Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Which Has Higher Patient Satisfaction?

More surgeons are offering patients the option of having adult reconstructive procedures performed as an outpatient at an ambulatory surgery center. However, it is unknown if these patients have higher or lower satisfaction with their care than patients having a traditional inpatient stay. The purpo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2018-11, Vol.33 (11), p.3402-3406
Hauptverfasser: Kelly, Mick P., Calkins, Tyler E., Culvern, Chris, Kogan, Monica, Della Valle, Craig J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3406
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3402
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 33
creator Kelly, Mick P.
Calkins, Tyler E.
Culvern, Chris
Kogan, Monica
Della Valle, Craig J.
description More surgeons are offering patients the option of having adult reconstructive procedures performed as an outpatient at an ambulatory surgery center. However, it is unknown if these patients have higher or lower satisfaction with their care than patients having a traditional inpatient stay. The purpose of this study is to compare satisfaction between inpatients and outpatients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Portions of the Health Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, the Friends and Family Test, and 8 additional questions were administered to 174 consecutive patients. There were 8 non-responders (95.4% response rate) leaving 102 who underwent inpatient and 64 who had outpatient surgery. Responses were stratified using the “boxes” scoring approach as recommended by Health Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and analyzed with a chi-squared or Fischer’s exact test where appropriate. Power analysis determined that 38 patients per group were needed to detect a 1-point difference in overall satisfaction between groups with 80% power and alpha of 0.05 considered significant. Outpatients responded with more top responses when asked about the staff’s explanation of any medicines received (91.4% vs 77.5%, P = .026), the staff’s assistance with their pain management (98.3% vs 88.0%, P = .022), the written health information they were given upon discharge (98.3% vs 90.1%, P = .05), and the courtesy and respect from the nurses (100.0% vs 92.2%, P = .022). Inpatients responded with more bottom responses when asked how prepared they felt for discharge home (8.9% vs 0.0%, P = .014). Top responses in overall satisfaction with the facility (87.1% vs 93.4%, P = .204) and overall experience (89.2% vs 95.2%, P = .177) were similar between inpatients and outpatients, respectively. Not surprisingly, inpatients were older (64.1 vs 59.2 years, P = .001), heavier (body mass index 32.7 vs 30.4, P = .035), and had higher Charlson comorbidity scores (2.6 vs 1.9, P = .002). Although satisfaction was high in both groups, when differences were present they favored outpatient surgery in the ambulatory surgery center.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2093397726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540318306685</els_id><sourcerecordid>2093397726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ed6a02d92e7b064ff51dadada86f107d59f2cae4835c4e6ba1824a68162566ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOj_-gBfSS29aT5Im7UQQEXWiMMGvKwlZeuoytrYmqbB_b8amlyYXB8Lzvoc8hBxTyChQeTbLtAvTjAEtMygyYGKLDKjgLC1zkNtkAGXJU5ED3yP73s8AKBUi3yV7HGjO4xmQj_um08FiE5I3dL73ybgPvy8j2yW6qZKHBjG5irtc2821D8vz5H1qzTQZaR-hzym65GmTeY7T19oE2zaXh2Sn1nOPR5t5QF5vb16uR-nj-O7--uoxNVzIkGIlNbBqyLCYgMzrWtBKr24pawpFJYY1MxrzkguTo5xoWrJcy5JKJqQ0yA_I6bq3c-1Xjz6ohfUG53PdYNt7xWDI-bAomIwoW6PGtd47rFXn7EK7paKgVlrVTK20qpVWBYWKWmPoZNPfTxZY_UV-PUbgYg1g_OW3Rae8iToMVtahCapq7X_9P2abiZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2093397726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Which Has Higher Patient Satisfaction?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kelly, Mick P. ; Calkins, Tyler E. ; Culvern, Chris ; Kogan, Monica ; Della Valle, Craig J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Mick P. ; Calkins, Tyler E. ; Culvern, Chris ; Kogan, Monica ; Della Valle, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><description>More surgeons are offering patients the option of having adult reconstructive procedures performed as an outpatient at an ambulatory surgery center. However, it is unknown if these patients have higher or lower satisfaction with their care than patients having a traditional inpatient stay. The purpose of this study is to compare satisfaction between inpatients and outpatients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Portions of the Health Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, the Friends and Family Test, and 8 additional questions were administered to 174 consecutive patients. There were 8 non-responders (95.4% response rate) leaving 102 who underwent inpatient and 64 who had outpatient surgery. Responses were stratified using the “boxes” scoring approach as recommended by Health Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and analyzed with a chi-squared or Fischer’s exact test where appropriate. Power analysis determined that 38 patients per group were needed to detect a 1-point difference in overall satisfaction between groups with 80% power and alpha of 0.05 considered significant. Outpatients responded with more top responses when asked about the staff’s explanation of any medicines received (91.4% vs 77.5%, P = .026), the staff’s assistance with their pain management (98.3% vs 88.0%, P = .022), the written health information they were given upon discharge (98.3% vs 90.1%, P = .05), and the courtesy and respect from the nurses (100.0% vs 92.2%, P = .022). Inpatients responded with more bottom responses when asked how prepared they felt for discharge home (8.9% vs 0.0%, P = .014). Top responses in overall satisfaction with the facility (87.1% vs 93.4%, P = .204) and overall experience (89.2% vs 95.2%, P = .177) were similar between inpatients and outpatients, respectively. Not surprisingly, inpatients were older (64.1 vs 59.2 years, P = .001), heavier (body mass index 32.7 vs 30.4, P = .035), and had higher Charlson comorbidity scores (2.6 vs 1.9, P = .002). Although satisfaction was high in both groups, when differences were present they favored outpatient surgery in the ambulatory surgery center.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30143333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>outpatient surgery ; patient satisfaction ; practice management ; total hip arthroplasty ; total knee arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2018-11, Vol.33 (11), p.3402-3406</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ed6a02d92e7b064ff51dadada86f107d59f2cae4835c4e6ba1824a68162566ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ed6a02d92e7b064ff51dadada86f107d59f2cae4835c4e6ba1824a68162566ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540318306685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30143333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Mick P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calkins, Tyler E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culvern, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogan, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Valle, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><title>Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Which Has Higher Patient Satisfaction?</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>More surgeons are offering patients the option of having adult reconstructive procedures performed as an outpatient at an ambulatory surgery center. However, it is unknown if these patients have higher or lower satisfaction with their care than patients having a traditional inpatient stay. The purpose of this study is to compare satisfaction between inpatients and outpatients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Portions of the Health Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, the Friends and Family Test, and 8 additional questions were administered to 174 consecutive patients. There were 8 non-responders (95.4% response rate) leaving 102 who underwent inpatient and 64 who had outpatient surgery. Responses were stratified using the “boxes” scoring approach as recommended by Health Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and analyzed with a chi-squared or Fischer’s exact test where appropriate. Power analysis determined that 38 patients per group were needed to detect a 1-point difference in overall satisfaction between groups with 80% power and alpha of 0.05 considered significant. Outpatients responded with more top responses when asked about the staff’s explanation of any medicines received (91.4% vs 77.5%, P = .026), the staff’s assistance with their pain management (98.3% vs 88.0%, P = .022), the written health information they were given upon discharge (98.3% vs 90.1%, P = .05), and the courtesy and respect from the nurses (100.0% vs 92.2%, P = .022). Inpatients responded with more bottom responses when asked how prepared they felt for discharge home (8.9% vs 0.0%, P = .014). Top responses in overall satisfaction with the facility (87.1% vs 93.4%, P = .204) and overall experience (89.2% vs 95.2%, P = .177) were similar between inpatients and outpatients, respectively. Not surprisingly, inpatients were older (64.1 vs 59.2 years, P = .001), heavier (body mass index 32.7 vs 30.4, P = .035), and had higher Charlson comorbidity scores (2.6 vs 1.9, P = .002). Although satisfaction was high in both groups, when differences were present they favored outpatient surgery in the ambulatory surgery center.</description><subject>outpatient surgery</subject><subject>patient satisfaction</subject><subject>practice management</subject><subject>total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>total knee arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOj_-gBfSS29aT5Im7UQQEXWiMMGvKwlZeuoytrYmqbB_b8amlyYXB8Lzvoc8hBxTyChQeTbLtAvTjAEtMygyYGKLDKjgLC1zkNtkAGXJU5ED3yP73s8AKBUi3yV7HGjO4xmQj_um08FiE5I3dL73ybgPvy8j2yW6qZKHBjG5irtc2821D8vz5H1qzTQZaR-hzym65GmTeY7T19oE2zaXh2Sn1nOPR5t5QF5vb16uR-nj-O7--uoxNVzIkGIlNbBqyLCYgMzrWtBKr24pawpFJYY1MxrzkguTo5xoWrJcy5JKJqQ0yA_I6bq3c-1Xjz6ohfUG53PdYNt7xWDI-bAomIwoW6PGtd47rFXn7EK7paKgVlrVTK20qpVWBYWKWmPoZNPfTxZY_UV-PUbgYg1g_OW3Rae8iToMVtahCapq7X_9P2abiZQ</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Kelly, Mick P.</creator><creator>Calkins, Tyler E.</creator><creator>Culvern, Chris</creator><creator>Kogan, Monica</creator><creator>Della Valle, Craig J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Which Has Higher Patient Satisfaction?</title><author>Kelly, Mick P. ; Calkins, Tyler E. ; Culvern, Chris ; Kogan, Monica ; Della Valle, Craig J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ed6a02d92e7b064ff51dadada86f107d59f2cae4835c4e6ba1824a68162566ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>outpatient surgery</topic><topic>patient satisfaction</topic><topic>practice management</topic><topic>total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>total knee arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Mick P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calkins, Tyler E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culvern, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogan, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Valle, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Mick P.</au><au>Calkins, Tyler E.</au><au>Culvern, Chris</au><au>Kogan, Monica</au><au>Della Valle, Craig J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Which Has Higher Patient Satisfaction?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3402</spage><epage>3406</epage><pages>3402-3406</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>More surgeons are offering patients the option of having adult reconstructive procedures performed as an outpatient at an ambulatory surgery center. However, it is unknown if these patients have higher or lower satisfaction with their care than patients having a traditional inpatient stay. The purpose of this study is to compare satisfaction between inpatients and outpatients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Portions of the Health Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, the Friends and Family Test, and 8 additional questions were administered to 174 consecutive patients. There were 8 non-responders (95.4% response rate) leaving 102 who underwent inpatient and 64 who had outpatient surgery. Responses were stratified using the “boxes” scoring approach as recommended by Health Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and analyzed with a chi-squared or Fischer’s exact test where appropriate. Power analysis determined that 38 patients per group were needed to detect a 1-point difference in overall satisfaction between groups with 80% power and alpha of 0.05 considered significant. Outpatients responded with more top responses when asked about the staff’s explanation of any medicines received (91.4% vs 77.5%, P = .026), the staff’s assistance with their pain management (98.3% vs 88.0%, P = .022), the written health information they were given upon discharge (98.3% vs 90.1%, P = .05), and the courtesy and respect from the nurses (100.0% vs 92.2%, P = .022). Inpatients responded with more bottom responses when asked how prepared they felt for discharge home (8.9% vs 0.0%, P = .014). Top responses in overall satisfaction with the facility (87.1% vs 93.4%, P = .204) and overall experience (89.2% vs 95.2%, P = .177) were similar between inpatients and outpatients, respectively. Not surprisingly, inpatients were older (64.1 vs 59.2 years, P = .001), heavier (body mass index 32.7 vs 30.4, P = .035), and had higher Charlson comorbidity scores (2.6 vs 1.9, P = .002). Although satisfaction was high in both groups, when differences were present they favored outpatient surgery in the ambulatory surgery center.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30143333</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.025</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2018-11, Vol.33 (11), p.3402-3406
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2093397726
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects outpatient surgery
patient satisfaction
practice management
total hip arthroplasty
total knee arthroplasty
title Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Which Has Higher Patient Satisfaction?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A53%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inpatient%20Versus%20Outpatient%20Hip%20and%20Knee%20Arthroplasty:%20Which%20Has%20Higher%20Patient%20Satisfaction?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Kelly,%20Mick%20P.&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3402&rft.epage=3406&rft.pages=3402-3406&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2093397726%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2093397726&rft_id=info:pmid/30143333&rft_els_id=S0883540318306685&rfr_iscdi=true