Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for chest wall irradiation: For a good plan, get the right mixture

•Utility of hybrid-VMAT for chest wall and supraclavicular node irradiation was studied.•Optimal dose weighting for hybrid-VMAT was demonstrated.•Hybrid-VMAT was dosimetrically compared with field-in-field and VMAT.•Hybrid -VMAT plans achieved balanced results for planning target and critical organs...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physica medica 2018-08, Vol.52, p.86-92
Hauptverfasser: Balaji, Karunakaran, Yadav, Poonam, BalajiSubramanian, Sitaraman, Anu Radha, Chandrasekaran, Ramasubramanian, Velayudham
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Utility of hybrid-VMAT for chest wall and supraclavicular node irradiation was studied.•Optimal dose weighting for hybrid-VMAT was demonstrated.•Hybrid-VMAT was dosimetrically compared with field-in-field and VMAT.•Hybrid -VMAT plans achieved balanced results for planning target and critical organs. To find the optimal dose weighting for hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT), a combination of conventional 3DCRT and VMAT plans for left sided chest wall and supraclavicular radiation therapy. 20 left-sided breast cancer patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy were considered for this study. To find the optimal weighting, 5 H-VMAT plans were generated for each study case by combining different dose proportions of 3DCRT and VMAT plans including: 90% 3DCRT/10% VMAT, 80% 3DCRT/20% VMAT, 70% 3DCRT/30% VMAT, 60% 3DCRT/40% VMAT, 50% 3DCRT/50% VMAT. Further field-in-field, optimal H-VMAT and VMAT alone plans were compared. All H-VMAT plans achieved the expected target coverage. A higher conformity index was achieved for 50% 3DCRT/50% VMAT plan, while better homogeneity index was achieved for 80% 3DCRT/20% VMAT plan. Mean and low doses were less in 90% 3DCRT/10% VMAT plan. Compared with other proportions, 80% 3DCRT/20% VMAT and 70% 3DCRT/30% VMAT weighted H-VMAT plans achieved balanced results for PTVs and OARs. The optimal dose mixture for H-VMAT technique is 70% to 80% for 3DCRT and 20% to 30% for VMAT. The optimal H-VMAT achieved balanced results for the PTVs and OARs compared with field-in-field and VMAT alone plans.
ISSN:1120-1797
1724-191X
DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.641