Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals
Objective To systematically assess the methodological quality of Systematic Reviews (SRs) and Meta‐Analyses (MA) published in Paediatric Dentistry journals and to analyse the relationship between the authors, journals, country, review topic, and the year of publication to the methodological quality...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of paediatric dentistry 2018-11, Vol.28 (6), p.548-560 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 560 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 548 |
| container_title | International journal of paediatric dentistry |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Jayaraman, Jayakumar Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob Innes, Nicola P. |
| description | Objective
To systematically assess the methodological quality of Systematic Reviews (SRs) and Meta‐Analyses (MA) published in Paediatric Dentistry journals and to analyse the relationship between the authors, journals, country, review topic, and the year of publication to the methodological quality of SRs and MA.
Design
Paediatric Dentistry journals ranked in the top five of the h5 index of Google Scholar Metrics were selected. SRs with MA were searched independently by two reviewers using PubMed and Scopus databases until December 2017. Methodological quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Statistical significance was set at P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ipd.12414 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2082092534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2082092534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-9d10f99c92851fec025c0981f25a0c30786ce80ec956e205d4af4ad91079d6413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10c1OFTEUB_DGaOCKLHwBM4kbXAycttOZdkkuqCQYiUrCrqntGSmZL9oON7PzEXxGn8TCBRcmdnOanF__Oekh5DWFQ5rPkZ_cIWUVrZ6RFeW1KFnNr56TFagayqbiape8jPEGgApgsEN2OUADAHxFNuvgk7emK8w0BeNjvo1t0WO6Ht3YjT8eerez6Xxa7jtfl5iwN_lN8QXvPG5iYQZXfMJkfv_8ZQbTLdHHwg_FhUHnTQpZnuCQfExhKW7GOWQTX5EXbS64_1j3yOX702_rj-X55w9n6-Pz0nIpq1I5Cq1SVjEpaIsWmLCgJG2ZMGA5NLK2KAGtEjUyEK4ybWWcotAoV1eU75GDbe4UxtsZY9K9jxa7zgw4zlEzkAwUE7zK9O0_9GlYzShVtZCN5Fm92yobxhgDtnoKvjdh0RT0_TZ03oZ-2Ea2bx4T5-89ur_y6fszONqCje9w-X-SPrs42Ub-AdWblS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2119658783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Jayaraman, Jayakumar ; Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu ; Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob ; Innes, Nicola P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jayaraman, Jayakumar ; Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu ; Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob ; Innes, Nicola P.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To systematically assess the methodological quality of Systematic Reviews (SRs) and Meta‐Analyses (MA) published in Paediatric Dentistry journals and to analyse the relationship between the authors, journals, country, review topic, and the year of publication to the methodological quality of SRs and MA.
Design
Paediatric Dentistry journals ranked in the top five of the h5 index of Google Scholar Metrics were selected. SRs with MA were searched independently by two reviewers using PubMed and Scopus databases until December 2017. Methodological quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 and Mann‐Whitney U test and Kruskal‐Wallis test was employed for comparing the AMSTAR score with the journal characteristics.
Results
Finally, 24 SRs with MA were included. The overall AMSTAR score of SRs and MA published in paediatric dentistry journals was 7.08 ± 2.41. No statistically significant differences were found between the country, journal or focus of study to the quality of SRs except the number of authors and the year of publication (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
The quality of SRs and MA in leading Paediatric Dentistry journals were evaluated with AMSTAR tool and areas where quality could be improved were identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12414</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30070003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>AMSTAR ; Databases, Factual ; Dentistry ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Journal Impact Factor ; Meta-analysis ; methodological quality ; paediatric dentistry ; Pediatric Dentistry ; Publications - statistics & numerical data ; Quality ; Research Report ; Reviews ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; systematic review</subject><ispartof>International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2018-11, Vol.28 (6), p.548-560</ispartof><rights>2018 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © 2018 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-9d10f99c92851fec025c0981f25a0c30786ce80ec956e205d4af4ad91079d6413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-9d10f99c92851fec025c0981f25a0c30786ce80ec956e205d4af4ad91079d6413</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1737-6891 ; 0000-0003-3783-3156</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fipd.12414$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fipd.12414$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30070003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jayaraman, Jayakumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, Nicola P.</creatorcontrib><title>Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals</title><title>International journal of paediatric dentistry</title><addtitle>Int J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><description>Objective
To systematically assess the methodological quality of Systematic Reviews (SRs) and Meta‐Analyses (MA) published in Paediatric Dentistry journals and to analyse the relationship between the authors, journals, country, review topic, and the year of publication to the methodological quality of SRs and MA.
Design
Paediatric Dentistry journals ranked in the top five of the h5 index of Google Scholar Metrics were selected. SRs with MA were searched independently by two reviewers using PubMed and Scopus databases until December 2017. Methodological quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 and Mann‐Whitney U test and Kruskal‐Wallis test was employed for comparing the AMSTAR score with the journal characteristics.
Results
Finally, 24 SRs with MA were included. The overall AMSTAR score of SRs and MA published in paediatric dentistry journals was 7.08 ± 2.41. No statistically significant differences were found between the country, journal or focus of study to the quality of SRs except the number of authors and the year of publication (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
The quality of SRs and MA in leading Paediatric Dentistry journals were evaluated with AMSTAR tool and areas where quality could be improved were identified.</description><subject>AMSTAR</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Journal Impact Factor</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>methodological quality</subject><subject>paediatric dentistry</subject><subject>Pediatric Dentistry</subject><subject>Publications - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><issn>0960-7439</issn><issn>1365-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10c1OFTEUB_DGaOCKLHwBM4kbXAycttOZdkkuqCQYiUrCrqntGSmZL9oON7PzEXxGn8TCBRcmdnOanF__Oekh5DWFQ5rPkZ_cIWUVrZ6RFeW1KFnNr56TFagayqbiape8jPEGgApgsEN2OUADAHxFNuvgk7emK8w0BeNjvo1t0WO6Ht3YjT8eerez6Xxa7jtfl5iwN_lN8QXvPG5iYQZXfMJkfv_8ZQbTLdHHwg_FhUHnTQpZnuCQfExhKW7GOWQTX5EXbS64_1j3yOX702_rj-X55w9n6-Pz0nIpq1I5Cq1SVjEpaIsWmLCgJG2ZMGA5NLK2KAGtEjUyEK4ybWWcotAoV1eU75GDbe4UxtsZY9K9jxa7zgw4zlEzkAwUE7zK9O0_9GlYzShVtZCN5Fm92yobxhgDtnoKvjdh0RT0_TZ03oZ-2Ea2bx4T5-89ur_y6fszONqCje9w-X-SPrs42Ub-AdWblS8</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Jayaraman, Jayakumar</creator><creator>Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu</creator><creator>Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob</creator><creator>Innes, Nicola P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1737-6891</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3783-3156</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals</title><author>Jayaraman, Jayakumar ; Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu ; Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob ; Innes, Nicola P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-9d10f99c92851fec025c0981f25a0c30786ce80ec956e205d4af4ad91079d6413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>AMSTAR</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Journal Impact Factor</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>methodological quality</topic><topic>paediatric dentistry</topic><topic>Pediatric Dentistry</topic><topic>Publications - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jayaraman, Jayakumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, Nicola P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jayaraman, Jayakumar</au><au>Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu</au><au>Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob</au><au>Innes, Nicola P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals</atitle><jtitle>International journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>548</spage><epage>560</epage><pages>548-560</pages><issn>0960-7439</issn><eissn>1365-263X</eissn><abstract>Objective
To systematically assess the methodological quality of Systematic Reviews (SRs) and Meta‐Analyses (MA) published in Paediatric Dentistry journals and to analyse the relationship between the authors, journals, country, review topic, and the year of publication to the methodological quality of SRs and MA.
Design
Paediatric Dentistry journals ranked in the top five of the h5 index of Google Scholar Metrics were selected. SRs with MA were searched independently by two reviewers using PubMed and Scopus databases until December 2017. Methodological quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 and Mann‐Whitney U test and Kruskal‐Wallis test was employed for comparing the AMSTAR score with the journal characteristics.
Results
Finally, 24 SRs with MA were included. The overall AMSTAR score of SRs and MA published in paediatric dentistry journals was 7.08 ± 2.41. No statistically significant differences were found between the country, journal or focus of study to the quality of SRs except the number of authors and the year of publication (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
The quality of SRs and MA in leading Paediatric Dentistry journals were evaluated with AMSTAR tool and areas where quality could be improved were identified.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>30070003</pmid><doi>10.1111/ipd.12414</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1737-6891</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3783-3156</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0960-7439 |
| ispartof | International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2018-11, Vol.28 (6), p.548-560 |
| issn | 0960-7439 1365-263X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2082092534 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE |
| subjects | AMSTAR Databases, Factual Dentistry Evaluation Studies as Topic Humans Journal Impact Factor Meta-analysis methodological quality paediatric dentistry Pediatric Dentistry Publications - statistics & numerical data Quality Research Report Reviews Statistical analysis Statistics, Nonparametric systematic review |
| title | Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A02%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20appraisal%20of%20methodological%20quality%20of%20Systematic%20Reviews%20and%20Meta%E2%80%90analysis%20in%20Paediatric%20Dentistry%20journals&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20paediatric%20dentistry&rft.au=Jayaraman,%20Jayakumar&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=548&rft.epage=560&rft.pages=548-560&rft.issn=0960-7439&rft.eissn=1365-263X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ipd.12414&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082092534%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2119658783&rft_id=info:pmid/30070003&rfr_iscdi=true |