFGu4X78tTtcorBvcfORgf5FTrq7VDg9cN9gr5efLzefCJXXy4_b86viBNcT6R1bE05Fxz6nmu9FutGOcVsR6Vkwjadq7VQPUjf1XW8bkW7FhLAt9oK6_kJOj347nP6PkOZzBiKg2GwEdJcTEM1F_UHpa7ouyfoTZpzrNMtVKMapRh7pLZ2ABNin6Zs3WJqzmXL6qiaLV5n_6Dq8TAGlyL0ofb_ErCDwOVUSobe7HMYbf5pGDVLzuaQs6k5myVnc1c1bx8GnrsR_B_F72Ar0ByAUp9ijfVxo_-7_gI95bHs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2092727711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Handforth, Catherine ; Burkinshaw, Roger ; Freeman, Jenny ; Brown, Janet E. ; Snowden, John A. ; Coleman, Robert E. ; Greenfield, Diana M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Handforth, Catherine ; Burkinshaw, Roger ; Freeman, Jenny ; Brown, Janet E. ; Snowden, John A. ; Coleman, Robert E. ; Greenfield, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with incurable but manageable disease provides information that would alter a cancer clinician’s intended management plan. Acceptability and feasibility were secondary aims. Methods Elderly men with incurable but manageable malignancies (advanced prostate cancer and multiple myeloma) who had previously received at least one line of treatment were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. A CGA was undertaken. Additional parameters measuring pain, fatigue and disease-specific concerns were also recorded, at the recommendation of patient involvement groups. Results were made available to clinicians. Patient and clinician acceptability and changes in subsequent management were recorded. Results Forty-eight patients completed the study. The median ages were 70.8 years and 74 years for myeloma and prostate respectively. Most identified concerns are related to disease-specific concerns (93%), pain (91%), frailty (57%) and nutrition (52%). Results altered the clinician’s oncological management plan in nine cases only. Patients found the format and content of CGA acceptable. Conclusions Many unmet needs were identified in this population of elderly men with manageable but non curable cancer which led to supportive care referrals and interventions. The CGA, however, did not result in significant changes in clinical oncology treatment plans for the majority of patients. The application of the CGA and other assessments was viewed positively by participants and can feasibly be undertaken in the outpatient oncology setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30143894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged patients ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer ; Care and treatment ; Clinical decision making ; Clinics ; Decision Making ; Fatigue - diagnosis ; Fatigue - etiology ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Geriatrics ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mens health ; Middle Aged ; Multiple myeloma ; Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis ; Multiple Myeloma - physiopathology ; Multiple Myeloma - therapy ; Needs Assessment ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Older people ; Oncology ; Oncology, Experimental ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative Care - methods ; Patients ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy ; Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2019-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1755-1763</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Supportive Care in Cancer is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-8c1603343eff39964627c71ab05514a2bc27c47fe5db014d9848645eed89a4ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-8c1603343eff39964627c71ab05514a2bc27c47fe5db014d9848645eed89a4ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5171-4917</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30143894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Handforth, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkinshaw, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snowden, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenfield, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with incurable but manageable disease provides information that would alter a cancer clinician’s intended management plan. Acceptability and feasibility were secondary aims. Methods Elderly men with incurable but manageable malignancies (advanced prostate cancer and multiple myeloma) who had previously received at least one line of treatment were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. A CGA was undertaken. Additional parameters measuring pain, fatigue and disease-specific concerns were also recorded, at the recommendation of patient involvement groups. Results were made available to clinicians. Patient and clinician acceptability and changes in subsequent management were recorded. Results Forty-eight patients completed the study. The median ages were 70.8 years and 74 years for myeloma and prostate respectively. Most identified concerns are related to disease-specific concerns (93%), pain (91%), frailty (57%) and nutrition (52%). Results altered the clinician’s oncological management plan in nine cases only. Patients found the format and content of CGA acceptable. Conclusions Many unmet needs were identified in this population of elderly men with manageable but non curable cancer which led to supportive care referrals and interventions. The CGA, however, did not result in significant changes in clinical oncology treatment plans for the majority of patients. The application of the CGA and other assessments was viewed positively by participants and can feasibly be undertaken in the outpatient oncology setting.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged patients</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Fatigue - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fatigue - etiology</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple myeloma</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative Care - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFvFCEUxomxsWv1D_BiSLzUAxUGWIZjs7HVpImXeiYMvNmlzsAKMzX2r5fpVhsbDQfyHr_vy3t8CL1h9IxRqj4USmVDCWUtEYJRcvcMrZjgnCjO9XO0olowIriUx-hlKTeUMqVk8wIdc1qxVosVyps07jPsIJZwC3gLOdgpB4dtKVDKCHHCNnrswYUSUiSj_RbiFoeI0-Ah40rgH2Ha1Y6bs-0GwN084dFGu4X78tTtcorBvcfORgf5FTrq7VDg9cN9gr5efLzefCJXXy4_b86viBNcT6R1bE05Fxz6nmu9FutGOcVsR6Vkwjadq7VQPUjf1XW8bkW7FhLAt9oK6_kJOj347nP6PkOZzBiKg2GwEdJcTEM1F_UHpa7ouyfoTZpzrNMtVKMapRh7pLZ2ABNin6Zs3WJqzmXL6qiaLV5n_6Dq8TAGlyL0ofb_ErCDwOVUSobe7HMYbf5pGDVLzuaQs6k5myVnc1c1bx8GnrsR_B_F72Ar0ByAUp9ijfVxo_-7_gI95bHs</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Handforth, Catherine</creator><creator>Burkinshaw, Roger</creator><creator>Freeman, Jenny</creator><creator>Brown, Janet E.</creator><creator>Snowden, John A.</creator><creator>Coleman, Robert E.</creator><creator>Greenfield, Diana M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-4917</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer</title><author>Handforth, Catherine ; Burkinshaw, Roger ; Freeman, Jenny ; Brown, Janet E. ; Snowden, John A. ; Coleman, Robert E. ; Greenfield, Diana M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-8c1603343eff39964627c71ab05514a2bc27c47fe5db014d9848645eed89a4ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged patients</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Fatigue - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fatigue - etiology</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple myeloma</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative Care - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Handforth, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkinshaw, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snowden, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenfield, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Handforth, Catherine</au><au>Burkinshaw, Roger</au><au>Freeman, Jenny</au><au>Brown, Janet E.</au><au>Snowden, John A.</au><au>Coleman, Robert E.</au><au>Greenfield, Diana M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1755</spage><epage>1763</epage><pages>1755-1763</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with incurable but manageable disease provides information that would alter a cancer clinician’s intended management plan. Acceptability and feasibility were secondary aims. Methods Elderly men with incurable but manageable malignancies (advanced prostate cancer and multiple myeloma) who had previously received at least one line of treatment were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. A CGA was undertaken. Additional parameters measuring pain, fatigue and disease-specific concerns were also recorded, at the recommendation of patient involvement groups. Results were made available to clinicians. Patient and clinician acceptability and changes in subsequent management were recorded. Results Forty-eight patients completed the study. The median ages were 70.8 years and 74 years for myeloma and prostate respectively. Most identified concerns are related to disease-specific concerns (93%), pain (91%), frailty (57%) and nutrition (52%). Results altered the clinician’s oncological management plan in nine cases only. Patients found the format and content of CGA acceptable. Conclusions Many unmet needs were identified in this population of elderly men with manageable but non curable cancer which led to supportive care referrals and interventions. The CGA, however, did not result in significant changes in clinical oncology treatment plans for the majority of patients. The application of the CGA and other assessments was viewed positively by participants and can feasibly be undertaken in the outpatient oncology setting.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>30143894</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-4917</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2019-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1755-1763
issn 0941-4355
1433-7339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2093400559
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Aged patients
Aged, 80 and over
Cancer
Care and treatment
Clinical decision making
Clinics
Decision Making
Fatigue - diagnosis
Fatigue - etiology
Geriatric Assessment - methods
Geriatrics
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mens health
Middle Aged
Multiple myeloma
Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis
Multiple Myeloma - physiopathology
Multiple Myeloma - therapy
Needs Assessment
Nursing
Nursing Research
Older people
Oncology
Oncology, Experimental
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Palliative Care - methods
Patients
Prostate
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy
Rehabilitation Medicine
title Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A04%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comprehensive%20geriatric%20assessment%20and%20decision-making%20in%20older%20men%20with%20incurable%20but%20manageable%20(chronic)%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Handforth,%20Catherine&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1755&rft.epage=1763&rft.pages=1755-1763&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA581343919%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2092727711&rft_id=info:pmid/30143894&rft_galeid=A581343919&rfr_iscdi=true