Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages : Efficiency of grazing management systems
Fermentation in the rumen of cattle produces methane (CH4). Methane may play a role in global warming scenarios. The linking of grazing management strategies to more efficient beef production while reducing the CH4 emitted by beef cattle is important. The sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique w...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental quality 2003, Vol.32 (1), p.269-277 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 277 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 269 |
| container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | DERAMUS, H. Alan CLEMENT, Terry C GIAMPOLA, Dean D DICKISON, Peter C |
| description | Fermentation in the rumen of cattle produces methane (CH4). Methane may play a role in global warming scenarios. The linking of grazing management strategies to more efficient beef production while reducing the CH4 emitted by beef cattle is important. The sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique was used to determine the effects of best management practices (BMP) grazing compared with continuous grazing on CH4 production in several Louisiana forages during 1996-1998. Cows and heifers (Bos taurus) grazed common bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge), and ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) pastures and were wintered on bahiagrass hay with supplements of protein molasses blocks (PMB), cottonseed meal and corn (CSMC), urea and corn (URC), or limited ryegrass grazing (LRG). Daily CH4 emissions were between 89 and 180 g d(-1) for young growing heifers and 165 to 294 g d(-1) for mature Simbrah cows. Heifers on "ad lib" ryegrass in March and April produced only one-tenth the CH4 per kg of gain as heifers on LRG of 1 h. Using BMP significantly reduced the emission of CH4 per unit of animal weight gain. Management-intensive grazing (MIG) is a BMP that offers the potential for more efficient utilization of grazed forage crops via controlled rotational grazing and more efficient conversion of forage into meat and milk. Projected CH4 annual emissions in cows reflect a 22% reduction from BMP when compared with continuous grazing in this study. With the BMP application of MIG, less methane was produced per kilogram of beef gain. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2003.2690 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20845427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>284170401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-6db701dddd4cd2c9528bf70407265822afc250aea8157bfb45e584f4ef845823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1LwzAYBvAgis7pzbMEQU9O36T5aL3JmB-geBleS5q9mR1tqkl3mH-9GSsIXswhCbw_Xnh4CDljcMNZJm5X-MUBshuuCtgjIyYzPeHp2icjAJH-gssjchzjCoBx0OqQHDEuRSGVGpH3V-w_jEeKbR1j3flIO0crREet6fsGaeep64JZYqR3dOZcbWv0drNly2C-a7-krfFp3qLvadzEHtt4Qg6caSKeDu-YzB9m8-nT5OXt8Xl6_zKxGYN-ohaVBrZIR9gFt4XkeeU0CNBcyZxz4yyXYNDkTOrKVUKizIUT6HKR5tmYXO3Wfobua42xL1MKi02TEnXrWHJITnD9L2RCCVVImeDFH7jq1sGnDCUrdFYowSCh6x2yoYsxoCs_Q92asCkZlNtSyqGUcltK4ufDznXV4uIXDy0kcDkAE61pXDDe1vHXSci1ljz7AZ0-k4c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197396410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages : Efficiency of grazing management systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>DERAMUS, H. Alan ; CLEMENT, Terry C ; GIAMPOLA, Dean D ; DICKISON, Peter C</creator><creatorcontrib>DERAMUS, H. Alan ; CLEMENT, Terry C ; GIAMPOLA, Dean D ; DICKISON, Peter C</creatorcontrib><description>Fermentation in the rumen of cattle produces methane (CH4). Methane may play a role in global warming scenarios. The linking of grazing management strategies to more efficient beef production while reducing the CH4 emitted by beef cattle is important. The sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique was used to determine the effects of best management practices (BMP) grazing compared with continuous grazing on CH4 production in several Louisiana forages during 1996-1998. Cows and heifers (Bos taurus) grazed common bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge), and ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) pastures and were wintered on bahiagrass hay with supplements of protein molasses blocks (PMB), cottonseed meal and corn (CSMC), urea and corn (URC), or limited ryegrass grazing (LRG). Daily CH4 emissions were between 89 and 180 g d(-1) for young growing heifers and 165 to 294 g d(-1) for mature Simbrah cows. Heifers on "ad lib" ryegrass in March and April produced only one-tenth the CH4 per kg of gain as heifers on LRG of 1 h. Using BMP significantly reduced the emission of CH4 per unit of animal weight gain. Management-intensive grazing (MIG) is a BMP that offers the potential for more efficient utilization of grazed forage crops via controlled rotational grazing and more efficient conversion of forage into meat and milk. Projected CH4 annual emissions in cows reflect a 22% reduction from BMP when compared with continuous grazing in this study. With the BMP application of MIG, less methane was produced per kilogram of beef gain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.2690</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12549566</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Beef cattle ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bos taurus ; Cattle - physiology ; Climate change ; Continuous grazing ; Corn ; Cynodon dactylon ; Digestive System ; Dispersed sources and other ; Emissions ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; Female ; Fermentation ; Forage ; Forage crops ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Global warming ; Grazing ; Greenhouse Effect ; Lolium multiflorum ; Methane ; Methane - analysis ; Paspalum notatum ; Pasture ; Pasture management ; Plants, Edible ; Poaceae ; Pollution ; Pollution sources. Measurement results ; Rotational grazing ; Sulfur ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Tracer techniques ; Urea ; Vertebrates ; Weight Gain</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2003, Vol.32 (1), p.269-277</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-6db701dddd4cd2c9528bf70407265822afc250aea8157bfb45e584f4ef845823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15087752$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12549566$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DERAMUS, H. Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLEMENT, Terry C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIAMPOLA, Dean D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DICKISON, Peter C</creatorcontrib><title>Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages : Efficiency of grazing management systems</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Fermentation in the rumen of cattle produces methane (CH4). Methane may play a role in global warming scenarios. The linking of grazing management strategies to more efficient beef production while reducing the CH4 emitted by beef cattle is important. The sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique was used to determine the effects of best management practices (BMP) grazing compared with continuous grazing on CH4 production in several Louisiana forages during 1996-1998. Cows and heifers (Bos taurus) grazed common bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge), and ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) pastures and were wintered on bahiagrass hay with supplements of protein molasses blocks (PMB), cottonseed meal and corn (CSMC), urea and corn (URC), or limited ryegrass grazing (LRG). Daily CH4 emissions were between 89 and 180 g d(-1) for young growing heifers and 165 to 294 g d(-1) for mature Simbrah cows. Heifers on "ad lib" ryegrass in March and April produced only one-tenth the CH4 per kg of gain as heifers on LRG of 1 h. Using BMP significantly reduced the emission of CH4 per unit of animal weight gain. Management-intensive grazing (MIG) is a BMP that offers the potential for more efficient utilization of grazed forage crops via controlled rotational grazing and more efficient conversion of forage into meat and milk. Projected CH4 annual emissions in cows reflect a 22% reduction from BMP when compared with continuous grazing in this study. With the BMP application of MIG, less methane was produced per kilogram of beef gain.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bos taurus</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Continuous grazing</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cynodon dactylon</subject><subject>Digestive System</subject><subject>Dispersed sources and other</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forage crops</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Greenhouse Effect</subject><subject>Lolium multiflorum</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane - analysis</subject><subject>Paspalum notatum</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pasture management</subject><subject>Plants, Edible</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution sources. Measurement results</subject><subject>Rotational grazing</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Tracer techniques</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1LwzAYBvAgis7pzbMEQU9O36T5aL3JmB-geBleS5q9mR1tqkl3mH-9GSsIXswhCbw_Xnh4CDljcMNZJm5X-MUBshuuCtgjIyYzPeHp2icjAJH-gssjchzjCoBx0OqQHDEuRSGVGpH3V-w_jEeKbR1j3flIO0crREet6fsGaeep64JZYqR3dOZcbWv0drNly2C-a7-krfFp3qLvadzEHtt4Qg6caSKeDu-YzB9m8-nT5OXt8Xl6_zKxGYN-ohaVBrZIR9gFt4XkeeU0CNBcyZxz4yyXYNDkTOrKVUKizIUT6HKR5tmYXO3Wfobua42xL1MKi02TEnXrWHJITnD9L2RCCVVImeDFH7jq1sGnDCUrdFYowSCh6x2yoYsxoCs_Q92asCkZlNtSyqGUcltK4ufDznXV4uIXDy0kcDkAE61pXDDe1vHXSci1ljz7AZ0-k4c</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>DERAMUS, H. Alan</creator><creator>CLEMENT, Terry C</creator><creator>GIAMPOLA, Dean D</creator><creator>DICKISON, Peter C</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages : Efficiency of grazing management systems</title><author>DERAMUS, H. Alan ; CLEMENT, Terry C ; GIAMPOLA, Dean D ; DICKISON, Peter C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-6db701dddd4cd2c9528bf70407265822afc250aea8157bfb45e584f4ef845823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bos taurus</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Continuous grazing</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cynodon dactylon</topic><topic>Digestive System</topic><topic>Dispersed sources and other</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forage crops</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Greenhouse Effect</topic><topic>Lolium multiflorum</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane - analysis</topic><topic>Paspalum notatum</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pasture management</topic><topic>Plants, Edible</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution sources. Measurement results</topic><topic>Rotational grazing</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Tracer techniques</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DERAMUS, H. Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLEMENT, Terry C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIAMPOLA, Dean D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DICKISON, Peter C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DERAMUS, H. Alan</au><au>CLEMENT, Terry C</au><au>GIAMPOLA, Dean D</au><au>DICKISON, Peter C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages : Efficiency of grazing management systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>269-277</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Fermentation in the rumen of cattle produces methane (CH4). Methane may play a role in global warming scenarios. The linking of grazing management strategies to more efficient beef production while reducing the CH4 emitted by beef cattle is important. The sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique was used to determine the effects of best management practices (BMP) grazing compared with continuous grazing on CH4 production in several Louisiana forages during 1996-1998. Cows and heifers (Bos taurus) grazed common bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge), and ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) pastures and were wintered on bahiagrass hay with supplements of protein molasses blocks (PMB), cottonseed meal and corn (CSMC), urea and corn (URC), or limited ryegrass grazing (LRG). Daily CH4 emissions were between 89 and 180 g d(-1) for young growing heifers and 165 to 294 g d(-1) for mature Simbrah cows. Heifers on "ad lib" ryegrass in March and April produced only one-tenth the CH4 per kg of gain as heifers on LRG of 1 h. Using BMP significantly reduced the emission of CH4 per unit of animal weight gain. Management-intensive grazing (MIG) is a BMP that offers the potential for more efficient utilization of grazed forage crops via controlled rotational grazing and more efficient conversion of forage into meat and milk. Projected CH4 annual emissions in cows reflect a 22% reduction from BMP when compared with continuous grazing in this study. With the BMP application of MIG, less methane was produced per kilogram of beef gain.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><pmid>12549566</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2003.2690</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
| ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2003, Vol.32 (1), p.269-277 |
| issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20845427 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Animal Husbandry Animal productions Animals Applied sciences Atmospheric pollution Beef cattle Biological and medical sciences Bos taurus Cattle - physiology Climate change Continuous grazing Corn Cynodon dactylon Digestive System Dispersed sources and other Emissions Environmental Monitoring Exact sciences and technology Female Fermentation Forage Forage crops Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Global warming Grazing Greenhouse Effect Lolium multiflorum Methane Methane - analysis Paspalum notatum Pasture Pasture management Plants, Edible Poaceae Pollution Pollution sources. Measurement results Rotational grazing Sulfur Terrestrial animal productions Tracer techniques Urea Vertebrates Weight Gain |
| title | Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages : Efficiency of grazing management systems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A10%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20emissions%20of%20beef%20cattle%20on%20forages%20:%20Efficiency%20of%20grazing%20management%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=DERAMUS,%20H.%20Alan&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=269-277&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2003.2690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E284170401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197396410&rft_id=info:pmid/12549566&rfr_iscdi=true |