Volume Conservation Controversy of the Variable Parameter Muskingum–Cunge Method

The study analyzes the volume conservation problem of the variable parameter Muskingum–Cunge (VPMC) method for which some remedial solutions have been advocated in recent literature. The limitation of the VPMC method to conserve volume is brought out by conducting a total of 6,400 routing experiment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2008-04, Vol.134 (4), p.475-485
Hauptverfasser: Perumal, Muthiah, Sahoo, Bhabagrahi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 485
container_issue 4
container_start_page 475
container_title Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 134
creator Perumal, Muthiah
Sahoo, Bhabagrahi
description The study analyzes the volume conservation problem of the variable parameter Muskingum–Cunge (VPMC) method for which some remedial solutions have been advocated in recent literature. The limitation of the VPMC method to conserve volume is brought out by conducting a total of 6,400 routing experiments. These experiments consist of routing a set of given hypothetical discharge hydrographs for a specified reach length in uniform rectangular and trapezoidal channels using the VPMC method, and comparing the routed solutions with the corresponding benchmark solutions obtained using the full Saint-Venant equations. The study consisted of 3,200 routing experiments carried out each in uniform rectangular and trapezoidal channel reaches. Each experiment was characterized by a unique set of channel bed slope, Manning’s roughness coefficient, peak discharge, inflow hydrograph shape factor, and time to peak. A parallel study was carried out using an alternate physically based variable parameter Muskingum discharge hydrograph (VPMD) routing method proposed by Perumal in 1994 under the same routing conditions, and the ability of both the VPMC and VPMD methods to reproduce the benchmark solutions was studied. It is brought out that within its applicability limits, the VPMD method is able to conserve mass more accurately than the VPMC method. The reason for the better performance of the former over the latter method is attributed to the physical basis of its development. It is argued that adoption of artificial remedial measures to overcome the volume conservation problem makes the VPMC method semiempirical in nature, thereby losing the fully physically based characteristics of the method. The paper also dwells on the problems of negative initial outflow or dip in the beginning of the Muskingum solution, and the negative value of the Muskingum weighting parameter. Besides, the effect of incorporating the inertial terms in the estimation of Muskingum parameters and their impact on the overall Muskingum routing solutions is addressed by conducting another set of 6,400 numerical experiments using both the VPMC and VPMD methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:4(475)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20768347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20768347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-47c04562fb6919c39afc25b8530f6283aa75c657bd98bc50cfefd0a6eb0bd0ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtO3DAUhq2qlZgC75BNy8wi5fgSO2aBhCJ6kUCgctlajucYQpOY2gkSO96BN-yTkGjQLKuz-HWkT_8vfYQcUPhGQdLD5clVdboCxXmuBdNLBlCuKBdHYilUsfpAFlQLnisN8JEsttwO-ZzSAwAVUpcL8vs2tGOHWRX6hPHJDk3o52eI4Qljes6Cz4Z7zG5tbGzdYnZpo-1wwJidj-lP09-N3b-X12rs7zA7x-E-rPfIJ2_bhPvvuUtuvp9eVz_zs4sfv6qTs9zykg25UA5EIZmvpabacW29Y0VdFhy8ZCW3VhVOFqpe67J2BTiPfg1WYg31lGu-S75ueh9j-DtiGkzXJIdta3sMYzIMlCy5UBN4vAFdDClF9OYxNp2Nz4aCmV0aM7s0syMzOzKzSzO5NNOpYir48r5kk7Otj7Z3Tdq2MGBCUsEm7mjDTRiahzDGfhKwXfn_yBuhtIjy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20768347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Volume Conservation Controversy of the Variable Parameter Muskingum–Cunge Method</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Perumal, Muthiah ; Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</creator><creatorcontrib>Perumal, Muthiah ; Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</creatorcontrib><description>The study analyzes the volume conservation problem of the variable parameter Muskingum–Cunge (VPMC) method for which some remedial solutions have been advocated in recent literature. The limitation of the VPMC method to conserve volume is brought out by conducting a total of 6,400 routing experiments. These experiments consist of routing a set of given hypothetical discharge hydrographs for a specified reach length in uniform rectangular and trapezoidal channels using the VPMC method, and comparing the routed solutions with the corresponding benchmark solutions obtained using the full Saint-Venant equations. The study consisted of 3,200 routing experiments carried out each in uniform rectangular and trapezoidal channel reaches. Each experiment was characterized by a unique set of channel bed slope, Manning’s roughness coefficient, peak discharge, inflow hydrograph shape factor, and time to peak. A parallel study was carried out using an alternate physically based variable parameter Muskingum discharge hydrograph (VPMD) routing method proposed by Perumal in 1994 under the same routing conditions, and the ability of both the VPMC and VPMD methods to reproduce the benchmark solutions was studied. It is brought out that within its applicability limits, the VPMD method is able to conserve mass more accurately than the VPMC method. The reason for the better performance of the former over the latter method is attributed to the physical basis of its development. It is argued that adoption of artificial remedial measures to overcome the volume conservation problem makes the VPMC method semiempirical in nature, thereby losing the fully physically based characteristics of the method. The paper also dwells on the problems of negative initial outflow or dip in the beginning of the Muskingum solution, and the negative value of the Muskingum weighting parameter. Besides, the effect of incorporating the inertial terms in the estimation of Muskingum parameters and their impact on the overall Muskingum routing solutions is addressed by conducting another set of 6,400 numerical experiments using both the VPMC and VPMD methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7900</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:4(475)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHEND8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hydraulic constructions ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; River flow control. Flood control ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2008-04, Vol.134 (4), p.475-485</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-47c04562fb6919c39afc25b8530f6283aa75c657bd98bc50cfefd0a6eb0bd0ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-47c04562fb6919c39afc25b8530f6283aa75c657bd98bc50cfefd0a6eb0bd0ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:4(475)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:4(475)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,75944,75952</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20246142$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perumal, Muthiah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</creatorcontrib><title>Volume Conservation Controversy of the Variable Parameter Muskingum–Cunge Method</title><title>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>The study analyzes the volume conservation problem of the variable parameter Muskingum–Cunge (VPMC) method for which some remedial solutions have been advocated in recent literature. The limitation of the VPMC method to conserve volume is brought out by conducting a total of 6,400 routing experiments. These experiments consist of routing a set of given hypothetical discharge hydrographs for a specified reach length in uniform rectangular and trapezoidal channels using the VPMC method, and comparing the routed solutions with the corresponding benchmark solutions obtained using the full Saint-Venant equations. The study consisted of 3,200 routing experiments carried out each in uniform rectangular and trapezoidal channel reaches. Each experiment was characterized by a unique set of channel bed slope, Manning’s roughness coefficient, peak discharge, inflow hydrograph shape factor, and time to peak. A parallel study was carried out using an alternate physically based variable parameter Muskingum discharge hydrograph (VPMD) routing method proposed by Perumal in 1994 under the same routing conditions, and the ability of both the VPMC and VPMD methods to reproduce the benchmark solutions was studied. It is brought out that within its applicability limits, the VPMD method is able to conserve mass more accurately than the VPMC method. The reason for the better performance of the former over the latter method is attributed to the physical basis of its development. It is argued that adoption of artificial remedial measures to overcome the volume conservation problem makes the VPMC method semiempirical in nature, thereby losing the fully physically based characteristics of the method. The paper also dwells on the problems of negative initial outflow or dip in the beginning of the Muskingum solution, and the negative value of the Muskingum weighting parameter. Besides, the effect of incorporating the inertial terms in the estimation of Muskingum parameters and their impact on the overall Muskingum routing solutions is addressed by conducting another set of 6,400 numerical experiments using both the VPMC and VPMD methods.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hydraulic constructions</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>River flow control. Flood control</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0733-9429</issn><issn>1943-7900</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtO3DAUhq2qlZgC75BNy8wi5fgSO2aBhCJ6kUCgctlajucYQpOY2gkSO96BN-yTkGjQLKuz-HWkT_8vfYQcUPhGQdLD5clVdboCxXmuBdNLBlCuKBdHYilUsfpAFlQLnisN8JEsttwO-ZzSAwAVUpcL8vs2tGOHWRX6hPHJDk3o52eI4Qljes6Cz4Z7zG5tbGzdYnZpo-1wwJidj-lP09-N3b-X12rs7zA7x-E-rPfIJ2_bhPvvuUtuvp9eVz_zs4sfv6qTs9zykg25UA5EIZmvpabacW29Y0VdFhy8ZCW3VhVOFqpe67J2BTiPfg1WYg31lGu-S75ueh9j-DtiGkzXJIdta3sMYzIMlCy5UBN4vAFdDClF9OYxNp2Nz4aCmV0aM7s0syMzOzKzSzO5NNOpYir48r5kk7Otj7Z3Tdq2MGBCUsEm7mjDTRiahzDGfhKwXfn_yBuhtIjy</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Perumal, Muthiah</creator><creator>Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Volume Conservation Controversy of the Variable Parameter Muskingum–Cunge Method</title><author>Perumal, Muthiah ; Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-47c04562fb6919c39afc25b8530f6283aa75c657bd98bc50cfefd0a6eb0bd0ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hydraulic constructions</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>River flow control. Flood control</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perumal, Muthiah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perumal, Muthiah</au><au>Sahoo, Bhabagrahi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Volume Conservation Controversy of the Variable Parameter Muskingum–Cunge Method</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>475</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>475-485</pages><issn>0733-9429</issn><eissn>1943-7900</eissn><coden>JHEND8</coden><abstract>The study analyzes the volume conservation problem of the variable parameter Muskingum–Cunge (VPMC) method for which some remedial solutions have been advocated in recent literature. The limitation of the VPMC method to conserve volume is brought out by conducting a total of 6,400 routing experiments. These experiments consist of routing a set of given hypothetical discharge hydrographs for a specified reach length in uniform rectangular and trapezoidal channels using the VPMC method, and comparing the routed solutions with the corresponding benchmark solutions obtained using the full Saint-Venant equations. The study consisted of 3,200 routing experiments carried out each in uniform rectangular and trapezoidal channel reaches. Each experiment was characterized by a unique set of channel bed slope, Manning’s roughness coefficient, peak discharge, inflow hydrograph shape factor, and time to peak. A parallel study was carried out using an alternate physically based variable parameter Muskingum discharge hydrograph (VPMD) routing method proposed by Perumal in 1994 under the same routing conditions, and the ability of both the VPMC and VPMD methods to reproduce the benchmark solutions was studied. It is brought out that within its applicability limits, the VPMD method is able to conserve mass more accurately than the VPMC method. The reason for the better performance of the former over the latter method is attributed to the physical basis of its development. It is argued that adoption of artificial remedial measures to overcome the volume conservation problem makes the VPMC method semiempirical in nature, thereby losing the fully physically based characteristics of the method. The paper also dwells on the problems of negative initial outflow or dip in the beginning of the Muskingum solution, and the negative value of the Muskingum weighting parameter. Besides, the effect of incorporating the inertial terms in the estimation of Muskingum parameters and their impact on the overall Muskingum routing solutions is addressed by conducting another set of 6,400 numerical experiments using both the VPMC and VPMD methods.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:4(475)</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9429
ispartof Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2008-04, Vol.134 (4), p.475-485
issn 0733-9429
1943-7900
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20768347
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Applied sciences
Buildings. Public works
Computation methods. Tables. Charts
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Hydraulic constructions
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
River flow control. Flood control
Structural analysis. Stresses
TECHNICAL PAPERS
title Volume Conservation Controversy of the Variable Parameter Muskingum–Cunge Method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A10%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Volume%20Conservation%20Controversy%20of%20the%20Variable%20Parameter%20Muskingum%E2%80%93Cunge%20Method&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydraulic%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Perumal,%20Muthiah&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=475&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=475-485&rft.issn=0733-9429&rft.eissn=1943-7900&rft.coden=JHEND8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:4(475)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20768347%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20768347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true