Restoring prairie pothole wetlands: does the species pool concept offer decision-making guidance for re-vegetation?

Question: Do regional species pools, landscape isolation or on-site constraints cause plants from different guilds to vary in their ability to colonize restored wetlands? Location: Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota, USA. Methods: Floristic surveys of 41 restored wetlands were made three and 12 years...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied vegetation science 2006-11, Vol.9 (2), p.261-270
1. Verfasser: Galatowitsch, Susan M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 270
container_issue 2
container_start_page 261
container_title Applied vegetation science
container_volume 9
creator Galatowitsch, Susan M
description Question: Do regional species pools, landscape isolation or on-site constraints cause plants from different guilds to vary in their ability to colonize restored wetlands? Location: Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota, USA. Methods: Floristic surveys of 41 restored wetlands were made three and 12 years after reflooding to determine changes in local species pools for eight plant guilds. The effect of landscape isolation on colonization efficiency was evaluated for each guild by plotting local species pools against distance to nearby natural wetlands, and the relative importance of dispersal vs. on-site constraints in limiting colonization was explored by comparing the local species pools of restored and natural wetlands within the region. Results: Of the 517 wetland plant taxa occurring in the region, 50% have established within 12 years. The proportion of the regional species pool represented in local species pools differed among guilds, with sedge-meadow perennials, emergent perennials and floating/submersed aquatics least represented (33–36%) and annual guilds most represented (74–94%). Colonization-to-extinction ratios suggest that floating/submersed aquatics have already reached a species equilibrium while sedge-meadow and emergent perennials are still accumulating species. Increasing distance to nearest wetlands decreased the proportion of the regional species pool present in local pools for all guilds except native annuals and woody plants. The maximum proportion predicted, assuming no distance constraint, was comparable to the lowest-diversity natural wetlands for most perennial guilds, and also lower than what was achieved in a planted, weeded restoration. Conclusions: Abiotic constraints seem to limit the colonization of floating/submersed aquatics into natural or restored wetlands, whereas all other guilds are potentially constrained by dispersal or biotic factors (i.e. competition from invasive species). Using species pools to evaluate restoration progress revealed that immigration potential varies considerably among guilds, that local species richness does not necessarily correspond to immigration limitations, and that some guilds (e.g. sedge-meadow perennials) will likely benefit more than others from being planted at restoration sites. Nomenclature: Anon. (2004).
doi_str_mv 10.1658/1402-2001(2006)9[261:RPPWDT]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20858612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4620485</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4620485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b351t-bb1dbae1c1153bb2ec954d36eee0f5a9ce49cd0f6a51f70fe21ea798a74142c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkFFrFDEUhYei0Fr7DwrmSRScbW4mmZ20D8VutS0UttQtCiIhk7nZpp2dTJNZi__eDKP-AF9uDpwvh3tPln0AOoNSVEfAKcsZpfAujfK9_M5KOL69ufl6vvrBZnS2WJ6wnWwvsTwHKr-9SPrvl93sVYwPScylkHtZvMU4-OC6NemDdsEh6f1w71skzzi0umviMWk8RjLcI4k9Gpd0731LjO8M9gPx1mIgTXKi812-0Y9j2nrrGp0AYn0gAfOfuMZBD4k4fZ29tLqNePDn3c9Wnz-tFpf59fLiavHxOq8LAUNe19DUGsEAiKKuGRopeFOUiEit0NIgl6ahttQC7JxaZIB6Lis958CZKfazt1NsH_zTNp2pNi4abNNR6LdRMVqJqgSWwPMJNMHHGNCqPriNDr8UUDUWrsb21NjeOEolVSpcTYUrpqhaLNUYczjFPIyN_svgJaO8Esl-M9lWe6XXwUV194VRKCgA45UsEnE2EbXzvsP_2-I3jFuhDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20858612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Restoring prairie pothole wetlands: does the species pool concept offer decision-making guidance for re-vegetation?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Galatowitsch, Susan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Galatowitsch, Susan M</creatorcontrib><description>Question: Do regional species pools, landscape isolation or on-site constraints cause plants from different guilds to vary in their ability to colonize restored wetlands? Location: Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota, USA. Methods: Floristic surveys of 41 restored wetlands were made three and 12 years after reflooding to determine changes in local species pools for eight plant guilds. The effect of landscape isolation on colonization efficiency was evaluated for each guild by plotting local species pools against distance to nearby natural wetlands, and the relative importance of dispersal vs. on-site constraints in limiting colonization was explored by comparing the local species pools of restored and natural wetlands within the region. Results: Of the 517 wetland plant taxa occurring in the region, 50% have established within 12 years. The proportion of the regional species pool represented in local species pools differed among guilds, with sedge-meadow perennials, emergent perennials and floating/submersed aquatics least represented (33–36%) and annual guilds most represented (74–94%). Colonization-to-extinction ratios suggest that floating/submersed aquatics have already reached a species equilibrium while sedge-meadow and emergent perennials are still accumulating species. Increasing distance to nearest wetlands decreased the proportion of the regional species pool present in local pools for all guilds except native annuals and woody plants. The maximum proportion predicted, assuming no distance constraint, was comparable to the lowest-diversity natural wetlands for most perennial guilds, and also lower than what was achieved in a planted, weeded restoration. Conclusions: Abiotic constraints seem to limit the colonization of floating/submersed aquatics into natural or restored wetlands, whereas all other guilds are potentially constrained by dispersal or biotic factors (i.e. competition from invasive species). Using species pools to evaluate restoration progress revealed that immigration potential varies considerably among guilds, that local species richness does not necessarily correspond to immigration limitations, and that some guilds (e.g. sedge-meadow perennials) will likely benefit more than others from being planted at restoration sites. Nomenclature: Anon. (2004).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1402-2001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1654-109X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1658/1402-2001(2006)9[261:RPPWDT]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IAVS; Opulus Press Uppsala</publisher><subject>Annuals ; botanical composition ; decision making ; ecological succession ; Invasive plant ; Invasive species ; land restoration ; Landscape fragmentation ; macrophytes ; niches ; Perennials ; pioneer species ; Plant colonization ; plant communities ; Plant community assembly ; Plant dispersal ; Planting ; Plants ; prairie pothole wetlands ; Prairies ; Restoration ; seed dispersal ; Species ; Succession ; Vegetation ; Vegetation management ; Wet prairies ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Applied vegetation science, 2006-11, Vol.9 (2), p.261-270</ispartof><rights>IAVS; Opulus Press Uppsala.</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 IAVS; Opulus Press Uppsala</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b351t-bb1dbae1c1153bb2ec954d36eee0f5a9ce49cd0f6a51f70fe21ea798a74142c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1658/1402-2001(2006)9[261:RPPWDT]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4620485$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26957,27903,27904,52342,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galatowitsch, Susan M</creatorcontrib><title>Restoring prairie pothole wetlands: does the species pool concept offer decision-making guidance for re-vegetation?</title><title>Applied vegetation science</title><description>Question: Do regional species pools, landscape isolation or on-site constraints cause plants from different guilds to vary in their ability to colonize restored wetlands? Location: Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota, USA. Methods: Floristic surveys of 41 restored wetlands were made three and 12 years after reflooding to determine changes in local species pools for eight plant guilds. The effect of landscape isolation on colonization efficiency was evaluated for each guild by plotting local species pools against distance to nearby natural wetlands, and the relative importance of dispersal vs. on-site constraints in limiting colonization was explored by comparing the local species pools of restored and natural wetlands within the region. Results: Of the 517 wetland plant taxa occurring in the region, 50% have established within 12 years. The proportion of the regional species pool represented in local species pools differed among guilds, with sedge-meadow perennials, emergent perennials and floating/submersed aquatics least represented (33–36%) and annual guilds most represented (74–94%). Colonization-to-extinction ratios suggest that floating/submersed aquatics have already reached a species equilibrium while sedge-meadow and emergent perennials are still accumulating species. Increasing distance to nearest wetlands decreased the proportion of the regional species pool present in local pools for all guilds except native annuals and woody plants. The maximum proportion predicted, assuming no distance constraint, was comparable to the lowest-diversity natural wetlands for most perennial guilds, and also lower than what was achieved in a planted, weeded restoration. Conclusions: Abiotic constraints seem to limit the colonization of floating/submersed aquatics into natural or restored wetlands, whereas all other guilds are potentially constrained by dispersal or biotic factors (i.e. competition from invasive species). Using species pools to evaluate restoration progress revealed that immigration potential varies considerably among guilds, that local species richness does not necessarily correspond to immigration limitations, and that some guilds (e.g. sedge-meadow perennials) will likely benefit more than others from being planted at restoration sites. Nomenclature: Anon. (2004).</description><subject>Annuals</subject><subject>botanical composition</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>ecological succession</subject><subject>Invasive plant</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>land restoration</subject><subject>Landscape fragmentation</subject><subject>macrophytes</subject><subject>niches</subject><subject>Perennials</subject><subject>pioneer species</subject><subject>Plant colonization</subject><subject>plant communities</subject><subject>Plant community assembly</subject><subject>Plant dispersal</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>prairie pothole wetlands</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>seed dispersal</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Succession</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation management</subject><subject>Wet prairies</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1402-2001</issn><issn>1654-109X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkFFrFDEUhYei0Fr7DwrmSRScbW4mmZ20D8VutS0UttQtCiIhk7nZpp2dTJNZi__eDKP-AF9uDpwvh3tPln0AOoNSVEfAKcsZpfAujfK9_M5KOL69ufl6vvrBZnS2WJ6wnWwvsTwHKr-9SPrvl93sVYwPScylkHtZvMU4-OC6NemDdsEh6f1w71skzzi0umviMWk8RjLcI4k9Gpd0731LjO8M9gPx1mIgTXKi812-0Y9j2nrrGp0AYn0gAfOfuMZBD4k4fZ29tLqNePDn3c9Wnz-tFpf59fLiavHxOq8LAUNe19DUGsEAiKKuGRopeFOUiEit0NIgl6ahttQC7JxaZIB6Lis958CZKfazt1NsH_zTNp2pNi4abNNR6LdRMVqJqgSWwPMJNMHHGNCqPriNDr8UUDUWrsb21NjeOEolVSpcTYUrpqhaLNUYczjFPIyN_svgJaO8Esl-M9lWe6XXwUV194VRKCgA45UsEnE2EbXzvsP_2-I3jFuhDQ</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Galatowitsch, Susan M</creator><general>IAVS; Opulus Press Uppsala</general><general>Opulus Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Restoring prairie pothole wetlands: does the species pool concept offer decision-making guidance for re-vegetation?</title><author>Galatowitsch, Susan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b351t-bb1dbae1c1153bb2ec954d36eee0f5a9ce49cd0f6a51f70fe21ea798a74142c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Annuals</topic><topic>botanical composition</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>ecological succession</topic><topic>Invasive plant</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>land restoration</topic><topic>Landscape fragmentation</topic><topic>macrophytes</topic><topic>niches</topic><topic>Perennials</topic><topic>pioneer species</topic><topic>Plant colonization</topic><topic>plant communities</topic><topic>Plant community assembly</topic><topic>Plant dispersal</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>prairie pothole wetlands</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>seed dispersal</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Succession</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation management</topic><topic>Wet prairies</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galatowitsch, Susan M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Applied vegetation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galatowitsch, Susan M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Restoring prairie pothole wetlands: does the species pool concept offer decision-making guidance for re-vegetation?</atitle><jtitle>Applied vegetation science</jtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>261-270</pages><issn>1402-2001</issn><eissn>1654-109X</eissn><abstract>Question: Do regional species pools, landscape isolation or on-site constraints cause plants from different guilds to vary in their ability to colonize restored wetlands? Location: Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota, USA. Methods: Floristic surveys of 41 restored wetlands were made three and 12 years after reflooding to determine changes in local species pools for eight plant guilds. The effect of landscape isolation on colonization efficiency was evaluated for each guild by plotting local species pools against distance to nearby natural wetlands, and the relative importance of dispersal vs. on-site constraints in limiting colonization was explored by comparing the local species pools of restored and natural wetlands within the region. Results: Of the 517 wetland plant taxa occurring in the region, 50% have established within 12 years. The proportion of the regional species pool represented in local species pools differed among guilds, with sedge-meadow perennials, emergent perennials and floating/submersed aquatics least represented (33–36%) and annual guilds most represented (74–94%). Colonization-to-extinction ratios suggest that floating/submersed aquatics have already reached a species equilibrium while sedge-meadow and emergent perennials are still accumulating species. Increasing distance to nearest wetlands decreased the proportion of the regional species pool present in local pools for all guilds except native annuals and woody plants. The maximum proportion predicted, assuming no distance constraint, was comparable to the lowest-diversity natural wetlands for most perennial guilds, and also lower than what was achieved in a planted, weeded restoration. Conclusions: Abiotic constraints seem to limit the colonization of floating/submersed aquatics into natural or restored wetlands, whereas all other guilds are potentially constrained by dispersal or biotic factors (i.e. competition from invasive species). Using species pools to evaluate restoration progress revealed that immigration potential varies considerably among guilds, that local species richness does not necessarily correspond to immigration limitations, and that some guilds (e.g. sedge-meadow perennials) will likely benefit more than others from being planted at restoration sites. Nomenclature: Anon. (2004).</abstract><pub>IAVS; Opulus Press Uppsala</pub><doi>10.1658/1402-2001(2006)9[261:RPPWDT]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1402-2001
ispartof Applied vegetation science, 2006-11, Vol.9 (2), p.261-270
issn 1402-2001
1654-109X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20858612
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; BioOne Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Annuals
botanical composition
decision making
ecological succession
Invasive plant
Invasive species
land restoration
Landscape fragmentation
macrophytes
niches
Perennials
pioneer species
Plant colonization
plant communities
Plant community assembly
Plant dispersal
Planting
Plants
prairie pothole wetlands
Prairies
Restoration
seed dispersal
Species
Succession
Vegetation
Vegetation management
Wet prairies
Wetlands
title Restoring prairie pothole wetlands: does the species pool concept offer decision-making guidance for re-vegetation?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T17%3A52%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Restoring%20prairie%20pothole%20wetlands:%20does%20the%20species%20pool%20concept%20offer%20decision-making%20guidance%20for%20re-vegetation?&rft.jtitle=Applied%20vegetation%20science&rft.au=Galatowitsch,%20Susan%20M&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=261-270&rft.issn=1402-2001&rft.eissn=1654-109X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1658/1402-2001(2006)9%5B261:RPPWDT%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4620485%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20858612&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4620485&rfr_iscdi=true