Frequency of occurrence of various drought types and its impact on performance of photoperiod-sensitive and insensitive rice genotypes in rainfed lowland conditions in Cambodia

Lowland rice production in the Mekong region is generally low because crops are cultivated under rainfed conditions and often exposed to drought. To examine how field water availability affects productivity of different genotypes in rainfed lowland rice, the field experiments were carried out for si...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Field crops research 2009-09, Vol.113 (3), p.287-296
Hauptverfasser: Tsubo, M., Fukai, S., Basnayake, J., Ouk, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 296
container_issue 3
container_start_page 287
container_title Field crops research
container_volume 113
creator Tsubo, M.
Fukai, S.
Basnayake, J.
Ouk, M.
description Lowland rice production in the Mekong region is generally low because crops are cultivated under rainfed conditions and often exposed to drought. To examine how field water availability affects productivity of different genotypes in rainfed lowland rice, the field experiments were carried out for six years at eight locations in Cambodia. We classified 34 genotypes used in the experiments into photoperiod-insensitive [short (IS) and medium (IM) maturity] and sensitive [medium (SM) and long-duration (SL) maturity] genotype groups. Mean days-to-flower from sowing was 87 in IS, 112 in IM, 112 in SM and 132 in SL and mean grain yield was 2.0, 2.8, 2.5 and 2.4 t ha −1, respectively. Drought environment was quantified for each experiment by determining whether free water level was observed to be less than the soil surface during three growth stages: GS1 (maximum tillering), GS2 (panicle development) and GS3 (grain filling). The drought frequency estimated from 44 field experiments was 18% in all IM, SM and SL at GS1, 23%, 25% and 32% in IM, SM and SL, respectively at GS2, and 43%, 45% and 57% at GS3. Thus, the drought occurred more frequently after flowering, particularly in the SL group. Based on the results, the IM genotypes may be grown to escape from drought during the GS2 and GS3 periods by sowing early (June) in the drought environment. When sown late (August), the SM genotypes are exposed to less drought risk because they flower earlier than the IM genotypes. Compared with the SM genotypes, the SL genotypes are highly exposed to water stress during the GS3 period, resulting in yield reduction. SM and IM had similar occurrence of drought environment, but yield reduction due to drought was less in SM than in IM. Thus, photoperiod-sensitive cultivars with medium maturity are preferred in drought-prone lowland fields, particularly when sowing is delayed. In the favourable water environment, the SM genotypes can be better than the IM genotypes when sown early in the season, while the IM genotypes performs better than the SM genotypes with late sowing. This suggests that for lowland fields without drought photoperiod-insensitive cultivars are recommended and photoperiod-sensitive cultivars can be preferred if sown early.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20787861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378429009001506</els_id><sourcerecordid>20787861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-fc4132494cf46e94bbfdc49b1ceaf4d64c11e2b64baa50145bb7af7155d810103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURS0EUoeWD-gKr9gl2BnHScQKjSggVWJBu7Yc-3nq0cQOz55B81f9RBxSiR0r69nnXj3fS8gtZzVnXH481M5g3TA21EzWjMlXZMP7rqlk3zavyYZtu74SzcCuyNuUDqwQkssNeb5D-HWCYC40OhqNOSGWCZbprNHHU6IW42n_lGm-zJCoDpb6nKifZm0yjYHOgC7ipF9k81PMsdz5aKsEIfnsz7DKwr8ZfaH3EOLq6gNF7YMDS4_x93GhTQy2sDH8fd3paYzW6xvyxuljgncv5zV5vPvysPtW3f_4-n33-b4ygve5cuXYNmIQxgkJgxhHZ40YRm5AO2GlMJxDM0oxat0yLtpx7LTreNvavgTKttfkw-o7YywBpawmnwwcy2pQQlEN6_qul7yAfAUNxpQQnJrRTxovijO1dKMOqnSjlm4Uk6okXzTvV43TUek9-qQefzaMbwsuy-KL66eVgPLHswdUyfilGOsRTFY2-v_4_wFTKqYj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20787861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frequency of occurrence of various drought types and its impact on performance of photoperiod-sensitive and insensitive rice genotypes in rainfed lowland conditions in Cambodia</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tsubo, M. ; Fukai, S. ; Basnayake, J. ; Ouk, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsubo, M. ; Fukai, S. ; Basnayake, J. ; Ouk, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Lowland rice production in the Mekong region is generally low because crops are cultivated under rainfed conditions and often exposed to drought. To examine how field water availability affects productivity of different genotypes in rainfed lowland rice, the field experiments were carried out for six years at eight locations in Cambodia. We classified 34 genotypes used in the experiments into photoperiod-insensitive [short (IS) and medium (IM) maturity] and sensitive [medium (SM) and long-duration (SL) maturity] genotype groups. Mean days-to-flower from sowing was 87 in IS, 112 in IM, 112 in SM and 132 in SL and mean grain yield was 2.0, 2.8, 2.5 and 2.4 t ha −1, respectively. Drought environment was quantified for each experiment by determining whether free water level was observed to be less than the soil surface during three growth stages: GS1 (maximum tillering), GS2 (panicle development) and GS3 (grain filling). The drought frequency estimated from 44 field experiments was 18% in all IM, SM and SL at GS1, 23%, 25% and 32% in IM, SM and SL, respectively at GS2, and 43%, 45% and 57% at GS3. Thus, the drought occurred more frequently after flowering, particularly in the SL group. Based on the results, the IM genotypes may be grown to escape from drought during the GS2 and GS3 periods by sowing early (June) in the drought environment. When sown late (August), the SM genotypes are exposed to less drought risk because they flower earlier than the IM genotypes. Compared with the SM genotypes, the SL genotypes are highly exposed to water stress during the GS3 period, resulting in yield reduction. SM and IM had similar occurrence of drought environment, but yield reduction due to drought was less in SM than in IM. Thus, photoperiod-sensitive cultivars with medium maturity are preferred in drought-prone lowland fields, particularly when sowing is delayed. In the favourable water environment, the SM genotypes can be better than the IM genotypes when sown early in the season, while the IM genotypes performs better than the SM genotypes with late sowing. This suggests that for lowland fields without drought photoperiod-insensitive cultivars are recommended and photoperiod-sensitive cultivars can be preferred if sown early.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>developmental stages ; Drought ; dryland farming ; field experimentation ; filling period ; Flowering ; frequency ; Freshwater ; genotype ; Grain yield ; inflorescences ; Oryza sativa ; phenology ; photoperiod ; Photoperiod sensitivity ; plant available water ; rice ; seasonal variation ; soil water content ; sowing date ; tillering ; Water availability ; water stress</subject><ispartof>Field crops research, 2009-09, Vol.113 (3), p.287-296</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-fc4132494cf46e94bbfdc49b1ceaf4d64c11e2b64baa50145bb7af7155d810103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-fc4132494cf46e94bbfdc49b1ceaf4d64c11e2b64baa50145bb7af7155d810103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429009001506$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsubo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukai, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basnayake, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouk, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Frequency of occurrence of various drought types and its impact on performance of photoperiod-sensitive and insensitive rice genotypes in rainfed lowland conditions in Cambodia</title><title>Field crops research</title><description>Lowland rice production in the Mekong region is generally low because crops are cultivated under rainfed conditions and often exposed to drought. To examine how field water availability affects productivity of different genotypes in rainfed lowland rice, the field experiments were carried out for six years at eight locations in Cambodia. We classified 34 genotypes used in the experiments into photoperiod-insensitive [short (IS) and medium (IM) maturity] and sensitive [medium (SM) and long-duration (SL) maturity] genotype groups. Mean days-to-flower from sowing was 87 in IS, 112 in IM, 112 in SM and 132 in SL and mean grain yield was 2.0, 2.8, 2.5 and 2.4 t ha −1, respectively. Drought environment was quantified for each experiment by determining whether free water level was observed to be less than the soil surface during three growth stages: GS1 (maximum tillering), GS2 (panicle development) and GS3 (grain filling). The drought frequency estimated from 44 field experiments was 18% in all IM, SM and SL at GS1, 23%, 25% and 32% in IM, SM and SL, respectively at GS2, and 43%, 45% and 57% at GS3. Thus, the drought occurred more frequently after flowering, particularly in the SL group. Based on the results, the IM genotypes may be grown to escape from drought during the GS2 and GS3 periods by sowing early (June) in the drought environment. When sown late (August), the SM genotypes are exposed to less drought risk because they flower earlier than the IM genotypes. Compared with the SM genotypes, the SL genotypes are highly exposed to water stress during the GS3 period, resulting in yield reduction. SM and IM had similar occurrence of drought environment, but yield reduction due to drought was less in SM than in IM. Thus, photoperiod-sensitive cultivars with medium maturity are preferred in drought-prone lowland fields, particularly when sowing is delayed. In the favourable water environment, the SM genotypes can be better than the IM genotypes when sown early in the season, while the IM genotypes performs better than the SM genotypes with late sowing. This suggests that for lowland fields without drought photoperiod-insensitive cultivars are recommended and photoperiod-sensitive cultivars can be preferred if sown early.</description><subject>developmental stages</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>dryland farming</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>filling period</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>frequency</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>Grain yield</subject><subject>inflorescences</subject><subject>Oryza sativa</subject><subject>phenology</subject><subject>photoperiod</subject><subject>Photoperiod sensitivity</subject><subject>plant available water</subject><subject>rice</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>soil water content</subject><subject>sowing date</subject><subject>tillering</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>water stress</subject><issn>0378-4290</issn><issn>1872-6852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURS0EUoeWD-gKr9gl2BnHScQKjSggVWJBu7Yc-3nq0cQOz55B81f9RBxSiR0r69nnXj3fS8gtZzVnXH481M5g3TA21EzWjMlXZMP7rqlk3zavyYZtu74SzcCuyNuUDqwQkssNeb5D-HWCYC40OhqNOSGWCZbprNHHU6IW42n_lGm-zJCoDpb6nKifZm0yjYHOgC7ipF9k81PMsdz5aKsEIfnsz7DKwr8ZfaH3EOLq6gNF7YMDS4_x93GhTQy2sDH8fd3paYzW6xvyxuljgncv5zV5vPvysPtW3f_4-n33-b4ygve5cuXYNmIQxgkJgxhHZ40YRm5AO2GlMJxDM0oxat0yLtpx7LTreNvavgTKttfkw-o7YywBpawmnwwcy2pQQlEN6_qul7yAfAUNxpQQnJrRTxovijO1dKMOqnSjlm4Uk6okXzTvV43TUek9-qQefzaMbwsuy-KL66eVgPLHswdUyfilGOsRTFY2-v_4_wFTKqYj</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Tsubo, M.</creator><creator>Fukai, S.</creator><creator>Basnayake, J.</creator><creator>Ouk, M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam]: Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Frequency of occurrence of various drought types and its impact on performance of photoperiod-sensitive and insensitive rice genotypes in rainfed lowland conditions in Cambodia</title><author>Tsubo, M. ; Fukai, S. ; Basnayake, J. ; Ouk, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-fc4132494cf46e94bbfdc49b1ceaf4d64c11e2b64baa50145bb7af7155d810103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>developmental stages</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>dryland farming</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>filling period</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>frequency</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>Grain yield</topic><topic>inflorescences</topic><topic>Oryza sativa</topic><topic>phenology</topic><topic>photoperiod</topic><topic>Photoperiod sensitivity</topic><topic>plant available water</topic><topic>rice</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>soil water content</topic><topic>sowing date</topic><topic>tillering</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>water stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsubo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukai, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basnayake, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouk, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Field crops research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsubo, M.</au><au>Fukai, S.</au><au>Basnayake, J.</au><au>Ouk, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frequency of occurrence of various drought types and its impact on performance of photoperiod-sensitive and insensitive rice genotypes in rainfed lowland conditions in Cambodia</atitle><jtitle>Field crops research</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>287-296</pages><issn>0378-4290</issn><eissn>1872-6852</eissn><abstract>Lowland rice production in the Mekong region is generally low because crops are cultivated under rainfed conditions and often exposed to drought. To examine how field water availability affects productivity of different genotypes in rainfed lowland rice, the field experiments were carried out for six years at eight locations in Cambodia. We classified 34 genotypes used in the experiments into photoperiod-insensitive [short (IS) and medium (IM) maturity] and sensitive [medium (SM) and long-duration (SL) maturity] genotype groups. Mean days-to-flower from sowing was 87 in IS, 112 in IM, 112 in SM and 132 in SL and mean grain yield was 2.0, 2.8, 2.5 and 2.4 t ha −1, respectively. Drought environment was quantified for each experiment by determining whether free water level was observed to be less than the soil surface during three growth stages: GS1 (maximum tillering), GS2 (panicle development) and GS3 (grain filling). The drought frequency estimated from 44 field experiments was 18% in all IM, SM and SL at GS1, 23%, 25% and 32% in IM, SM and SL, respectively at GS2, and 43%, 45% and 57% at GS3. Thus, the drought occurred more frequently after flowering, particularly in the SL group. Based on the results, the IM genotypes may be grown to escape from drought during the GS2 and GS3 periods by sowing early (June) in the drought environment. When sown late (August), the SM genotypes are exposed to less drought risk because they flower earlier than the IM genotypes. Compared with the SM genotypes, the SL genotypes are highly exposed to water stress during the GS3 period, resulting in yield reduction. SM and IM had similar occurrence of drought environment, but yield reduction due to drought was less in SM than in IM. Thus, photoperiod-sensitive cultivars with medium maturity are preferred in drought-prone lowland fields, particularly when sowing is delayed. In the favourable water environment, the SM genotypes can be better than the IM genotypes when sown early in the season, while the IM genotypes performs better than the SM genotypes with late sowing. This suggests that for lowland fields without drought photoperiod-insensitive cultivars are recommended and photoperiod-sensitive cultivars can be preferred if sown early.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.006</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4290
ispartof Field crops research, 2009-09, Vol.113 (3), p.287-296
issn 0378-4290
1872-6852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20787861
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects developmental stages
Drought
dryland farming
field experimentation
filling period
Flowering
frequency
Freshwater
genotype
Grain yield
inflorescences
Oryza sativa
phenology
photoperiod
Photoperiod sensitivity
plant available water
rice
seasonal variation
soil water content
sowing date
tillering
Water availability
water stress
title Frequency of occurrence of various drought types and its impact on performance of photoperiod-sensitive and insensitive rice genotypes in rainfed lowland conditions in Cambodia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A44%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frequency%20of%20occurrence%20of%20various%20drought%20types%20and%20its%20impact%20on%20performance%20of%20photoperiod-sensitive%20and%20insensitive%20rice%20genotypes%20in%20rainfed%20lowland%20conditions%20in%20Cambodia&rft.jtitle=Field%20crops%20research&rft.au=Tsubo,%20M.&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=287-296&rft.issn=0378-4290&rft.eissn=1872-6852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20787861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20787861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378429009001506&rfr_iscdi=true