Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomies: Ready for Widespread Adoption?

OBJECTIVE:In order to minimize the impact of donation, fully laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) is being investigated at a few centers throughout the world. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomies. BACKGROUND:Adoption of minimal access techniques to livin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2018-10, Vol.268 (4), p.602-609
Hauptverfasser: Samstein, Benjamin, Griesemer, Adam, Halazun, Karim, Kato, Tomoaki, Guarrera, James V, Cherqui, Daniel, Emond, Jean C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 609
container_issue 4
container_start_page 602
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 268
creator Samstein, Benjamin
Griesemer, Adam
Halazun, Karim
Kato, Tomoaki
Guarrera, James V
Cherqui, Daniel
Emond, Jean C
description OBJECTIVE:In order to minimize the impact of donation, fully laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) is being investigated at a few centers throughout the world. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomies. BACKGROUND:Adoption of minimal access techniques to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been slowed by concerns about donor safety and the quality of the grafts. METHODS:Of 344 donor hepatectomies (DHs) for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) since 1998, 51 pure LDH have been performed since 2009. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH), based on prospectively collected data. There were 31 left lateral sectionectomy and 20 full lobectomies LH. We matched full lobe LH to open DH prior to introduction of LH. RESULTS:LH increased from 21% of all DH in first 5 years of performing LH to 45% of DH in the most recent 3 years. Laparoscopic donors were more likely female, had lower body mass index, smaller total livers, and smaller allografts but longer operating room times. In the total LD experience, total 5 donors were converted to open surgery (10%), 2 donors required transfusion (4%), and there was 2 donor bile leaks (4%). Recipient patient and graft 1-year survival was 98% and 94%. CONCLUSIONS:Our experience indicates that LDH for LDLT can be safely used with appropriate attention to learning curve and progression from left lateral sectionectomy to right hepatectomy.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002959
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2088289910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2088289910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3059-d1dcc66d729521a8d9af1d6ea25c4ad8e16e313022e70d0203c7a0229883d7003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRCIlsIfIJQjlxQvWWwuqCqFIkUCsYijZeyJGkjqYCeq-ve4akGIA3MZvZn3ZnkInRI8JljkF0_FZIx_BRWp2ENDklIeE5LgfTQMVRYngtEBOvL-HWOScJwfogHDBNOMJUM0e-gdRIVqlbNe27bS0bVdWhfNoVUd6M42FfjL6BGUWUdlaLxWBnzrAo4mxrZdZZdXx-igVLWHk10eoZeb2fN0Hhf3t3fTSRFrhlMRG2K0zjKTh1spUdwIVRKTgaKpTpThQDJghGFKIccGU8x0rgISnDOTh2dG6Hw7t3X2swffyabyGupaLcH2XlLMOeVCkA012VJ1eMw7KGXrqka5tSRYbgyUwUD518AgO9tt6N8aMD-ib8cCgW8JK1t34PxH3a_AyQWoulv8P_sLd-x68g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2088289910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomies: Ready for Widespread Adoption?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Samstein, Benjamin ; Griesemer, Adam ; Halazun, Karim ; Kato, Tomoaki ; Guarrera, James V ; Cherqui, Daniel ; Emond, Jean C</creator><creatorcontrib>Samstein, Benjamin ; Griesemer, Adam ; Halazun, Karim ; Kato, Tomoaki ; Guarrera, James V ; Cherqui, Daniel ; Emond, Jean C</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:In order to minimize the impact of donation, fully laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) is being investigated at a few centers throughout the world. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomies. BACKGROUND:Adoption of minimal access techniques to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been slowed by concerns about donor safety and the quality of the grafts. METHODS:Of 344 donor hepatectomies (DHs) for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) since 1998, 51 pure LDH have been performed since 2009. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH), based on prospectively collected data. There were 31 left lateral sectionectomy and 20 full lobectomies LH. We matched full lobe LH to open DH prior to introduction of LH. RESULTS:LH increased from 21% of all DH in first 5 years of performing LH to 45% of DH in the most recent 3 years. Laparoscopic donors were more likely female, had lower body mass index, smaller total livers, and smaller allografts but longer operating room times. In the total LD experience, total 5 donors were converted to open surgery (10%), 2 donors required transfusion (4%), and there was 2 donor bile leaks (4%). Recipient patient and graft 1-year survival was 98% and 94%. CONCLUSIONS:Our experience indicates that LDH for LDLT can be safely used with appropriate attention to learning curve and progression from left lateral sectionectomy to right hepatectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002959</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30102634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Graft Survival ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Liver Transplantation ; Living Donors ; Male ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2018-10, Vol.268 (4), p.602-609</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3059-d1dcc66d729521a8d9af1d6ea25c4ad8e16e313022e70d0203c7a0229883d7003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30102634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samstein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesemer, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halazun, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Tomoaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarrera, James V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherqui, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emond, Jean C</creatorcontrib><title>Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomies: Ready for Widespread Adoption?</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:In order to minimize the impact of donation, fully laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) is being investigated at a few centers throughout the world. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomies. BACKGROUND:Adoption of minimal access techniques to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been slowed by concerns about donor safety and the quality of the grafts. METHODS:Of 344 donor hepatectomies (DHs) for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) since 1998, 51 pure LDH have been performed since 2009. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH), based on prospectively collected data. There were 31 left lateral sectionectomy and 20 full lobectomies LH. We matched full lobe LH to open DH prior to introduction of LH. RESULTS:LH increased from 21% of all DH in first 5 years of performing LH to 45% of DH in the most recent 3 years. Laparoscopic donors were more likely female, had lower body mass index, smaller total livers, and smaller allografts but longer operating room times. In the total LD experience, total 5 donors were converted to open surgery (10%), 2 donors required transfusion (4%), and there was 2 donor bile leaks (4%). Recipient patient and graft 1-year survival was 98% and 94%. CONCLUSIONS:Our experience indicates that LDH for LDLT can be safely used with appropriate attention to learning curve and progression from left lateral sectionectomy to right hepatectomy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation</subject><subject>Living Donors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRCIlsIfIJQjlxQvWWwuqCqFIkUCsYijZeyJGkjqYCeq-ve4akGIA3MZvZn3ZnkInRI8JljkF0_FZIx_BRWp2ENDklIeE5LgfTQMVRYngtEBOvL-HWOScJwfogHDBNOMJUM0e-gdRIVqlbNe27bS0bVdWhfNoVUd6M42FfjL6BGUWUdlaLxWBnzrAo4mxrZdZZdXx-igVLWHk10eoZeb2fN0Hhf3t3fTSRFrhlMRG2K0zjKTh1spUdwIVRKTgaKpTpThQDJghGFKIccGU8x0rgISnDOTh2dG6Hw7t3X2swffyabyGupaLcH2XlLMOeVCkA012VJ1eMw7KGXrqka5tSRYbgyUwUD518AgO9tt6N8aMD-ib8cCgW8JK1t34PxH3a_AyQWoulv8P_sLd-x68g</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Samstein, Benjamin</creator><creator>Griesemer, Adam</creator><creator>Halazun, Karim</creator><creator>Kato, Tomoaki</creator><creator>Guarrera, James V</creator><creator>Cherqui, Daniel</creator><creator>Emond, Jean C</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomies: Ready for Widespread Adoption?</title><author>Samstein, Benjamin ; Griesemer, Adam ; Halazun, Karim ; Kato, Tomoaki ; Guarrera, James V ; Cherqui, Daniel ; Emond, Jean C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3059-d1dcc66d729521a8d9af1d6ea25c4ad8e16e313022e70d0203c7a0229883d7003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation</topic><topic>Living Donors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samstein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesemer, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halazun, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Tomoaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarrera, James V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherqui, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emond, Jean C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samstein, Benjamin</au><au>Griesemer, Adam</au><au>Halazun, Karim</au><au>Kato, Tomoaki</au><au>Guarrera, James V</au><au>Cherqui, Daniel</au><au>Emond, Jean C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomies: Ready for Widespread Adoption?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>268</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>602</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>602-609</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:In order to minimize the impact of donation, fully laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) is being investigated at a few centers throughout the world. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomies. BACKGROUND:Adoption of minimal access techniques to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been slowed by concerns about donor safety and the quality of the grafts. METHODS:Of 344 donor hepatectomies (DHs) for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) since 1998, 51 pure LDH have been performed since 2009. We report here our experience with 51 living donor pure laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH), based on prospectively collected data. There were 31 left lateral sectionectomy and 20 full lobectomies LH. We matched full lobe LH to open DH prior to introduction of LH. RESULTS:LH increased from 21% of all DH in first 5 years of performing LH to 45% of DH in the most recent 3 years. Laparoscopic donors were more likely female, had lower body mass index, smaller total livers, and smaller allografts but longer operating room times. In the total LD experience, total 5 donors were converted to open surgery (10%), 2 donors required transfusion (4%), and there was 2 donor bile leaks (4%). Recipient patient and graft 1-year survival was 98% and 94%. CONCLUSIONS:Our experience indicates that LDH for LDLT can be safely used with appropriate attention to learning curve and progression from left lateral sectionectomy to right hepatectomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>30102634</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0000000000002959</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2018-10, Vol.268 (4), p.602-609
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2088289910
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Female
Graft Survival
Hepatectomy - methods
Humans
Laparoscopy - methods
Liver Transplantation
Living Donors
Male
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Survival Rate
title Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomies: Ready for Widespread Adoption?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A17%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pure%20Laparoscopic%20Donor%20Hepatectomies:%20Ready%20for%20Widespread%20Adoption?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Samstein,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=268&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=602&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=602-609&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002959&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2088289910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2088289910&rft_id=info:pmid/30102634&rfr_iscdi=true