Noncardiac genetic predisposition in sudden infant death syndrome

Purpose Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is the commonest cause of sudden death of an infant; however, the genetic basis remains poorly understood. We aimed to identify noncardiac genes underpinning SIDS and determine their prevalence compared with ethnically matched controls. Methods Using exome...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetics in medicine 2019-03, Vol.21 (3), p.641-649
Hauptverfasser: Gray, Belinda, Tester, David J., Wong, Leonie CH, Chanana, Pritha, Jaye, Amie, Evans, Jared M., Baruteau, Alban-Elouen, Evans, Margaret, Fleming, Peter, Jeffrey, Iona, Cohen, Marta, Tfelt-Hansen, Jacob, Simpson, Michael A., Ackerman, Michael J., Behr, Elijah R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is the commonest cause of sudden death of an infant; however, the genetic basis remains poorly understood. We aimed to identify noncardiac genes underpinning SIDS and determine their prevalence compared with ethnically matched controls. Methods Using exome sequencing we assessed the yield of ultrarare nonsynonymous variants (minor allele frequency [MAF] ≤0.00005, dominant model; MAF ≤0.01, recessive model) in 278 European SIDS cases (62% male; average age =2.7 ± 2 months) versus 973 European controls across 61 noncardiac SIDS-susceptibility genes. The variants were classified according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria. Case-control, gene-collapsing analysis was performed in eight candidate biological pathways previously implicated in SIDS pathogenesis. Results Overall 43/278 SIDS cases harbored an ultrarare single-nucleotide variant compared with 114/973 controls (15.5 vs. 11.7%, p =0.10). Only 2/61 noncardiac genes were significantly overrepresented in cases compared with controls ( ECE1 , 3/278 [1%] vs. 1/973 [0.1%] p =0.036; SLC6A4 , 2/278 [0.7%] vs. 1/973 [0.1%] p =0.049). There was no difference in yield of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants between cases and controls (1/278 [0.36%] vs. 4/973 [0.41%]; p =1.0). Gene-collapsing analysis did not identify any specific biological pathways to be significantly associated with SIDS. Conclusions A monogenic basis for SIDS amongst the previously implicated noncardiac genes and their encoded biological pathways is negligible.
ISSN:1098-3600
1530-0366
DOI:10.1038/s41436-018-0131-4