Effect of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on CT Image Quality Using Metal Artifact Reduction

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) on the computed tomography (CT) image quality by using single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR). Materials & Methods: A water phantom (22 cmφ) with the stem for total hip arthroplasty made of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 2018, Vol.74(8), pp.797-804
Hauptverfasser: Hoyoshi, Kazutaka, Satou, Toshimitsu, Okada, Akio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) on the computed tomography (CT) image quality by using single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR). Materials & Methods: A water phantom (22 cmφ) with the stem for total hip arthroplasty made of titanium was scanned. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) was set to 8.9 and 5.0 mGy. The reconstruction was performed using filtered back projection and AIDR 3D by soft kernel (FC13) and SEMAR. The averaged profile method was used for the quantitative evaluation of artifacts. We placed a rectangular region-of-interest on the artifact part, and obtained the x-direction averaged profile (Profile A). Profile B was obtained using a water phantom without metal. Profiles A and B were normalized as Profiles A′ and B′ using the mean value calculated from Profile B. Based on the standard deviation (SD) calculated from Profile B′, the background variation level was defined as ±2SD, and subtracted from Profile A′ (Profile A″). Finally, the area of Profile A″ was calculated and defined as Artifacttotal. Artifactover, and Artifactunder, respectively, the positive- and negative-side components of Artifacttotal. Results: Both Artifacttotal and Artifactunder increased according to the strength of AIDR 3D. The variations of Artifactover and Artifactunder, due to the AIDR 3D strength, were small and large, respectively. Further, in comparison with a high dose, the effect of artifact emphasis increased at low dose. Therefore, it should be noted that stronger AIDR 3D can emphasize the residual metal artifact.
ISSN:0369-4305
1881-4883
DOI:10.6009/jjrt.2018_JSRT_74.8.797