Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels
The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the dif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie, 2018-08, Vol.50 (4), p.248-255 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | ger |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 255 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 248 |
container_title | Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Eisenhardt, Steffen U Momeni, Arash von Fritschen, Uwe Horch, Raymund E Stark, G Björn Bannasch, Holger Harder, Yves Heitmann, Christoph Kremer, Thomas Rieger, Ulrich M Kneser, Ulrich |
description | The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the differences between muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Hence, the question which approach should be considered standard of care remains unanswered. To address this question the current literature and published evidence was critically reviewed and discussed by an expert panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Micro surgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM). Based on this discussion a consensus statement was developed that incorporates contemporary data regarding postoperative complication rate, donor site morbidity, as well as expert opinion regarding technical details in autologous breast reconstruction with free TRAM and DIEP flaps. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/a-0631-9025 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2091823143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2091823143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p564-c1e00e269d610757322f5fe4682fd121580438b6fa8f26c8976ce9d7f60718d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9P1UAUxScmRhBZuTd36aY4f9rpdGXwCU8SUAIvsnwZ2ju8Stup90417PwOfic-iJ-E-oDVWZzfOSc5QrxV8kDJovjgM2mNyiqpixdiV-Wmykzl5I54zfxDSmlyq1-JHSOVkc7ku-L-E6HnBIR1HDjRVKc2DvC7TRtIG4RAiLC6ODyDSPD55OgcQudH-PfnL1xtfIKWt1g9EeGQgJMfGk_NR1jMdTjwxHCZfML-vxvDFl4i9X6AyxH9bTvcwFWkrS4pTiOEeeisrSnyRDdId8-pc6R23CD5Dr4i_UKGeQq-IzN2_Ea8DL5j3H_SPbE6PlotvmSn35Yni8PTbCxsntUKpURtq8YqWRal0ToUAXPrdGiUVoWTuXHXNngXtK1dVdoaq6YMVpbKNbnZE-8fa0eKPyfktO5brrHr_IBx4rWWlXLazL_P6LsndLrusVmP1Pae7tbP15sHb0iFzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2091823143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels</title><source>Thieme - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Eisenhardt, Steffen U ; Momeni, Arash ; von Fritschen, Uwe ; Horch, Raymund E ; Stark, G Björn ; Bannasch, Holger ; Harder, Yves ; Heitmann, Christoph ; Kremer, Thomas ; Rieger, Ulrich M ; Kneser, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisenhardt, Steffen U ; Momeni, Arash ; von Fritschen, Uwe ; Horch, Raymund E ; Stark, G Björn ; Bannasch, Holger ; Harder, Yves ; Heitmann, Christoph ; Kremer, Thomas ; Rieger, Ulrich M ; Kneser, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the differences between muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Hence, the question which approach should be considered standard of care remains unanswered. To address this question the current literature and published evidence was critically reviewed and discussed by an expert panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Micro surgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM). Based on this discussion a consensus statement was developed that incorporates contemporary data regarding postoperative complication rate, donor site morbidity, as well as expert opinion regarding technical details in autologous breast reconstruction with free TRAM and DIEP flaps.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1439-3980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/a-0631-9025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30130834</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Consensus ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty ; Microsurgery ; Perforator Flap ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectus Abdominis</subject><ispartof>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie, 2018-08, Vol.50 (4), p.248-255</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30130834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisenhardt, Steffen U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momeni, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Fritschen, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horch, Raymund E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, G Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bannasch, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harder, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitmann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Ulrich M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kneser, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels</title><title>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie</title><addtitle>Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir</addtitle><description>The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the differences between muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Hence, the question which approach should be considered standard of care remains unanswered. To address this question the current literature and published evidence was critically reviewed and discussed by an expert panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Micro surgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM). Based on this discussion a consensus statement was developed that incorporates contemporary data regarding postoperative complication rate, donor site morbidity, as well as expert opinion regarding technical details in autologous breast reconstruction with free TRAM and DIEP flaps.</description><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Perforator Flap</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Rectus Abdominis</subject><issn>1439-3980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE9P1UAUxScmRhBZuTd36aY4f9rpdGXwCU8SUAIvsnwZ2ju8Stup90417PwOfic-iJ-E-oDVWZzfOSc5QrxV8kDJovjgM2mNyiqpixdiV-Wmykzl5I54zfxDSmlyq1-JHSOVkc7ku-L-E6HnBIR1HDjRVKc2DvC7TRtIG4RAiLC6ODyDSPD55OgcQudH-PfnL1xtfIKWt1g9EeGQgJMfGk_NR1jMdTjwxHCZfML-vxvDFl4i9X6AyxH9bTvcwFWkrS4pTiOEeeisrSnyRDdId8-pc6R23CD5Dr4i_UKGeQq-IzN2_Ea8DL5j3H_SPbE6PlotvmSn35Yni8PTbCxsntUKpURtq8YqWRal0ToUAXPrdGiUVoWTuXHXNngXtK1dVdoaq6YMVpbKNbnZE-8fa0eKPyfktO5brrHr_IBx4rWWlXLazL_P6LsndLrusVmP1Pae7tbP15sHb0iFzQ</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Eisenhardt, Steffen U</creator><creator>Momeni, Arash</creator><creator>von Fritschen, Uwe</creator><creator>Horch, Raymund E</creator><creator>Stark, G Björn</creator><creator>Bannasch, Holger</creator><creator>Harder, Yves</creator><creator>Heitmann, Christoph</creator><creator>Kremer, Thomas</creator><creator>Rieger, Ulrich M</creator><creator>Kneser, Ulrich</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels</title><author>Eisenhardt, Steffen U ; Momeni, Arash ; von Fritschen, Uwe ; Horch, Raymund E ; Stark, G Björn ; Bannasch, Holger ; Harder, Yves ; Heitmann, Christoph ; Kremer, Thomas ; Rieger, Ulrich M ; Kneser, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p564-c1e00e269d610757322f5fe4682fd121580438b6fa8f26c8976ce9d7f60718d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Perforator Flap</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Rectus Abdominis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisenhardt, Steffen U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momeni, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Fritschen, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horch, Raymund E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, G Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bannasch, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harder, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitmann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Ulrich M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kneser, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisenhardt, Steffen U</au><au>Momeni, Arash</au><au>von Fritschen, Uwe</au><au>Horch, Raymund E</au><au>Stark, G Björn</au><au>Bannasch, Holger</au><au>Harder, Yves</au><au>Heitmann, Christoph</au><au>Kremer, Thomas</au><au>Rieger, Ulrich M</au><au>Kneser, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels</atitle><jtitle>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie</jtitle><addtitle>Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>255</epage><pages>248-255</pages><eissn>1439-3980</eissn><abstract>The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the differences between muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Hence, the question which approach should be considered standard of care remains unanswered. To address this question the current literature and published evidence was critically reviewed and discussed by an expert panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Micro surgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM). Based on this discussion a consensus statement was developed that incorporates contemporary data regarding postoperative complication rate, donor site morbidity, as well as expert opinion regarding technical details in autologous breast reconstruction with free TRAM and DIEP flaps.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>30130834</pmid><doi>10.1055/a-0631-9025</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1439-3980 |
ispartof | Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie, 2018-08, Vol.50 (4), p.248-255 |
issn | 1439-3980 |
language | ger |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2091823143 |
source | Thieme - Connect here FIRST to enable access; MEDLINE |
subjects | Consensus Female Humans Mammaplasty Microsurgery Perforator Flap Postoperative Complications Rectus Abdominis |
title | Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A06%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20reconstruction%20with%20the%20free%20TRAM%20or%20DIEP%20flap%20%E2%80%93%20What%20is%20the%20current%20standard?%20Consensus%20Statement%20of%20the%20German%20Speaking%20Working%20Group%20for%20Microsurgery%20of%20the%20Peripheral%20Nerves%20and%20Vessels&rft.jtitle=Handchirurgie,%20Mikrochirurgie,%20plastische%20Chirurgie&rft.au=Eisenhardt,%20Steffen%20U&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=255&rft.pages=248-255&rft.eissn=1439-3980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/a-0631-9025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2091823143%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2091823143&rft_id=info:pmid/30130834&rfr_iscdi=true |