Moxifloxacin Monotherapy Is Effective in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: The MOTIV Study—A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background. The aim of this study was to show that sequential intravenous and oral moxifloxacin monotherapy (400 mg once per day) is as efficacious and safe as a combination regimen (intravenous ceftriaxone, 2 g once per day, plus sequential intravenous and oral levofloxacin, 500 mg twice per day) i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2008-05, Vol.46 (10), p.1499-1509
Hauptverfasser: Torres, Antoni, Garau, Javier, Arvis, Pierre, Carlet, Jean, Choudhri, Shurjeel, Kureishi, Amar, Le Berre, Marie-Aude, Lode, Hartmut, Winter, John, Read, Robert C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1509
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1499
container_title Clinical infectious diseases
container_volume 46
creator Torres, Antoni
Garau, Javier
Arvis, Pierre
Carlet, Jean
Choudhri, Shurjeel
Kureishi, Amar
Le Berre, Marie-Aude
Lode, Hartmut
Winter, John
Read, Robert C.
description Background. The aim of this study was to show that sequential intravenous and oral moxifloxacin monotherapy (400 mg once per day) is as efficacious and safe as a combination regimen (intravenous ceftriaxone, 2 g once per day, plus sequential intravenous and oral levofloxacin, 500 mg twice per day) in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial. Patients with a Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) of III–V were stratified on the basis of PSI risk class before randomization. The primary efficacy end point was clinical response at test of cure (4–14 days after the completion of treatment). Secondary efficacy end points were clinical and bacteriological response at end of treatment (days 7–14) and at follow-up assessment (21–28 days after the end of treatment), overall mortality, and mortality attributable to pneumonia. Results. Seven hundred thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study (368 in the moxifloxacin arm and 365 in the comparator arm); 49% had a PSI of IV, and 10% had a PSI of V. Of 569 patients (291 in the moxifloxacin arm and 278 in the comparator arm) valid for per-protocol analysis, the overall clinical cure rates at test of cure were 86.9% for moxifloxacin and 89.9% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, −8.1% to 2.2%). Bacteriological success at test of cure was 83.3% for moxifloxacin and 85.1% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, −15.4% to 11.8%). There were no significant differences between moxifloxacin and comparator treatments in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events or in mortality. Conclusions. Monotherapy with sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin was noninferior to treatment with ceftriaxone plus levofloxacin combination therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia who required hospitalization. Clinical trials registration. The MOxifloxacin Treatment IV Study is registered at NLM Clinical Trials (registration number NCT00431678).
doi_str_mv 10.1086/587519
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20856668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40307391</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40307391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-bd3776c7dbfec8ed07866dcf6d2df10b6b2724edb05a0d828eaed241b70ec6243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1uEzEURkcIREsLbwCyumA3YI_HP8MuikoTqaFtCBViY3lsj-IwY6e2BxJWfYNueEKehCmJWonVvdI5-u6Vvix7heA7BDl9TzgjqHqSHSKCWU5JhZ4OOyQ8LznmB9mLGFcQIsQheZ4dIF6iquTFYXY38xvbtH4jlXVg5p1PSxPkegumEZw2jVHJ_jBgYBMf1zbJ1v4yGlzKZI1LEfy0aQnGvut6Z9M2H6mb3oZ7wZm-887KD2CxNGB2sZheg8-p19s_t79HYC6d9t2_qHFrnVWyBYtgZXucPWtkG83L_TzKvnw8XYwn-fnF2XQ8Os8VrkjKa40Zo4rpeviQGw0Zp1SrhupCNwjWtC5YURpdQyKh5gU30uiiRDWDRtGixEfZ213uOvib3sQkOhuVaVvpjO-jKCAnlFI-iCf_iSvfBzf8JgpUVcNdTB_TVPAxBtOIdbCdDFuBoLjvR-z6GcQ3-7S-7ox-1PaFDMLrnbCKyYcHXkIMGa7QwPMdtzGZzQOX4bugDDMiJl-_iWv4aX55NpuLK_wXtm2mEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219978636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moxifloxacin Monotherapy Is Effective in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: The MOTIV Study—A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Torres, Antoni ; Garau, Javier ; Arvis, Pierre ; Carlet, Jean ; Choudhri, Shurjeel ; Kureishi, Amar ; Le Berre, Marie-Aude ; Lode, Hartmut ; Winter, John ; Read, Robert C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Torres, Antoni ; Garau, Javier ; Arvis, Pierre ; Carlet, Jean ; Choudhri, Shurjeel ; Kureishi, Amar ; Le Berre, Marie-Aude ; Lode, Hartmut ; Winter, John ; Read, Robert C. ; MOTIV (MOxifloxacin Treatment IV) Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Background. The aim of this study was to show that sequential intravenous and oral moxifloxacin monotherapy (400 mg once per day) is as efficacious and safe as a combination regimen (intravenous ceftriaxone, 2 g once per day, plus sequential intravenous and oral levofloxacin, 500 mg twice per day) in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial. Patients with a Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) of III–V were stratified on the basis of PSI risk class before randomization. The primary efficacy end point was clinical response at test of cure (4–14 days after the completion of treatment). Secondary efficacy end points were clinical and bacteriological response at end of treatment (days 7–14) and at follow-up assessment (21–28 days after the end of treatment), overall mortality, and mortality attributable to pneumonia. Results. Seven hundred thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study (368 in the moxifloxacin arm and 365 in the comparator arm); 49% had a PSI of IV, and 10% had a PSI of V. Of 569 patients (291 in the moxifloxacin arm and 278 in the comparator arm) valid for per-protocol analysis, the overall clinical cure rates at test of cure were 86.9% for moxifloxacin and 89.9% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, −8.1% to 2.2%). Bacteriological success at test of cure was 83.3% for moxifloxacin and 85.1% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, −15.4% to 11.8%). There were no significant differences between moxifloxacin and comparator treatments in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events or in mortality. Conclusions. Monotherapy with sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin was noninferior to treatment with ceftriaxone plus levofloxacin combination therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia who required hospitalization. Clinical trials registration. The MOxifloxacin Treatment IV Study is registered at NLM Clinical Trials (registration number NCT00431678).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/587519</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18419482</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics ; Antigens ; Articles and Commentaries ; Aza Compounds - administration & dosage ; Aza Compounds - adverse effects ; Aza Compounds - therapeutic use ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Blood ; Ceftriaxone - administration & dosage ; Ceftriaxone - adverse effects ; Ceftriaxone - therapeutic use ; Clinical trials ; Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy ; Community-Acquired Infections - mortality ; Comparators ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Fluoroquinolones ; Health outcomes ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Intensive care units ; Levofloxacin ; Male ; Medications ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Ofloxacin - administration & dosage ; Ofloxacin - adverse effects ; Ofloxacin - therapeutic use ; Pneumonia ; Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy ; Pneumonia, Bacterial - mortality ; Prospective Studies ; Quinolines - administration & dosage ; Quinolines - adverse effects ; Quinolines - therapeutic use ; Severity of Illness Index ; Studies ; Symptoms ; Therapy ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2008-05, Vol.46 (10), p.1499-1509</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Infectious Diseases Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press May 15, 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-bd3776c7dbfec8ed07866dcf6d2df10b6b2724edb05a0d828eaed241b70ec6243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-bd3776c7dbfec8ed07866dcf6d2df10b6b2724edb05a0d828eaed241b70ec6243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40307391$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40307391$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18419482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torres, Antoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garau, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arvis, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlet, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhri, Shurjeel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kureishi, Amar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Berre, Marie-Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lode, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOTIV (MOxifloxacin Treatment IV) Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Moxifloxacin Monotherapy Is Effective in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: The MOTIV Study—A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><description>Background. The aim of this study was to show that sequential intravenous and oral moxifloxacin monotherapy (400 mg once per day) is as efficacious and safe as a combination regimen (intravenous ceftriaxone, 2 g once per day, plus sequential intravenous and oral levofloxacin, 500 mg twice per day) in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial. Patients with a Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) of III–V were stratified on the basis of PSI risk class before randomization. The primary efficacy end point was clinical response at test of cure (4–14 days after the completion of treatment). Secondary efficacy end points were clinical and bacteriological response at end of treatment (days 7–14) and at follow-up assessment (21–28 days after the end of treatment), overall mortality, and mortality attributable to pneumonia. Results. Seven hundred thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study (368 in the moxifloxacin arm and 365 in the comparator arm); 49% had a PSI of IV, and 10% had a PSI of V. Of 569 patients (291 in the moxifloxacin arm and 278 in the comparator arm) valid for per-protocol analysis, the overall clinical cure rates at test of cure were 86.9% for moxifloxacin and 89.9% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, −8.1% to 2.2%). Bacteriological success at test of cure was 83.3% for moxifloxacin and 85.1% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, −15.4% to 11.8%). There were no significant differences between moxifloxacin and comparator treatments in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events or in mortality. Conclusions. Monotherapy with sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin was noninferior to treatment with ceftriaxone plus levofloxacin combination therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia who required hospitalization. Clinical trials registration. The MOxifloxacin Treatment IV Study is registered at NLM Clinical Trials (registration number NCT00431678).</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Articles and Commentaries</subject><subject>Aza Compounds - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Aza Compounds - adverse effects</subject><subject>Aza Compounds - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Ceftriaxone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ceftriaxone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ceftriaxone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - mortality</subject><subject>Comparators</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones</subject><subject>Health outcomes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Levofloxacin</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medications</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Ofloxacin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ofloxacin - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ofloxacin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Bacterial - mortality</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quinolines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Quinolines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Quinolines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1uEzEURkcIREsLbwCyumA3YI_HP8MuikoTqaFtCBViY3lsj-IwY6e2BxJWfYNueEKehCmJWonVvdI5-u6Vvix7heA7BDl9TzgjqHqSHSKCWU5JhZ4OOyQ8LznmB9mLGFcQIsQheZ4dIF6iquTFYXY38xvbtH4jlXVg5p1PSxPkegumEZw2jVHJ_jBgYBMf1zbJ1v4yGlzKZI1LEfy0aQnGvut6Z9M2H6mb3oZ7wZm-887KD2CxNGB2sZheg8-p19s_t79HYC6d9t2_qHFrnVWyBYtgZXucPWtkG83L_TzKvnw8XYwn-fnF2XQ8Os8VrkjKa40Zo4rpeviQGw0Zp1SrhupCNwjWtC5YURpdQyKh5gU30uiiRDWDRtGixEfZ213uOvib3sQkOhuVaVvpjO-jKCAnlFI-iCf_iSvfBzf8JgpUVcNdTB_TVPAxBtOIdbCdDFuBoLjvR-z6GcQ3-7S-7ox-1PaFDMLrnbCKyYcHXkIMGa7QwPMdtzGZzQOX4bugDDMiJl-_iWv4aX55NpuLK_wXtm2mEA</recordid><startdate>20080515</startdate><enddate>20080515</enddate><creator>Torres, Antoni</creator><creator>Garau, Javier</creator><creator>Arvis, Pierre</creator><creator>Carlet, Jean</creator><creator>Choudhri, Shurjeel</creator><creator>Kureishi, Amar</creator><creator>Le Berre, Marie-Aude</creator><creator>Lode, Hartmut</creator><creator>Winter, John</creator><creator>Read, Robert C.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080515</creationdate><title>Moxifloxacin Monotherapy Is Effective in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: The MOTIV Study—A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Torres, Antoni ; Garau, Javier ; Arvis, Pierre ; Carlet, Jean ; Choudhri, Shurjeel ; Kureishi, Amar ; Le Berre, Marie-Aude ; Lode, Hartmut ; Winter, John ; Read, Robert C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-bd3776c7dbfec8ed07866dcf6d2df10b6b2724edb05a0d828eaed241b70ec6243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Articles and Commentaries</topic><topic>Aza Compounds - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Aza Compounds - adverse effects</topic><topic>Aza Compounds - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Ceftriaxone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ceftriaxone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ceftriaxone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - mortality</topic><topic>Comparators</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones</topic><topic>Health outcomes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Levofloxacin</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medications</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Ofloxacin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ofloxacin - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ofloxacin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Bacterial - mortality</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quinolines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Quinolines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Quinolines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres, Antoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garau, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arvis, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlet, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhri, Shurjeel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kureishi, Amar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Berre, Marie-Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lode, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOTIV (MOxifloxacin Treatment IV) Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres, Antoni</au><au>Garau, Javier</au><au>Arvis, Pierre</au><au>Carlet, Jean</au><au>Choudhri, Shurjeel</au><au>Kureishi, Amar</au><au>Le Berre, Marie-Aude</au><au>Lode, Hartmut</au><au>Winter, John</au><au>Read, Robert C.</au><aucorp>MOTIV (MOxifloxacin Treatment IV) Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moxifloxacin Monotherapy Is Effective in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: The MOTIV Study—A Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><date>2008-05-15</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1499</spage><epage>1509</epage><pages>1499-1509</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>Background. The aim of this study was to show that sequential intravenous and oral moxifloxacin monotherapy (400 mg once per day) is as efficacious and safe as a combination regimen (intravenous ceftriaxone, 2 g once per day, plus sequential intravenous and oral levofloxacin, 500 mg twice per day) in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial. Patients with a Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) of III–V were stratified on the basis of PSI risk class before randomization. The primary efficacy end point was clinical response at test of cure (4–14 days after the completion of treatment). Secondary efficacy end points were clinical and bacteriological response at end of treatment (days 7–14) and at follow-up assessment (21–28 days after the end of treatment), overall mortality, and mortality attributable to pneumonia. Results. Seven hundred thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study (368 in the moxifloxacin arm and 365 in the comparator arm); 49% had a PSI of IV, and 10% had a PSI of V. Of 569 patients (291 in the moxifloxacin arm and 278 in the comparator arm) valid for per-protocol analysis, the overall clinical cure rates at test of cure were 86.9% for moxifloxacin and 89.9% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, −8.1% to 2.2%). Bacteriological success at test of cure was 83.3% for moxifloxacin and 85.1% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, −15.4% to 11.8%). There were no significant differences between moxifloxacin and comparator treatments in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events or in mortality. Conclusions. Monotherapy with sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin was noninferior to treatment with ceftriaxone plus levofloxacin combination therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia who required hospitalization. Clinical trials registration. The MOxifloxacin Treatment IV Study is registered at NLM Clinical Trials (registration number NCT00431678).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>18419482</pmid><doi>10.1086/587519</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-4838
ispartof Clinical infectious diseases, 2008-05, Vol.46 (10), p.1499-1509
issn 1058-4838
1537-6591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20856668
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibiotics
Antigens
Articles and Commentaries
Aza Compounds - administration & dosage
Aza Compounds - adverse effects
Aza Compounds - therapeutic use
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Blood
Ceftriaxone - administration & dosage
Ceftriaxone - adverse effects
Ceftriaxone - therapeutic use
Clinical trials
Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy
Community-Acquired Infections - mortality
Comparators
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Fluoroquinolones
Health outcomes
Humans
Infections
Infectious diseases
Intensive care units
Levofloxacin
Male
Medications
Middle Aged
Mortality
Ofloxacin - administration & dosage
Ofloxacin - adverse effects
Ofloxacin - therapeutic use
Pneumonia
Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy
Pneumonia, Bacterial - mortality
Prospective Studies
Quinolines - administration & dosage
Quinolines - adverse effects
Quinolines - therapeutic use
Severity of Illness Index
Studies
Symptoms
Therapy
Treatment Outcome
title Moxifloxacin Monotherapy Is Effective in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: The MOTIV Study—A Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T20%3A46%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moxifloxacin%20Monotherapy%20Is%20Effective%20in%20Hospitalized%20Patients%20with%20Community-Acquired%20Pneumonia:%20The%20MOTIV%20Study%E2%80%94A%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Torres,%20Antoni&rft.aucorp=MOTIV%20(MOxifloxacin%20Treatment%20IV)%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2008-05-15&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1499&rft.epage=1509&rft.pages=1499-1509&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/587519&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40307391%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219978636&rft_id=info:pmid/18419482&rft_jstor_id=40307391&rfr_iscdi=true