Radiological parameters related to success of the round window approach in cochlear implantation: A retrospective study

Objectives To evaluate the radiologic parameters related to success of round window (RW) approach for cochlear implantation (CI). Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic‐tertiary centre. Participants Eighty‐four consecutive patients without inner ear anomaly who underwent CI with the i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical otolaryngology 2018-12, Vol.43 (6), p.1535-1540
Hauptverfasser: Kang, Jae‐Yoon, Chung, Jee‐Hye, Park, Hee‐Sung, Park, Yong‐Ho, Choi, Jin Woong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1540
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1535
container_title Clinical otolaryngology
container_volume 43
creator Kang, Jae‐Yoon
Chung, Jee‐Hye
Park, Hee‐Sung
Park, Yong‐Ho
Choi, Jin Woong
description Objectives To evaluate the radiologic parameters related to success of round window (RW) approach for cochlear implantation (CI). Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic‐tertiary centre. Participants Eighty‐four consecutive patients without inner ear anomaly who underwent CI with the intent of the RW approach were included. The RW approach was performed through the facial recess after posterior tympanotomy (RW group). When the RW approach was not possible despite maximum effort to expose the RW, promontory cochleostomy (PC) was performed (PC group). Main outcome measures The following radiologic parameters were compared between the two groups: (a) Width of the facial recess, (b) oblique distance between the cochlear basal turn (CBT) and facial nerve (FN), (c) anteroposterior distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and (d) angle between the EAC and CBT. Results Seventy patients (83.3%) were implanted using the RW approach, and 14 patients (16.7%) underwent the PC approach for CI. The anteroposterior distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and the angle between the EAC and CBT in the RW group were significantly longer and wider than those in the PC group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that these two parameters were independent parameters for success of the RW approach. Conclusions The distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and the angle between the EAC and CBT are associated with success of RW approach. Therefore, preoperative radiologic analysis of the two parameters might help CI surgeons to select RW approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/coa.13207
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2086258533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2086258533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-e648ff14707cecb079cf4ada8fe0b9a8a8be656d8ad9dade35f9b706f061b2743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoMo7oce_AMS8OIeZjfppDtpb8PgFywsiJ5DdVJxsnR32iTtMP_e6Kx7EMylcnh4eKteQl5xds3ru7ERrrlomHpCzrmS_UZK3T19_Ct9Ri5yvmdMCqb4c3ImGOs51-ycHL6AC3GM34OFkS6QYMKCKdOEIxR0tESaV2sxZxo9LXukKa6zo4cwu3igsCwpgt3TMFMb7X5ESDRMywhzgRLi_I5uq6ukmBe0JfxEmsvqji_IMw9jxpcP85J8-_D-6-7T5vbu4-fd9nZjRSvUBjupvedSMWXRDkz11ktwoD2yoQcNesCu7ZwG1ztwKFrfD4p1nnV8aJQUl-TtyVtj_lgxFzOFbHGs-TCu2TRMd02rWyEq-uYf9D6uaa7pTMOF7HvFeVupqxNl60o5oTdLChOko-HM_G7D1DbMnzYq-_rBuA4Tukfy7_krcHMCDmHE4_9NZne3PSl_AQz-lc8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2134997115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiological parameters related to success of the round window approach in cochlear implantation: A retrospective study</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kang, Jae‐Yoon ; Chung, Jee‐Hye ; Park, Hee‐Sung ; Park, Yong‐Ho ; Choi, Jin Woong</creator><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jae‐Yoon ; Chung, Jee‐Hye ; Park, Hee‐Sung ; Park, Yong‐Ho ; Choi, Jin Woong</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate the radiologic parameters related to success of round window (RW) approach for cochlear implantation (CI). Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic‐tertiary centre. Participants Eighty‐four consecutive patients without inner ear anomaly who underwent CI with the intent of the RW approach were included. The RW approach was performed through the facial recess after posterior tympanotomy (RW group). When the RW approach was not possible despite maximum effort to expose the RW, promontory cochleostomy (PC) was performed (PC group). Main outcome measures The following radiologic parameters were compared between the two groups: (a) Width of the facial recess, (b) oblique distance between the cochlear basal turn (CBT) and facial nerve (FN), (c) anteroposterior distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and (d) angle between the EAC and CBT. Results Seventy patients (83.3%) were implanted using the RW approach, and 14 patients (16.7%) underwent the PC approach for CI. The anteroposterior distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and the angle between the EAC and CBT in the RW group were significantly longer and wider than those in the PC group (P &lt; 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that these two parameters were independent parameters for success of the RW approach. Conclusions The distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and the angle between the EAC and CBT are associated with success of RW approach. Therefore, preoperative radiologic analysis of the two parameters might help CI surgeons to select RW approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-4478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-4486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/coa.13207</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30091180</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cochlea ; cochlear implant ; cochlear implantation ; Cochlear implants ; Facial nerve ; Implantation ; Inner ear ; Medical personnel ; Multivariate analysis ; Parameters ; Patients ; radiology ; round window ; Success ; temporal bone computed tomography</subject><ispartof>Clinical otolaryngology, 2018-12, Vol.43 (6), p.1535-1540</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-e648ff14707cecb079cf4ada8fe0b9a8a8be656d8ad9dade35f9b706f061b2743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-e648ff14707cecb079cf4ada8fe0b9a8a8be656d8ad9dade35f9b706f061b2743</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3101-6841</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcoa.13207$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcoa.13207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30091180$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jae‐Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Jee‐Hye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hee‐Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Yong‐Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin Woong</creatorcontrib><title>Radiological parameters related to success of the round window approach in cochlear implantation: A retrospective study</title><title>Clinical otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Clin Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate the radiologic parameters related to success of round window (RW) approach for cochlear implantation (CI). Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic‐tertiary centre. Participants Eighty‐four consecutive patients without inner ear anomaly who underwent CI with the intent of the RW approach were included. The RW approach was performed through the facial recess after posterior tympanotomy (RW group). When the RW approach was not possible despite maximum effort to expose the RW, promontory cochleostomy (PC) was performed (PC group). Main outcome measures The following radiologic parameters were compared between the two groups: (a) Width of the facial recess, (b) oblique distance between the cochlear basal turn (CBT) and facial nerve (FN), (c) anteroposterior distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and (d) angle between the EAC and CBT. Results Seventy patients (83.3%) were implanted using the RW approach, and 14 patients (16.7%) underwent the PC approach for CI. The anteroposterior distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and the angle between the EAC and CBT in the RW group were significantly longer and wider than those in the PC group (P &lt; 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that these two parameters were independent parameters for success of the RW approach. Conclusions The distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and the angle between the EAC and CBT are associated with success of RW approach. Therefore, preoperative radiologic analysis of the two parameters might help CI surgeons to select RW approach.</description><subject>Cochlea</subject><subject>cochlear implant</subject><subject>cochlear implantation</subject><subject>Cochlear implants</subject><subject>Facial nerve</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Inner ear</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>radiology</subject><subject>round window</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>temporal bone computed tomography</subject><issn>1749-4478</issn><issn>1749-4486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoMo7oce_AMS8OIeZjfppDtpb8PgFywsiJ5DdVJxsnR32iTtMP_e6Kx7EMylcnh4eKteQl5xds3ru7ERrrlomHpCzrmS_UZK3T19_Ct9Ri5yvmdMCqb4c3ImGOs51-ycHL6AC3GM34OFkS6QYMKCKdOEIxR0tESaV2sxZxo9LXukKa6zo4cwu3igsCwpgt3TMFMb7X5ESDRMywhzgRLi_I5uq6ukmBe0JfxEmsvqji_IMw9jxpcP85J8-_D-6-7T5vbu4-fd9nZjRSvUBjupvedSMWXRDkz11ktwoD2yoQcNesCu7ZwG1ztwKFrfD4p1nnV8aJQUl-TtyVtj_lgxFzOFbHGs-TCu2TRMd02rWyEq-uYf9D6uaa7pTMOF7HvFeVupqxNl60o5oTdLChOko-HM_G7D1DbMnzYq-_rBuA4Tukfy7_krcHMCDmHE4_9NZne3PSl_AQz-lc8</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Kang, Jae‐Yoon</creator><creator>Chung, Jee‐Hye</creator><creator>Park, Hee‐Sung</creator><creator>Park, Yong‐Ho</creator><creator>Choi, Jin Woong</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-6841</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Radiological parameters related to success of the round window approach in cochlear implantation: A retrospective study</title><author>Kang, Jae‐Yoon ; Chung, Jee‐Hye ; Park, Hee‐Sung ; Park, Yong‐Ho ; Choi, Jin Woong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-e648ff14707cecb079cf4ada8fe0b9a8a8be656d8ad9dade35f9b706f061b2743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cochlea</topic><topic>cochlear implant</topic><topic>cochlear implantation</topic><topic>Cochlear implants</topic><topic>Facial nerve</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Inner ear</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>radiology</topic><topic>round window</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>temporal bone computed tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jae‐Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Jee‐Hye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hee‐Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Yong‐Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin Woong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kang, Jae‐Yoon</au><au>Chung, Jee‐Hye</au><au>Park, Hee‐Sung</au><au>Park, Yong‐Ho</au><au>Choi, Jin Woong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiological parameters related to success of the round window approach in cochlear implantation: A retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1535</spage><epage>1540</epage><pages>1535-1540</pages><issn>1749-4478</issn><eissn>1749-4486</eissn><abstract>Objectives To evaluate the radiologic parameters related to success of round window (RW) approach for cochlear implantation (CI). Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic‐tertiary centre. Participants Eighty‐four consecutive patients without inner ear anomaly who underwent CI with the intent of the RW approach were included. The RW approach was performed through the facial recess after posterior tympanotomy (RW group). When the RW approach was not possible despite maximum effort to expose the RW, promontory cochleostomy (PC) was performed (PC group). Main outcome measures The following radiologic parameters were compared between the two groups: (a) Width of the facial recess, (b) oblique distance between the cochlear basal turn (CBT) and facial nerve (FN), (c) anteroposterior distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and (d) angle between the EAC and CBT. Results Seventy patients (83.3%) were implanted using the RW approach, and 14 patients (16.7%) underwent the PC approach for CI. The anteroposterior distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and the angle between the EAC and CBT in the RW group were significantly longer and wider than those in the PC group (P &lt; 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that these two parameters were independent parameters for success of the RW approach. Conclusions The distance between the posterior margin of the RW and FN and the angle between the EAC and CBT are associated with success of RW approach. Therefore, preoperative radiologic analysis of the two parameters might help CI surgeons to select RW approach.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30091180</pmid><doi>10.1111/coa.13207</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-6841</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-4478
ispartof Clinical otolaryngology, 2018-12, Vol.43 (6), p.1535-1540
issn 1749-4478
1749-4486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2086258533
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cochlea
cochlear implant
cochlear implantation
Cochlear implants
Facial nerve
Implantation
Inner ear
Medical personnel
Multivariate analysis
Parameters
Patients
radiology
round window
Success
temporal bone computed tomography
title Radiological parameters related to success of the round window approach in cochlear implantation: A retrospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A17%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiological%20parameters%20related%20to%20success%20of%20the%20round%20window%20approach%20in%20cochlear%20implantation:%20A%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Kang,%20Jae%E2%80%90Yoon&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1535&rft.epage=1540&rft.pages=1535-1540&rft.issn=1749-4478&rft.eissn=1749-4486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/coa.13207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2086258533%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2134997115&rft_id=info:pmid/30091180&rfr_iscdi=true