SAMPLE DESIGN, EXECUTION, AND ANALYSIS FOR WETLAND ASSESSMENT
Probability-based sample surveys are increasingly being used to assess natural resource condition, yet many of the techniques commonly used in survey sampling are not well known to environmental scientists. Here we discuss several techniques from survey sample methodology that can substantially incr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 2007-09, Vol.27 (3), p.515-523 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 523 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 515 |
| container_title | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Stevens, Don L. Jensen, Susan F. |
| description | Probability-based sample surveys are increasingly being used to assess natural resource condition, yet many of the techniques commonly used in survey sampling are not well known to environmental scientists. Here we discuss several techniques from survey sample methodology that can substantially increase the efficiency of a sample (lower the variance for the same sample size), make the survey more cost-effective, or adjust the analysis to accommodate difficulties in implementation, such as lack of access to all sample sites. The techniques are illustrated with two surveys that were designed to assess wetland condition: one in the Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA, and one in the Nanticoke watershed in Maryland and Delaware, USA. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[515:SDEAAF]2.0.CO;2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20867077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20867077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b428t-3ea62192132d1d98c69d0563d009654a3f095add6415eeff4736a933958b94ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkNFq2zAUhkVZoVm3Z1hgMDaYs6MjS7JWemEcpQ248ZgS2lGKUGJ5pKRxZzUXe_vJ89hFL3shJB19-s_hIyShMKFC4hdAKROOFD8igPyE8pZT_tVMdZ7P7nACk6I6wyMyoiplicBUvCKj_39OyOsQ7gGoQKQjcm7yq2-lHk-1mV8sPo_1jS5Wy3kVj_liGlde_jBzM55V38fXeln-LRqjjbnSi-Ubcty4XfBv_-2nZDXTy-IyKauLeZGXyTrF7Clh3gmkCinDmtYq2whVAxesBlCCp441oLira5FS7n3TpJIJpxhTPFur1NXslHwYch-79tfBhyf7sA0bv9u5vW8PwSJkQoKUEXz_DLxvD90-zmZRUcVZljKMlB6oTdeG0PnGPnbbB9f9thRsr9j2umyvy_aKLcYL5XZQbOOzLSrb57wbchrXWvez2wa7MgiUAWTI4kCRKAZivW3bvX9hnz9yZ4bY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919538432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SAMPLE DESIGN, EXECUTION, AND ANALYSIS FOR WETLAND ASSESSMENT</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Stevens, Don L. ; Jensen, Susan F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Don L. ; Jensen, Susan F.</creatorcontrib><description>Probability-based sample surveys are increasingly being used to assess natural resource condition, yet many of the techniques commonly used in survey sampling are not well known to environmental scientists. Here we discuss several techniques from survey sample methodology that can substantially increase the efficiency of a sample (lower the variance for the same sample size), make the survey more cost-effective, or adjust the analysis to accommodate difficulties in implementation, such as lack of access to all sample sites. The techniques are illustrated with two surveys that were designed to assess wetland condition: one in the Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA, and one in the Nanticoke watershed in Maryland and Delaware, USA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[515:SDEAAF]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>1313 Dolley Madison Boulevard, Suite 402, McLean, Virginia, USA 22101: The Society of Wetland Scientists</publisher><subject>access denial ; Cost analysis ; environmental assessment ; Freshwater ; methodology ; missing data ; multiple frame survey ; multiple frames ; Nanticoke River watershed ; Natural resources ; non-response ; Polls & surveys ; post-stratification ; probabilistic models ; probabilistic sampling ; probability analysis ; sampling ; spatial data ; spatially balance sampling ; spatially balanced environmental samples ; SPECIAL FEATURE: MONITORING WETLANDS AT THE WATERSHED SCALE ; Surveys ; two-phase sampling ; Upper Juniata watershed ; Watersheds ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2007-09, Vol.27 (3), p.515-523</ispartof><rights>The Society of Wetland Scientists</rights><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2007.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b428t-3ea62192132d1d98c69d0563d009654a3f095add6415eeff4736a933958b94ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b428t-3ea62192132d1d98c69d0563d009654a3f095add6415eeff4736a933958b94ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[515:SDEAAF]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919538432?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21388,26978,27924,27925,33744,33745,43805,52363,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Don L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Susan F.</creatorcontrib><title>SAMPLE DESIGN, EXECUTION, AND ANALYSIS FOR WETLAND ASSESSMENT</title><title>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</title><description>Probability-based sample surveys are increasingly being used to assess natural resource condition, yet many of the techniques commonly used in survey sampling are not well known to environmental scientists. Here we discuss several techniques from survey sample methodology that can substantially increase the efficiency of a sample (lower the variance for the same sample size), make the survey more cost-effective, or adjust the analysis to accommodate difficulties in implementation, such as lack of access to all sample sites. The techniques are illustrated with two surveys that were designed to assess wetland condition: one in the Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA, and one in the Nanticoke watershed in Maryland and Delaware, USA.</description><subject>access denial</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>environmental assessment</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>missing data</subject><subject>multiple frame survey</subject><subject>multiple frames</subject><subject>Nanticoke River watershed</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>non-response</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>post-stratification</subject><subject>probabilistic models</subject><subject>probabilistic sampling</subject><subject>probability analysis</subject><subject>sampling</subject><subject>spatial data</subject><subject>spatially balance sampling</subject><subject>spatially balanced environmental samples</subject><subject>SPECIAL FEATURE: MONITORING WETLANDS AT THE WATERSHED SCALE</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>two-phase sampling</subject><subject>Upper Juniata watershed</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0277-5212</issn><issn>1943-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkNFq2zAUhkVZoVm3Z1hgMDaYs6MjS7JWemEcpQ248ZgS2lGKUGJ5pKRxZzUXe_vJ89hFL3shJB19-s_hIyShMKFC4hdAKROOFD8igPyE8pZT_tVMdZ7P7nACk6I6wyMyoiplicBUvCKj_39OyOsQ7gGoQKQjcm7yq2-lHk-1mV8sPo_1jS5Wy3kVj_liGlde_jBzM55V38fXeln-LRqjjbnSi-Ubcty4XfBv_-2nZDXTy-IyKauLeZGXyTrF7Clh3gmkCinDmtYq2whVAxesBlCCp441oLira5FS7n3TpJIJpxhTPFur1NXslHwYch-79tfBhyf7sA0bv9u5vW8PwSJkQoKUEXz_DLxvD90-zmZRUcVZljKMlB6oTdeG0PnGPnbbB9f9thRsr9j2umyvy_aKLcYL5XZQbOOzLSrb57wbchrXWvez2wa7MgiUAWTI4kCRKAZivW3bvX9hnz9yZ4bY</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Stevens, Don L.</creator><creator>Jensen, Susan F.</creator><general>The Society of Wetland Scientists</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>SAMPLE DESIGN, EXECUTION, AND ANALYSIS FOR WETLAND ASSESSMENT</title><author>Stevens, Don L. ; Jensen, Susan F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b428t-3ea62192132d1d98c69d0563d009654a3f095add6415eeff4736a933958b94ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>access denial</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>environmental assessment</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>missing data</topic><topic>multiple frame survey</topic><topic>multiple frames</topic><topic>Nanticoke River watershed</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>non-response</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>post-stratification</topic><topic>probabilistic models</topic><topic>probabilistic sampling</topic><topic>probability analysis</topic><topic>sampling</topic><topic>spatial data</topic><topic>spatially balance sampling</topic><topic>spatially balanced environmental samples</topic><topic>SPECIAL FEATURE: MONITORING WETLANDS AT THE WATERSHED SCALE</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>two-phase sampling</topic><topic>Upper Juniata watershed</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Don L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Susan F.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevens, Don L.</au><au>Jensen, Susan F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SAMPLE DESIGN, EXECUTION, AND ANALYSIS FOR WETLAND ASSESSMENT</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>515</spage><epage>523</epage><pages>515-523</pages><issn>0277-5212</issn><eissn>1943-6246</eissn><abstract>Probability-based sample surveys are increasingly being used to assess natural resource condition, yet many of the techniques commonly used in survey sampling are not well known to environmental scientists. Here we discuss several techniques from survey sample methodology that can substantially increase the efficiency of a sample (lower the variance for the same sample size), make the survey more cost-effective, or adjust the analysis to accommodate difficulties in implementation, such as lack of access to all sample sites. The techniques are illustrated with two surveys that were designed to assess wetland condition: one in the Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA, and one in the Nanticoke watershed in Maryland and Delaware, USA.</abstract><cop>1313 Dolley Madison Boulevard, Suite 402, McLean, Virginia, USA 22101</cop><pub>The Society of Wetland Scientists</pub><doi>10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[515:SDEAAF]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0277-5212 |
| ispartof | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2007-09, Vol.27 (3), p.515-523 |
| issn | 0277-5212 1943-6246 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20867077 |
| source | BioOne Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | access denial Cost analysis environmental assessment Freshwater methodology missing data multiple frame survey multiple frames Nanticoke River watershed Natural resources non-response Polls & surveys post-stratification probabilistic models probabilistic sampling probability analysis sampling spatial data spatially balance sampling spatially balanced environmental samples SPECIAL FEATURE: MONITORING WETLANDS AT THE WATERSHED SCALE Surveys two-phase sampling Upper Juniata watershed Watersheds Wetlands |
| title | SAMPLE DESIGN, EXECUTION, AND ANALYSIS FOR WETLAND ASSESSMENT |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A58%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAMPLE%20DESIGN,%20EXECUTION,%20AND%20ANALYSIS%20FOR%20WETLAND%20ASSESSMENT&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20(Wilmington,%20N.C.)&rft.au=Stevens,%20Don%20L.&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=515&rft.epage=523&rft.pages=515-523&rft.issn=0277-5212&rft.eissn=1943-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27%5B515:SDEAAF%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20867077%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919538432&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |