Radiofrequency Identification of the ER-REBOA: Confirmation of Placement Without Fluoroscopy

Abstract Introduction Non-compressible torso hemorrhage accounts for 70% of battlefield deaths. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging technology used to mitigate massive truncal hemorrhage. Use of REBOA on the battlefield is limited by the need for radiogra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Military medicine 2019-03, Vol.184 (3-4), p.e285-e289
Hauptverfasser: Wessels, Lyndsey E, Wallace, James D, Bowie, Jason, Butler, William J, Spalding, Carmen, Krzyzaniak, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e289
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page e285
container_title Military medicine
container_volume 184
creator Wessels, Lyndsey E
Wallace, James D
Bowie, Jason
Butler, William J
Spalding, Carmen
Krzyzaniak, Michael
description Abstract Introduction Non-compressible torso hemorrhage accounts for 70% of battlefield deaths. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging technology used to mitigate massive truncal hemorrhage. Use of REBOA on the battlefield is limited by the need for radiographic guided balloon placement. Radiofrequency identification (RFID) is a simple, portable, real-time technology utilized to detect retained sponges during surgery. We investigated the feasibility of RFID to confirm the placement of ER-REBOA. Materials and Methods This was a single-arm prospective proof-of-concept experimental study approved by the institutional review board at Naval Medical Center San Diego. The ER-REBOA (Prytime Medical Devices, Inc, Boerne, TX, USA) was modified by placement of a RFID tag. The tagged ER-REBOA was placed in zone I or zone III of the aorta in a previously perfused cadaver. Exact location was documented with X-ray. Five blinded individuals used the RF Assure Detection System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) handheld detection wand to predict catheter tip location from the xiphoid process (zone I) or pubic tubercle (zone III). Results In zone I, actual distance (Da) of the catheter tip was 11 cm from the xiphoid process. Mean predicted distance (Dp) from Da was 1.52 cm (95% CI 1.19–1.85). In zone III, Da was 14 cm from the pubic tubercle. Mean Dp from Da was 4.11 cm (95% CI 3.68–4.54). Sensitivity of detection was 100% in both zones. Specificity (Defined as Dp within 2 cm of Da) was 86% in zone I and 16% in zone III. Conclusions Using RFID to confirm the placement of ER-REBOA is feasible with specificity highest in zone I. Future work should focus on refining this technology for the forward-deployed setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/milmed/usy187
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2084921084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/milmed/usy187</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2084921084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-2a0882850dc5b33760ea9cf17fd0fc30f8df7c1ef02a2a87a6b4ac07bc322ab23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRbK0evUrAi5fY2d18bLzV0mqhUCmKHoSw2ezSLUm2ZrOH_PempFXw4mUGZn7zePMQusZwjyGh41IXpczHzraYxSdoiBMKfoTpxykaApDIDyAOB-jC2i0ADhKGz9GAArCQ4GSIPtc810bV8svJSrTeIpdVo5UWvNGm8ozymo30Zmt_PXtcTR68qamUrsuf7UvBhSy7G-9dNxvjGm9eOFMbK8yuvURnihdWXh36CL3NZ6_TZ3-5elpMJ0tf0IQ2PuHAGGEh5CLMKI0jkDwRCscqByUoKJarWGCpgHDCWcyjLOAC4kxQQnhG6Ajd9bq72nR_2CYttRWyKHgljbMpARYkBHe1Q2__oFvj6qpzlxISRElIIsI6yu8p0X1ia6nSXa1LXrcphnQfe9rHnvaxd_zNQdVl-_GRPub869C43T9a3znTjjc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2246952628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiofrequency Identification of the ER-REBOA: Confirmation of Placement Without Fluoroscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wessels, Lyndsey E ; Wallace, James D ; Bowie, Jason ; Butler, William J ; Spalding, Carmen ; Krzyzaniak, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Lyndsey E ; Wallace, James D ; Bowie, Jason ; Butler, William J ; Spalding, Carmen ; Krzyzaniak, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Non-compressible torso hemorrhage accounts for 70% of battlefield deaths. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging technology used to mitigate massive truncal hemorrhage. Use of REBOA on the battlefield is limited by the need for radiographic guided balloon placement. Radiofrequency identification (RFID) is a simple, portable, real-time technology utilized to detect retained sponges during surgery. We investigated the feasibility of RFID to confirm the placement of ER-REBOA. Materials and Methods This was a single-arm prospective proof-of-concept experimental study approved by the institutional review board at Naval Medical Center San Diego. The ER-REBOA (Prytime Medical Devices, Inc, Boerne, TX, USA) was modified by placement of a RFID tag. The tagged ER-REBOA was placed in zone I or zone III of the aorta in a previously perfused cadaver. Exact location was documented with X-ray. Five blinded individuals used the RF Assure Detection System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) handheld detection wand to predict catheter tip location from the xiphoid process (zone I) or pubic tubercle (zone III). Results In zone I, actual distance (Da) of the catheter tip was 11 cm from the xiphoid process. Mean predicted distance (Dp) from Da was 1.52 cm (95% CI 1.19–1.85). In zone III, Da was 14 cm from the pubic tubercle. Mean Dp from Da was 4.11 cm (95% CI 3.68–4.54). Sensitivity of detection was 100% in both zones. Specificity (Defined as Dp within 2 cm of Da) was 86% in zone I and 16% in zone III. Conclusions Using RFID to confirm the placement of ER-REBOA is feasible with specificity highest in zone I. Future work should focus on refining this technology for the forward-deployed setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usy187</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30085219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged, 80 and over ; Aorta - diagnostic imaging ; Aorta - physiopathology ; Balloon Occlusion - instrumentation ; Balloon Occlusion - methods ; Balloon Occlusion - standards ; Battlefields ; Cadaver ; Catheters ; Coronary vessels ; Female ; Fluoroscopy - methods ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Military medicine ; Prospective Studies ; Radio Frequency Identification Device - methods ; Resuscitation - instrumentation ; Resuscitation - methods</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2019-03, Vol.184 (3-4), p.e285-e289</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2018. 2018</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-2a0882850dc5b33760ea9cf17fd0fc30f8df7c1ef02a2a87a6b4ac07bc322ab23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-2a0882850dc5b33760ea9cf17fd0fc30f8df7c1ef02a2a87a6b4ac07bc322ab23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30085219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Lyndsey E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowie, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spalding, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzyzaniak, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Radiofrequency Identification of the ER-REBOA: Confirmation of Placement Without Fluoroscopy</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Non-compressible torso hemorrhage accounts for 70% of battlefield deaths. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging technology used to mitigate massive truncal hemorrhage. Use of REBOA on the battlefield is limited by the need for radiographic guided balloon placement. Radiofrequency identification (RFID) is a simple, portable, real-time technology utilized to detect retained sponges during surgery. We investigated the feasibility of RFID to confirm the placement of ER-REBOA. Materials and Methods This was a single-arm prospective proof-of-concept experimental study approved by the institutional review board at Naval Medical Center San Diego. The ER-REBOA (Prytime Medical Devices, Inc, Boerne, TX, USA) was modified by placement of a RFID tag. The tagged ER-REBOA was placed in zone I or zone III of the aorta in a previously perfused cadaver. Exact location was documented with X-ray. Five blinded individuals used the RF Assure Detection System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) handheld detection wand to predict catheter tip location from the xiphoid process (zone I) or pubic tubercle (zone III). Results In zone I, actual distance (Da) of the catheter tip was 11 cm from the xiphoid process. Mean predicted distance (Dp) from Da was 1.52 cm (95% CI 1.19–1.85). In zone III, Da was 14 cm from the pubic tubercle. Mean Dp from Da was 4.11 cm (95% CI 3.68–4.54). Sensitivity of detection was 100% in both zones. Specificity (Defined as Dp within 2 cm of Da) was 86% in zone I and 16% in zone III. Conclusions Using RFID to confirm the placement of ER-REBOA is feasible with specificity highest in zone I. Future work should focus on refining this technology for the forward-deployed setting.</description><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aorta - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aorta - physiopathology</subject><subject>Balloon Occlusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Balloon Occlusion - methods</subject><subject>Balloon Occlusion - standards</subject><subject>Battlefields</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Military medicine</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radio Frequency Identification Device - methods</subject><subject>Resuscitation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Resuscitation - methods</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRbK0evUrAi5fY2d18bLzV0mqhUCmKHoSw2ezSLUm2ZrOH_PempFXw4mUGZn7zePMQusZwjyGh41IXpczHzraYxSdoiBMKfoTpxykaApDIDyAOB-jC2i0ADhKGz9GAArCQ4GSIPtc810bV8svJSrTeIpdVo5UWvNGm8ozymo30Zmt_PXtcTR68qamUrsuf7UvBhSy7G-9dNxvjGm9eOFMbK8yuvURnihdWXh36CL3NZ6_TZ3-5elpMJ0tf0IQ2PuHAGGEh5CLMKI0jkDwRCscqByUoKJarWGCpgHDCWcyjLOAC4kxQQnhG6Ajd9bq72nR_2CYttRWyKHgljbMpARYkBHe1Q2__oFvj6qpzlxISRElIIsI6yu8p0X1ia6nSXa1LXrcphnQfe9rHnvaxd_zNQdVl-_GRPub869C43T9a3znTjjc</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Wessels, Lyndsey E</creator><creator>Wallace, James D</creator><creator>Bowie, Jason</creator><creator>Butler, William J</creator><creator>Spalding, Carmen</creator><creator>Krzyzaniak, Michael</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Radiofrequency Identification of the ER-REBOA: Confirmation of Placement Without Fluoroscopy</title><author>Wessels, Lyndsey E ; Wallace, James D ; Bowie, Jason ; Butler, William J ; Spalding, Carmen ; Krzyzaniak, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-2a0882850dc5b33760ea9cf17fd0fc30f8df7c1ef02a2a87a6b4ac07bc322ab23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aorta - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aorta - physiopathology</topic><topic>Balloon Occlusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Balloon Occlusion - methods</topic><topic>Balloon Occlusion - standards</topic><topic>Battlefields</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Military medicine</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radio Frequency Identification Device - methods</topic><topic>Resuscitation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Resuscitation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Lyndsey E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowie, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spalding, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzyzaniak, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wessels, Lyndsey E</au><au>Wallace, James D</au><au>Bowie, Jason</au><au>Butler, William J</au><au>Spalding, Carmen</au><au>Krzyzaniak, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiofrequency Identification of the ER-REBOA: Confirmation of Placement Without Fluoroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>184</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>e285</spage><epage>e289</epage><pages>e285-e289</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Non-compressible torso hemorrhage accounts for 70% of battlefield deaths. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging technology used to mitigate massive truncal hemorrhage. Use of REBOA on the battlefield is limited by the need for radiographic guided balloon placement. Radiofrequency identification (RFID) is a simple, portable, real-time technology utilized to detect retained sponges during surgery. We investigated the feasibility of RFID to confirm the placement of ER-REBOA. Materials and Methods This was a single-arm prospective proof-of-concept experimental study approved by the institutional review board at Naval Medical Center San Diego. The ER-REBOA (Prytime Medical Devices, Inc, Boerne, TX, USA) was modified by placement of a RFID tag. The tagged ER-REBOA was placed in zone I or zone III of the aorta in a previously perfused cadaver. Exact location was documented with X-ray. Five blinded individuals used the RF Assure Detection System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) handheld detection wand to predict catheter tip location from the xiphoid process (zone I) or pubic tubercle (zone III). Results In zone I, actual distance (Da) of the catheter tip was 11 cm from the xiphoid process. Mean predicted distance (Dp) from Da was 1.52 cm (95% CI 1.19–1.85). In zone III, Da was 14 cm from the pubic tubercle. Mean Dp from Da was 4.11 cm (95% CI 3.68–4.54). Sensitivity of detection was 100% in both zones. Specificity (Defined as Dp within 2 cm of Da) was 86% in zone I and 16% in zone III. Conclusions Using RFID to confirm the placement of ER-REBOA is feasible with specificity highest in zone I. Future work should focus on refining this technology for the forward-deployed setting.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30085219</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/usy187</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-4075
ispartof Military medicine, 2019-03, Vol.184 (3-4), p.e285-e289
issn 0026-4075
1930-613X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2084921084
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged, 80 and over
Aorta - diagnostic imaging
Aorta - physiopathology
Balloon Occlusion - instrumentation
Balloon Occlusion - methods
Balloon Occlusion - standards
Battlefields
Cadaver
Catheters
Coronary vessels
Female
Fluoroscopy - methods
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - prevention & control
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy
Hemorrhage
Humans
Military medicine
Prospective Studies
Radio Frequency Identification Device - methods
Resuscitation - instrumentation
Resuscitation - methods
title Radiofrequency Identification of the ER-REBOA: Confirmation of Placement Without Fluoroscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T21%3A07%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiofrequency%20Identification%20of%20the%20ER-REBOA:%20Confirmation%20of%20Placement%20Without%20Fluoroscopy&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Wessels,%20Lyndsey%20E&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=184&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=e285&rft.epage=e289&rft.pages=e285-e289&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/usy187&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2084921084%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2246952628&rft_id=info:pmid/30085219&rft_oup_id=10.1093/milmed/usy187&rfr_iscdi=true