Comparative Analysis of Distribution and Abundance of West Nile and Eastern Equine Encephalomyelitis Virus Vectors in Suffolk County, New York, Using Human Population Density and Land Use/Cover Data

Five years of CDC light trap data from Suffolk County, NY, were analyzed to compare the applicability of human population density (HPD) and land use/cover (LUC) classification systems to describe mosquito abundance and to determine whether certain mosquito species of medical importance tend to be mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical entomology 2008-05, Vol.45 (3), p.563-571
Hauptverfasser: Rochlin, I., Harding, K., Ginsberg, H. S., Campbell, S. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 571
container_issue 3
container_start_page 563
container_title Journal of medical entomology
container_volume 45
creator Rochlin, I.
Harding, K.
Ginsberg, H. S.
Campbell, S. R.
description Five years of CDC light trap data from Suffolk County, NY, were analyzed to compare the applicability of human population density (HPD) and land use/cover (LUC) classification systems to describe mosquito abundance and to determine whether certain mosquito species of medical importance tend to be more common in urban (defined by HPD) or residential (defined by LUC) areas. Eleven study sites were categorized as urban or rural using U.S. Census Bureau data and by LUC types using geographic information systems (GISs). Abundance and percent composition of nine mosquito taxa, all known or potential vectors of arboviruses, were analyzed to determine spatial patterns. By HPD definitions, three mosquito species, Aedes canadensis (Theobald), Coquillettidia perturbans (Walker), and Culiseta melanura (Coquillett), differed significantly between habitat types, with higher abundance and percent composition in rural areas. Abundance and percent composition of these three species also increased with freshwater wetland, natural vegetation areas, or a combination when using LUC definitions. Additionally, two species, Ae. canadensis and Cs. melanura, were negatively affected by increased residential area. One species, Aedes vexans (Meigen), had higher percent composition in urban areas. Two medically important taxa, Culex spp. and Aedes triseriatus (Say), were proportionally more prevalent in residential areas by LUC classification, as was Aedes trivittatus (Coquillett). Although HPD classification was readily available and had some predictive value, LUC classification resulted in higher spatial resolution and better ability to develop location specific predictive models.
doi_str_mv 10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[563:CAODAA]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20739893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20739893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-739fd500fb41f8d2a64b0ea958a5a4721977deb7a157495f93a818199fb8aa8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkW9r1EAQxoNYsFa_w74Shea6u8leEn0VctEKR0-w1yIiyyTZ1bXJbrp_KvmC_Vwmd0V8MzMwz8wzzC-KYoJXZI2TC4wpjSnL2VuKcf4uZd_ZOnlflbtNWf6gK7yqdh_os-j0n-75f_WL6KVzv_E8SNLiNHqszDCCBa8eBCo19JNTDhmJNsp5q5rgldEIdIfKJugOdCuW7q1wHl2pXhxaNTgvrEb1fVBaoHoWjb-gN8MkeuXnfTfKhjmK1hvrkNLoa5DS9HeoMkH76RxdiT_om7F352jvlP6JLsMAGn0xY-jhcMFGaKf8dLDbLmHvxEVlHoRFG_DwKjqR0Dvx-imfRfuP9XV1GW93nz5X5TZuE7L2cZYUsmMYyyYlMu8orNMGCyhYDgzSjJIiyzrRZEBYlhZMFgnkJCdFIZscIJfJWfTmuHe05j7MT-CDcq3oe9DCBMcpni3yIpmF9VHYWuOcFZKPVg1gJ04wXyjyhQhfiPCFIk8ZnynyI0VOOebVjtPkL57hlrk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20739893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Distribution and Abundance of West Nile and Eastern Equine Encephalomyelitis Virus Vectors in Suffolk County, New York, Using Human Population Density and Land Use/Cover Data</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Rochlin, I. ; Harding, K. ; Ginsberg, H. S. ; Campbell, S. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rochlin, I. ; Harding, K. ; Ginsberg, H. S. ; Campbell, S. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Five years of CDC light trap data from Suffolk County, NY, were analyzed to compare the applicability of human population density (HPD) and land use/cover (LUC) classification systems to describe mosquito abundance and to determine whether certain mosquito species of medical importance tend to be more common in urban (defined by HPD) or residential (defined by LUC) areas. Eleven study sites were categorized as urban or rural using U.S. Census Bureau data and by LUC types using geographic information systems (GISs). Abundance and percent composition of nine mosquito taxa, all known or potential vectors of arboviruses, were analyzed to determine spatial patterns. By HPD definitions, three mosquito species, Aedes canadensis (Theobald), Coquillettidia perturbans (Walker), and Culiseta melanura (Coquillett), differed significantly between habitat types, with higher abundance and percent composition in rural areas. Abundance and percent composition of these three species also increased with freshwater wetland, natural vegetation areas, or a combination when using LUC definitions. Additionally, two species, Ae. canadensis and Cs. melanura, were negatively affected by increased residential area. One species, Aedes vexans (Meigen), had higher percent composition in urban areas. Two medically important taxa, Culex spp. and Aedes triseriatus (Say), were proportionally more prevalent in residential areas by LUC classification, as was Aedes trivittatus (Coquillett). Although HPD classification was readily available and had some predictive value, LUC classification resulted in higher spatial resolution and better ability to develop location specific predictive models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-2585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[563:CAODAA]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Aedes ; Aedes canadensis ; Aedes trivittatus ; Aedes vexans ; Coquillettidia perturbans ; Culex ; Culiseta melanura</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical entomology, 2008-05, Vol.45 (3), p.563-571</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-739fd500fb41f8d2a64b0ea958a5a4721977deb7a157495f93a818199fb8aa8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-739fd500fb41f8d2a64b0ea958a5a4721977deb7a157495f93a818199fb8aa8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rochlin, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsberg, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, S. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Distribution and Abundance of West Nile and Eastern Equine Encephalomyelitis Virus Vectors in Suffolk County, New York, Using Human Population Density and Land Use/Cover Data</title><title>Journal of medical entomology</title><description>Five years of CDC light trap data from Suffolk County, NY, were analyzed to compare the applicability of human population density (HPD) and land use/cover (LUC) classification systems to describe mosquito abundance and to determine whether certain mosquito species of medical importance tend to be more common in urban (defined by HPD) or residential (defined by LUC) areas. Eleven study sites were categorized as urban or rural using U.S. Census Bureau data and by LUC types using geographic information systems (GISs). Abundance and percent composition of nine mosquito taxa, all known or potential vectors of arboviruses, were analyzed to determine spatial patterns. By HPD definitions, three mosquito species, Aedes canadensis (Theobald), Coquillettidia perturbans (Walker), and Culiseta melanura (Coquillett), differed significantly between habitat types, with higher abundance and percent composition in rural areas. Abundance and percent composition of these three species also increased with freshwater wetland, natural vegetation areas, or a combination when using LUC definitions. Additionally, two species, Ae. canadensis and Cs. melanura, were negatively affected by increased residential area. One species, Aedes vexans (Meigen), had higher percent composition in urban areas. Two medically important taxa, Culex spp. and Aedes triseriatus (Say), were proportionally more prevalent in residential areas by LUC classification, as was Aedes trivittatus (Coquillett). Although HPD classification was readily available and had some predictive value, LUC classification resulted in higher spatial resolution and better ability to develop location specific predictive models.</description><subject>Aedes</subject><subject>Aedes canadensis</subject><subject>Aedes trivittatus</subject><subject>Aedes vexans</subject><subject>Coquillettidia perturbans</subject><subject>Culex</subject><subject>Culiseta melanura</subject><issn>0022-2585</issn><issn>0022-2585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkW9r1EAQxoNYsFa_w74Shea6u8leEn0VctEKR0-w1yIiyyTZ1bXJbrp_KvmC_Vwmd0V8MzMwz8wzzC-KYoJXZI2TC4wpjSnL2VuKcf4uZd_ZOnlflbtNWf6gK7yqdh_os-j0n-75f_WL6KVzv_E8SNLiNHqszDCCBa8eBCo19JNTDhmJNsp5q5rgldEIdIfKJugOdCuW7q1wHl2pXhxaNTgvrEb1fVBaoHoWjb-gN8MkeuXnfTfKhjmK1hvrkNLoa5DS9HeoMkH76RxdiT_om7F352jvlP6JLsMAGn0xY-jhcMFGaKf8dLDbLmHvxEVlHoRFG_DwKjqR0Dvx-imfRfuP9XV1GW93nz5X5TZuE7L2cZYUsmMYyyYlMu8orNMGCyhYDgzSjJIiyzrRZEBYlhZMFgnkJCdFIZscIJfJWfTmuHe05j7MT-CDcq3oe9DCBMcpni3yIpmF9VHYWuOcFZKPVg1gJ04wXyjyhQhfiPCFIk8ZnynyI0VOOebVjtPkL57hlrk</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Rochlin, I.</creator><creator>Harding, K.</creator><creator>Ginsberg, H. S.</creator><creator>Campbell, S. R.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Distribution and Abundance of West Nile and Eastern Equine Encephalomyelitis Virus Vectors in Suffolk County, New York, Using Human Population Density and Land Use/Cover Data</title><author>Rochlin, I. ; Harding, K. ; Ginsberg, H. S. ; Campbell, S. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-739fd500fb41f8d2a64b0ea958a5a4721977deb7a157495f93a818199fb8aa8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aedes</topic><topic>Aedes canadensis</topic><topic>Aedes trivittatus</topic><topic>Aedes vexans</topic><topic>Coquillettidia perturbans</topic><topic>Culex</topic><topic>Culiseta melanura</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rochlin, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsberg, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, S. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rochlin, I.</au><au>Harding, K.</au><au>Ginsberg, H. S.</au><au>Campbell, S. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Distribution and Abundance of West Nile and Eastern Equine Encephalomyelitis Virus Vectors in Suffolk County, New York, Using Human Population Density and Land Use/Cover Data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>571</epage><pages>563-571</pages><issn>0022-2585</issn><eissn>0022-2585</eissn><abstract>Five years of CDC light trap data from Suffolk County, NY, were analyzed to compare the applicability of human population density (HPD) and land use/cover (LUC) classification systems to describe mosquito abundance and to determine whether certain mosquito species of medical importance tend to be more common in urban (defined by HPD) or residential (defined by LUC) areas. Eleven study sites were categorized as urban or rural using U.S. Census Bureau data and by LUC types using geographic information systems (GISs). Abundance and percent composition of nine mosquito taxa, all known or potential vectors of arboviruses, were analyzed to determine spatial patterns. By HPD definitions, three mosquito species, Aedes canadensis (Theobald), Coquillettidia perturbans (Walker), and Culiseta melanura (Coquillett), differed significantly between habitat types, with higher abundance and percent composition in rural areas. Abundance and percent composition of these three species also increased with freshwater wetland, natural vegetation areas, or a combination when using LUC definitions. Additionally, two species, Ae. canadensis and Cs. melanura, were negatively affected by increased residential area. One species, Aedes vexans (Meigen), had higher percent composition in urban areas. Two medically important taxa, Culex spp. and Aedes triseriatus (Say), were proportionally more prevalent in residential areas by LUC classification, as was Aedes trivittatus (Coquillett). Although HPD classification was readily available and had some predictive value, LUC classification resulted in higher spatial resolution and better ability to develop location specific predictive models.</abstract><doi>10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[563:CAODAA]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2585
ispartof Journal of medical entomology, 2008-05, Vol.45 (3), p.563-571
issn 0022-2585
0022-2585
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20739893
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); BioOne Complete
subjects Aedes
Aedes canadensis
Aedes trivittatus
Aedes vexans
Coquillettidia perturbans
Culex
Culiseta melanura
title Comparative Analysis of Distribution and Abundance of West Nile and Eastern Equine Encephalomyelitis Virus Vectors in Suffolk County, New York, Using Human Population Density and Land Use/Cover Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T17%3A19%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Distribution%20and%20Abundance%20of%20West%20Nile%20and%20Eastern%20Equine%20Encephalomyelitis%20Virus%20Vectors%20in%20Suffolk%20County,%20New%20York,%20Using%20Human%20Population%20Density%20and%20Land%20Use/Cover%20Data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20entomology&rft.au=Rochlin,%20I.&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=571&rft.pages=563-571&rft.issn=0022-2585&rft.eissn=0022-2585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45%5B563:CAODAA%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20739893%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20739893&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true