Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

This study evaluated the safety and performance of the Guardian™ continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Subjects 2-18 years of age (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 13.1 ± 3.9 years) with T1D and duration of diagnosis ≥1 year were enrolled at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes technology & therapeutics 2018-09, Vol.20 (9), p.576-584
Hauptverfasser: Slover, Robert H, Tryggestad, Jeanie B, DiMeglio, Linda A, Fox, Larry A, Bode, Bruce W, Bailey, Timothy S, Brazg, Ronald, Christiansen, Mark P, Sherr, Jennifer L, Tsalikian, Eva, Kaiserman, Kevin B, Sullivan, Ashley, Huang, Suiying, Shin, John, Lee, Scott W, Kaufman, Francine R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 584
container_issue 9
container_start_page 576
container_title Diabetes technology & therapeutics
container_volume 20
creator Slover, Robert H
Tryggestad, Jeanie B
DiMeglio, Linda A
Fox, Larry A
Bode, Bruce W
Bailey, Timothy S
Brazg, Ronald
Christiansen, Mark P
Sherr, Jennifer L
Tsalikian, Eva
Kaiserman, Kevin B
Sullivan, Ashley
Huang, Suiying
Shin, John
Lee, Scott W
Kaufman, Francine R
description This study evaluated the safety and performance of the Guardian™ continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Subjects 2-18 years of age (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 13.1 ± 3.9 years) with T1D and duration of diagnosis ≥1 year were enrolled at 11 sites in the United States and wore two Guardian Sensor 3 sensors in the abdomen and/or buttock. Sensors were connected to a transmitter paired with either a Guardian Connect system (i.e., mobile device with software application allowing display of sensor glucose [SG] values) or a Guardian Link 3 transmitter used as a Glucose Sensor Recorder (GSR). There were 145 participants who underwent a 6-h in-clinic frequent sample testing (FST) on day 1 (n = 54), day 3 (n = 48), or day 7 (n = 43) postsensor insertion. During FST, SG values were compared with a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) plasma reference every 5-15 min (n = 124, 7-18 years of age; n = 2, 2-6 years of age), or to a self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) reference every 5-30 min (n = 19, 2-6 years of age). The overall mean absolute relative difference (ARD ± SD) between SG and reference values (YSI or SMBG) when calibrating approximately every 12 h, was 10.9% ± 10.7% (3102 paired points) for sensors communicating with the Guardian Connect system and 11.1% ± 10.6% (2624 paired points) for sensors connected to the GSR. The overall percentage of SG values within ±20% of reference values >80 mg/dL or within 20 mg/dL of reference values ≤80 mg/dL was 87.8% for the Guardian Connect system and 86.7% for the GSR, respectively. There was one device-related adverse event of contact dermatitis, but no serious device-related adverse events. The Guardian CGM system demonstrated good accuracy in children and adolescents. These findings support its use in sensor-integrated insulin pump platforms, as well as a standalone technology, for managing diabetes in pediatric populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/dia.2018.0109
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2080821870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2080821870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c4fc67c36856c6084032ba290b8bb7561a9a31085292de23e2d0419fe069e9203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkTFvFDEQRi1EREKgpEWWaGj2MrbPXrs8XcgRKREFoV55vbOcoz37sL2K7t_jVQJFqpni6dM38wj5xGDFQJurwdsVB6ZXwMC8IRdMyrbR0oi3y86hMUyqc_I-50cAaAVn78i5AFCCKX5B5o1zc7LuRONILb2Jcyr7ZocBky0-BrqNofgwxznT3TS7mJHex-BLTD78pj9PueCB-srt_TQkDNSGgW6GOGF2GEqmT77s6cPpiJTRa297LJg_kLPRThk_vsxL8uvm28P2e3P3Y3e73dw1rvYsjVuPTrVOKC2VU6DXIHhvuYFe930rFbPGivoFyQ0fkAvkA6yZGRGUQcNBXJKvz7nHFP_MmEt38LXWNNmA9aKOgwbNmW4X9Msr9LH-ItR2lTJcyTVIUanmmXIp5pxw7I7JH2w6dQy6xUdXfXSLj27xUfnPL6lzf8DhP_1PgPgLJKiE1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2092654053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Slover, Robert H ; Tryggestad, Jeanie B ; DiMeglio, Linda A ; Fox, Larry A ; Bode, Bruce W ; Bailey, Timothy S ; Brazg, Ronald ; Christiansen, Mark P ; Sherr, Jennifer L ; Tsalikian, Eva ; Kaiserman, Kevin B ; Sullivan, Ashley ; Huang, Suiying ; Shin, John ; Lee, Scott W ; Kaufman, Francine R</creator><creatorcontrib>Slover, Robert H ; Tryggestad, Jeanie B ; DiMeglio, Linda A ; Fox, Larry A ; Bode, Bruce W ; Bailey, Timothy S ; Brazg, Ronald ; Christiansen, Mark P ; Sherr, Jennifer L ; Tsalikian, Eva ; Kaiserman, Kevin B ; Sullivan, Ashley ; Huang, Suiying ; Shin, John ; Lee, Scott W ; Kaufman, Francine R</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the safety and performance of the Guardian™ continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Subjects 2-18 years of age (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 13.1 ± 3.9 years) with T1D and duration of diagnosis ≥1 year were enrolled at 11 sites in the United States and wore two Guardian Sensor 3 sensors in the abdomen and/or buttock. Sensors were connected to a transmitter paired with either a Guardian Connect system (i.e., mobile device with software application allowing display of sensor glucose [SG] values) or a Guardian Link 3 transmitter used as a Glucose Sensor Recorder (GSR). There were 145 participants who underwent a 6-h in-clinic frequent sample testing (FST) on day 1 (n = 54), day 3 (n = 48), or day 7 (n = 43) postsensor insertion. During FST, SG values were compared with a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) plasma reference every 5-15 min (n = 124, 7-18 years of age; n = 2, 2-6 years of age), or to a self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) reference every 5-30 min (n = 19, 2-6 years of age). The overall mean absolute relative difference (ARD ± SD) between SG and reference values (YSI or SMBG) when calibrating approximately every 12 h, was 10.9% ± 10.7% (3102 paired points) for sensors communicating with the Guardian Connect system and 11.1% ± 10.6% (2624 paired points) for sensors connected to the GSR. The overall percentage of SG values within ±20% of reference values &gt;80 mg/dL or within 20 mg/dL of reference values ≤80 mg/dL was 87.8% for the Guardian Connect system and 86.7% for the GSR, respectively. There was one device-related adverse event of contact dermatitis, but no serious device-related adverse events. The Guardian CGM system demonstrated good accuracy in children and adolescents. These findings support its use in sensor-integrated insulin pump platforms, as well as a standalone technology, for managing diabetes in pediatric populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-9156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/dia.2018.0109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30063162</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Diabetes ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 ; Female ; Glucose ; Glucose monitoring ; Humans ; Male ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation ; Pediatrics ; Sensors ; Teenagers</subject><ispartof>Diabetes technology &amp; therapeutics, 2018-09, Vol.20 (9), p.576-584</ispartof><rights>(©) Copyright 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c4fc67c36856c6084032ba290b8bb7561a9a31085292de23e2d0419fe069e9203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c4fc67c36856c6084032ba290b8bb7561a9a31085292de23e2d0419fe069e9203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30063162$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slover, Robert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tryggestad, Jeanie B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiMeglio, Linda A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Larry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, Bruce W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazg, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Mark P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherr, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsalikian, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiserman, Kevin B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Suiying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Scott W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Francine R</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes</title><title>Diabetes technology &amp; therapeutics</title><addtitle>Diabetes Technol Ther</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the safety and performance of the Guardian™ continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Subjects 2-18 years of age (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 13.1 ± 3.9 years) with T1D and duration of diagnosis ≥1 year were enrolled at 11 sites in the United States and wore two Guardian Sensor 3 sensors in the abdomen and/or buttock. Sensors were connected to a transmitter paired with either a Guardian Connect system (i.e., mobile device with software application allowing display of sensor glucose [SG] values) or a Guardian Link 3 transmitter used as a Glucose Sensor Recorder (GSR). There were 145 participants who underwent a 6-h in-clinic frequent sample testing (FST) on day 1 (n = 54), day 3 (n = 48), or day 7 (n = 43) postsensor insertion. During FST, SG values were compared with a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) plasma reference every 5-15 min (n = 124, 7-18 years of age; n = 2, 2-6 years of age), or to a self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) reference every 5-30 min (n = 19, 2-6 years of age). The overall mean absolute relative difference (ARD ± SD) between SG and reference values (YSI or SMBG) when calibrating approximately every 12 h, was 10.9% ± 10.7% (3102 paired points) for sensors communicating with the Guardian Connect system and 11.1% ± 10.6% (2624 paired points) for sensors connected to the GSR. The overall percentage of SG values within ±20% of reference values &gt;80 mg/dL or within 20 mg/dL of reference values ≤80 mg/dL was 87.8% for the Guardian Connect system and 86.7% for the GSR, respectively. There was one device-related adverse event of contact dermatitis, but no serious device-related adverse events. The Guardian CGM system demonstrated good accuracy in children and adolescents. These findings support its use in sensor-integrated insulin pump platforms, as well as a standalone technology, for managing diabetes in pediatric populations.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glucose monitoring</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><issn>1520-9156</issn><issn>1557-8593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkTFvFDEQRi1EREKgpEWWaGj2MrbPXrs8XcgRKREFoV55vbOcoz37sL2K7t_jVQJFqpni6dM38wj5xGDFQJurwdsVB6ZXwMC8IRdMyrbR0oi3y86hMUyqc_I-50cAaAVn78i5AFCCKX5B5o1zc7LuRONILb2Jcyr7ZocBky0-BrqNofgwxznT3TS7mJHex-BLTD78pj9PueCB-srt_TQkDNSGgW6GOGF2GEqmT77s6cPpiJTRa297LJg_kLPRThk_vsxL8uvm28P2e3P3Y3e73dw1rvYsjVuPTrVOKC2VU6DXIHhvuYFe930rFbPGivoFyQ0fkAvkA6yZGRGUQcNBXJKvz7nHFP_MmEt38LXWNNmA9aKOgwbNmW4X9Msr9LH-ItR2lTJcyTVIUanmmXIp5pxw7I7JH2w6dQy6xUdXfXSLj27xUfnPL6lzf8DhP_1PgPgLJKiE1w</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Slover, Robert H</creator><creator>Tryggestad, Jeanie B</creator><creator>DiMeglio, Linda A</creator><creator>Fox, Larry A</creator><creator>Bode, Bruce W</creator><creator>Bailey, Timothy S</creator><creator>Brazg, Ronald</creator><creator>Christiansen, Mark P</creator><creator>Sherr, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Tsalikian, Eva</creator><creator>Kaiserman, Kevin B</creator><creator>Sullivan, Ashley</creator><creator>Huang, Suiying</creator><creator>Shin, John</creator><creator>Lee, Scott W</creator><creator>Kaufman, Francine R</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes</title><author>Slover, Robert H ; Tryggestad, Jeanie B ; DiMeglio, Linda A ; Fox, Larry A ; Bode, Bruce W ; Bailey, Timothy S ; Brazg, Ronald ; Christiansen, Mark P ; Sherr, Jennifer L ; Tsalikian, Eva ; Kaiserman, Kevin B ; Sullivan, Ashley ; Huang, Suiying ; Shin, John ; Lee, Scott W ; Kaufman, Francine R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c4fc67c36856c6084032ba290b8bb7561a9a31085292de23e2d0419fe069e9203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glucose monitoring</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slover, Robert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tryggestad, Jeanie B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiMeglio, Linda A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Larry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, Bruce W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazg, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Mark P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherr, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsalikian, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiserman, Kevin B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Suiying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Scott W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Francine R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diabetes technology &amp; therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slover, Robert H</au><au>Tryggestad, Jeanie B</au><au>DiMeglio, Linda A</au><au>Fox, Larry A</au><au>Bode, Bruce W</au><au>Bailey, Timothy S</au><au>Brazg, Ronald</au><au>Christiansen, Mark P</au><au>Sherr, Jennifer L</au><au>Tsalikian, Eva</au><au>Kaiserman, Kevin B</au><au>Sullivan, Ashley</au><au>Huang, Suiying</au><au>Shin, John</au><au>Lee, Scott W</au><au>Kaufman, Francine R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes technology &amp; therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Technol Ther</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>576</spage><epage>584</epage><pages>576-584</pages><issn>1520-9156</issn><eissn>1557-8593</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the safety and performance of the Guardian™ continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Subjects 2-18 years of age (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 13.1 ± 3.9 years) with T1D and duration of diagnosis ≥1 year were enrolled at 11 sites in the United States and wore two Guardian Sensor 3 sensors in the abdomen and/or buttock. Sensors were connected to a transmitter paired with either a Guardian Connect system (i.e., mobile device with software application allowing display of sensor glucose [SG] values) or a Guardian Link 3 transmitter used as a Glucose Sensor Recorder (GSR). There were 145 participants who underwent a 6-h in-clinic frequent sample testing (FST) on day 1 (n = 54), day 3 (n = 48), or day 7 (n = 43) postsensor insertion. During FST, SG values were compared with a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) plasma reference every 5-15 min (n = 124, 7-18 years of age; n = 2, 2-6 years of age), or to a self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) reference every 5-30 min (n = 19, 2-6 years of age). The overall mean absolute relative difference (ARD ± SD) between SG and reference values (YSI or SMBG) when calibrating approximately every 12 h, was 10.9% ± 10.7% (3102 paired points) for sensors communicating with the Guardian Connect system and 11.1% ± 10.6% (2624 paired points) for sensors connected to the GSR. The overall percentage of SG values within ±20% of reference values &gt;80 mg/dL or within 20 mg/dL of reference values ≤80 mg/dL was 87.8% for the Guardian Connect system and 86.7% for the GSR, respectively. There was one device-related adverse event of contact dermatitis, but no serious device-related adverse events. The Guardian CGM system demonstrated good accuracy in children and adolescents. These findings support its use in sensor-integrated insulin pump platforms, as well as a standalone technology, for managing diabetes in pediatric populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>30063162</pmid><doi>10.1089/dia.2018.0109</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-9156
ispartof Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2018-09, Vol.20 (9), p.576-584
issn 1520-9156
1557-8593
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2080821870
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Age
Blood Glucose - analysis
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation
Child
Child, Preschool
Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Female
Glucose
Glucose monitoring
Humans
Male
Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation
Pediatrics
Sensors
Teenagers
title Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A56%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20a%20Fourth-Generation%20Continuous%20Glucose%20Monitoring%20System%20in%20Children%20and%20Adolescents%20with%20Type%201%20Diabetes&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20technology%20&%20therapeutics&rft.au=Slover,%20Robert%20H&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=576&rft.epage=584&rft.pages=576-584&rft.issn=1520-9156&rft.eissn=1557-8593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/dia.2018.0109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2080821870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2092654053&rft_id=info:pmid/30063162&rfr_iscdi=true