Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films

•Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis were used to produce soybean straw nanocellulose.•SPI films were reinforced with nanocellulose produced by enzymatic/acid hydrolysis.•CNFs presented a greater aspect ratio and thermal stability and lower crystallinity.•CNFs as reinforcing filler yielded more elongable...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Carbohydrate polymers 2018-10, Vol.198, p.61-68
Hauptverfasser: Martelli-Tosi, Milena, Masson, Maraiane M., Silva, Natália C., Esposto, Bruno S., Barros, Taís T., Assis, Odílio B.G., Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 68
container_issue
container_start_page 61
container_title Carbohydrate polymers
container_volume 198
creator Martelli-Tosi, Milena
Masson, Maraiane M.
Silva, Natália C.
Esposto, Bruno S.
Barros, Taís T.
Assis, Odílio B.G.
Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.
description •Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis were used to produce soybean straw nanocellulose.•SPI films were reinforced with nanocellulose produced by enzymatic/acid hydrolysis.•CNFs presented a greater aspect ratio and thermal stability and lower crystallinity.•CNFs as reinforcing filler yielded more elongable nanocomposites with lower WVP.•Both CNFs and CNCs improved the mechanical resistance of SPI films. This work is a comparative study of the application of mercerized soybean straw (MSS) and nanocellulose produced by acid (CNCs) or enzymatic hydrolysis (CNFs) as reinforcing fillers in soy protein isolate (SPI) films. CNCs presented average dimensions of about 10 nm-thick and 300 nm-long with a crystallinity index of 57%, whereas CNFs have similar diameters, though with greater lengths (>1 μm), lower crystallinity index (50%) and greater thermal stability. Incorporation of 5% of CNCs and CNFs (g/100 g of SPI) improved the SPI film tensile strength by 38 and 48% respectively, and decreased the SPI film elongation at break when compared to control films. The SPI-CNC films showed the lowest values for solubility, probably due to their higher crystallinity (63%). On the other hand, the water vapor permeability was solely reduced with CNF addition, which can be attributed to their higher aspect ratio (length/diameter) and a better incorporation into the protein matrix.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.053
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2087592017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0144861718307070</els_id><sourcerecordid>2087592017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f05026d0d083a02c8f445a5b4a0eb6f675afeeba27cc0aab18e8448cd1bae4f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM2u1DAMhSME4g4XHgGUJZsWp03bzAqhK_6kK7EA1pGTOiijthmSFChPT6oZ2OKNFz4-9vkYey6gFiD6V6faYjTnMNUNCFVDX0PXPmAHoYZjJVopH7IDCCkr1Yvhhj1J6QSlegGP2U0LcGxBwoH9-hw2Q7jwlCP-5AsuwdI0rVNIxM8xjKulkZuN0_J7mzF7y0PkaP3IcyTMMy2ZY-LII_nFhWj98o07P00UuS-2Ydttchlyn8KEmfbpnJ6yRw6nRM-u_ZZ9fff2y92H6v7T-493b-4rK6HJlYMOmn6EEVSL0FjlpOywMxKBTO_6oUNHZLAZrAVEIxQpKZUdhUGSrmtv2cuLb_ni-0op69mnPSIuFNakG1BDdywMhyLtLlIbQ0qRnD5HP2PctAC9Q9cnfYWud-gael2gl70X1xOrmWn8t_WXchG8vgioBP3hKepkPS2FrI9ksx6D_8-JP7iimN0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2087592017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Martelli-Tosi, Milena ; Masson, Maraiane M. ; Silva, Natália C. ; Esposto, Bruno S. ; Barros, Taís T. ; Assis, Odílio B.G. ; Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martelli-Tosi, Milena ; Masson, Maraiane M. ; Silva, Natália C. ; Esposto, Bruno S. ; Barros, Taís T. ; Assis, Odílio B.G. ; Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</creatorcontrib><description>•Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis were used to produce soybean straw nanocellulose.•SPI films were reinforced with nanocellulose produced by enzymatic/acid hydrolysis.•CNFs presented a greater aspect ratio and thermal stability and lower crystallinity.•CNFs as reinforcing filler yielded more elongable nanocomposites with lower WVP.•Both CNFs and CNCs improved the mechanical resistance of SPI films. This work is a comparative study of the application of mercerized soybean straw (MSS) and nanocellulose produced by acid (CNCs) or enzymatic hydrolysis (CNFs) as reinforcing fillers in soy protein isolate (SPI) films. CNCs presented average dimensions of about 10 nm-thick and 300 nm-long with a crystallinity index of 57%, whereas CNFs have similar diameters, though with greater lengths (&gt;1 μm), lower crystallinity index (50%) and greater thermal stability. Incorporation of 5% of CNCs and CNFs (g/100 g of SPI) improved the SPI film tensile strength by 38 and 48% respectively, and decreased the SPI film elongation at break when compared to control films. The SPI-CNC films showed the lowest values for solubility, probably due to their higher crystallinity (63%). On the other hand, the water vapor permeability was solely reduced with CNF addition, which can be attributed to their higher aspect ratio (length/diameter) and a better incorporation into the protein matrix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8617</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30093040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acid hydrolysis ; Cellulose nanofibrils ; Enzymatic hydrolysis ; Nanocomposite film ; Nanowhiskers ; Soybean straw</subject><ispartof>Carbohydrate polymers, 2018-10, Vol.198, p.61-68</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f05026d0d083a02c8f445a5b4a0eb6f675afeeba27cc0aab18e8448cd1bae4f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f05026d0d083a02c8f445a5b4a0eb6f675afeeba27cc0aab18e8448cd1bae4f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6060-9713</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.053$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30093040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martelli-Tosi, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masson, Maraiane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Natália C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposto, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Taís T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assis, Odílio B.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</creatorcontrib><title>Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films</title><title>Carbohydrate polymers</title><addtitle>Carbohydr Polym</addtitle><description>•Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis were used to produce soybean straw nanocellulose.•SPI films were reinforced with nanocellulose produced by enzymatic/acid hydrolysis.•CNFs presented a greater aspect ratio and thermal stability and lower crystallinity.•CNFs as reinforcing filler yielded more elongable nanocomposites with lower WVP.•Both CNFs and CNCs improved the mechanical resistance of SPI films. This work is a comparative study of the application of mercerized soybean straw (MSS) and nanocellulose produced by acid (CNCs) or enzymatic hydrolysis (CNFs) as reinforcing fillers in soy protein isolate (SPI) films. CNCs presented average dimensions of about 10 nm-thick and 300 nm-long with a crystallinity index of 57%, whereas CNFs have similar diameters, though with greater lengths (&gt;1 μm), lower crystallinity index (50%) and greater thermal stability. Incorporation of 5% of CNCs and CNFs (g/100 g of SPI) improved the SPI film tensile strength by 38 and 48% respectively, and decreased the SPI film elongation at break when compared to control films. The SPI-CNC films showed the lowest values for solubility, probably due to their higher crystallinity (63%). On the other hand, the water vapor permeability was solely reduced with CNF addition, which can be attributed to their higher aspect ratio (length/diameter) and a better incorporation into the protein matrix.</description><subject>Acid hydrolysis</subject><subject>Cellulose nanofibrils</subject><subject>Enzymatic hydrolysis</subject><subject>Nanocomposite film</subject><subject>Nanowhiskers</subject><subject>Soybean straw</subject><issn>0144-8617</issn><issn>1879-1344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM2u1DAMhSME4g4XHgGUJZsWp03bzAqhK_6kK7EA1pGTOiijthmSFChPT6oZ2OKNFz4-9vkYey6gFiD6V6faYjTnMNUNCFVDX0PXPmAHoYZjJVopH7IDCCkr1Yvhhj1J6QSlegGP2U0LcGxBwoH9-hw2Q7jwlCP-5AsuwdI0rVNIxM8xjKulkZuN0_J7mzF7y0PkaP3IcyTMMy2ZY-LII_nFhWj98o07P00UuS-2Ydttchlyn8KEmfbpnJ6yRw6nRM-u_ZZ9fff2y92H6v7T-493b-4rK6HJlYMOmn6EEVSL0FjlpOywMxKBTO_6oUNHZLAZrAVEIxQpKZUdhUGSrmtv2cuLb_ni-0op69mnPSIuFNakG1BDdywMhyLtLlIbQ0qRnD5HP2PctAC9Q9cnfYWud-gael2gl70X1xOrmWn8t_WXchG8vgioBP3hKepkPS2FrI9ksx6D_8-JP7iimN0</recordid><startdate>20181015</startdate><enddate>20181015</enddate><creator>Martelli-Tosi, Milena</creator><creator>Masson, Maraiane M.</creator><creator>Silva, Natália C.</creator><creator>Esposto, Bruno S.</creator><creator>Barros, Taís T.</creator><creator>Assis, Odílio B.G.</creator><creator>Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-9713</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181015</creationdate><title>Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films</title><author>Martelli-Tosi, Milena ; Masson, Maraiane M. ; Silva, Natália C. ; Esposto, Bruno S. ; Barros, Taís T. ; Assis, Odílio B.G. ; Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f05026d0d083a02c8f445a5b4a0eb6f675afeeba27cc0aab18e8448cd1bae4f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acid hydrolysis</topic><topic>Cellulose nanofibrils</topic><topic>Enzymatic hydrolysis</topic><topic>Nanocomposite film</topic><topic>Nanowhiskers</topic><topic>Soybean straw</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martelli-Tosi, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masson, Maraiane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Natália C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposto, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Taís T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assis, Odílio B.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Carbohydrate polymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martelli-Tosi, Milena</au><au>Masson, Maraiane M.</au><au>Silva, Natália C.</au><au>Esposto, Bruno S.</au><au>Barros, Taís T.</au><au>Assis, Odílio B.G.</au><au>Tapia-Blácido, Delia R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films</atitle><jtitle>Carbohydrate polymers</jtitle><addtitle>Carbohydr Polym</addtitle><date>2018-10-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>198</volume><spage>61</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>61-68</pages><issn>0144-8617</issn><eissn>1879-1344</eissn><abstract>•Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis were used to produce soybean straw nanocellulose.•SPI films were reinforced with nanocellulose produced by enzymatic/acid hydrolysis.•CNFs presented a greater aspect ratio and thermal stability and lower crystallinity.•CNFs as reinforcing filler yielded more elongable nanocomposites with lower WVP.•Both CNFs and CNCs improved the mechanical resistance of SPI films. This work is a comparative study of the application of mercerized soybean straw (MSS) and nanocellulose produced by acid (CNCs) or enzymatic hydrolysis (CNFs) as reinforcing fillers in soy protein isolate (SPI) films. CNCs presented average dimensions of about 10 nm-thick and 300 nm-long with a crystallinity index of 57%, whereas CNFs have similar diameters, though with greater lengths (&gt;1 μm), lower crystallinity index (50%) and greater thermal stability. Incorporation of 5% of CNCs and CNFs (g/100 g of SPI) improved the SPI film tensile strength by 38 and 48% respectively, and decreased the SPI film elongation at break when compared to control films. The SPI-CNC films showed the lowest values for solubility, probably due to their higher crystallinity (63%). On the other hand, the water vapor permeability was solely reduced with CNF addition, which can be attributed to their higher aspect ratio (length/diameter) and a better incorporation into the protein matrix.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30093040</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.053</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-9713</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8617
ispartof Carbohydrate polymers, 2018-10, Vol.198, p.61-68
issn 0144-8617
1879-1344
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2087592017
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acid hydrolysis
Cellulose nanofibrils
Enzymatic hydrolysis
Nanocomposite film
Nanowhiskers
Soybean straw
title Soybean straw nanocellulose produced by enzymatic or acid treatment as a reinforcing filler in soy protein isolate films
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A22%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soybean%20straw%20nanocellulose%20produced%20by%20enzymatic%20or%20acid%20treatment%20as%20a%20reinforcing%20filler%20in%20soy%20protein%20isolate%20films&rft.jtitle=Carbohydrate%20polymers&rft.au=Martelli-Tosi,%20Milena&rft.date=2018-10-15&rft.volume=198&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=61-68&rft.issn=0144-8617&rft.eissn=1879-1344&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2087592017%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2087592017&rft_id=info:pmid/30093040&rft_els_id=S0144861718307070&rfr_iscdi=true