The shape and mobility of the thoracic spine in asymptomatic adults – A systematic review of in vivo studies
A comprehensive knowledge of the thoracic shape and kinematics is essential for effective risk prevention, diagnose and proper management of thoracic disorders and assessment of treatment or rehabilitation strategies as well as for in silico and in vitro models for realistic applications of boundary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2018-09, Vol.78, p.21-35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 35 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Pan, Fumin Firouzabadi, Ali Reitmaier, Sandra Zander, Thomas Schmidt, Hendrik |
description | A comprehensive knowledge of the thoracic shape and kinematics is essential for effective risk prevention, diagnose and proper management of thoracic disorders and assessment of treatment or rehabilitation strategies as well as for in silico and in vitro models for realistic applications of boundary conditions.
After an extensive search of the existing literature, this study summarizes 45 studies on in vivo thoracic kyphosis and kinematics and creates a systematic and detailed database. The thoracic kyphosis over T1–12 determined using non-radiological devices (34°) was relatively less than measured using radiological devices (40°) during standing. The majority of kinematical measurements are based on non-radiological devices. The thoracic range of motion (RoM) was greatest during axial rotation (40°), followed by lateral bending (26°), and flexion (21°) when determined using non-radiological devices during standing. The smallest RoM was identified during extension (13°). The lower thoracic level (T8–12) contributed more to the RoM than the upper (T1–4) and middle (T4–8) levels during flexion and lateral bending. During axial rotation and extension, the middle level (T4–8) contributed the most. Coupled motion was evident, mostly during lateral bending and axial rotation. With aging, the thoracic kyphosis increased by about 3° per decade, whereas the RoM decreased by about 5° per decade for all load directions. These changes with aging mainly occurred in the lower region (T6–12). The influence of sex on thoracic kyphosis and the RoM has been described as partly contradictory. Obesity was found to decrease the thoracic RoM. Studies comparing standing, sitting and lying reported the effect of posture as significant. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.041 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2087995009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002192901830647X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2087995009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-aade11afa57615316858629dbbe3b20faecbb5661ea84596316a1b4169307a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQhkVpaDZJXyEIeunF7shay9atITRtIdDL3oUkj1kZ23Ilecve-g59wzxJtGzSQy89Dcx8_z_D_ITcMigZMPFpKAfj_IR2X1bA2hKaErbsDdmwtuFFxVt4SzYAFStkJeGSXMU4AECzbeQ7csmBnWZyQ-bdHmnc6wWpnjs6eeNGl47U9zTlSdr7oK2zNC5uRupmquNxWpKfdMpd3a1jivTp9x96R-MxJjz3Ax4c_jqZZMXBHTyNae0cxhty0esx4vuXek12D19299-Kxx9fv9_fPRa2ZpAKrTtkTPe6bgSrORNt3YpKdsYgNxX0Gq0xtRAMdbutpciEZmbLhOTQaMavycez7RL8zxVjUpOLFsdRz-jXqCpoGylrAJnRD_-gg1_DnI_LlJRcthzqTIkzZYOPMWCvluAmHY6KgToFogb1Gog6BaKgUTmQLLx9sV_NhN1f2WsCGfh8BjC_I38tqGgdzhY7F9Am1Xn3vx3PzwugUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2099398305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The shape and mobility of the thoracic spine in asymptomatic adults – A systematic review of in vivo studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Pan, Fumin ; Firouzabadi, Ali ; Reitmaier, Sandra ; Zander, Thomas ; Schmidt, Hendrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Pan, Fumin ; Firouzabadi, Ali ; Reitmaier, Sandra ; Zander, Thomas ; Schmidt, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><description>A comprehensive knowledge of the thoracic shape and kinematics is essential for effective risk prevention, diagnose and proper management of thoracic disorders and assessment of treatment or rehabilitation strategies as well as for in silico and in vitro models for realistic applications of boundary conditions.
After an extensive search of the existing literature, this study summarizes 45 studies on in vivo thoracic kyphosis and kinematics and creates a systematic and detailed database. The thoracic kyphosis over T1–12 determined using non-radiological devices (34°) was relatively less than measured using radiological devices (40°) during standing. The majority of kinematical measurements are based on non-radiological devices. The thoracic range of motion (RoM) was greatest during axial rotation (40°), followed by lateral bending (26°), and flexion (21°) when determined using non-radiological devices during standing. The smallest RoM was identified during extension (13°). The lower thoracic level (T8–12) contributed more to the RoM than the upper (T1–4) and middle (T4–8) levels during flexion and lateral bending. During axial rotation and extension, the middle level (T4–8) contributed the most. Coupled motion was evident, mostly during lateral bending and axial rotation. With aging, the thoracic kyphosis increased by about 3° per decade, whereas the RoM decreased by about 5° per decade for all load directions. These changes with aging mainly occurred in the lower region (T6–12). The influence of sex on thoracic kyphosis and the RoM has been described as partly contradictory. Obesity was found to decrease the thoracic RoM. Studies comparing standing, sitting and lying reported the effect of posture as significant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30100219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Aging ; Asymptomatic Diseases ; Bending machines ; Bias ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Devices ; Humans ; In vivo ; In vivo methods and tests ; Kinematics ; Kyphosis ; Kyphosis - pathology ; Kyphosis - physiopathology ; Movement ; Older people ; Posture ; Range of motion ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Rehabilitation ; Review ; Rotation ; Spine (thoracic) ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Thoracic spine ; Thoracic Vertebrae - pathology ; Thoracic Vertebrae - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2018-09, Vol.78, p.21-35</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 10, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-aade11afa57615316858629dbbe3b20faecbb5661ea84596316a1b4169307a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-aade11afa57615316858629dbbe3b20faecbb5661ea84596316a1b4169307a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2099398305?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30100219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pan, Fumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firouzabadi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitmaier, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><title>The shape and mobility of the thoracic spine in asymptomatic adults – A systematic review of in vivo studies</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>A comprehensive knowledge of the thoracic shape and kinematics is essential for effective risk prevention, diagnose and proper management of thoracic disorders and assessment of treatment or rehabilitation strategies as well as for in silico and in vitro models for realistic applications of boundary conditions.
After an extensive search of the existing literature, this study summarizes 45 studies on in vivo thoracic kyphosis and kinematics and creates a systematic and detailed database. The thoracic kyphosis over T1–12 determined using non-radiological devices (34°) was relatively less than measured using radiological devices (40°) during standing. The majority of kinematical measurements are based on non-radiological devices. The thoracic range of motion (RoM) was greatest during axial rotation (40°), followed by lateral bending (26°), and flexion (21°) when determined using non-radiological devices during standing. The smallest RoM was identified during extension (13°). The lower thoracic level (T8–12) contributed more to the RoM than the upper (T1–4) and middle (T4–8) levels during flexion and lateral bending. During axial rotation and extension, the middle level (T4–8) contributed the most. Coupled motion was evident, mostly during lateral bending and axial rotation. With aging, the thoracic kyphosis increased by about 3° per decade, whereas the RoM decreased by about 5° per decade for all load directions. These changes with aging mainly occurred in the lower region (T6–12). The influence of sex on thoracic kyphosis and the RoM has been described as partly contradictory. Obesity was found to decrease the thoracic RoM. Studies comparing standing, sitting and lying reported the effect of posture as significant.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Asymptomatic Diseases</subject><subject>Bending machines</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In vivo</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Kyphosis</subject><subject>Kyphosis - pathology</subject><subject>Kyphosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Spine (thoracic)</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Thoracic spine</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - pathology</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - physiopathology</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQhkVpaDZJXyEIeunF7shay9atITRtIdDL3oUkj1kZ23Ilecve-g59wzxJtGzSQy89Dcx8_z_D_ITcMigZMPFpKAfj_IR2X1bA2hKaErbsDdmwtuFFxVt4SzYAFStkJeGSXMU4AECzbeQ7csmBnWZyQ-bdHmnc6wWpnjs6eeNGl47U9zTlSdr7oK2zNC5uRupmquNxWpKfdMpd3a1jivTp9x96R-MxJjz3Ax4c_jqZZMXBHTyNae0cxhty0esx4vuXek12D19299-Kxx9fv9_fPRa2ZpAKrTtkTPe6bgSrORNt3YpKdsYgNxX0Gq0xtRAMdbutpciEZmbLhOTQaMavycez7RL8zxVjUpOLFsdRz-jXqCpoGylrAJnRD_-gg1_DnI_LlJRcthzqTIkzZYOPMWCvluAmHY6KgToFogb1Gog6BaKgUTmQLLx9sV_NhN1f2WsCGfh8BjC_I38tqGgdzhY7F9Am1Xn3vx3PzwugUw</recordid><startdate>20180910</startdate><enddate>20180910</enddate><creator>Pan, Fumin</creator><creator>Firouzabadi, Ali</creator><creator>Reitmaier, Sandra</creator><creator>Zander, Thomas</creator><creator>Schmidt, Hendrik</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180910</creationdate><title>The shape and mobility of the thoracic spine in asymptomatic adults – A systematic review of in vivo studies</title><author>Pan, Fumin ; Firouzabadi, Ali ; Reitmaier, Sandra ; Zander, Thomas ; Schmidt, Hendrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-aade11afa57615316858629dbbe3b20faecbb5661ea84596316a1b4169307a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Asymptomatic Diseases</topic><topic>Bending machines</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In vivo</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Kyphosis</topic><topic>Kyphosis - pathology</topic><topic>Kyphosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Spine (thoracic)</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Thoracic spine</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - pathology</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pan, Fumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firouzabadi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitmaier, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pan, Fumin</au><au>Firouzabadi, Ali</au><au>Reitmaier, Sandra</au><au>Zander, Thomas</au><au>Schmidt, Hendrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The shape and mobility of the thoracic spine in asymptomatic adults – A systematic review of in vivo studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2018-09-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>78</volume><spage>21</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>21-35</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>A comprehensive knowledge of the thoracic shape and kinematics is essential for effective risk prevention, diagnose and proper management of thoracic disorders and assessment of treatment or rehabilitation strategies as well as for in silico and in vitro models for realistic applications of boundary conditions.
After an extensive search of the existing literature, this study summarizes 45 studies on in vivo thoracic kyphosis and kinematics and creates a systematic and detailed database. The thoracic kyphosis over T1–12 determined using non-radiological devices (34°) was relatively less than measured using radiological devices (40°) during standing. The majority of kinematical measurements are based on non-radiological devices. The thoracic range of motion (RoM) was greatest during axial rotation (40°), followed by lateral bending (26°), and flexion (21°) when determined using non-radiological devices during standing. The smallest RoM was identified during extension (13°). The lower thoracic level (T8–12) contributed more to the RoM than the upper (T1–4) and middle (T4–8) levels during flexion and lateral bending. During axial rotation and extension, the middle level (T4–8) contributed the most. Coupled motion was evident, mostly during lateral bending and axial rotation. With aging, the thoracic kyphosis increased by about 3° per decade, whereas the RoM decreased by about 5° per decade for all load directions. These changes with aging mainly occurred in the lower region (T6–12). The influence of sex on thoracic kyphosis and the RoM has been described as partly contradictory. Obesity was found to decrease the thoracic RoM. Studies comparing standing, sitting and lying reported the effect of posture as significant.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30100219</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.041</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2018-09, Vol.78, p.21-35 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2087995009 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adult Adults Aging Asymptomatic Diseases Bending machines Bias Biomechanical Phenomena Devices Humans In vivo In vivo methods and tests Kinematics Kyphosis Kyphosis - pathology Kyphosis - physiopathology Movement Older people Posture Range of motion Range of Motion, Articular Rehabilitation Review Rotation Spine (thoracic) Studies Systematic review Thoracic spine Thoracic Vertebrae - pathology Thoracic Vertebrae - physiopathology |
title | The shape and mobility of the thoracic spine in asymptomatic adults – A systematic review of in vivo studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A45%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20shape%20and%20mobility%20of%20the%20thoracic%20spine%20in%20asymptomatic%20adults%20%E2%80%93%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20in%20vivo%20studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Pan,%20Fumin&rft.date=2018-09-10&rft.volume=78&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=21-35&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2087995009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2099398305&rft_id=info:pmid/30100219&rft_els_id=S002192901830647X&rfr_iscdi=true |