Separate and combined effects of scopolamine and nicotine on retrieval-induced forgetting
Proficiency of information processing is likely to derive from a combination of effective processing of relevant information and efficient inhibition of unwanted or irrelevant material. Compromised inhibitory processes have been associated with the memory deficits in dementia and the elderly. These...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychopharmacologia 2003-12, Vol.170 (4), p.351-357 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 357 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 351 |
container_title | Psychopharmacologia |
container_volume | 170 |
creator | EDGINTON, Trudi RUSTED, Jennifer M |
description | Proficiency of information processing is likely to derive from a combination of effective processing of relevant information and efficient inhibition of unwanted or irrelevant material. Compromised inhibitory processes have been associated with the memory deficits in dementia and the elderly. These deficits in inhibition could be directly related to the reduced cholinergic function evident in dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). Scopolamine, a cholinergic antagonist, has been associated with disinhibition. Nicotine, a cholinergic agonist, has been associated with enhanced focus and reduced intrusions in both healthy adults and people with dementia.
This study examines the separate and combined effects of nicotine and scopolamine on inhibitory processes using retrieval induced forgetting (RIF).
In two studies, minimally deprived smokers received either nicotine or no nicotine, in the second study combined with placebo, 0.3 or 0.5 mg SC scopolamine. All volunteers completed the RIF procedure providing within-subject measures of inhibition in an episodic recall paradigm.
Nicotine did not modulate recall of practised exemplars but it did increase inhibition of unpractised exemplars. Consistent with an effect on encoding, scopolamine reduced recall for all exemplars. Scopolamine did not differentially affect practised or unpractised exemplars, relative to the control words.
Independent of its potential to influence memory at encoding, nicotine can affect task performance by inhibiting unpractised (and by implication, irrelevant) material, thereby reducing interference and benefiting the task in hand. The absence of effects of scopolamine on inhibition in the RIF paradigm argues for a more complex subdivision of "inhibitory" processes, which may be differentially influenced by cholinergic blockade. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00213-003-1563-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20879407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20879407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e0aca64ca95735ae16bcf254b480b257f16d80075d844e31303cfa2fefc1d3493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIEfQWzWebHmXxCxY8qAdPIU0nS5e2WZNW8N-bdQuCuYTMPO8weRA6p-SGElLcRkIY5ZgQjqnMOWYHaE4FZ5iRgh2ieWpwzKlUM3QS44akI5Q4RjPKSilZyefo4xW2JpgBMtPXmfVd1fRQZ-Ac2CFm3mXR-q1vTZfqv0zfWD_sHr7PAgyhgS_T4qavR5uCzoc1DKm_PkVHzrQRzqZ7gd4f7t-WT3j18vi8vFthKyQdMBBjTS6sKWXBpQGaV9YxKSqhSMVk4Wheq_RZWSshgFNOuHWGOXCW1lyUfIGu93O3wX-OEAfdNdFC25oe_Bg1I6ooBSkSePkP3Pgx9Gk3zagqFZOKJojuIRt8jAGc3oamM-FbU6J30vVeuk5u9U66ZilzMQ0eqw7qv8RkOQFXE2CiNa0LprdN_OOk4GVJFP8BOLuJsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218982581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Separate and combined effects of scopolamine and nicotine on retrieval-induced forgetting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>EDGINTON, Trudi ; RUSTED, Jennifer M</creator><creatorcontrib>EDGINTON, Trudi ; RUSTED, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><description>Proficiency of information processing is likely to derive from a combination of effective processing of relevant information and efficient inhibition of unwanted or irrelevant material. Compromised inhibitory processes have been associated with the memory deficits in dementia and the elderly. These deficits in inhibition could be directly related to the reduced cholinergic function evident in dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). Scopolamine, a cholinergic antagonist, has been associated with disinhibition. Nicotine, a cholinergic agonist, has been associated with enhanced focus and reduced intrusions in both healthy adults and people with dementia.
This study examines the separate and combined effects of nicotine and scopolamine on inhibitory processes using retrieval induced forgetting (RIF).
In two studies, minimally deprived smokers received either nicotine or no nicotine, in the second study combined with placebo, 0.3 or 0.5 mg SC scopolamine. All volunteers completed the RIF procedure providing within-subject measures of inhibition in an episodic recall paradigm.
Nicotine did not modulate recall of practised exemplars but it did increase inhibition of unpractised exemplars. Consistent with an effect on encoding, scopolamine reduced recall for all exemplars. Scopolamine did not differentially affect practised or unpractised exemplars, relative to the control words.
Independent of its potential to influence memory at encoding, nicotine can affect task performance by inhibiting unpractised (and by implication, irrelevant) material, thereby reducing interference and benefiting the task in hand. The absence of effects of scopolamine on inhibition in the RIF paradigm argues for a more complex subdivision of "inhibitory" processes, which may be differentially influenced by cholinergic blockade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1563-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12955293</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSYPAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cholinergic Agents - pharmacology ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Interactions ; Female ; Ganglionic Stimulants - pharmacology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Memory - drug effects ; Mental Recall - drug effects ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Nicotine - administration & dosage ; Nicotine - pharmacology ; Scopolamine Hydrobromide - administration & dosage ; Scopolamine Hydrobromide - pharmacology ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Psychopharmacologia, 2003-12, Vol.170 (4), p.351-357</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e0aca64ca95735ae16bcf254b480b257f16d80075d844e31303cfa2fefc1d3493</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15439908$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12955293$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>EDGINTON, Trudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSTED, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><title>Separate and combined effects of scopolamine and nicotine on retrieval-induced forgetting</title><title>Psychopharmacologia</title><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><description>Proficiency of information processing is likely to derive from a combination of effective processing of relevant information and efficient inhibition of unwanted or irrelevant material. Compromised inhibitory processes have been associated with the memory deficits in dementia and the elderly. These deficits in inhibition could be directly related to the reduced cholinergic function evident in dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). Scopolamine, a cholinergic antagonist, has been associated with disinhibition. Nicotine, a cholinergic agonist, has been associated with enhanced focus and reduced intrusions in both healthy adults and people with dementia.
This study examines the separate and combined effects of nicotine and scopolamine on inhibitory processes using retrieval induced forgetting (RIF).
In two studies, minimally deprived smokers received either nicotine or no nicotine, in the second study combined with placebo, 0.3 or 0.5 mg SC scopolamine. All volunteers completed the RIF procedure providing within-subject measures of inhibition in an episodic recall paradigm.
Nicotine did not modulate recall of practised exemplars but it did increase inhibition of unpractised exemplars. Consistent with an effect on encoding, scopolamine reduced recall for all exemplars. Scopolamine did not differentially affect practised or unpractised exemplars, relative to the control words.
Independent of its potential to influence memory at encoding, nicotine can affect task performance by inhibiting unpractised (and by implication, irrelevant) material, thereby reducing interference and benefiting the task in hand. The absence of effects of scopolamine on inhibition in the RIF paradigm argues for a more complex subdivision of "inhibitory" processes, which may be differentially influenced by cholinergic blockade.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cholinergic Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Interactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ganglionic Stimulants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory - drug effects</subject><subject>Mental Recall - drug effects</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Nicotine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Nicotine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Scopolamine Hydrobromide - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Scopolamine Hydrobromide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0033-3158</issn><issn>1432-2072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIEfQWzWebHmXxCxY8qAdPIU0nS5e2WZNW8N-bdQuCuYTMPO8weRA6p-SGElLcRkIY5ZgQjqnMOWYHaE4FZ5iRgh2ieWpwzKlUM3QS44akI5Q4RjPKSilZyefo4xW2JpgBMtPXmfVd1fRQZ-Ac2CFm3mXR-q1vTZfqv0zfWD_sHr7PAgyhgS_T4qavR5uCzoc1DKm_PkVHzrQRzqZ7gd4f7t-WT3j18vi8vFthKyQdMBBjTS6sKWXBpQGaV9YxKSqhSMVk4Wheq_RZWSshgFNOuHWGOXCW1lyUfIGu93O3wX-OEAfdNdFC25oe_Bg1I6ooBSkSePkP3Pgx9Gk3zagqFZOKJojuIRt8jAGc3oamM-FbU6J30vVeuk5u9U66ZilzMQ0eqw7qv8RkOQFXE2CiNa0LprdN_OOk4GVJFP8BOLuJsA</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>EDGINTON, Trudi</creator><creator>RUSTED, Jennifer M</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>Separate and combined effects of scopolamine and nicotine on retrieval-induced forgetting</title><author>EDGINTON, Trudi ; RUSTED, Jennifer M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e0aca64ca95735ae16bcf254b480b257f16d80075d844e31303cfa2fefc1d3493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cholinergic Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Interactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ganglionic Stimulants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory - drug effects</topic><topic>Mental Recall - drug effects</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Nicotine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Nicotine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Scopolamine Hydrobromide - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Scopolamine Hydrobromide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>EDGINTON, Trudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSTED, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Psychopharmacologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>EDGINTON, Trudi</au><au>RUSTED, Jennifer M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Separate and combined effects of scopolamine and nicotine on retrieval-induced forgetting</atitle><jtitle>Psychopharmacologia</jtitle><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>170</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>351-357</pages><issn>0033-3158</issn><eissn>1432-2072</eissn><coden>PSYPAG</coden><abstract>Proficiency of information processing is likely to derive from a combination of effective processing of relevant information and efficient inhibition of unwanted or irrelevant material. Compromised inhibitory processes have been associated with the memory deficits in dementia and the elderly. These deficits in inhibition could be directly related to the reduced cholinergic function evident in dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). Scopolamine, a cholinergic antagonist, has been associated with disinhibition. Nicotine, a cholinergic agonist, has been associated with enhanced focus and reduced intrusions in both healthy adults and people with dementia.
This study examines the separate and combined effects of nicotine and scopolamine on inhibitory processes using retrieval induced forgetting (RIF).
In two studies, minimally deprived smokers received either nicotine or no nicotine, in the second study combined with placebo, 0.3 or 0.5 mg SC scopolamine. All volunteers completed the RIF procedure providing within-subject measures of inhibition in an episodic recall paradigm.
Nicotine did not modulate recall of practised exemplars but it did increase inhibition of unpractised exemplars. Consistent with an effect on encoding, scopolamine reduced recall for all exemplars. Scopolamine did not differentially affect practised or unpractised exemplars, relative to the control words.
Independent of its potential to influence memory at encoding, nicotine can affect task performance by inhibiting unpractised (and by implication, irrelevant) material, thereby reducing interference and benefiting the task in hand. The absence of effects of scopolamine on inhibition in the RIF paradigm argues for a more complex subdivision of "inhibitory" processes, which may be differentially influenced by cholinergic blockade.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12955293</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00213-003-1563-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-3158 |
ispartof | Psychopharmacologia, 2003-12, Vol.170 (4), p.351-357 |
issn | 0033-3158 1432-2072 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20879407 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cholinergic Agents - pharmacology Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drug Interactions Female Ganglionic Stimulants - pharmacology Humans Male Medical sciences Memory - drug effects Mental Recall - drug effects Neuropsychological Tests Nicotine - administration & dosage Nicotine - pharmacology Scopolamine Hydrobromide - administration & dosage Scopolamine Hydrobromide - pharmacology Tobacco, tobacco smoking Toxicology |
title | Separate and combined effects of scopolamine and nicotine on retrieval-induced forgetting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Separate%20and%20combined%20effects%20of%20scopolamine%20and%20nicotine%20on%20retrieval-induced%20forgetting&rft.jtitle=Psychopharmacologia&rft.au=EDGINTON,%20Trudi&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=170&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=351-357&rft.issn=0033-3158&rft.eissn=1432-2072&rft.coden=PSYPAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00213-003-1563-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20879407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218982581&rft_id=info:pmid/12955293&rfr_iscdi=true |