Effect of a Probiotic Preparation on Ventilator‐Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) occurs as a life‐threatening complication in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Probiotic administration may modify the gut microbiota; however, whether this modification could decrease VAP occurrence is not known. Methods In this study,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrition in clinical practice 2019-02, Vol.34 (1), p.156-162
Hauptverfasser: Mahmoodpoor, Ata, Hamishehkar, Hadi, Asghari, Roghaieh, Abri, Ramin, Shadvar, Kamran, Sanaie, Sarvin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 1
container_start_page 156
container_title Nutrition in clinical practice
container_volume 34
creator Mahmoodpoor, Ata
Hamishehkar, Hadi
Asghari, Roghaieh
Abri, Ramin
Shadvar, Kamran
Sanaie, Sarvin
description Background Ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) occurs as a life‐threatening complication in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Probiotic administration may modify the gut microbiota; however, whether this modification could decrease VAP occurrence is not known. Methods In this study, 100 adult critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for >48 hours were randomly assigned to either the probiotic or the control group. The patients in the probiotic group received 2 capsules of probiotic preparation containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus spp., and those in the control group received placebo daily for 14 days. Results The patients in the probiotic group had a lower incidence of statistically microbiologically confirmed VAP. The duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay was also lower in the probiotic group (P < .05). More than half of the patients in the control group had gastric residuals during ICU stay, compared with only 30% of patients in the probiotic group (P = .004). Probiotic usage led to a nonsignificant decrease in diarrhea, gastric and oropharyngeal colonization, and incidence of multidrug‐resistant pathogens. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curves for time to the first episode of VAP did not show a significant difference between probiotic and control groups (log‐rank test = 1.89; P = .17). Conclusions The results of probiotic administration for the prevention of VAP remain inconclusive in this trial. However, such an approach can decrease the length of ICU and hospital stay. Well‐designed multicenter clinical studies with defined combinations of probiotics and definite end points are necessary in this field.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ncp.10191
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2085663372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2085663372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3601-74b3715bd59bb8479b9753662a2e619d23df264b7577fb27a5b030618bca297d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCghdAXsIi1D-JnbCbpgVGqmCEWraRndwII8cOtkM1XfEIfSPehSfB0ynskCz5SPc759o6CL2g5A0lhJ26fs6CNvQRWtGmpAUrK_YYrUhdl0XFuThCxzF-I4TWXNZP0REneVSXdIV-XYwj9An7ESu8DV4bn0yfFcwqqGS8w_l8AZeMVcmH3z_v1jH63qgEA946WCbvjMLG4TaYbFXW7vDGWrzN7myLeD1MJu3p5HH6CnjjErhofgBuVQB87Ux6i9f75XHOT9kPzv2iLeRdZ9a4AX9WbvCTuc0ZrXcpeGuzvApG2WfoyahshOcP9wm6fndx1X4oLj-937Try6LngtBClppLWumharSuS9noRlZcCKYYCNoMjA8jE6WWlZSjZlJVmnAiaK17xRo58BP06pA7B_99gZi6ycQerFUO_BI7RupKCM4ly-jrA9rnH8UAYzcHM6mw6yjp9n11ua_uvq_MvnyIXfQEwz_yb0EZOD0AN8bC7v9J3cd2e4j8Azs5o5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2085663372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of a Probiotic Preparation on Ventilator‐Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Mahmoodpoor, Ata ; Hamishehkar, Hadi ; Asghari, Roghaieh ; Abri, Ramin ; Shadvar, Kamran ; Sanaie, Sarvin</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahmoodpoor, Ata ; Hamishehkar, Hadi ; Asghari, Roghaieh ; Abri, Ramin ; Shadvar, Kamran ; Sanaie, Sarvin</creatorcontrib><description>Background Ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) occurs as a life‐threatening complication in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Probiotic administration may modify the gut microbiota; however, whether this modification could decrease VAP occurrence is not known. Methods In this study, 100 adult critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for &gt;48 hours were randomly assigned to either the probiotic or the control group. The patients in the probiotic group received 2 capsules of probiotic preparation containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus spp., and those in the control group received placebo daily for 14 days. Results The patients in the probiotic group had a lower incidence of statistically microbiologically confirmed VAP. The duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay was also lower in the probiotic group (P &lt; .05). More than half of the patients in the control group had gastric residuals during ICU stay, compared with only 30% of patients in the probiotic group (P = .004). Probiotic usage led to a nonsignificant decrease in diarrhea, gastric and oropharyngeal colonization, and incidence of multidrug‐resistant pathogens. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curves for time to the first episode of VAP did not show a significant difference between probiotic and control groups (log‐rank test = 1.89; P = .17). Conclusions The results of probiotic administration for the prevention of VAP remain inconclusive in this trial. However, such an approach can decrease the length of ICU and hospital stay. Well‐designed multicenter clinical studies with defined combinations of probiotics and definite end points are necessary in this field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-5336</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10191</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30088841</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>critical illness ; intensive care unit ; Nursing ; probiotics ; ventilator‐associated pneumonia</subject><ispartof>Nutrition in clinical practice, 2019-02, Vol.34 (1), p.156-162</ispartof><rights>2018 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition</rights><rights>2018 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3601-74b3715bd59bb8479b9753662a2e619d23df264b7577fb27a5b030618bca297d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3601-74b3715bd59bb8479b9753662a2e619d23df264b7577fb27a5b030618bca297d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2325-5631</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fncp.10191$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fncp.10191$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30088841$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahmoodpoor, Ata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamishehkar, Hadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asghari, Roghaieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abri, Ramin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadvar, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanaie, Sarvin</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of a Probiotic Preparation on Ventilator‐Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Nutrition in clinical practice</title><addtitle>Nutr Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Background Ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) occurs as a life‐threatening complication in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Probiotic administration may modify the gut microbiota; however, whether this modification could decrease VAP occurrence is not known. Methods In this study, 100 adult critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for &gt;48 hours were randomly assigned to either the probiotic or the control group. The patients in the probiotic group received 2 capsules of probiotic preparation containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus spp., and those in the control group received placebo daily for 14 days. Results The patients in the probiotic group had a lower incidence of statistically microbiologically confirmed VAP. The duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay was also lower in the probiotic group (P &lt; .05). More than half of the patients in the control group had gastric residuals during ICU stay, compared with only 30% of patients in the probiotic group (P = .004). Probiotic usage led to a nonsignificant decrease in diarrhea, gastric and oropharyngeal colonization, and incidence of multidrug‐resistant pathogens. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curves for time to the first episode of VAP did not show a significant difference between probiotic and control groups (log‐rank test = 1.89; P = .17). Conclusions The results of probiotic administration for the prevention of VAP remain inconclusive in this trial. However, such an approach can decrease the length of ICU and hospital stay. Well‐designed multicenter clinical studies with defined combinations of probiotics and definite end points are necessary in this field.</description><subject>critical illness</subject><subject>intensive care unit</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>probiotics</subject><subject>ventilator‐associated pneumonia</subject><issn>0884-5336</issn><issn>1941-2452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCghdAXsIi1D-JnbCbpgVGqmCEWraRndwII8cOtkM1XfEIfSPehSfB0ynskCz5SPc759o6CL2g5A0lhJ26fs6CNvQRWtGmpAUrK_YYrUhdl0XFuThCxzF-I4TWXNZP0REneVSXdIV-XYwj9An7ESu8DV4bn0yfFcwqqGS8w_l8AZeMVcmH3z_v1jH63qgEA946WCbvjMLG4TaYbFXW7vDGWrzN7myLeD1MJu3p5HH6CnjjErhofgBuVQB87Ux6i9f75XHOT9kPzv2iLeRdZ9a4AX9WbvCTuc0ZrXcpeGuzvApG2WfoyahshOcP9wm6fndx1X4oLj-937Try6LngtBClppLWumharSuS9noRlZcCKYYCNoMjA8jE6WWlZSjZlJVmnAiaK17xRo58BP06pA7B_99gZi6ycQerFUO_BI7RupKCM4ly-jrA9rnH8UAYzcHM6mw6yjp9n11ua_uvq_MvnyIXfQEwz_yb0EZOD0AN8bC7v9J3cd2e4j8Azs5o5Q</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Mahmoodpoor, Ata</creator><creator>Hamishehkar, Hadi</creator><creator>Asghari, Roghaieh</creator><creator>Abri, Ramin</creator><creator>Shadvar, Kamran</creator><creator>Sanaie, Sarvin</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2325-5631</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Effect of a Probiotic Preparation on Ventilator‐Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Mahmoodpoor, Ata ; Hamishehkar, Hadi ; Asghari, Roghaieh ; Abri, Ramin ; Shadvar, Kamran ; Sanaie, Sarvin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3601-74b3715bd59bb8479b9753662a2e619d23df264b7577fb27a5b030618bca297d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>critical illness</topic><topic>intensive care unit</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>probiotics</topic><topic>ventilator‐associated pneumonia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahmoodpoor, Ata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamishehkar, Hadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asghari, Roghaieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abri, Ramin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadvar, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanaie, Sarvin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahmoodpoor, Ata</au><au>Hamishehkar, Hadi</au><au>Asghari, Roghaieh</au><au>Abri, Ramin</au><au>Shadvar, Kamran</au><au>Sanaie, Sarvin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of a Probiotic Preparation on Ventilator‐Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>156-162</pages><issn>0884-5336</issn><eissn>1941-2452</eissn><abstract>Background Ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) occurs as a life‐threatening complication in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Probiotic administration may modify the gut microbiota; however, whether this modification could decrease VAP occurrence is not known. Methods In this study, 100 adult critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for &gt;48 hours were randomly assigned to either the probiotic or the control group. The patients in the probiotic group received 2 capsules of probiotic preparation containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus spp., and those in the control group received placebo daily for 14 days. Results The patients in the probiotic group had a lower incidence of statistically microbiologically confirmed VAP. The duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay was also lower in the probiotic group (P &lt; .05). More than half of the patients in the control group had gastric residuals during ICU stay, compared with only 30% of patients in the probiotic group (P = .004). Probiotic usage led to a nonsignificant decrease in diarrhea, gastric and oropharyngeal colonization, and incidence of multidrug‐resistant pathogens. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curves for time to the first episode of VAP did not show a significant difference between probiotic and control groups (log‐rank test = 1.89; P = .17). Conclusions The results of probiotic administration for the prevention of VAP remain inconclusive in this trial. However, such an approach can decrease the length of ICU and hospital stay. Well‐designed multicenter clinical studies with defined combinations of probiotics and definite end points are necessary in this field.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30088841</pmid><doi>10.1002/ncp.10191</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2325-5631</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-5336
ispartof Nutrition in clinical practice, 2019-02, Vol.34 (1), p.156-162
issn 0884-5336
1941-2452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2085663372
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects critical illness
intensive care unit
Nursing
probiotics
ventilator‐associated pneumonia
title Effect of a Probiotic Preparation on Ventilator‐Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A10%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20a%20Probiotic%20Preparation%20on%20Ventilator%E2%80%90Associated%20Pneumonia%20in%20Critically%20Ill%20Patients%20Admitted%20to%20the%20Intensive%20Care%20Unit:%20A%20Prospective%20Double%E2%80%90Blind%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Mahmoodpoor,%20Ata&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=156-162&rft.issn=0884-5336&rft.eissn=1941-2452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ncp.10191&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2085663372%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2085663372&rft_id=info:pmid/30088841&rfr_iscdi=true