Spatial distribution of source locations for particulate nitrate and sulfate in the upper-midwestern United States

Two back-trajectory analysis methods designed to be used with multiple site data, simplified quantitative transport bias analysis (SQTBA) and residence time weighted concentration (RTWC), were applied to nitrate and sulfate concentration data from two rural sites (the Mammoth Cave National Park and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric environment (1994) 2007-03, Vol.41 (9), p.1831-1847
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Weixiang, Hopke, Philip K., Zhou, Liming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1847
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1831
container_title Atmospheric environment (1994)
container_volume 41
creator Zhao, Weixiang
Hopke, Philip K.
Zhou, Liming
description Two back-trajectory analysis methods designed to be used with multiple site data, simplified quantitative transport bias analysis (SQTBA) and residence time weighted concentration (RTWC), were applied to nitrate and sulfate concentration data from two rural sites (the Mammoth Cave National Park and the Great Smoky Mountain National Park) and five urban sites (Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Indianapolis, and St. Louis) for an intensive investigation on the spatial patterns of origins for these two species in the upper-midwestern area. The study was made by dividing the data into five categories: all sites and all seasons, rural sites in summer, rural sites in winter, urban sites in summer, and urban sites in winter. A general conclusion was that the origins of the nitrate in these seven sites were mainly in the upper-midwestern areas, while the sulfate in these seven sites were mainly from the Ohio and Tennessee River Valley areas. The upper-midwestern areas are regions of high ammonia emissions rather than high NO x emissions. In the winter, metropolitan areas showed the highest nitrate emission potential suggesting the importance of local NO x emissions. In the summer, ammonia emissions from fertilizer application in the lower midwestern area made a significant contribution to nitrate in the rural sites of this study. The impact of the wind direction prevalence on the source spatial patterns was observed by comparing the urban and rural patterns of the summer. The differences between the results of two methods are discussed and suggestions for applying these methods are also provided.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.060
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20820776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231006010880</els_id><sourcerecordid>19608317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-ffc1efb45e7e95f558ae44e712b1f0c9b86e3709b0a536144802bcd3f16fbf0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxRtRcF39CpKL3nqs_OkkfVMWV4UFD-ueQzpdwQw9SZukV_z2ppkVj3Oq4vGrekW9rntL4UCByg_Hg62nVDA-HhiAbOIBJDzrrqhWvGdaiOet5wPrGafwsntVyhEAuBrVVZfvV1uDXcgcSs1h2mpIkSRPStqyQ7IkZ3epEJ8yWW2uwW2LrUhiqHmvNs6kbIvf-xBJ_YlkW1fM_SnMv7FUzJE8NBhncl8bVF53L7xdCr55qtfdw-3nHzdf-7vvX77dfLrrneBD7b13FP0kBlQ4Dn4YtEUhUFE2UQ9unLRErmCcwA5cUiE0sMnN3FPpJw-WX3fvz3vXnH5t7RJzCsXhstiIaSuGgWaglLwI0lGC5lRdBtsNmgvaQHkGXU6lZPRmzeFk8x9DweyhmaP5F5rZQ9v1FlobfPfkYIuzi882ulD-T-sBRkZ3g49nDtsDHwNmU1zA6HAOGV01cwqXrP4Ca_izfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14808341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial distribution of source locations for particulate nitrate and sulfate in the upper-midwestern United States</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhao, Weixiang ; Hopke, Philip K. ; Zhou, Liming</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Weixiang ; Hopke, Philip K. ; Zhou, Liming</creatorcontrib><description>Two back-trajectory analysis methods designed to be used with multiple site data, simplified quantitative transport bias analysis (SQTBA) and residence time weighted concentration (RTWC), were applied to nitrate and sulfate concentration data from two rural sites (the Mammoth Cave National Park and the Great Smoky Mountain National Park) and five urban sites (Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Indianapolis, and St. Louis) for an intensive investigation on the spatial patterns of origins for these two species in the upper-midwestern area. The study was made by dividing the data into five categories: all sites and all seasons, rural sites in summer, rural sites in winter, urban sites in summer, and urban sites in winter. A general conclusion was that the origins of the nitrate in these seven sites were mainly in the upper-midwestern areas, while the sulfate in these seven sites were mainly from the Ohio and Tennessee River Valley areas. The upper-midwestern areas are regions of high ammonia emissions rather than high NO x emissions. In the winter, metropolitan areas showed the highest nitrate emission potential suggesting the importance of local NO x emissions. In the summer, ammonia emissions from fertilizer application in the lower midwestern area made a significant contribution to nitrate in the rural sites of this study. The impact of the wind direction prevalence on the source spatial patterns was observed by comparing the urban and rural patterns of the summer. The differences between the results of two methods are discussed and suggestions for applying these methods are also provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Back trajectory ; Exact sciences and technology ; Nitrate ; Pollution ; Pollution sources. Measurement results ; RTWC ; SQTBA ; Sulfate ; Trajectory ensemble methods</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 2007-03, Vol.41 (9), p.1831-1847</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-ffc1efb45e7e95f558ae44e712b1f0c9b86e3709b0a536144802bcd3f16fbf0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-ffc1efb45e7e95f558ae44e712b1f0c9b86e3709b0a536144802bcd3f16fbf0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231006010880$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18509211$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Weixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopke, Philip K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Liming</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial distribution of source locations for particulate nitrate and sulfate in the upper-midwestern United States</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>Two back-trajectory analysis methods designed to be used with multiple site data, simplified quantitative transport bias analysis (SQTBA) and residence time weighted concentration (RTWC), were applied to nitrate and sulfate concentration data from two rural sites (the Mammoth Cave National Park and the Great Smoky Mountain National Park) and five urban sites (Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Indianapolis, and St. Louis) for an intensive investigation on the spatial patterns of origins for these two species in the upper-midwestern area. The study was made by dividing the data into five categories: all sites and all seasons, rural sites in summer, rural sites in winter, urban sites in summer, and urban sites in winter. A general conclusion was that the origins of the nitrate in these seven sites were mainly in the upper-midwestern areas, while the sulfate in these seven sites were mainly from the Ohio and Tennessee River Valley areas. The upper-midwestern areas are regions of high ammonia emissions rather than high NO x emissions. In the winter, metropolitan areas showed the highest nitrate emission potential suggesting the importance of local NO x emissions. In the summer, ammonia emissions from fertilizer application in the lower midwestern area made a significant contribution to nitrate in the rural sites of this study. The impact of the wind direction prevalence on the source spatial patterns was observed by comparing the urban and rural patterns of the summer. The differences between the results of two methods are discussed and suggestions for applying these methods are also provided.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Back trajectory</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Nitrate</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution sources. Measurement results</subject><subject>RTWC</subject><subject>SQTBA</subject><subject>Sulfate</subject><subject>Trajectory ensemble methods</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxRtRcF39CpKL3nqs_OkkfVMWV4UFD-ueQzpdwQw9SZukV_z2ppkVj3Oq4vGrekW9rntL4UCByg_Hg62nVDA-HhiAbOIBJDzrrqhWvGdaiOet5wPrGafwsntVyhEAuBrVVZfvV1uDXcgcSs1h2mpIkSRPStqyQ7IkZ3epEJ8yWW2uwW2LrUhiqHmvNs6kbIvf-xBJ_YlkW1fM_SnMv7FUzJE8NBhncl8bVF53L7xdCr55qtfdw-3nHzdf-7vvX77dfLrrneBD7b13FP0kBlQ4Dn4YtEUhUFE2UQ9unLRErmCcwA5cUiE0sMnN3FPpJw-WX3fvz3vXnH5t7RJzCsXhstiIaSuGgWaglLwI0lGC5lRdBtsNmgvaQHkGXU6lZPRmzeFk8x9DweyhmaP5F5rZQ9v1FlobfPfkYIuzi882ulD-T-sBRkZ3g49nDtsDHwNmU1zA6HAOGV01cwqXrP4Ca_izfA</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>Zhao, Weixiang</creator><creator>Hopke, Philip K.</creator><creator>Zhou, Liming</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Spatial distribution of source locations for particulate nitrate and sulfate in the upper-midwestern United States</title><author>Zhao, Weixiang ; Hopke, Philip K. ; Zhou, Liming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-ffc1efb45e7e95f558ae44e712b1f0c9b86e3709b0a536144802bcd3f16fbf0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Back trajectory</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Nitrate</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution sources. Measurement results</topic><topic>RTWC</topic><topic>SQTBA</topic><topic>Sulfate</topic><topic>Trajectory ensemble methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Weixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopke, Philip K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Liming</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Weixiang</au><au>Hopke, Philip K.</au><au>Zhou, Liming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial distribution of source locations for particulate nitrate and sulfate in the upper-midwestern United States</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1831</spage><epage>1847</epage><pages>1831-1847</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>Two back-trajectory analysis methods designed to be used with multiple site data, simplified quantitative transport bias analysis (SQTBA) and residence time weighted concentration (RTWC), were applied to nitrate and sulfate concentration data from two rural sites (the Mammoth Cave National Park and the Great Smoky Mountain National Park) and five urban sites (Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Indianapolis, and St. Louis) for an intensive investigation on the spatial patterns of origins for these two species in the upper-midwestern area. The study was made by dividing the data into five categories: all sites and all seasons, rural sites in summer, rural sites in winter, urban sites in summer, and urban sites in winter. A general conclusion was that the origins of the nitrate in these seven sites were mainly in the upper-midwestern areas, while the sulfate in these seven sites were mainly from the Ohio and Tennessee River Valley areas. The upper-midwestern areas are regions of high ammonia emissions rather than high NO x emissions. In the winter, metropolitan areas showed the highest nitrate emission potential suggesting the importance of local NO x emissions. In the summer, ammonia emissions from fertilizer application in the lower midwestern area made a significant contribution to nitrate in the rural sites of this study. The impact of the wind direction prevalence on the source spatial patterns was observed by comparing the urban and rural patterns of the summer. The differences between the results of two methods are discussed and suggestions for applying these methods are also provided.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.060</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-2310
ispartof Atmospheric environment (1994), 2007-03, Vol.41 (9), p.1831-1847
issn 1352-2310
1873-2844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20820776
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Atmospheric pollution
Back trajectory
Exact sciences and technology
Nitrate
Pollution
Pollution sources. Measurement results
RTWC
SQTBA
Sulfate
Trajectory ensemble methods
title Spatial distribution of source locations for particulate nitrate and sulfate in the upper-midwestern United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A34%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20distribution%20of%20source%20locations%20for%20particulate%20nitrate%20and%20sulfate%20in%20the%20upper-midwestern%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Zhao,%20Weixiang&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1831&rft.epage=1847&rft.pages=1831-1847&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19608317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14808341&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1352231006010880&rfr_iscdi=true