Postoperative Longitudinal Outcomes in Patients with Residual Disc Fragments after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
Residual disc fragments are observed on immediate postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 2.8-15% of patients after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Considering the known postoperative longitudinal outcomes in patients with residual disc tissue, a 'watchful waiting...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain physician 2018-07, Vol.21 (4), p.E457-E466 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E466 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | E457 |
container_title | Pain physician |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Baek, Jonghyuk Yang, Seung Heon Kim, Chi Heon Chung, Chun Kee Choi, Yunhee Heo, Ji Han Park, Sung Bae Hwang, Sung Hwan Jung, Jong-Myung Kim, Kyoung-Tae |
description | Residual disc fragments are observed on immediate postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 2.8-15% of patients after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Considering the known postoperative longitudinal outcomes in patients with residual disc tissue, a 'watchful waiting' strategy may be preferable to immediate re-operation in patients with asymptomatic residual disc material.
The aim of the present study was to compare the longitudinal clinical outcomes between PELD patients in whom the complete removal of disc fragments was achieved (complete group) and those in whom residual disc fragments were observed on postoperative MRI (residual group).
Retrospective nested case-control study.
A total of 225 patients were included (complete group, n=187 and residual group, n=38). Clinical assessments were performed using the visual analog pain score for the leg (VAS-L, x/10) and back (VAS-B, x/10) and the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index (K-ODI, x/45). A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze changes during the first 24 postoperative months.
One month after surgery, significant improvements in the VAS-L, VAS-B and K-ODI values were observed and were maintained during the first 24 postoperative months. No differences in these changes were noted between the groups. Early re-operation (during the first 3 postoperative months) was performed in 3 patients in the residual group (7.9%) and in 4 patients in the complete group (2.1%) (P = 0.10).
First, the study design was retrospective. Moreover, the number of patients was relatively small and therefore insufficient to achieve robust statistical power. Second, we did not explore the radiological outcomes in patients with asymptomatic residual disc material because follow-up MRI was only obtained to document symptom recurrence.
When residual disc tissue is observed in asymptomatic patients, a 'watchful waiting' strategy may be preferable to immediate re-operation. However, an increased early re-operation rate is expected for patients with residual disc tissue.
Discectomy, endoscopes, longitudinal studies, patient-reported outcome, percutaneous, reoperation, spine, residual disc. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2076893602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2656002323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p239t-3b6b18f4133d620b97d9ae0a329f301a6cd070ce04eeff7d377436a1eb98a7663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFFurf0EWvHgJ7GaSTfcotVUh0CJ6DptkUrck2bgfSsEfb7T14mkO7zPD8J6QacxTFnGeyFMy5SlABDyVE3Lh3I4xEFLCOZkAY0kqeDwlXxvjvBnQKq8_kOam32ofat2rlq6Dr0yHjuqebsYce-_op_Zv9BmdrsNI7rWr6MqqbfcbqsajpRu0VfCqRxMcXfa1cZUZdEXz0JXK_u5g5U23vyRnjWodXh3njLyuli-LxyhfPzwt7vJoiEH6CEpR8nmTcIBaxKyUWS0VMgWxbIBxJaqaZaxCliA2TVZDliUgFMdSzlUmBMzI7eHuYM17QOeL7ueHtj38WMQsE3MJgsUjvflHdybYsY1RiVSwkcQwquujCmWHdTFY3Sm7L_56hW_8wHac</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2656002323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postoperative Longitudinal Outcomes in Patients with Residual Disc Fragments after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Baek, Jonghyuk ; Yang, Seung Heon ; Kim, Chi Heon ; Chung, Chun Kee ; Choi, Yunhee ; Heo, Ji Han ; Park, Sung Bae ; Hwang, Sung Hwan ; Jung, Jong-Myung ; Kim, Kyoung-Tae</creator><creatorcontrib>Baek, Jonghyuk ; Yang, Seung Heon ; Kim, Chi Heon ; Chung, Chun Kee ; Choi, Yunhee ; Heo, Ji Han ; Park, Sung Bae ; Hwang, Sung Hwan ; Jung, Jong-Myung ; Kim, Kyoung-Tae</creatorcontrib><description>Residual disc fragments are observed on immediate postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 2.8-15% of patients after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Considering the known postoperative longitudinal outcomes in patients with residual disc tissue, a 'watchful waiting' strategy may be preferable to immediate re-operation in patients with asymptomatic residual disc material.
The aim of the present study was to compare the longitudinal clinical outcomes between PELD patients in whom the complete removal of disc fragments was achieved (complete group) and those in whom residual disc fragments were observed on postoperative MRI (residual group).
Retrospective nested case-control study.
A total of 225 patients were included (complete group, n=187 and residual group, n=38). Clinical assessments were performed using the visual analog pain score for the leg (VAS-L, x/10) and back (VAS-B, x/10) and the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index (K-ODI, x/45). A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze changes during the first 24 postoperative months.
One month after surgery, significant improvements in the VAS-L, VAS-B and K-ODI values were observed and were maintained during the first 24 postoperative months. No differences in these changes were noted between the groups. Early re-operation (during the first 3 postoperative months) was performed in 3 patients in the residual group (7.9%) and in 4 patients in the complete group (2.1%) (P = 0.10).
First, the study design was retrospective. Moreover, the number of patients was relatively small and therefore insufficient to achieve robust statistical power. Second, we did not explore the radiological outcomes in patients with asymptomatic residual disc material because follow-up MRI was only obtained to document symptom recurrence.
When residual disc tissue is observed in asymptomatic patients, a 'watchful waiting' strategy may be preferable to immediate re-operation. However, an increased early re-operation rate is expected for patients with residual disc tissue.
Discectomy, endoscopes, longitudinal studies, patient-reported outcome, percutaneous, reoperation, spine, residual disc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-3159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-1149</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30045612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Interventional Pain Physician</publisher><subject>Asymptomatic ; Endoscopy ; Longitudinal studies ; Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><ispartof>Pain physician, 2018-07, Vol.21 (4), p.E457-E466</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30045612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baek, Jonghyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Seung Heon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chi Heon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chun Kee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Ji Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Sung Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jong-Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyoung-Tae</creatorcontrib><title>Postoperative Longitudinal Outcomes in Patients with Residual Disc Fragments after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy</title><title>Pain physician</title><addtitle>Pain Physician</addtitle><description>Residual disc fragments are observed on immediate postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 2.8-15% of patients after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Considering the known postoperative longitudinal outcomes in patients with residual disc tissue, a 'watchful waiting' strategy may be preferable to immediate re-operation in patients with asymptomatic residual disc material.
The aim of the present study was to compare the longitudinal clinical outcomes between PELD patients in whom the complete removal of disc fragments was achieved (complete group) and those in whom residual disc fragments were observed on postoperative MRI (residual group).
Retrospective nested case-control study.
A total of 225 patients were included (complete group, n=187 and residual group, n=38). Clinical assessments were performed using the visual analog pain score for the leg (VAS-L, x/10) and back (VAS-B, x/10) and the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index (K-ODI, x/45). A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze changes during the first 24 postoperative months.
One month after surgery, significant improvements in the VAS-L, VAS-B and K-ODI values were observed and were maintained during the first 24 postoperative months. No differences in these changes were noted between the groups. Early re-operation (during the first 3 postoperative months) was performed in 3 patients in the residual group (7.9%) and in 4 patients in the complete group (2.1%) (P = 0.10).
First, the study design was retrospective. Moreover, the number of patients was relatively small and therefore insufficient to achieve robust statistical power. Second, we did not explore the radiological outcomes in patients with asymptomatic residual disc material because follow-up MRI was only obtained to document symptom recurrence.
When residual disc tissue is observed in asymptomatic patients, a 'watchful waiting' strategy may be preferable to immediate re-operation. However, an increased early re-operation rate is expected for patients with residual disc tissue.
Discectomy, endoscopes, longitudinal studies, patient-reported outcome, percutaneous, reoperation, spine, residual disc.</description><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><issn>1533-3159</issn><issn>2150-1149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFFurf0EWvHgJ7GaSTfcotVUh0CJ6DptkUrck2bgfSsEfb7T14mkO7zPD8J6QacxTFnGeyFMy5SlABDyVE3Lh3I4xEFLCOZkAY0kqeDwlXxvjvBnQKq8_kOam32ofat2rlq6Dr0yHjuqebsYce-_op_Zv9BmdrsNI7rWr6MqqbfcbqsajpRu0VfCqRxMcXfa1cZUZdEXz0JXK_u5g5U23vyRnjWodXh3njLyuli-LxyhfPzwt7vJoiEH6CEpR8nmTcIBaxKyUWS0VMgWxbIBxJaqaZaxCliA2TVZDliUgFMdSzlUmBMzI7eHuYM17QOeL7ueHtj38WMQsE3MJgsUjvflHdybYsY1RiVSwkcQwquujCmWHdTFY3Sm7L_56hW_8wHac</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Baek, Jonghyuk</creator><creator>Yang, Seung Heon</creator><creator>Kim, Chi Heon</creator><creator>Chung, Chun Kee</creator><creator>Choi, Yunhee</creator><creator>Heo, Ji Han</creator><creator>Park, Sung Bae</creator><creator>Hwang, Sung Hwan</creator><creator>Jung, Jong-Myung</creator><creator>Kim, Kyoung-Tae</creator><general>American Society of Interventional Pain Physician</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Postoperative Longitudinal Outcomes in Patients with Residual Disc Fragments after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy</title><author>Baek, Jonghyuk ; Yang, Seung Heon ; Kim, Chi Heon ; Chung, Chun Kee ; Choi, Yunhee ; Heo, Ji Han ; Park, Sung Bae ; Hwang, Sung Hwan ; Jung, Jong-Myung ; Kim, Kyoung-Tae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p239t-3b6b18f4133d620b97d9ae0a329f301a6cd070ce04eeff7d377436a1eb98a7663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baek, Jonghyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Seung Heon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chi Heon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chun Kee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Ji Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Sung Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jong-Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyoung-Tae</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain physician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baek, Jonghyuk</au><au>Yang, Seung Heon</au><au>Kim, Chi Heon</au><au>Chung, Chun Kee</au><au>Choi, Yunhee</au><au>Heo, Ji Han</au><au>Park, Sung Bae</au><au>Hwang, Sung Hwan</au><au>Jung, Jong-Myung</au><au>Kim, Kyoung-Tae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postoperative Longitudinal Outcomes in Patients with Residual Disc Fragments after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy</atitle><jtitle>Pain physician</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Physician</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>E457</spage><epage>E466</epage><pages>E457-E466</pages><issn>1533-3159</issn><eissn>2150-1149</eissn><abstract>Residual disc fragments are observed on immediate postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 2.8-15% of patients after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Considering the known postoperative longitudinal outcomes in patients with residual disc tissue, a 'watchful waiting' strategy may be preferable to immediate re-operation in patients with asymptomatic residual disc material.
The aim of the present study was to compare the longitudinal clinical outcomes between PELD patients in whom the complete removal of disc fragments was achieved (complete group) and those in whom residual disc fragments were observed on postoperative MRI (residual group).
Retrospective nested case-control study.
A total of 225 patients were included (complete group, n=187 and residual group, n=38). Clinical assessments were performed using the visual analog pain score for the leg (VAS-L, x/10) and back (VAS-B, x/10) and the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index (K-ODI, x/45). A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze changes during the first 24 postoperative months.
One month after surgery, significant improvements in the VAS-L, VAS-B and K-ODI values were observed and were maintained during the first 24 postoperative months. No differences in these changes were noted between the groups. Early re-operation (during the first 3 postoperative months) was performed in 3 patients in the residual group (7.9%) and in 4 patients in the complete group (2.1%) (P = 0.10).
First, the study design was retrospective. Moreover, the number of patients was relatively small and therefore insufficient to achieve robust statistical power. Second, we did not explore the radiological outcomes in patients with asymptomatic residual disc material because follow-up MRI was only obtained to document symptom recurrence.
When residual disc tissue is observed in asymptomatic patients, a 'watchful waiting' strategy may be preferable to immediate re-operation. However, an increased early re-operation rate is expected for patients with residual disc tissue.
Discectomy, endoscopes, longitudinal studies, patient-reported outcome, percutaneous, reoperation, spine, residual disc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Interventional Pain Physician</pub><pmid>30045612</pmid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1533-3159 |
ispartof | Pain physician, 2018-07, Vol.21 (4), p.E457-E466 |
issn | 1533-3159 2150-1149 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2076893602 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Asymptomatic Endoscopy Longitudinal studies Magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Postoperative Longitudinal Outcomes in Patients with Residual Disc Fragments after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A49%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postoperative%20Longitudinal%20Outcomes%20in%20Patients%20with%20Residual%20Disc%20Fragments%20after%20Percutaneous%20Endoscopic%20Lumbar%20Discectomy&rft.jtitle=Pain%20physician&rft.au=Baek,%20Jonghyuk&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=E457&rft.epage=E466&rft.pages=E457-E466&rft.issn=1533-3159&rft.eissn=2150-1149&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2656002323%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2656002323&rft_id=info:pmid/30045612&rfr_iscdi=true |