Prospective study of germline genetic testing in incident cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in 32 cancer susceptibility genes in individuals with newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A key secondary objective was to evaluate how often PGVs would have been unde...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2018-09, Vol.124 (17), p.3520-3527
Hauptverfasser: Brand, Randall, Borazanci, Erkut, Speare, Virginia, Dudley, Beth, Karloski, Eve, Peters, Mary Linton B., Stobie, Lindsey, Bahary, Nathan, Zeh, Herbert, Zureikat, Amer, Hogg, Melissa, Lee, Kenneth, Tsung, Allan, Rhee, John, Ohr, James, Sun, Weijing, Lee, James, Moser, A. James, DeLeonardis, Kim, Krejdovsky, Jill, Dalton, Emily, LaDuca, Holly, Dolinsky, Jill, Colvin, Arlene, Lim, Cynthia, Black, Mary Helen, Tung, Nadine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in 32 cancer susceptibility genes in individuals with newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A key secondary objective was to evaluate how often PGVs would have been undetected with existing genetic testing criteria. METHODS From May 2016 through May 2017, this multicenter cohort study enrolled consecutive patients aged 18 to 89 years with histologically confirmed PDAC diagnosed within the previous 12 weeks. Demographics, medical histories, and 3‐generation pedigrees were collected from participants who provided samples for germline DNA analysis. RESULTS Four hundred nineteen patients were deemed eligible, 302 were enrolled, and 298 were included in the final cohort. Clinically actionable variants were reported in 29 PDAC patients (9.7%), with 23 (7.7%) having a PGV associated with an increased risk for PDAC. Six of 23 individuals (26%) with PDAC‐associated gene mutations did not meet currently established genetic testing criteria. According to guideline‐based genetic testing, only 11 of the 23 PGVs (48%) in known PDAC genes would have been detected. Six additional patients (2%) had PGVs associated with an increased risk for other cancers. CONCLUSIONS These findings support the significant prevalence of PGVs associated with PDAC and the limitations of current paradigms for selecting patients for genetic testing, and they thereby lend support for universal germline multigene genetic testing in this population. This study suggests that a substantial proportion of pancreatic cancer cases may be explained by mutations in cancer susceptibility genes and points to limitations of genetic testing criteria in identifying genetic risk for this disease. These findings lend support for universal germline genetic testing in patients with pancreatic cancer.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.31628