Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films
•Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis were used to produce soybean straw nanocellulose.•SPI films were reinforced with nanocellulose produced by enzymatic/acid hydrolysis.•CNFs presented a greater aspect ratio and thermal stability and lower crystallinity.•CNFs as reinforcing filler yielded more elongable...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Carbohydrate polymers 2018-10, Vol.198, p.61-68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 68 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 61 |
container_title | Carbohydrate polymers |
container_volume | 198 |
creator | Martelli-Tosi, Milena Masson, Maraiane M. Silva, Natália C. Esposto, Bruno S. Barros, Taís T. Assis, Odílio B.G. Tapia-Blácido, Delia R. |
description | •Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis were used to produce soybean straw nanocellulose.•SPI films were reinforced with nanocellulose produced by enzymatic/acid hydrolysis.•CNFs presented a greater aspect ratio and thermal stability and lower crystallinity.•CNFs as reinforcing filler yielded more elongable nanocomposites with lower WVP.•Both CNFs and CNCs improved the mechanical resistance of SPI films.
This work is a comparative study of the application of mercerized soybean straw (MSS) and nanocellulose produced by acid (CNCs) or enzymatic hydrolysis (CNFs) as reinforcing fillers in soy protein isolate (SPI) films. CNCs presented average dimensions of about 10 nm-thick and 300 nm-long with a crystallinity index of 57%, whereas CNFs have similar diameters, though with greater lengths (>1 μm), lower crystallinity index (50%) and greater thermal stability. Incorporation of 5% of CNCs and CNFs (g/100 g of SPI) improved the SPI film tensile strength by 38 and 48% respectively, and decreased the SPI film elongation at break when compared to control films. The SPI-CNC films showed the lowest values for solubility, probably due to their higher crystallinity (63%). On the other hand, the water vapor permeability was solely reduced with CNF addition, which can be attributed to their higher aspect ratio (length/diameter) and a better incorporation into the protein matrix. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.053 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2087592017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0144861718307070</els_id><sourcerecordid>2087592017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f05026d0d083a02c8f445a5b4a0eb6f675afeeba27cc0aab18e8448cd1bae4f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM2u1DAMhSME4g4XHgGUJZsWp03bzAqhK_6kK7EA1pGTOiijthmSFChPT6oZ2OKNFz4-9vkYey6gFiD6V6faYjTnMNUNCFVDX0PXPmAHoYZjJVopH7IDCCkr1Yvhhj1J6QSlegGP2U0LcGxBwoH9-hw2Q7jwlCP-5AsuwdI0rVNIxM8xjKulkZuN0_J7mzF7y0PkaP3IcyTMMy2ZY-LII_nFhWj98o07P00UuS-2Ydttchlyn8KEmfbpnJ6yRw6nRM-u_ZZ9fff2y92H6v7T-493b-4rK6HJlYMOmn6EEVSL0FjlpOywMxKBTO_6oUNHZLAZrAVEIxQpKZUdhUGSrmtv2cuLb_ni-0op69mnPSIuFNakG1BDdywMhyLtLlIbQ0qRnD5HP2PctAC9Q9cnfYWud-gael2gl70X1xOrmWn8t_WXchG8vgioBP3hKepkPS2FrI9ksx6D_8-JP7iimN0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2087592017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Martelli-Tosi, Milena ; Masson, Maraiane M. ; Silva, Natália C. ; Esposto, Bruno S. ; Barros, Taís T. ; Assis, Odílio B.G. ; Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martelli-Tosi, Milena ; Masson, Maraiane M. ; Silva, Natália C. ; Esposto, Bruno S. ; Barros, Taís T. ; Assis, Odílio B.G. ; Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</creatorcontrib><description>•Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis were used to produce soybean straw nanocellulose.•SPI films were reinforced with nanocellulose produced by enzymatic/acid hydrolysis.•CNFs presented a greater aspect ratio and thermal stability and lower crystallinity.•CNFs as reinforcing filler yielded more elongable nanocomposites with lower WVP.•Both CNFs and CNCs improved the mechanical resistance of SPI films.
This work is a comparative study of the application of mercerized soybean straw (MSS) and nanocellulose produced by acid (CNCs) or enzymatic hydrolysis (CNFs) as reinforcing fillers in soy protein isolate (SPI) films. CNCs presented average dimensions of about 10 nm-thick and 300 nm-long with a crystallinity index of 57%, whereas CNFs have similar diameters, though with greater lengths (>1 μm), lower crystallinity index (50%) and greater thermal stability. Incorporation of 5% of CNCs and CNFs (g/100 g of SPI) improved the SPI film tensile strength by 38 and 48% respectively, and decreased the SPI film elongation at break when compared to control films. The SPI-CNC films showed the lowest values for solubility, probably due to their higher crystallinity (63%). On the other hand, the water vapor permeability was solely reduced with CNF addition, which can be attributed to their higher aspect ratio (length/diameter) and a better incorporation into the protein matrix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8617</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30093040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acid hydrolysis ; Cellulose nanofibrils ; Enzymatic hydrolysis ; Nanocomposite film ; Nanowhiskers ; Soybean straw</subject><ispartof>Carbohydrate polymers, 2018-10, Vol.198, p.61-68</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f05026d0d083a02c8f445a5b4a0eb6f675afeeba27cc0aab18e8448cd1bae4f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f05026d0d083a02c8f445a5b4a0eb6f675afeeba27cc0aab18e8448cd1bae4f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6060-9713</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.053$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30093040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martelli-Tosi, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masson, Maraiane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Natália C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposto, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Taís T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assis, Odílio B.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</creatorcontrib><title>Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films</title><title>Carbohydrate polymers</title><addtitle>Carbohydr Polym</addtitle><description>•Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis were used to produce soybean straw nanocellulose.•SPI films were reinforced with nanocellulose produced by enzymatic/acid hydrolysis.•CNFs presented a greater aspect ratio and thermal stability and lower crystallinity.•CNFs as reinforcing filler yielded more elongable nanocomposites with lower WVP.•Both CNFs and CNCs improved the mechanical resistance of SPI films.
This work is a comparative study of the application of mercerized soybean straw (MSS) and nanocellulose produced by acid (CNCs) or enzymatic hydrolysis (CNFs) as reinforcing fillers in soy protein isolate (SPI) films. CNCs presented average dimensions of about 10 nm-thick and 300 nm-long with a crystallinity index of 57%, whereas CNFs have similar diameters, though with greater lengths (>1 μm), lower crystallinity index (50%) and greater thermal stability. Incorporation of 5% of CNCs and CNFs (g/100 g of SPI) improved the SPI film tensile strength by 38 and 48% respectively, and decreased the SPI film elongation at break when compared to control films. The SPI-CNC films showed the lowest values for solubility, probably due to their higher crystallinity (63%). On the other hand, the water vapor permeability was solely reduced with CNF addition, which can be attributed to their higher aspect ratio (length/diameter) and a better incorporation into the protein matrix.</description><subject>Acid hydrolysis</subject><subject>Cellulose nanofibrils</subject><subject>Enzymatic hydrolysis</subject><subject>Nanocomposite film</subject><subject>Nanowhiskers</subject><subject>Soybean straw</subject><issn>0144-8617</issn><issn>1879-1344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM2u1DAMhSME4g4XHgGUJZsWp03bzAqhK_6kK7EA1pGTOiijthmSFChPT6oZ2OKNFz4-9vkYey6gFiD6V6faYjTnMNUNCFVDX0PXPmAHoYZjJVopH7IDCCkr1Yvhhj1J6QSlegGP2U0LcGxBwoH9-hw2Q7jwlCP-5AsuwdI0rVNIxM8xjKulkZuN0_J7mzF7y0PkaP3IcyTMMy2ZY-LII_nFhWj98o07P00UuS-2Ydttchlyn8KEmfbpnJ6yRw6nRM-u_ZZ9fff2y92H6v7T-493b-4rK6HJlYMOmn6EEVSL0FjlpOywMxKBTO_6oUNHZLAZrAVEIxQpKZUdhUGSrmtv2cuLb_ni-0op69mnPSIuFNakG1BDdywMhyLtLlIbQ0qRnD5HP2PctAC9Q9cnfYWud-gael2gl70X1xOrmWn8t_WXchG8vgioBP3hKepkPS2FrI9ksx6D_8-JP7iimN0</recordid><startdate>20181015</startdate><enddate>20181015</enddate><creator>Martelli-Tosi, Milena</creator><creator>Masson, Maraiane M.</creator><creator>Silva, Natália C.</creator><creator>Esposto, Bruno S.</creator><creator>Barros, Taís T.</creator><creator>Assis, Odílio B.G.</creator><creator>Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-9713</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181015</creationdate><title>Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films</title><author>Martelli-Tosi, Milena ; Masson, Maraiane M. ; Silva, Natália C. ; Esposto, Bruno S. ; Barros, Taís T. ; Assis, Odílio B.G. ; Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f05026d0d083a02c8f445a5b4a0eb6f675afeeba27cc0aab18e8448cd1bae4f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acid hydrolysis</topic><topic>Cellulose nanofibrils</topic><topic>Enzymatic hydrolysis</topic><topic>Nanocomposite film</topic><topic>Nanowhiskers</topic><topic>Soybean straw</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martelli-Tosi, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masson, Maraiane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Natália C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposto, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Taís T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assis, Odílio B.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Carbohydrate polymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martelli-Tosi, Milena</au><au>Masson, Maraiane M.</au><au>Silva, Natália C.</au><au>Esposto, Bruno S.</au><au>Barros, Taís T.</au><au>Assis, Odílio B.G.</au><au>Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films</atitle><jtitle>Carbohydrate polymers</jtitle><addtitle>Carbohydr Polym</addtitle><date>2018-10-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>198</volume><spage>61</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>61-68</pages><issn>0144-8617</issn><eissn>1879-1344</eissn><abstract>•Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis were used to produce soybean straw nanocellulose.•SPI films were reinforced with nanocellulose produced by enzymatic/acid hydrolysis.•CNFs presented a greater aspect ratio and thermal stability and lower crystallinity.•CNFs as reinforcing filler yielded more elongable nanocomposites with lower WVP.•Both CNFs and CNCs improved the mechanical resistance of SPI films.
This work is a comparative study of the application of mercerized soybean straw (MSS) and nanocellulose produced by acid (CNCs) or enzymatic hydrolysis (CNFs) as reinforcing fillers in soy protein isolate (SPI) films. CNCs presented average dimensions of about 10 nm-thick and 300 nm-long with a crystallinity index of 57%, whereas CNFs have similar diameters, though with greater lengths (>1 μm), lower crystallinity index (50%) and greater thermal stability. Incorporation of 5% of CNCs and CNFs (g/100 g of SPI) improved the SPI film tensile strength by 38 and 48% respectively, and decreased the SPI film elongation at break when compared to control films. The SPI-CNC films showed the lowest values for solubility, probably due to their higher crystallinity (63%). On the other hand, the water vapor permeability was solely reduced with CNF addition, which can be attributed to their higher aspect ratio (length/diameter) and a better incorporation into the protein matrix.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30093040</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.053</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-9713</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-8617 |
ispartof | Carbohydrate polymers, 2018-10, Vol.198, p.61-68 |
issn | 0144-8617 1879-1344 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2087592017 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acid hydrolysis Cellulose nanofibrils Enzymatic hydrolysis Nanocomposite film Nanowhiskers Soybean straw |
title | Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A22%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soybean%20straw%20nanocellulose%20produced%20by%20enzymatic%20or%20acid%20treatment%20as%20a%20reinforcing%20filler%20in%20soy%20protein%20isolate%20films&rft.jtitle=Carbohydrate%20polymers&rft.au=Martelli-Tosi,%20Milena&rft.date=2018-10-15&rft.volume=198&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=61-68&rft.issn=0144-8617&rft.eissn=1879-1344&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2087592017%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2087592017&rft_id=info:pmid/30093040&rft_els_id=S0144861718307070&rfr_iscdi=true |