Impact of bark beetle ( Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change
The likely environmental changes throughout the next century have the potential to strongly alter forest disturbance regimes which may heavily affect forest functions as well as forest management. Forest stands already poorly adapted to current environmental conditions, such as secondary Norway spru...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Forest ecology and management 2008-07, Vol.256 (3), p.209-220 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 220 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 209 |
| container_title | Forest ecology and management |
| container_volume | 256 |
| creator | Seidl, Rupert Rammer, Werner Jäger, Dietmar Lexer, Manfred J. |
| description | The likely environmental changes throughout the next century have the potential to strongly alter forest disturbance regimes which may heavily affect forest functions as well as forest management. Forest stands already poorly adapted to current environmental conditions, such as secondary Norway spruce (
Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests outside their natural range, are expected to be particularly prone to such risks. By means of a simulation study, a secondary Norway spruce forest management unit in Austria was studied under conditions of climatic change with regard to effects of bark beetle disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration over a time period of 100 years. The modified patch model PICUS v1.41, including a submodule of bark beetle-induced tree mortality, was employed to assess four alternative management strategies: (a) Norway spruce age-class forestry, (b) Norway spruce continuous cover forestry, (c) conversion to mixed species stands, and (d) no management. Two sets of simulations were investigated, one without the consideration of biotic disturbances, the other including possible bark beetle damages. Simulations were conducted for a de-trended baseline climate (1961–1990) as well as for two transient climate change scenarios featuring a distinct increase in temperature. The main objectives were to: (i) estimate the effects of bark beetle damage on timber production and carbon (C) sequestration under climate change; (ii) assess the effects of disregarding bark beetle disturbance in the analysis.
Results indicated a strong increase in bark beetle damage under climate change scenarios (up to +219% in terms of timber volume losses) compared to the baseline climate scenario. Furthermore, distinct differences were revealed between the studied management strategies, pointing at considerably lower amounts of salvage in the conversion strategy. In terms of C storage, increased biotic disturbances under climate change reduced C storage in the actively managed strategies (up to −41.0
tC
ha
−1) over the 100-year simulation period, whereas in the unmanaged control variant some scenarios even resulted in increased C sequestration due to a stand density effect.
Comparing the simulation series with and without bark beetle disturbances the main findings were: (i) forest C storage was higher in all actively managed strategies under climate change, when biotic disturbances were disregarded (up to +31.6
tC
ha
−1 over 100 years); and (ii) in the undis |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20823109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112708003198</els_id><sourcerecordid>20823109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8322a6808c7c3f3eec71198b432a6593bb30ddff92750b3d8a1fd4cddb2edb923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuO1DAQRSMEEs3AHyDhDQgWCWU76TgbJDSCoaWWWMCsLT_KGTd5YTtI8zH8K-7OaJasXLo-dV2uWxSvKVQU6P7jqXJzQDNXDEBUUFcA7Emxo6JlZQs1e1rsgLeipJS1z4sXMZ4AoGlqsSv-HsZFmURmR7QKv4hGTAOS9-SwRJLul7kParlbIzlWH4j1Ma1Bq8kgmSeS_KgxkCXMdjXJZ0VNlhgVdC4j_l4xpqAuF37Kzc5hwCmRUU2qx_FcXgDsPUayTjabmcGPWSHmTk09viyeOTVEfPVwXhW3X7_8vP5WHr_fHK4_H0vDO5pKwRlTewHCtIY7jmhaSjuha57lpuNac7DWuY61DWhuhaLO1sZazdDqjvGr4t3mm_9yGVuOPhocBjXhvEbJQDBOoctgvYEmzDEGdHIJeeBwLynIcxbyJLcs5DkLCbXMWeS2tw_-Kho1uJBX6ONjL4OGsro-c282zqlZqj5k5vYHA8oBOso7vs_Ep43AvI4_HoOMxmMOxPr8apJ29v8f5R_uGK4m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20823109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of bark beetle ( Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Seidl, Rupert ; Rammer, Werner ; Jäger, Dietmar ; Lexer, Manfred J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seidl, Rupert ; Rammer, Werner ; Jäger, Dietmar ; Lexer, Manfred J.</creatorcontrib><description>The likely environmental changes throughout the next century have the potential to strongly alter forest disturbance regimes which may heavily affect forest functions as well as forest management. Forest stands already poorly adapted to current environmental conditions, such as secondary Norway spruce (
Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests outside their natural range, are expected to be particularly prone to such risks. By means of a simulation study, a secondary Norway spruce forest management unit in Austria was studied under conditions of climatic change with regard to effects of bark beetle disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration over a time period of 100 years. The modified patch model PICUS v1.41, including a submodule of bark beetle-induced tree mortality, was employed to assess four alternative management strategies: (a) Norway spruce age-class forestry, (b) Norway spruce continuous cover forestry, (c) conversion to mixed species stands, and (d) no management. Two sets of simulations were investigated, one without the consideration of biotic disturbances, the other including possible bark beetle damages. Simulations were conducted for a de-trended baseline climate (1961–1990) as well as for two transient climate change scenarios featuring a distinct increase in temperature. The main objectives were to: (i) estimate the effects of bark beetle damage on timber production and carbon (C) sequestration under climate change; (ii) assess the effects of disregarding bark beetle disturbance in the analysis.
Results indicated a strong increase in bark beetle damage under climate change scenarios (up to +219% in terms of timber volume losses) compared to the baseline climate scenario. Furthermore, distinct differences were revealed between the studied management strategies, pointing at considerably lower amounts of salvage in the conversion strategy. In terms of C storage, increased biotic disturbances under climate change reduced C storage in the actively managed strategies (up to −41.0
tC
ha
−1) over the 100-year simulation period, whereas in the unmanaged control variant some scenarios even resulted in increased C sequestration due to a stand density effect.
Comparing the simulation series with and without bark beetle disturbances the main findings were: (i) forest C storage was higher in all actively managed strategies under climate change, when biotic disturbances were disregarded (up to +31.6
tC
ha
−1 over 100 years); and (ii) in the undisturbed, unmanaged variant C sequestration was lower compared to the simulations with bark beetle disturbance (up to −69.9
tC
ha
−1 over 100 years). The study highlights the importance of including the full range of ecosystem-specific disturbances by isolating the effect of one important agent on timber production and C sequestration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECMDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Bark beetle ; bark beetles ; Biological and medical sciences ; biotic disturbances ; carbon sequestration ; Carbon storage ; climate change ; Climatic change ; climatic factors ; computer analysis ; forest insects ; Forest management ; forest stands ; forest thinning ; forest trees ; forest yields ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology ; Ips typographus ; Natural disturbance ; Picea abies ; PICUS ; plant pests ; Production. Biomass ; Scolytidae ; Secondary coniferous forests ; secondary forests ; silvicultural practices ; Simulation ; simulations ; soil ; stand converstion ; stand density ; stand management ; statistical analysis ; strategies ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; timber production</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2008-07, Vol.256 (3), p.209-220</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8322a6808c7c3f3eec71198b432a6593bb30ddff92750b3d8a1fd4cddb2edb923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8322a6808c7c3f3eec71198b432a6593bb30ddff92750b3d8a1fd4cddb2edb923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20512442$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seidl, Rupert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rammer, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Dietmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lexer, Manfred J.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of bark beetle ( Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>The likely environmental changes throughout the next century have the potential to strongly alter forest disturbance regimes which may heavily affect forest functions as well as forest management. Forest stands already poorly adapted to current environmental conditions, such as secondary Norway spruce (
Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests outside their natural range, are expected to be particularly prone to such risks. By means of a simulation study, a secondary Norway spruce forest management unit in Austria was studied under conditions of climatic change with regard to effects of bark beetle disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration over a time period of 100 years. The modified patch model PICUS v1.41, including a submodule of bark beetle-induced tree mortality, was employed to assess four alternative management strategies: (a) Norway spruce age-class forestry, (b) Norway spruce continuous cover forestry, (c) conversion to mixed species stands, and (d) no management. Two sets of simulations were investigated, one without the consideration of biotic disturbances, the other including possible bark beetle damages. Simulations were conducted for a de-trended baseline climate (1961–1990) as well as for two transient climate change scenarios featuring a distinct increase in temperature. The main objectives were to: (i) estimate the effects of bark beetle damage on timber production and carbon (C) sequestration under climate change; (ii) assess the effects of disregarding bark beetle disturbance in the analysis.
Results indicated a strong increase in bark beetle damage under climate change scenarios (up to +219% in terms of timber volume losses) compared to the baseline climate scenario. Furthermore, distinct differences were revealed between the studied management strategies, pointing at considerably lower amounts of salvage in the conversion strategy. In terms of C storage, increased biotic disturbances under climate change reduced C storage in the actively managed strategies (up to −41.0
tC
ha
−1) over the 100-year simulation period, whereas in the unmanaged control variant some scenarios even resulted in increased C sequestration due to a stand density effect.
Comparing the simulation series with and without bark beetle disturbances the main findings were: (i) forest C storage was higher in all actively managed strategies under climate change, when biotic disturbances were disregarded (up to +31.6
tC
ha
−1 over 100 years); and (ii) in the undisturbed, unmanaged variant C sequestration was lower compared to the simulations with bark beetle disturbance (up to −69.9
tC
ha
−1 over 100 years). The study highlights the importance of including the full range of ecosystem-specific disturbances by isolating the effect of one important agent on timber production and C sequestration.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Bark beetle</subject><subject>bark beetles</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biotic disturbances</subject><subject>carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon storage</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Climatic change</subject><subject>climatic factors</subject><subject>computer analysis</subject><subject>forest insects</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>forest stands</subject><subject>forest thinning</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>forest yields</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</subject><subject>Ips typographus</subject><subject>Natural disturbance</subject><subject>Picea abies</subject><subject>PICUS</subject><subject>plant pests</subject><subject>Production. Biomass</subject><subject>Scolytidae</subject><subject>Secondary coniferous forests</subject><subject>secondary forests</subject><subject>silvicultural practices</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>simulations</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>stand converstion</subject><subject>stand density</subject><subject>stand management</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>strategies</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>timber production</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcuO1DAQRSMEEs3AHyDhDQgWCWU76TgbJDSCoaWWWMCsLT_KGTd5YTtI8zH8K-7OaJasXLo-dV2uWxSvKVQU6P7jqXJzQDNXDEBUUFcA7Emxo6JlZQs1e1rsgLeipJS1z4sXMZ4AoGlqsSv-HsZFmURmR7QKv4hGTAOS9-SwRJLul7kParlbIzlWH4j1Ma1Bq8kgmSeS_KgxkCXMdjXJZ0VNlhgVdC4j_l4xpqAuF37Kzc5hwCmRUU2qx_FcXgDsPUayTjabmcGPWSHmTk09viyeOTVEfPVwXhW3X7_8vP5WHr_fHK4_H0vDO5pKwRlTewHCtIY7jmhaSjuha57lpuNac7DWuY61DWhuhaLO1sZazdDqjvGr4t3mm_9yGVuOPhocBjXhvEbJQDBOoctgvYEmzDEGdHIJeeBwLynIcxbyJLcs5DkLCbXMWeS2tw_-Kho1uJBX6ONjL4OGsro-c282zqlZqj5k5vYHA8oBOso7vs_Ep43AvI4_HoOMxmMOxPr8apJ29v8f5R_uGK4m</recordid><startdate>20080730</startdate><enddate>20080730</enddate><creator>Seidl, Rupert</creator><creator>Rammer, Werner</creator><creator>Jäger, Dietmar</creator><creator>Lexer, Manfred J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam]: Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080730</creationdate><title>Impact of bark beetle ( Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change</title><author>Seidl, Rupert ; Rammer, Werner ; Jäger, Dietmar ; Lexer, Manfred J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8322a6808c7c3f3eec71198b432a6593bb30ddff92750b3d8a1fd4cddb2edb923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Bark beetle</topic><topic>bark beetles</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biotic disturbances</topic><topic>carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon storage</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Climatic change</topic><topic>climatic factors</topic><topic>computer analysis</topic><topic>forest insects</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>forest stands</topic><topic>forest thinning</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>forest yields</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</topic><topic>Ips typographus</topic><topic>Natural disturbance</topic><topic>Picea abies</topic><topic>PICUS</topic><topic>plant pests</topic><topic>Production. Biomass</topic><topic>Scolytidae</topic><topic>Secondary coniferous forests</topic><topic>secondary forests</topic><topic>silvicultural practices</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>simulations</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>stand converstion</topic><topic>stand density</topic><topic>stand management</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>strategies</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>timber production</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seidl, Rupert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rammer, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Dietmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lexer, Manfred J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seidl, Rupert</au><au>Rammer, Werner</au><au>Jäger, Dietmar</au><au>Lexer, Manfred J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of bark beetle ( Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2008-07-30</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>256</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>209-220</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><coden>FECMDW</coden><abstract>The likely environmental changes throughout the next century have the potential to strongly alter forest disturbance regimes which may heavily affect forest functions as well as forest management. Forest stands already poorly adapted to current environmental conditions, such as secondary Norway spruce (
Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests outside their natural range, are expected to be particularly prone to such risks. By means of a simulation study, a secondary Norway spruce forest management unit in Austria was studied under conditions of climatic change with regard to effects of bark beetle disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration over a time period of 100 years. The modified patch model PICUS v1.41, including a submodule of bark beetle-induced tree mortality, was employed to assess four alternative management strategies: (a) Norway spruce age-class forestry, (b) Norway spruce continuous cover forestry, (c) conversion to mixed species stands, and (d) no management. Two sets of simulations were investigated, one without the consideration of biotic disturbances, the other including possible bark beetle damages. Simulations were conducted for a de-trended baseline climate (1961–1990) as well as for two transient climate change scenarios featuring a distinct increase in temperature. The main objectives were to: (i) estimate the effects of bark beetle damage on timber production and carbon (C) sequestration under climate change; (ii) assess the effects of disregarding bark beetle disturbance in the analysis.
Results indicated a strong increase in bark beetle damage under climate change scenarios (up to +219% in terms of timber volume losses) compared to the baseline climate scenario. Furthermore, distinct differences were revealed between the studied management strategies, pointing at considerably lower amounts of salvage in the conversion strategy. In terms of C storage, increased biotic disturbances under climate change reduced C storage in the actively managed strategies (up to −41.0
tC
ha
−1) over the 100-year simulation period, whereas in the unmanaged control variant some scenarios even resulted in increased C sequestration due to a stand density effect.
Comparing the simulation series with and without bark beetle disturbances the main findings were: (i) forest C storage was higher in all actively managed strategies under climate change, when biotic disturbances were disregarded (up to +31.6
tC
ha
−1 over 100 years); and (ii) in the undisturbed, unmanaged variant C sequestration was lower compared to the simulations with bark beetle disturbance (up to −69.9
tC
ha
−1 over 100 years). The study highlights the importance of including the full range of ecosystem-specific disturbances by isolating the effect of one important agent on timber production and C sequestration.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.002</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0378-1127 |
| ispartof | Forest ecology and management, 2008-07, Vol.256 (3), p.209-220 |
| issn | 0378-1127 1872-7042 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20823109 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Bark beetle bark beetles Biological and medical sciences biotic disturbances carbon sequestration Carbon storage climate change Climatic change climatic factors computer analysis forest insects Forest management forest stands forest thinning forest trees forest yields Forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology Ips typographus Natural disturbance Picea abies PICUS plant pests Production. Biomass Scolytidae Secondary coniferous forests secondary forests silvicultural practices Simulation simulations soil stand converstion stand density stand management statistical analysis strategies Synecology Terrestrial ecosystems timber production |
| title | Impact of bark beetle ( Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A21%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20bark%20beetle%20(%20Ips%20typographus%20L.)%20disturbance%20on%20timber%20production%20and%20carbon%20sequestration%20in%20different%20management%20strategies%20under%20climate%20change&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Seidl,%20Rupert&rft.date=2008-07-30&rft.volume=256&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=209-220&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft.coden=FECMDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20823109%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20823109&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112708003198&rfr_iscdi=true |