Contributors Toward Pulmonary Vein Restenosis Following Successful Intervention

This study sought to identify clinical and procedural risk factors associated with pulmonary vein (PV) restenosis. Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is a rare but morbid complication of PV isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Interventions such as PV balloon angioplasty (BA) or stenting achi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JACC. Clinical electrophysiology 2018-04, Vol.4 (4), p.547-552
Hauptverfasser: Widmer, R. Jay, Fender, Erin A., Hodge, David O., Monahan, Kristi H., Peterson, Lauri A., Holmes, David R., Packer, Douglas L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 552
container_issue 4
container_start_page 547
container_title JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 4
creator Widmer, R. Jay
Fender, Erin A.
Hodge, David O.
Monahan, Kristi H.
Peterson, Lauri A.
Holmes, David R.
Packer, Douglas L.
description This study sought to identify clinical and procedural risk factors associated with pulmonary vein (PV) restenosis. Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is a rare but morbid complication of PV isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Interventions such as PV balloon angioplasty (BA) or stenting achieve excellent acute success; however, subsequent restenosis is common. A total of 113 patients underwent invasive treatment for severe PVS between 2000 and 2014 and were followed prospectively. Baseline patient and lesion characteristics were abstracted from chart review and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using patient and procedural characteristics to determine which factors were associated with an increased risk for subsequent PV restenosis. Over a median follow-up of 4.6 years there was PVS recurrence in 75 veins; 52 veins (57%) were treated with index BA and 23 veins were treated with stenting. After multivariate analysis, the only patient factor that was significantly associated with restenosis was a history of more than 1 AF ablation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 3.41; p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis on a per-vein level demonstrated a significantly lower risk of restenosis in veins treated with a stent (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 1.75 to 4.61; p < 0.0001). In veins treated with BA alone, inflation of the balloon to higher atmospheres significantly reduced the risk of recurrence (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.98; p = 0.02). Restenosis is common after a successful PV intervention and the risk of restenosis is highest in those with a history of multiple AF ablations and in those treated with BA. Proceduralists should take into account the number of AF ablations a patient has undergone and should strongly consider stent deployment when intervening on PVS to reduce risk of restenosis. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.10.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2082093328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2405500X17309532</els_id><sourcerecordid>2082093328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b860ac6ee45e74fc43d84dcc2fcb6d172f6dc99c797715f25998258252cfab533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUQIMoVmq_QJBZupmaZN4LF1KsFgq-qrgLM3fuSMpMUpOZFv-m39IvM7W1SyFww-Xc1yHkgtEhoyy-ng_nOeBiyClLXGZIKTsiZzykkR9Rlh4f_vSjRwbWzqkjIp5yFp6SXkBpnIRZfEaeR1q1RhZdq431ZnqVm9J76upGq9x8e-8o1Wb9grZFpa203ljXtV5J9em9dgBobdXVm_VEtWiWqFqp1Tk5qfLa4mAf--RtfDcbPfjTx_vJ6HbqQ5jQ1i_SmOYQI4YRJmEFYVCmYQnAKyjikiW8ikvIMkiyJGFRxaMsS3nkHocqL6Ig6JOrXd-F0V-d21A00gLWda5Qd1ZwmnKaBQFPHRrsUDDaWoOVWBjZuPsEo2KrU8zFr06x1blNOlmu6nI_oCsaLA81f_IccLMD0J25lGiEBYkKsJQGoRWllv8O-AEKsInk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2082093328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contributors Toward Pulmonary Vein Restenosis Following Successful Intervention</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Widmer, R. Jay ; Fender, Erin A. ; Hodge, David O. ; Monahan, Kristi H. ; Peterson, Lauri A. ; Holmes, David R. ; Packer, Douglas L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Widmer, R. Jay ; Fender, Erin A. ; Hodge, David O. ; Monahan, Kristi H. ; Peterson, Lauri A. ; Holmes, David R. ; Packer, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><description>This study sought to identify clinical and procedural risk factors associated with pulmonary vein (PV) restenosis. Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is a rare but morbid complication of PV isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Interventions such as PV balloon angioplasty (BA) or stenting achieve excellent acute success; however, subsequent restenosis is common. A total of 113 patients underwent invasive treatment for severe PVS between 2000 and 2014 and were followed prospectively. Baseline patient and lesion characteristics were abstracted from chart review and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using patient and procedural characteristics to determine which factors were associated with an increased risk for subsequent PV restenosis. Over a median follow-up of 4.6 years there was PVS recurrence in 75 veins; 52 veins (57%) were treated with index BA and 23 veins were treated with stenting. After multivariate analysis, the only patient factor that was significantly associated with restenosis was a history of more than 1 AF ablation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 3.41; p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis on a per-vein level demonstrated a significantly lower risk of restenosis in veins treated with a stent (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 1.75 to 4.61; p &lt; 0.0001). In veins treated with BA alone, inflation of the balloon to higher atmospheres significantly reduced the risk of recurrence (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.98; p = 0.02). Restenosis is common after a successful PV intervention and the risk of restenosis is highest in those with a history of multiple AF ablations and in those treated with BA. Proceduralists should take into account the number of AF ablations a patient has undergone and should strongly consider stent deployment when intervening on PVS to reduce risk of restenosis. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-500X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-5018</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.10.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30067496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>atrial fibrillation ; intervention ; pulmonary vein isolation ; pulmonary vein stenosis</subject><ispartof>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2018-04, Vol.4 (4), p.547-552</ispartof><rights>2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b860ac6ee45e74fc43d84dcc2fcb6d172f6dc99c797715f25998258252cfab533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b860ac6ee45e74fc43d84dcc2fcb6d172f6dc99c797715f25998258252cfab533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30067496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Widmer, R. Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fender, Erin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodge, David O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monahan, Kristi H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Lauri A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packer, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><title>Contributors Toward Pulmonary Vein Restenosis Following Successful Intervention</title><title>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>JACC Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>This study sought to identify clinical and procedural risk factors associated with pulmonary vein (PV) restenosis. Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is a rare but morbid complication of PV isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Interventions such as PV balloon angioplasty (BA) or stenting achieve excellent acute success; however, subsequent restenosis is common. A total of 113 patients underwent invasive treatment for severe PVS between 2000 and 2014 and were followed prospectively. Baseline patient and lesion characteristics were abstracted from chart review and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using patient and procedural characteristics to determine which factors were associated with an increased risk for subsequent PV restenosis. Over a median follow-up of 4.6 years there was PVS recurrence in 75 veins; 52 veins (57%) were treated with index BA and 23 veins were treated with stenting. After multivariate analysis, the only patient factor that was significantly associated with restenosis was a history of more than 1 AF ablation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 3.41; p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis on a per-vein level demonstrated a significantly lower risk of restenosis in veins treated with a stent (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 1.75 to 4.61; p &lt; 0.0001). In veins treated with BA alone, inflation of the balloon to higher atmospheres significantly reduced the risk of recurrence (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.98; p = 0.02). Restenosis is common after a successful PV intervention and the risk of restenosis is highest in those with a history of multiple AF ablations and in those treated with BA. Proceduralists should take into account the number of AF ablations a patient has undergone and should strongly consider stent deployment when intervening on PVS to reduce risk of restenosis. [Display omitted]</description><subject>atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>intervention</subject><subject>pulmonary vein isolation</subject><subject>pulmonary vein stenosis</subject><issn>2405-500X</issn><issn>2405-5018</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUQIMoVmq_QJBZupmaZN4LF1KsFgq-qrgLM3fuSMpMUpOZFv-m39IvM7W1SyFww-Xc1yHkgtEhoyy-ng_nOeBiyClLXGZIKTsiZzykkR9Rlh4f_vSjRwbWzqkjIp5yFp6SXkBpnIRZfEaeR1q1RhZdq431ZnqVm9J76upGq9x8e-8o1Wb9grZFpa203ljXtV5J9em9dgBobdXVm_VEtWiWqFqp1Tk5qfLa4mAf--RtfDcbPfjTx_vJ6HbqQ5jQ1i_SmOYQI4YRJmEFYVCmYQnAKyjikiW8ikvIMkiyJGFRxaMsS3nkHocqL6Ig6JOrXd-F0V-d21A00gLWda5Qd1ZwmnKaBQFPHRrsUDDaWoOVWBjZuPsEo2KrU8zFr06x1blNOlmu6nI_oCsaLA81f_IccLMD0J25lGiEBYkKsJQGoRWllv8O-AEKsInk</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Widmer, R. Jay</creator><creator>Fender, Erin A.</creator><creator>Hodge, David O.</creator><creator>Monahan, Kristi H.</creator><creator>Peterson, Lauri A.</creator><creator>Holmes, David R.</creator><creator>Packer, Douglas L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Contributors Toward Pulmonary Vein Restenosis Following Successful Intervention</title><author>Widmer, R. Jay ; Fender, Erin A. ; Hodge, David O. ; Monahan, Kristi H. ; Peterson, Lauri A. ; Holmes, David R. ; Packer, Douglas L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b860ac6ee45e74fc43d84dcc2fcb6d172f6dc99c797715f25998258252cfab533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>intervention</topic><topic>pulmonary vein isolation</topic><topic>pulmonary vein stenosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Widmer, R. Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fender, Erin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodge, David O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monahan, Kristi H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Lauri A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packer, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Widmer, R. Jay</au><au>Fender, Erin A.</au><au>Hodge, David O.</au><au>Monahan, Kristi H.</au><au>Peterson, Lauri A.</au><au>Holmes, David R.</au><au>Packer, Douglas L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contributors Toward Pulmonary Vein Restenosis Following Successful Intervention</atitle><jtitle>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>JACC Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>552</epage><pages>547-552</pages><issn>2405-500X</issn><eissn>2405-5018</eissn><abstract>This study sought to identify clinical and procedural risk factors associated with pulmonary vein (PV) restenosis. Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is a rare but morbid complication of PV isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Interventions such as PV balloon angioplasty (BA) or stenting achieve excellent acute success; however, subsequent restenosis is common. A total of 113 patients underwent invasive treatment for severe PVS between 2000 and 2014 and were followed prospectively. Baseline patient and lesion characteristics were abstracted from chart review and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using patient and procedural characteristics to determine which factors were associated with an increased risk for subsequent PV restenosis. Over a median follow-up of 4.6 years there was PVS recurrence in 75 veins; 52 veins (57%) were treated with index BA and 23 veins were treated with stenting. After multivariate analysis, the only patient factor that was significantly associated with restenosis was a history of more than 1 AF ablation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 3.41; p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis on a per-vein level demonstrated a significantly lower risk of restenosis in veins treated with a stent (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 1.75 to 4.61; p &lt; 0.0001). In veins treated with BA alone, inflation of the balloon to higher atmospheres significantly reduced the risk of recurrence (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.98; p = 0.02). Restenosis is common after a successful PV intervention and the risk of restenosis is highest in those with a history of multiple AF ablations and in those treated with BA. Proceduralists should take into account the number of AF ablations a patient has undergone and should strongly consider stent deployment when intervening on PVS to reduce risk of restenosis. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30067496</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacep.2017.10.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-500X
ispartof JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2018-04, Vol.4 (4), p.547-552
issn 2405-500X
2405-5018
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2082093328
source EZB Free E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects atrial fibrillation
intervention
pulmonary vein isolation
pulmonary vein stenosis
title Contributors Toward Pulmonary Vein Restenosis Following Successful Intervention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T16%3A23%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contributors%20Toward%20Pulmonary%20Vein%C2%A0Restenosis%20Following%20Successful%C2%A0Intervention&rft.jtitle=JACC.%20Clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Widmer,%20R.%20Jay&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=552&rft.pages=547-552&rft.issn=2405-500X&rft.eissn=2405-5018&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacep.2017.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082093328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2082093328&rft_id=info:pmid/30067496&rft_els_id=S2405500X17309532&rfr_iscdi=true