Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels

The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the dif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie, 2018-08, Vol.50 (4), p.248-255
Hauptverfasser: Eisenhardt, Steffen U, Momeni, Arash, von Fritschen, Uwe, Horch, Raymund E, Stark, G Björn, Bannasch, Holger, Harder, Yves, Heitmann, Christoph, Kremer, Thomas, Rieger, Ulrich M, Kneser, Ulrich
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ger
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 255
container_issue 4
container_start_page 248
container_title Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie
container_volume 50
creator Eisenhardt, Steffen U
Momeni, Arash
von Fritschen, Uwe
Horch, Raymund E
Stark, G Björn
Bannasch, Holger
Harder, Yves
Heitmann, Christoph
Kremer, Thomas
Rieger, Ulrich M
Kneser, Ulrich
description The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the differences between muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Hence, the question which approach should be considered standard of care remains unanswered. To address this question the current literature and published evidence was critically reviewed and discussed by an expert panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Micro surgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM). Based on this discussion a consensus statement was developed that incorporates contemporary data regarding postoperative complication rate, donor site morbidity, as well as expert opinion regarding technical details in autologous breast reconstruction with free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/a-0631-9025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2091823143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2091823143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p564-c1e00e269d610757322f5fe4682fd121580438b6fa8f26c8976ce9d7f60718d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9P1UAUxScmRhBZuTd36aY4f9rpdGXwCU8SUAIvsnwZ2ju8Stup90417PwOfic-iJ-E-oDVWZzfOSc5QrxV8kDJovjgM2mNyiqpixdiV-Wmykzl5I54zfxDSmlyq1-JHSOVkc7ku-L-E6HnBIR1HDjRVKc2DvC7TRtIG4RAiLC6ODyDSPD55OgcQudH-PfnL1xtfIKWt1g9EeGQgJMfGk_NR1jMdTjwxHCZfML-vxvDFl4i9X6AyxH9bTvcwFWkrS4pTiOEeeisrSnyRDdId8-pc6R23CD5Dr4i_UKGeQq-IzN2_Ea8DL5j3H_SPbE6PlotvmSn35Yni8PTbCxsntUKpURtq8YqWRal0ToUAXPrdGiUVoWTuXHXNngXtK1dVdoaq6YMVpbKNbnZE-8fa0eKPyfktO5brrHr_IBx4rWWlXLazL_P6LsndLrusVmP1Pae7tbP15sHb0iFzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2091823143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels</title><source>Thieme - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Eisenhardt, Steffen U ; Momeni, Arash ; von Fritschen, Uwe ; Horch, Raymund E ; Stark, G Björn ; Bannasch, Holger ; Harder, Yves ; Heitmann, Christoph ; Kremer, Thomas ; Rieger, Ulrich M ; Kneser, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisenhardt, Steffen U ; Momeni, Arash ; von Fritschen, Uwe ; Horch, Raymund E ; Stark, G Björn ; Bannasch, Holger ; Harder, Yves ; Heitmann, Christoph ; Kremer, Thomas ; Rieger, Ulrich M ; Kneser, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the differences between muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Hence, the question which approach should be considered standard of care remains unanswered. To address this question the current literature and published evidence was critically reviewed and discussed by an expert panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Micro surgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM). Based on this discussion a consensus statement was developed that incorporates contemporary data regarding postoperative complication rate, donor site morbidity, as well as expert opinion regarding technical details in autologous breast reconstruction with free TRAM and DIEP flaps.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1439-3980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/a-0631-9025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30130834</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Consensus ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty ; Microsurgery ; Perforator Flap ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectus Abdominis</subject><ispartof>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie, 2018-08, Vol.50 (4), p.248-255</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30130834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisenhardt, Steffen U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momeni, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Fritschen, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horch, Raymund E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, G Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bannasch, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harder, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitmann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Ulrich M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kneser, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels</title><title>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie</title><addtitle>Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir</addtitle><description>The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the differences between muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Hence, the question which approach should be considered standard of care remains unanswered. To address this question the current literature and published evidence was critically reviewed and discussed by an expert panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Micro surgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM). Based on this discussion a consensus statement was developed that incorporates contemporary data regarding postoperative complication rate, donor site morbidity, as well as expert opinion regarding technical details in autologous breast reconstruction with free TRAM and DIEP flaps.</description><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Perforator Flap</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Rectus Abdominis</subject><issn>1439-3980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE9P1UAUxScmRhBZuTd36aY4f9rpdGXwCU8SUAIvsnwZ2ju8Stup90417PwOfic-iJ-E-oDVWZzfOSc5QrxV8kDJovjgM2mNyiqpixdiV-Wmykzl5I54zfxDSmlyq1-JHSOVkc7ku-L-E6HnBIR1HDjRVKc2DvC7TRtIG4RAiLC6ODyDSPD55OgcQudH-PfnL1xtfIKWt1g9EeGQgJMfGk_NR1jMdTjwxHCZfML-vxvDFl4i9X6AyxH9bTvcwFWkrS4pTiOEeeisrSnyRDdId8-pc6R23CD5Dr4i_UKGeQq-IzN2_Ea8DL5j3H_SPbE6PlotvmSn35Yni8PTbCxsntUKpURtq8YqWRal0ToUAXPrdGiUVoWTuXHXNngXtK1dVdoaq6YMVpbKNbnZE-8fa0eKPyfktO5brrHr_IBx4rWWlXLazL_P6LsndLrusVmP1Pae7tbP15sHb0iFzQ</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Eisenhardt, Steffen U</creator><creator>Momeni, Arash</creator><creator>von Fritschen, Uwe</creator><creator>Horch, Raymund E</creator><creator>Stark, G Björn</creator><creator>Bannasch, Holger</creator><creator>Harder, Yves</creator><creator>Heitmann, Christoph</creator><creator>Kremer, Thomas</creator><creator>Rieger, Ulrich M</creator><creator>Kneser, Ulrich</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels</title><author>Eisenhardt, Steffen U ; Momeni, Arash ; von Fritschen, Uwe ; Horch, Raymund E ; Stark, G Björn ; Bannasch, Holger ; Harder, Yves ; Heitmann, Christoph ; Kremer, Thomas ; Rieger, Ulrich M ; Kneser, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p564-c1e00e269d610757322f5fe4682fd121580438b6fa8f26c8976ce9d7f60718d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Perforator Flap</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Rectus Abdominis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisenhardt, Steffen U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momeni, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Fritschen, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horch, Raymund E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, G Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bannasch, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harder, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitmann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Ulrich M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kneser, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisenhardt, Steffen U</au><au>Momeni, Arash</au><au>von Fritschen, Uwe</au><au>Horch, Raymund E</au><au>Stark, G Björn</au><au>Bannasch, Holger</au><au>Harder, Yves</au><au>Heitmann, Christoph</au><au>Kremer, Thomas</au><au>Rieger, Ulrich M</au><au>Kneser, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels</atitle><jtitle>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie</jtitle><addtitle>Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>255</epage><pages>248-255</pages><eissn>1439-3980</eissn><abstract>The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the differences between muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Hence, the question which approach should be considered standard of care remains unanswered. To address this question the current literature and published evidence was critically reviewed and discussed by an expert panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Micro surgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM). Based on this discussion a consensus statement was developed that incorporates contemporary data regarding postoperative complication rate, donor site morbidity, as well as expert opinion regarding technical details in autologous breast reconstruction with free TRAM and DIEP flaps.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>30130834</pmid><doi>10.1055/a-0631-9025</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1439-3980
ispartof Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie, 2018-08, Vol.50 (4), p.248-255
issn 1439-3980
language ger
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2091823143
source Thieme - Connect here FIRST to enable access; MEDLINE
subjects Consensus
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty
Microsurgery
Perforator Flap
Postoperative Complications
Rectus Abdominis
title Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A06%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20reconstruction%20with%20the%20free%20TRAM%20or%20DIEP%20flap%20%E2%80%93%20What%20is%20the%20current%20standard?%20Consensus%20Statement%20of%20the%20German%20Speaking%20Working%20Group%20for%20Microsurgery%20of%20the%20Peripheral%20Nerves%20and%20Vessels&rft.jtitle=Handchirurgie,%20Mikrochirurgie,%20plastische%20Chirurgie&rft.au=Eisenhardt,%20Steffen%20U&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=255&rft.pages=248-255&rft.eissn=1439-3980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/a-0631-9025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2091823143%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2091823143&rft_id=info:pmid/30130834&rfr_iscdi=true