Impact of single‐plane versus Bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention
Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of single‐plane and bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods Between January 2008 and December 2015, a tota...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of interventional cardiology 2018-12, Vol.31 (6), p.799-806 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 806 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 799 |
| container_title | Journal of interventional cardiology |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Fang, Hsiu‐Yu Wu, Chiung‐Jen Lee, Wei‐Chieh |
| description | Objective
The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of single‐plane and bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods
Between January 2008 and December 2015, a total of 359 patients received scheduled retrograde CTO PCI and were enrolled in the study; 119 patients underwent PCI by single‐plane imaging, and another 240 patients underwent PCI by bi‐plane imaging.
Results
A 95.0% rate of technical success was noted in the single‐plane imaging group, and a 95.8% rate of technical success was noted in the bi‐plane imaging group. All patients received the CTO approach via the retrograde method, and the retrograde method success rate was 88.2% in single‐plane imaging group, and 81.7% in the bi‐plane imaging group. A longer procedural time (153.73 ± 53.15 vs 172.88 ± 61.30 min; P = 0.004), longer fluorescence time (71.40 ± 25.96 vs 80.95 ± 34.70 min; P = 0.008), and more contrast medium volume (342.77 ± 102.25 vs 394.58 ± 156.41 mL; P = 0.001) were noted in the bi‐plane imaging group. After propensity score match, a longer procedural time, longer fluorescence time, and more contrast volume was noted in bi‐plane group.
Conclusion
Bi‐plane imaging could not decrease procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde CTO PCI. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joic.12545 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2082092493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2082092493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-3ada7151f8f16b57c374d9a48c6d75308ae185966ee68d2440ca59c91615e5763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9uEzEQxi0EoiFw4QGQJS4VYou9XnvXxxIBDarUC5xXrnc2OPLawX-Ccusj8EK8DE-C0w09cMAXS6PffPPNfAi9pOSClvdu642-oDVv-CO0oLwhVUc79hgtSCdF1bC6PUPPYtwSUhPO66fojBEipCTtAv1aTzulE_YjjsZtLPy--7mzygHeQ4g54vfmoWImtSkM9g7vgtcw5KAsTmaCt3i02QeIGpyGU0m5AWvvUlAx4QkGkye89zZPRcnhACn4TVADYP0teGc0Tj4VPa-1zdEch0DQOZXJvvjQvkAqHEpvgrAHlwryHD0ZlY3w4vQv0dePH76srqrrm0_r1eV1pRlvecXUoFrK6diNVNzyVrO2GaRqOi2GljPSKaAdl0IAiG6om4ZoxaWWVFAOvBVsic5n3bL39wwx9ZMpu1o7m-tr0tVE1o1kBX39D7r1Objirq9pI7ngrISzRG9mSgcfY4Cx34Vy3nDoKemPofbHUPv7UAv86iSZb8sdH9C_KRaAzsAPY-HwH6n-8816NYv-ARNysog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2149565318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of single‐plane versus Bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Fang, Hsiu‐Yu ; Wu, Chiung‐Jen ; Lee, Wei‐Chieh</creator><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hsiu‐Yu ; Wu, Chiung‐Jen ; Lee, Wei‐Chieh</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of single‐plane and bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods
Between January 2008 and December 2015, a total of 359 patients received scheduled retrograde CTO PCI and were enrolled in the study; 119 patients underwent PCI by single‐plane imaging, and another 240 patients underwent PCI by bi‐plane imaging.
Results
A 95.0% rate of technical success was noted in the single‐plane imaging group, and a 95.8% rate of technical success was noted in the bi‐plane imaging group. All patients received the CTO approach via the retrograde method, and the retrograde method success rate was 88.2% in single‐plane imaging group, and 81.7% in the bi‐plane imaging group. A longer procedural time (153.73 ± 53.15 vs 172.88 ± 61.30 min; P = 0.004), longer fluorescence time (71.40 ± 25.96 vs 80.95 ± 34.70 min; P = 0.008), and more contrast medium volume (342.77 ± 102.25 vs 394.58 ± 156.41 mL; P = 0.001) were noted in the bi‐plane imaging group. After propensity score match, a longer procedural time, longer fluorescence time, and more contrast volume was noted in bi‐plane group.
Conclusion
Bi‐plane imaging could not decrease procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde CTO PCI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0896-4327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8183</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joic.12545</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30069907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angioplasty ; Chronic Disease ; chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention ; Contrast Media - administration & dosage ; Contrast Media - adverse effects ; contrast medium volume ; Coronary Angiography - adverse effects ; Coronary Angiography - methods ; Coronary Occlusion - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Occlusion - surgery ; Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Vessels - surgery ; Cost reduction ; Female ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescence time ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occlusion ; Operative Time ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - statistics & numerical data ; Propensity Score ; Prospective Studies ; Radiodermatitis - epidemiology ; Radiodermatitis - etiology ; Registries ; retrograde ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; single‐plane vs Bi‐plane ; Success ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of interventional cardiology, 2018-12, Vol.31 (6), p.799-806</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-3ada7151f8f16b57c374d9a48c6d75308ae185966ee68d2440ca59c91615e5763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-3ada7151f8f16b57c374d9a48c6d75308ae185966ee68d2440ca59c91615e5763</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0585-6134</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30069907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hsiu‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chiung‐Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Wei‐Chieh</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of single‐plane versus Bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention</title><title>Journal of interventional cardiology</title><addtitle>J Interv Cardiol</addtitle><description>Objective
The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of single‐plane and bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods
Between January 2008 and December 2015, a total of 359 patients received scheduled retrograde CTO PCI and were enrolled in the study; 119 patients underwent PCI by single‐plane imaging, and another 240 patients underwent PCI by bi‐plane imaging.
Results
A 95.0% rate of technical success was noted in the single‐plane imaging group, and a 95.8% rate of technical success was noted in the bi‐plane imaging group. All patients received the CTO approach via the retrograde method, and the retrograde method success rate was 88.2% in single‐plane imaging group, and 81.7% in the bi‐plane imaging group. A longer procedural time (153.73 ± 53.15 vs 172.88 ± 61.30 min; P = 0.004), longer fluorescence time (71.40 ± 25.96 vs 80.95 ± 34.70 min; P = 0.008), and more contrast medium volume (342.77 ± 102.25 vs 394.58 ± 156.41 mL; P = 0.001) were noted in the bi‐plane imaging group. After propensity score match, a longer procedural time, longer fluorescence time, and more contrast volume was noted in bi‐plane group.
Conclusion
Bi‐plane imaging could not decrease procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde CTO PCI.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Contrast Media - adverse effects</subject><subject>contrast medium volume</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - adverse effects</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Coronary Occlusion - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Occlusion - surgery</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - surgery</subject><subject>Cost reduction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescence time</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occlusion</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiodermatitis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Radiodermatitis - etiology</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>retrograde</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>single‐plane vs Bi‐plane</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0896-4327</issn><issn>1540-8183</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9uEzEQxi0EoiFw4QGQJS4VYou9XnvXxxIBDarUC5xXrnc2OPLawX-Ccusj8EK8DE-C0w09cMAXS6PffPPNfAi9pOSClvdu642-oDVv-CO0oLwhVUc79hgtSCdF1bC6PUPPYtwSUhPO66fojBEipCTtAv1aTzulE_YjjsZtLPy--7mzygHeQ4g54vfmoWImtSkM9g7vgtcw5KAsTmaCt3i02QeIGpyGU0m5AWvvUlAx4QkGkye89zZPRcnhACn4TVADYP0teGc0Tj4VPa-1zdEch0DQOZXJvvjQvkAqHEpvgrAHlwryHD0ZlY3w4vQv0dePH76srqrrm0_r1eV1pRlvecXUoFrK6diNVNzyVrO2GaRqOi2GljPSKaAdl0IAiG6om4ZoxaWWVFAOvBVsic5n3bL39wwx9ZMpu1o7m-tr0tVE1o1kBX39D7r1Objirq9pI7ngrISzRG9mSgcfY4Cx34Vy3nDoKemPofbHUPv7UAv86iSZb8sdH9C_KRaAzsAPY-HwH6n-8816NYv-ARNysog</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Fang, Hsiu‐Yu</creator><creator>Wu, Chiung‐Jen</creator><creator>Lee, Wei‐Chieh</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-6134</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Impact of single‐plane versus Bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention</title><author>Fang, Hsiu‐Yu ; Wu, Chiung‐Jen ; Lee, Wei‐Chieh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-3ada7151f8f16b57c374d9a48c6d75308ae185966ee68d2440ca59c91615e5763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Contrast Media - adverse effects</topic><topic>contrast medium volume</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - adverse effects</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Coronary Occlusion - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Occlusion - surgery</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - surgery</topic><topic>Cost reduction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescence time</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occlusion</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiodermatitis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Radiodermatitis - etiology</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>retrograde</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>single‐plane vs Bi‐plane</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hsiu‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chiung‐Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Wei‐Chieh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fang, Hsiu‐Yu</au><au>Wu, Chiung‐Jen</au><au>Lee, Wei‐Chieh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of single‐plane versus Bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Interv Cardiol</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>799</spage><epage>806</epage><pages>799-806</pages><issn>0896-4327</issn><eissn>1540-8183</eissn><abstract>Objective
The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of single‐plane and bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods
Between January 2008 and December 2015, a total of 359 patients received scheduled retrograde CTO PCI and were enrolled in the study; 119 patients underwent PCI by single‐plane imaging, and another 240 patients underwent PCI by bi‐plane imaging.
Results
A 95.0% rate of technical success was noted in the single‐plane imaging group, and a 95.8% rate of technical success was noted in the bi‐plane imaging group. All patients received the CTO approach via the retrograde method, and the retrograde method success rate was 88.2% in single‐plane imaging group, and 81.7% in the bi‐plane imaging group. A longer procedural time (153.73 ± 53.15 vs 172.88 ± 61.30 min; P = 0.004), longer fluorescence time (71.40 ± 25.96 vs 80.95 ± 34.70 min; P = 0.008), and more contrast medium volume (342.77 ± 102.25 vs 394.58 ± 156.41 mL; P = 0.001) were noted in the bi‐plane imaging group. After propensity score match, a longer procedural time, longer fluorescence time, and more contrast volume was noted in bi‐plane group.
Conclusion
Bi‐plane imaging could not decrease procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde CTO PCI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>30069907</pmid><doi>10.1111/joic.12545</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-6134</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0896-4327 |
| ispartof | Journal of interventional cardiology, 2018-12, Vol.31 (6), p.799-806 |
| issn | 0896-4327 1540-8183 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2082092493 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Aged Angioplasty Chronic Disease chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention Contrast Media - administration & dosage Contrast Media - adverse effects contrast medium volume Coronary Angiography - adverse effects Coronary Angiography - methods Coronary Occlusion - diagnostic imaging Coronary Occlusion - surgery Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging Coronary Vessels - surgery Cost reduction Female Fluorescence Fluorescence time Hospital Mortality Humans Male Middle Aged Occlusion Operative Time Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - statistics & numerical data Propensity Score Prospective Studies Radiodermatitis - epidemiology Radiodermatitis - etiology Registries retrograde Retrospective Studies Risk Factors single‐plane vs Bi‐plane Success Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
| title | Impact of single‐plane versus Bi‐plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T22%3A17%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20single%E2%80%90plane%20versus%20Bi%E2%80%90plane%20imaging%20on%20procedural%20time,%20fluorescence%20time,%20and%20contrast%20medium%20volume%20in%20retrograde%20chronic%20total%20occlusion%20percutaneous%20coronary%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interventional%20cardiology&rft.au=Fang,%20Hsiu%E2%80%90Yu&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=799&rft.epage=806&rft.pages=799-806&rft.issn=0896-4327&rft.eissn=1540-8183&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joic.12545&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082092493%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2149565318&rft_id=info:pmid/30069907&rfr_iscdi=true |