Nectar concentration affects sugar preferences in two Australian honeyeaters and a lorikeet

1. Understanding avian diet preferences reveals a great deal about the birds' digestive physiology and relationships with food plants, and can make a valuable contribution towards directing physiological and ecological research. Importantly, diet preferences are likely to reflect physiological...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Functional ecology 2008-08, Vol.22 (4), p.599-605
Hauptverfasser: Fleming, P. A., Xie, S., Napier, K., McWhorter, T. J., Nicolson, S. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 605
container_issue 4
container_start_page 599
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 22
creator Fleming, P. A.
Xie, S.
Napier, K.
McWhorter, T. J.
Nicolson, S. W.
description 1. Understanding avian diet preferences reveals a great deal about the birds' digestive physiology and relationships with food plants, and can make a valuable contribution towards directing physiological and ecological research. Importantly, diet preferences are likely to reflect physiological constraints and therefore mechanisms of digestion. 2. We assessed the interaction between diet concentration and sugar-type preferences of three Australian nectarivorous bird species. Each individual bird was offered paired energetically-equivalent diets: a sucrose solution and hexose (1 : 1 mixture of glucose : fructose) solution over a range of diet concentrations from 0·075 to 2 mol L⁻¹ Sucrose Equivalents (SE). 3. Similar patterns were found for all three species. Intake on the most dilute diets was insufficient to maintain energy balance, suggesting that these birds faced physiological constraints on such diets. 4. All three species demonstrated a preference for hexose over sucrose when offered dilute diets, and sucrose (or none) preference on more concentrated diets. The three species differed in terms of when this switch from hexose to sucrose preference took place. Rainbow lorikeets (Psittacidae, c. 135 g body mass) demonstrated hexose preference for diets up to and including 0·75 mol L⁻¹ SE; sucrose was preferred on 2 mol L⁻¹ SE diets. Red wattlebirds (Meliphagidae, c. 105 g) showed hexose preference on only the most dilute (0·075 mol L⁻¹ SE) diet, and sucrose preference on 1 and 2 mol L⁻¹ SE diets. New Holland honeyeaters (Meliphagidae, c. 22 g) preferred hexose on 0·075 and 0·1 mol L⁻¹ SE diets, and their selectivity for sucrose was not statistically significant. We suggest that the switch from hexose preference may be directly related to the digestive capacity of different taxa. 5. Accumulating evidence suggests similar patterns of sugar preferences in various nectarivorous bird lineages. A switch from hexose preference on dilute diets to sucrose preference on concentrated diets has now been shown for hummingbirds, flowerpiercers, sunbirds, honeyeaters and lorikeets. Hexose preference on dilute diets suggests that reduced digesta retention time and low sugar concentration influences sucrose hydrolysis efficiency, whilst absorption rate of monosaccharides is less limiting. Sucrose preference on concentrated diets is more puzzling, but may reflect preference for diets with lower osmolality. Varying preferences suggest that the co-evolutionary relationships
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01401.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20878925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20142846</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20142846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4701-f8425ab319dd711946f9ee3063441ef18e8c5c40377f5d23d90b929514e7303b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EEsvCR0D4Arek439JfOBQrVpaqSoH2lMPltcZlyypvdhZtfvtcUhVccQXW36_N2O_IYQyqFlZJ7uaiUZVXApVc4CuBiaB1U-vyOpFeE1WwBtddbIRb8m7nHcAoBXnK3J3jW6yiboYHIYp2WmIgVrvy3Wm-XBftH1CjwkLkOkQ6PQY6ekhF3YcbKA_Y8Aj2glTpjb01NIxpuEX4vSevPF2zPjheV-T2_Ozm81FdfX92-Xm9KpysgVW-U5yZbeC6b5vGdOy8RpRQCOkZOhZh51TToJoW696LnoNW821YhJbAWIr1uTLUnef4u8D5sk8DNnhONqA8ZANh67tNFcF7BbQpZhz-ZXZp-HBpqNhYOY0zc7MoZk5NDOnaf6maZ6K9fNzD5udHX2ywQ35xc9BCdkwWbivC_c4jHj87_rm_Gwzn4r_4-Lf5Smmf-ozyefxrcmnRfc2GnufyhtufxRVlIEyIUGKP5BKmno</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20878925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nectar concentration affects sugar preferences in two Australian honeyeaters and a lorikeet</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Fleming, P. A. ; Xie, S. ; Napier, K. ; McWhorter, T. J. ; Nicolson, S. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleming, P. A. ; Xie, S. ; Napier, K. ; McWhorter, T. J. ; Nicolson, S. W.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Understanding avian diet preferences reveals a great deal about the birds' digestive physiology and relationships with food plants, and can make a valuable contribution towards directing physiological and ecological research. Importantly, diet preferences are likely to reflect physiological constraints and therefore mechanisms of digestion. 2. We assessed the interaction between diet concentration and sugar-type preferences of three Australian nectarivorous bird species. Each individual bird was offered paired energetically-equivalent diets: a sucrose solution and hexose (1 : 1 mixture of glucose : fructose) solution over a range of diet concentrations from 0·075 to 2 mol L⁻¹ Sucrose Equivalents (SE). 3. Similar patterns were found for all three species. Intake on the most dilute diets was insufficient to maintain energy balance, suggesting that these birds faced physiological constraints on such diets. 4. All three species demonstrated a preference for hexose over sucrose when offered dilute diets, and sucrose (or none) preference on more concentrated diets. The three species differed in terms of when this switch from hexose to sucrose preference took place. Rainbow lorikeets (Psittacidae, c. 135 g body mass) demonstrated hexose preference for diets up to and including 0·75 mol L⁻¹ SE; sucrose was preferred on 2 mol L⁻¹ SE diets. Red wattlebirds (Meliphagidae, c. 105 g) showed hexose preference on only the most dilute (0·075 mol L⁻¹ SE) diet, and sucrose preference on 1 and 2 mol L⁻¹ SE diets. New Holland honeyeaters (Meliphagidae, c. 22 g) preferred hexose on 0·075 and 0·1 mol L⁻¹ SE diets, and their selectivity for sucrose was not statistically significant. We suggest that the switch from hexose preference may be directly related to the digestive capacity of different taxa. 5. Accumulating evidence suggests similar patterns of sugar preferences in various nectarivorous bird lineages. A switch from hexose preference on dilute diets to sucrose preference on concentrated diets has now been shown for hummingbirds, flowerpiercers, sunbirds, honeyeaters and lorikeets. Hexose preference on dilute diets suggests that reduced digesta retention time and low sugar concentration influences sucrose hydrolysis efficiency, whilst absorption rate of monosaccharides is less limiting. Sucrose preference on concentrated diets is more puzzling, but may reflect preference for diets with lower osmolality. Varying preferences suggest that the co-evolutionary relationships between birds and nectar sugar composition are likely to be similarly dynamic and situation dependent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01401.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal digestion ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Autoecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Diet ; digestive constraint ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Hexoses ; honeyeater ; Human ecology ; Hummingbirds ; lorikeet ; Meliphagidae ; Nectar ; nectar sugars ; Plant-Animal Interactions ; plant-pollinator co-evolution ; Psittacidae ; Species ; sucrose hydrolysis ; Sugars ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2008-08, Vol.22 (4), p.599-605</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2008 The Authors.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4701-f8425ab319dd711946f9ee3063441ef18e8c5c40377f5d23d90b929514e7303b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4701-f8425ab319dd711946f9ee3063441ef18e8c5c40377f5d23d90b929514e7303b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20142846$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20142846$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20534614$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleming, P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Napier, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhorter, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolson, S. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Nectar concentration affects sugar preferences in two Australian honeyeaters and a lorikeet</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>1. Understanding avian diet preferences reveals a great deal about the birds' digestive physiology and relationships with food plants, and can make a valuable contribution towards directing physiological and ecological research. Importantly, diet preferences are likely to reflect physiological constraints and therefore mechanisms of digestion. 2. We assessed the interaction between diet concentration and sugar-type preferences of three Australian nectarivorous bird species. Each individual bird was offered paired energetically-equivalent diets: a sucrose solution and hexose (1 : 1 mixture of glucose : fructose) solution over a range of diet concentrations from 0·075 to 2 mol L⁻¹ Sucrose Equivalents (SE). 3. Similar patterns were found for all three species. Intake on the most dilute diets was insufficient to maintain energy balance, suggesting that these birds faced physiological constraints on such diets. 4. All three species demonstrated a preference for hexose over sucrose when offered dilute diets, and sucrose (or none) preference on more concentrated diets. The three species differed in terms of when this switch from hexose to sucrose preference took place. Rainbow lorikeets (Psittacidae, c. 135 g body mass) demonstrated hexose preference for diets up to and including 0·75 mol L⁻¹ SE; sucrose was preferred on 2 mol L⁻¹ SE diets. Red wattlebirds (Meliphagidae, c. 105 g) showed hexose preference on only the most dilute (0·075 mol L⁻¹ SE) diet, and sucrose preference on 1 and 2 mol L⁻¹ SE diets. New Holland honeyeaters (Meliphagidae, c. 22 g) preferred hexose on 0·075 and 0·1 mol L⁻¹ SE diets, and their selectivity for sucrose was not statistically significant. We suggest that the switch from hexose preference may be directly related to the digestive capacity of different taxa. 5. Accumulating evidence suggests similar patterns of sugar preferences in various nectarivorous bird lineages. A switch from hexose preference on dilute diets to sucrose preference on concentrated diets has now been shown for hummingbirds, flowerpiercers, sunbirds, honeyeaters and lorikeets. Hexose preference on dilute diets suggests that reduced digesta retention time and low sugar concentration influences sucrose hydrolysis efficiency, whilst absorption rate of monosaccharides is less limiting. Sucrose preference on concentrated diets is more puzzling, but may reflect preference for diets with lower osmolality. Varying preferences suggest that the co-evolutionary relationships between birds and nectar sugar composition are likely to be similarly dynamic and situation dependent.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal digestion</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>digestive constraint</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hexoses</subject><subject>honeyeater</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Hummingbirds</subject><subject>lorikeet</subject><subject>Meliphagidae</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>nectar sugars</subject><subject>Plant-Animal Interactions</subject><subject>plant-pollinator co-evolution</subject><subject>Psittacidae</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>sucrose hydrolysis</subject><subject>Sugars</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EEsvCR0D4Arek439JfOBQrVpaqSoH2lMPltcZlyypvdhZtfvtcUhVccQXW36_N2O_IYQyqFlZJ7uaiUZVXApVc4CuBiaB1U-vyOpFeE1WwBtddbIRb8m7nHcAoBXnK3J3jW6yiboYHIYp2WmIgVrvy3Wm-XBftH1CjwkLkOkQ6PQY6ekhF3YcbKA_Y8Aj2glTpjb01NIxpuEX4vSevPF2zPjheV-T2_Ozm81FdfX92-Xm9KpysgVW-U5yZbeC6b5vGdOy8RpRQCOkZOhZh51TToJoW696LnoNW821YhJbAWIr1uTLUnef4u8D5sk8DNnhONqA8ZANh67tNFcF7BbQpZhz-ZXZp-HBpqNhYOY0zc7MoZk5NDOnaf6maZ6K9fNzD5udHX2ywQ35xc9BCdkwWbivC_c4jHj87_rm_Gwzn4r_4-Lf5Smmf-ozyefxrcmnRfc2GnufyhtufxRVlIEyIUGKP5BKmno</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Fleming, P. A.</creator><creator>Xie, S.</creator><creator>Napier, K.</creator><creator>McWhorter, T. J.</creator><creator>Nicolson, S. W.</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Ecological Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Nectar concentration affects sugar preferences in two Australian honeyeaters and a lorikeet</title><author>Fleming, P. A. ; Xie, S. ; Napier, K. ; McWhorter, T. J. ; Nicolson, S. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4701-f8425ab319dd711946f9ee3063441ef18e8c5c40377f5d23d90b929514e7303b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal digestion</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>digestive constraint</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hexoses</topic><topic>honeyeater</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Hummingbirds</topic><topic>lorikeet</topic><topic>Meliphagidae</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>nectar sugars</topic><topic>Plant-Animal Interactions</topic><topic>plant-pollinator co-evolution</topic><topic>Psittacidae</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>sucrose hydrolysis</topic><topic>Sugars</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleming, P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Napier, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhorter, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolson, S. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleming, P. A.</au><au>Xie, S.</au><au>Napier, K.</au><au>McWhorter, T. J.</au><au>Nicolson, S. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nectar concentration affects sugar preferences in two Australian honeyeaters and a lorikeet</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>605</epage><pages>599-605</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>1. Understanding avian diet preferences reveals a great deal about the birds' digestive physiology and relationships with food plants, and can make a valuable contribution towards directing physiological and ecological research. Importantly, diet preferences are likely to reflect physiological constraints and therefore mechanisms of digestion. 2. We assessed the interaction between diet concentration and sugar-type preferences of three Australian nectarivorous bird species. Each individual bird was offered paired energetically-equivalent diets: a sucrose solution and hexose (1 : 1 mixture of glucose : fructose) solution over a range of diet concentrations from 0·075 to 2 mol L⁻¹ Sucrose Equivalents (SE). 3. Similar patterns were found for all three species. Intake on the most dilute diets was insufficient to maintain energy balance, suggesting that these birds faced physiological constraints on such diets. 4. All three species demonstrated a preference for hexose over sucrose when offered dilute diets, and sucrose (or none) preference on more concentrated diets. The three species differed in terms of when this switch from hexose to sucrose preference took place. Rainbow lorikeets (Psittacidae, c. 135 g body mass) demonstrated hexose preference for diets up to and including 0·75 mol L⁻¹ SE; sucrose was preferred on 2 mol L⁻¹ SE diets. Red wattlebirds (Meliphagidae, c. 105 g) showed hexose preference on only the most dilute (0·075 mol L⁻¹ SE) diet, and sucrose preference on 1 and 2 mol L⁻¹ SE diets. New Holland honeyeaters (Meliphagidae, c. 22 g) preferred hexose on 0·075 and 0·1 mol L⁻¹ SE diets, and their selectivity for sucrose was not statistically significant. We suggest that the switch from hexose preference may be directly related to the digestive capacity of different taxa. 5. Accumulating evidence suggests similar patterns of sugar preferences in various nectarivorous bird lineages. A switch from hexose preference on dilute diets to sucrose preference on concentrated diets has now been shown for hummingbirds, flowerpiercers, sunbirds, honeyeaters and lorikeets. Hexose preference on dilute diets suggests that reduced digesta retention time and low sugar concentration influences sucrose hydrolysis efficiency, whilst absorption rate of monosaccharides is less limiting. Sucrose preference on concentrated diets is more puzzling, but may reflect preference for diets with lower osmolality. Varying preferences suggest that the co-evolutionary relationships between birds and nectar sugar composition are likely to be similarly dynamic and situation dependent.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01401.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2008-08, Vol.22 (4), p.599-605
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20878925
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal digestion
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Autoecology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Diet
digestive constraint
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Hexoses
honeyeater
Human ecology
Hummingbirds
lorikeet
Meliphagidae
Nectar
nectar sugars
Plant-Animal Interactions
plant-pollinator co-evolution
Psittacidae
Species
sucrose hydrolysis
Sugars
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
Zoology
title Nectar concentration affects sugar preferences in two Australian honeyeaters and a lorikeet
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A06%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nectar%20concentration%20affects%20sugar%20preferences%20in%20two%20Australian%20honeyeaters%20and%20a%20lorikeet&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Fleming,%20P.%20A.&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=605&rft.pages=599-605&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01401.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20142846%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20878925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20142846&rfr_iscdi=true