When should the driver with a history of substance misuse be allowed to return to the wheel? A review of the substance misuse section of the Australian national guidelines

Assessing fitness to drive in applicants with a historical or current substance use disorder presents a specific clinical challenge. The Australian guidelines require evidence of remission and absence of cognitive change when considering applications for re‐licensing driver or individuals applying t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Internal medicine journal 2018-08, Vol.48 (8), p.908-915
Hauptverfasser: Ogden, Edward J. D, Verster, Joris C., Hayley, Amie C., Downey, Luke A., Hocking, Bruce, Stough, Con K., Scholey, Andrew B., Bonomo, Yvonne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 915
container_issue 8
container_start_page 908
container_title Internal medicine journal
container_volume 48
creator Ogden, Edward J. D
Verster, Joris C.
Hayley, Amie C.
Downey, Luke A.
Hocking, Bruce
Stough, Con K.
Scholey, Andrew B.
Bonomo, Yvonne
description Assessing fitness to drive in applicants with a historical or current substance use disorder presents a specific clinical challenge. The Australian guidelines require evidence of remission and absence of cognitive change when considering applications for re‐licensing driver or individuals applying to reengage in safety‐sensitive work. This paper reviews some of the clinical and biochemical indicators that determine whether a particular person is in ‘remission’ and meets the criteria for return to driving or other safety‐sensitive occupation. It provides an overview of the challenges in establishing an evidence‐based approach to determining fitness for safety critical activities. There is no internationally accepted definition of ‘remission’. Review of the literature and examination of assessment protocols from other national jurisdictions are available for alcohol and the more important drugs of interest in road safety. Assessing fitness to drive when there is a history of substance misuse and/or substance use disorders is a complex issue that requires assessment of biomarkers, clinical findings and clinical assessment before the person returns to driving. We propose that hair testing provides a reliable and reproducible way to demonstrate remission and provide cost‐effective monitoring. Standardised psychological tests could provide a reproducible assessment of the cognitive effects of drug use and suitability to resume driving. We recommend that AustRoads amend the national guidelines to reflect an evidence‐based approach to assessing fitness to drive after conviction for offences related to alcohol and drug use.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/imj.13975
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2092540112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2092540112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4145-56caf29a82ff3b064ee11f02f259b1b147b7284d1d53041b2e4e1231d38d82ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQxi3UCuiWAy9QWeqFHhY8trMbn6oV6h8qEBcqjpGTjIlX3pjaMdE-U18Sh4UeqPDFo5nf92nsj5BjYKeQz5ndrE9BqGWxRw5BymJeKCXfPdVyzhQTB-RDjGvGYCmU3CcHgoEQqiwOyd_bDnsaO59cS4cOaRvsAwY62qGjmnY2Dj5sqTc0pjoOum-QbmxMEWmNVDvnR8xCTwMOKfRTNbmMHaL7Sle5_WBxnPRT-z-PiM1gff8yX6U4BO2s7mmvp4F29C7ZFp3tMX4k7412EY-e7xn5_f3bzfnP-eX1j4vz1eW8kTA9ftFow5UuuTGiZguJCGAYN7xQNdQgl_WSl7KFthBMQs1RInABrSjbkqMRM3Ky870P_k_COFR52wad0z36FCvOFC8kgyyakc-v0LXP35C3y1QpF5xxpTL1ZUc1wccY0FT3wW502FbAqinBKidYPSWY2U_PjqneYPuPfIksA2c7YLQOt287VRdXv3aWj49Apxc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2084620299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When should the driver with a history of substance misuse be allowed to return to the wheel? A review of the substance misuse section of the Australian national guidelines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ogden, Edward J. D ; Verster, Joris C. ; Hayley, Amie C. ; Downey, Luke A. ; Hocking, Bruce ; Stough, Con K. ; Scholey, Andrew B. ; Bonomo, Yvonne</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Edward J. D ; Verster, Joris C. ; Hayley, Amie C. ; Downey, Luke A. ; Hocking, Bruce ; Stough, Con K. ; Scholey, Andrew B. ; Bonomo, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><description>Assessing fitness to drive in applicants with a historical or current substance use disorder presents a specific clinical challenge. The Australian guidelines require evidence of remission and absence of cognitive change when considering applications for re‐licensing driver or individuals applying to reengage in safety‐sensitive work. This paper reviews some of the clinical and biochemical indicators that determine whether a particular person is in ‘remission’ and meets the criteria for return to driving or other safety‐sensitive occupation. It provides an overview of the challenges in establishing an evidence‐based approach to determining fitness for safety critical activities. There is no internationally accepted definition of ‘remission’. Review of the literature and examination of assessment protocols from other national jurisdictions are available for alcohol and the more important drugs of interest in road safety. Assessing fitness to drive when there is a history of substance misuse and/or substance use disorders is a complex issue that requires assessment of biomarkers, clinical findings and clinical assessment before the person returns to driving. We propose that hair testing provides a reliable and reproducible way to demonstrate remission and provide cost‐effective monitoring. Standardised psychological tests could provide a reproducible assessment of the cognitive effects of drug use and suitability to resume driving. We recommend that AustRoads amend the national guidelines to reflect an evidence‐based approach to assessing fitness to drive after conviction for offences related to alcohol and drug use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1444-0903</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-5994</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/imj.13975</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30133985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidents, Traffic - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Accidents, Traffic - prevention &amp; control ; Alcohol ; alcohol misuse ; Australia - epidemiology ; Automobile Driving - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Automobile Driving - standards ; Cognitive ability ; commercial drivers ; driver fitness ; Driving Under the Influence - prevention &amp; control ; drug misuse ; Drug use ; Fitness ; fitness to drive ; Guidelines as Topic - standards ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; medical guidelines ; medical standards ; Psychological assessment ; Remission ; Reviews ; Safety ; Substance Abuse Detection - standards ; Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Internal medicine journal, 2018-08, Vol.48 (8), p.908-915</ispartof><rights>2018 Royal Australasian College of Physicians</rights><rights>2018 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4145-56caf29a82ff3b064ee11f02f259b1b147b7284d1d53041b2e4e1231d38d82ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4145-56caf29a82ff3b064ee11f02f259b1b147b7284d1d53041b2e4e1231d38d82ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9914-3324</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fimj.13975$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fimj.13975$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30133985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Edward J. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verster, Joris C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayley, Amie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downey, Luke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hocking, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stough, Con K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholey, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><title>When should the driver with a history of substance misuse be allowed to return to the wheel? A review of the substance misuse section of the Australian national guidelines</title><title>Internal medicine journal</title><addtitle>Intern Med J</addtitle><description>Assessing fitness to drive in applicants with a historical or current substance use disorder presents a specific clinical challenge. The Australian guidelines require evidence of remission and absence of cognitive change when considering applications for re‐licensing driver or individuals applying to reengage in safety‐sensitive work. This paper reviews some of the clinical and biochemical indicators that determine whether a particular person is in ‘remission’ and meets the criteria for return to driving or other safety‐sensitive occupation. It provides an overview of the challenges in establishing an evidence‐based approach to determining fitness for safety critical activities. There is no internationally accepted definition of ‘remission’. Review of the literature and examination of assessment protocols from other national jurisdictions are available for alcohol and the more important drugs of interest in road safety. Assessing fitness to drive when there is a history of substance misuse and/or substance use disorders is a complex issue that requires assessment of biomarkers, clinical findings and clinical assessment before the person returns to driving. We propose that hair testing provides a reliable and reproducible way to demonstrate remission and provide cost‐effective monitoring. Standardised psychological tests could provide a reproducible assessment of the cognitive effects of drug use and suitability to resume driving. We recommend that AustRoads amend the national guidelines to reflect an evidence‐based approach to assessing fitness to drive after conviction for offences related to alcohol and drug use.</description><subject>Accidents, Traffic - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Accidents, Traffic - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>alcohol misuse</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Automobile Driving - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Automobile Driving - standards</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>commercial drivers</subject><subject>driver fitness</subject><subject>Driving Under the Influence - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>drug misuse</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>fitness to drive</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>medical guidelines</subject><subject>medical standards</subject><subject>Psychological assessment</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Substance Abuse Detection - standards</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</subject><issn>1444-0903</issn><issn>1445-5994</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQxi3UCuiWAy9QWeqFHhY8trMbn6oV6h8qEBcqjpGTjIlX3pjaMdE-U18Sh4UeqPDFo5nf92nsj5BjYKeQz5ndrE9BqGWxRw5BymJeKCXfPdVyzhQTB-RDjGvGYCmU3CcHgoEQqiwOyd_bDnsaO59cS4cOaRvsAwY62qGjmnY2Dj5sqTc0pjoOum-QbmxMEWmNVDvnR8xCTwMOKfRTNbmMHaL7Sle5_WBxnPRT-z-PiM1gff8yX6U4BO2s7mmvp4F29C7ZFp3tMX4k7412EY-e7xn5_f3bzfnP-eX1j4vz1eW8kTA9ftFow5UuuTGiZguJCGAYN7xQNdQgl_WSl7KFthBMQs1RInABrSjbkqMRM3Ky870P_k_COFR52wad0z36FCvOFC8kgyyakc-v0LXP35C3y1QpF5xxpTL1ZUc1wccY0FT3wW502FbAqinBKidYPSWY2U_PjqneYPuPfIksA2c7YLQOt287VRdXv3aWj49Apxc</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Ogden, Edward J. D</creator><creator>Verster, Joris C.</creator><creator>Hayley, Amie C.</creator><creator>Downey, Luke A.</creator><creator>Hocking, Bruce</creator><creator>Stough, Con K.</creator><creator>Scholey, Andrew B.</creator><creator>Bonomo, Yvonne</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-3324</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>When should the driver with a history of substance misuse be allowed to return to the wheel? A review of the substance misuse section of the Australian national guidelines</title><author>Ogden, Edward J. D ; Verster, Joris C. ; Hayley, Amie C. ; Downey, Luke A. ; Hocking, Bruce ; Stough, Con K. ; Scholey, Andrew B. ; Bonomo, Yvonne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4145-56caf29a82ff3b064ee11f02f259b1b147b7284d1d53041b2e4e1231d38d82ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Traffic - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Accidents, Traffic - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>alcohol misuse</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Automobile Driving - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Automobile Driving - standards</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>commercial drivers</topic><topic>driver fitness</topic><topic>Driving Under the Influence - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>drug misuse</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>fitness to drive</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>medical guidelines</topic><topic>medical standards</topic><topic>Psychological assessment</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Substance Abuse Detection - standards</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Edward J. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verster, Joris C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayley, Amie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downey, Luke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hocking, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stough, Con K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholey, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Internal medicine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogden, Edward J. D</au><au>Verster, Joris C.</au><au>Hayley, Amie C.</au><au>Downey, Luke A.</au><au>Hocking, Bruce</au><au>Stough, Con K.</au><au>Scholey, Andrew B.</au><au>Bonomo, Yvonne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When should the driver with a history of substance misuse be allowed to return to the wheel? A review of the substance misuse section of the Australian national guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Internal medicine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Intern Med J</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>908</spage><epage>915</epage><pages>908-915</pages><issn>1444-0903</issn><eissn>1445-5994</eissn><abstract>Assessing fitness to drive in applicants with a historical or current substance use disorder presents a specific clinical challenge. The Australian guidelines require evidence of remission and absence of cognitive change when considering applications for re‐licensing driver or individuals applying to reengage in safety‐sensitive work. This paper reviews some of the clinical and biochemical indicators that determine whether a particular person is in ‘remission’ and meets the criteria for return to driving or other safety‐sensitive occupation. It provides an overview of the challenges in establishing an evidence‐based approach to determining fitness for safety critical activities. There is no internationally accepted definition of ‘remission’. Review of the literature and examination of assessment protocols from other national jurisdictions are available for alcohol and the more important drugs of interest in road safety. Assessing fitness to drive when there is a history of substance misuse and/or substance use disorders is a complex issue that requires assessment of biomarkers, clinical findings and clinical assessment before the person returns to driving. We propose that hair testing provides a reliable and reproducible way to demonstrate remission and provide cost‐effective monitoring. Standardised psychological tests could provide a reproducible assessment of the cognitive effects of drug use and suitability to resume driving. We recommend that AustRoads amend the national guidelines to reflect an evidence‐based approach to assessing fitness to drive after conviction for offences related to alcohol and drug use.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>30133985</pmid><doi>10.1111/imj.13975</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-3324</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1444-0903
ispartof Internal medicine journal, 2018-08, Vol.48 (8), p.908-915
issn 1444-0903
1445-5994
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2092540112
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Accidents, Traffic - legislation & jurisprudence
Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control
Alcohol
alcohol misuse
Australia - epidemiology
Automobile Driving - legislation & jurisprudence
Automobile Driving - standards
Cognitive ability
commercial drivers
driver fitness
Driving Under the Influence - prevention & control
drug misuse
Drug use
Fitness
fitness to drive
Guidelines as Topic - standards
Humans
Literature reviews
medical guidelines
medical standards
Psychological assessment
Remission
Reviews
Safety
Substance Abuse Detection - standards
Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology
title When should the driver with a history of substance misuse be allowed to return to the wheel? A review of the substance misuse section of the Australian national guidelines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A22%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20should%20the%20driver%20with%20a%20history%20of%20substance%20misuse%20be%20allowed%20to%20return%20to%20the%20wheel?%20A%20review%20of%20the%20substance%20misuse%20section%20of%20the%20Australian%20national%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=Internal%20medicine%20journal&rft.au=Ogden,%20Edward%20J.%20D&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=908&rft.epage=915&rft.pages=908-915&rft.issn=1444-0903&rft.eissn=1445-5994&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/imj.13975&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2092540112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2084620299&rft_id=info:pmid/30133985&rfr_iscdi=true