A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system
Aim To investigate the quality of periapical radiographic images produced by two digital dental radiography systems, a charge‐coupled device (CCD) and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) image plate system, and to examine the overall radiation exposure when using these systems in a clinical setting. M...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International endodontic journal 2009-10, Vol.42 (10), p.900-907 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 907 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 900 |
| container_title | International endodontic journal |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Farrier, S. L. Drage, N. A. Newcombe, R. G. Hayes, S. J. Dummer, P. M. H. |
| description | Aim To investigate the quality of periapical radiographic images produced by two digital dental radiography systems, a charge‐coupled device (CCD) and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) image plate system, and to examine the overall radiation exposure when using these systems in a clinical setting.
Methodology Patients were randomly allocated to both systems and the resultant radiographs rated for quality. The expected radiation exposure for an investigation was calculated.
Results Overall, 98 images were acquired using the CCD system and 108 with the PSP system. The PSP system produced significantly higher quality (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01593.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20832234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20832234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5033-e3aca144e0c6f3efb4917f19be2023c1f7df4de958d0c54ba4a1fda6199c34d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcGO2yAURFWrbrrtL1ScerMLBhJz6GG12t1uZaWXVjkiAo_EqW28YG_jD-n_FifR9lokxBNvZnjMIIQpyWlanw85ZUuRFULSvCBE5oQKyfLjK7R4abxGC0I5y4qyFFfoXYwHQoggjL5FV1QKXkpGF-jPDTa-7XXQQ_0MOA6jnbB3uG71DvDTqJt6mLDuLA7a1gnkOwzH3scxAHY-YAvdoJtT1--C7vcR98Hb0YDFY6y7HdbY7HXYQWb82Dfp2sJzbeAkqnG_9zHtgPtGD2mAKQ7QvkdvnG4ifLic1-jn_d2P269Z9f3h8famykz6CMuAaaMp50DM0jFwWy7pylG5hYIUzFC3so5bkKK0xAi-1VxTZ_WSSmkYtwW7Rp_OumnkpxHioNo6Gmga3YEfoypIyYqC8QQsz0ATfIwBnOpDsihMihI1R6IOanZezc6rORJ1ikQdE_Xj5Y1x24L9R7xkkABfzoDfdQPTfwurx7tvc5X42ZlfJ-uOL3wdfqnliq2E2qwfFFuvN2JTVapifwEGAK18</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20832234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Farrier, S. L. ; Drage, N. A. ; Newcombe, R. G. ; Hayes, S. J. ; Dummer, P. M. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farrier, S. L. ; Drage, N. A. ; Newcombe, R. G. ; Hayes, S. J. ; Dummer, P. M. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To investigate the quality of periapical radiographic images produced by two digital dental radiography systems, a charge‐coupled device (CCD) and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) image plate system, and to examine the overall radiation exposure when using these systems in a clinical setting.
Methodology Patients were randomly allocated to both systems and the resultant radiographs rated for quality. The expected radiation exposure for an investigation was calculated.
Results Overall, 98 images were acquired using the CCD system and 108 with the PSP system. The PSP system produced significantly higher quality (P < 0.001) periapical images compared with the CCD system. The CCD system required significantly more (P < 0.001) repeat exposures to obtain a diagnostic image than the PSP system but at a lower expected radiation exposure.
Conclusions The image quality was superior using the phosphor plate system. Although more repeat radiographs were required using the CCD system, the images were produced with a lower expected radiation exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01593.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19548931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bicuspid - diagnostic imaging ; Cuspid - diagnostic imaging ; dental digital radiography ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Incisor - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Middle Aged ; Molar - diagnostic imaging ; Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; radiation doses ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - instrumentation ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiography, Bitewing - methods ; Radiography, Bitewing - standards ; Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation ; Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods ; Radiography, Dental, Digital - standards ; Single-Blind Method ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2009-10, Vol.42 (10), p.900-907</ispartof><rights>2009 International Endodontic Journal</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5033-e3aca144e0c6f3efb4917f19be2023c1f7df4de958d0c54ba4a1fda6199c34d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5033-e3aca144e0c6f3efb4917f19be2023c1f7df4de958d0c54ba4a1fda6199c34d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2591.2009.01593.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2591.2009.01593.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19548931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farrier, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drage, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newcombe, R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dummer, P. M. H.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Aim To investigate the quality of periapical radiographic images produced by two digital dental radiography systems, a charge‐coupled device (CCD) and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) image plate system, and to examine the overall radiation exposure when using these systems in a clinical setting.
Methodology Patients were randomly allocated to both systems and the resultant radiographs rated for quality. The expected radiation exposure for an investigation was calculated.
Results Overall, 98 images were acquired using the CCD system and 108 with the PSP system. The PSP system produced significantly higher quality (P < 0.001) periapical images compared with the CCD system. The CCD system required significantly more (P < 0.001) repeat exposures to obtain a diagnostic image than the PSP system but at a lower expected radiation exposure.
Conclusions The image quality was superior using the phosphor plate system. Although more repeat radiographs were required using the CCD system, the images were produced with a lower expected radiation exposure.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bicuspid - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cuspid - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>dental digital radiography</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisor - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molar - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>radiation doses</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Bitewing - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Bitewing - standards</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital - standards</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUcGO2yAURFWrbrrtL1ScerMLBhJz6GG12t1uZaWXVjkiAo_EqW28YG_jD-n_FifR9lokxBNvZnjMIIQpyWlanw85ZUuRFULSvCBE5oQKyfLjK7R4abxGC0I5y4qyFFfoXYwHQoggjL5FV1QKXkpGF-jPDTa-7XXQQ_0MOA6jnbB3uG71DvDTqJt6mLDuLA7a1gnkOwzH3scxAHY-YAvdoJtT1--C7vcR98Hb0YDFY6y7HdbY7HXYQWb82Dfp2sJzbeAkqnG_9zHtgPtGD2mAKQ7QvkdvnG4ifLic1-jn_d2P269Z9f3h8famykz6CMuAaaMp50DM0jFwWy7pylG5hYIUzFC3so5bkKK0xAi-1VxTZ_WSSmkYtwW7Rp_OumnkpxHioNo6Gmga3YEfoypIyYqC8QQsz0ATfIwBnOpDsihMihI1R6IOanZezc6rORJ1ikQdE_Xj5Y1x24L9R7xkkABfzoDfdQPTfwurx7tvc5X42ZlfJ-uOL3wdfqnliq2E2qwfFFuvN2JTVapifwEGAK18</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Farrier, S. L.</creator><creator>Drage, N. A.</creator><creator>Newcombe, R. G.</creator><creator>Hayes, S. J.</creator><creator>Dummer, P. M. H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system</title><author>Farrier, S. L. ; Drage, N. A. ; Newcombe, R. G. ; Hayes, S. J. ; Dummer, P. M. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5033-e3aca144e0c6f3efb4917f19be2023c1f7df4de958d0c54ba4a1fda6199c34d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bicuspid - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cuspid - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>dental digital radiography</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisor - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molar - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>radiation doses</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Bitewing - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Bitewing - standards</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital - standards</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farrier, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drage, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newcombe, R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dummer, P. M. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farrier, S. L.</au><au>Drage, N. A.</au><au>Newcombe, R. G.</au><au>Hayes, S. J.</au><au>Dummer, P. M. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>900</spage><epage>907</epage><pages>900-907</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Aim To investigate the quality of periapical radiographic images produced by two digital dental radiography systems, a charge‐coupled device (CCD) and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) image plate system, and to examine the overall radiation exposure when using these systems in a clinical setting.
Methodology Patients were randomly allocated to both systems and the resultant radiographs rated for quality. The expected radiation exposure for an investigation was calculated.
Results Overall, 98 images were acquired using the CCD system and 108 with the PSP system. The PSP system produced significantly higher quality (P < 0.001) periapical images compared with the CCD system. The CCD system required significantly more (P < 0.001) repeat exposures to obtain a diagnostic image than the PSP system but at a lower expected radiation exposure.
Conclusions The image quality was superior using the phosphor plate system. Although more repeat radiographs were required using the CCD system, the images were produced with a lower expected radiation exposure.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19548931</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01593.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0143-2885 |
| ispartof | International endodontic journal, 2009-10, Vol.42 (10), p.900-907 |
| issn | 0143-2885 1365-2591 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20832234 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Bicuspid - diagnostic imaging Cuspid - diagnostic imaging dental digital radiography Equipment Design Female Humans Incisor - diagnostic imaging Male Mandible - diagnostic imaging Maxilla - diagnostic imaging Middle Aged Molar - diagnostic imaging Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging Radiation Dosage radiation doses Radiographic Image Enhancement - instrumentation Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods Radiography, Bitewing - methods Radiography, Bitewing - standards Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods Radiography, Dental, Digital - standards Single-Blind Method Time Factors Young Adult |
| title | A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T20%3A04%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20of%20image%20quality%20and%20radiation%20exposure%20for%20dental%20radiographs%20produced%20using%20a%20charge-coupled%20device%20and%20a%20phosphor%20plate%20system&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Farrier,%20S.%20L.&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=900&rft.epage=907&rft.pages=900-907&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01593.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20832234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20832234&rft_id=info:pmid/19548931&rfr_iscdi=true |