Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer
Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and its variation by modifying factors. In this historic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2008-03, Vol.17 (3), p.605-613 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 613 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 605 |
container_title | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | RONCKERS, Cécile M DOODY, Michele M LONSTEIN, John E STOVALL, Marilyn LAND, Charles E |
description | Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography
at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and
its variation by modifying factors. In this historic cohort, 95% of daily dose increments (when exposure to the breast occurred)
were under 2.4 cGy, with mean 1.1 cGy.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of 3,010 women, diagnosed with spinal curvature between 1912 and 1965 in 14 U.S. pediatric
orthopedic centers and who completed a questionnaire by telephone interview or mail survey in 1992, were studied for risk
of breast cancer by radiation dose to the breast (mean, 12 cGy) after adjustment for established breast cancer risk factors.
Results: A borderline-significant radiation dose response (excess relative risk/Gy = 2.86; P = 0.058; one-tailed P = 0.029) was observed during 118,905 woman-years of follow-up (median, 35.5 years) based on 78 cases of invasive breast cancer.
The dose response was significantly greater ( P = 0.03) for women who reported a family history of breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives (excess relative risk/Gy
= 8.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-28.16). Radiation-related risk did not vary significantly by stage of reproductive development
at exposure.
Conclusions: Assuming that repair of radiation-related DNA damage requires at most a few hours, our data argue against existence
of a low-dose threshold on the order of 1 to 3 cGy for radiation exposure contributing to breast carcinogenesis. The possibility
that a family history of breast cancer may have enhanced a carcinogenic radiation effect requires confirmation in other studies.
(Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):605–13) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2628 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20727187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20727187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-9be62209c2948dc03af0cda31320ebb58a71f562dd1d14ec99588f12f9ceffd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMlOwzAQQC0EYil8AsgX4BTwUsf2EUrZVARikbhZrjNuDWlS7FSIvyehBU4z0rzZHkL7lJxQKtQpJUJkWufiZPhwkxGZsZypNbRNBVeZlEKst_kvs4V2UnojhEgtxCbaoor3NZNqG93eLcomzEvAF8FOqjo1weHXLNqvhH0d8dM8VG0N2nwWmgAJ26rAjyG949rj8wg2NXhgKwdxF214WybYW8UeerkcPg-us9H91c3gbJQ5QXmT6THkjBHtmO6rwhFuPXGF5ZQzAuOxUFZSL3JWFLSgfXBaC6U8ZV478L4QvIeOlnPnsf5YQGrMLCQHZWkrqBfJMCKZpEq2oFiCLtYpRfBmHsPMxi9Diekkmk6Q6QSZVqIh0nQS276D1YLFeAbFf9fKWgscrgCbnC19bP8P6Y9jhBPGaXfp8ZKbhsn0M0Qw7sdUhAQ2uqmh0nCTE8G_AUbLh8s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20727187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>RONCKERS, Cécile M ; DOODY, Michele M ; LONSTEIN, John E ; STOVALL, Marilyn ; LAND, Charles E</creator><creatorcontrib>RONCKERS, Cécile M ; DOODY, Michele M ; LONSTEIN, John E ; STOVALL, Marilyn ; LAND, Charles E</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography
at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and
its variation by modifying factors. In this historic cohort, 95% of daily dose increments (when exposure to the breast occurred)
were under 2.4 cGy, with mean 1.1 cGy.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of 3,010 women, diagnosed with spinal curvature between 1912 and 1965 in 14 U.S. pediatric
orthopedic centers and who completed a questionnaire by telephone interview or mail survey in 1992, were studied for risk
of breast cancer by radiation dose to the breast (mean, 12 cGy) after adjustment for established breast cancer risk factors.
Results: A borderline-significant radiation dose response (excess relative risk/Gy = 2.86; P = 0.058; one-tailed P = 0.029) was observed during 118,905 woman-years of follow-up (median, 35.5 years) based on 78 cases of invasive breast cancer.
The dose response was significantly greater ( P = 0.03) for women who reported a family history of breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives (excess relative risk/Gy
= 8.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-28.16). Radiation-related risk did not vary significantly by stage of reproductive development
at exposure.
Conclusions: Assuming that repair of radiation-related DNA damage requires at most a few hours, our data argue against existence
of a low-dose threshold on the order of 1 to 3 cGy for radiation exposure contributing to breast carcinogenesis. The possibility
that a family history of breast cancer may have enhanced a carcinogenic radiation effect requires confirmation in other studies.
(Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):605–13)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-9965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2628</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18349278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - etiology ; DNA Damage ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology ; radiation ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiography - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; scoliosis ; Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2008-03, Vol.17 (3), p.605-613</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-9be62209c2948dc03af0cda31320ebb58a71f562dd1d14ec99588f12f9ceffd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-9be62209c2948dc03af0cda31320ebb58a71f562dd1d14ec99588f12f9ceffd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3342,27902,27903</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20302315$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18349278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RONCKERS, Cécile M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOODY, Michele M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONSTEIN, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOVALL, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAND, Charles E</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer</title><title>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><description>Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography
at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and
its variation by modifying factors. In this historic cohort, 95% of daily dose increments (when exposure to the breast occurred)
were under 2.4 cGy, with mean 1.1 cGy.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of 3,010 women, diagnosed with spinal curvature between 1912 and 1965 in 14 U.S. pediatric
orthopedic centers and who completed a questionnaire by telephone interview or mail survey in 1992, were studied for risk
of breast cancer by radiation dose to the breast (mean, 12 cGy) after adjustment for established breast cancer risk factors.
Results: A borderline-significant radiation dose response (excess relative risk/Gy = 2.86; P = 0.058; one-tailed P = 0.029) was observed during 118,905 woman-years of follow-up (median, 35.5 years) based on 78 cases of invasive breast cancer.
The dose response was significantly greater ( P = 0.03) for women who reported a family history of breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives (excess relative risk/Gy
= 8.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-28.16). Radiation-related risk did not vary significantly by stage of reproductive development
at exposure.
Conclusions: Assuming that repair of radiation-related DNA damage requires at most a few hours, our data argue against existence
of a low-dose threshold on the order of 1 to 3 cGy for radiation exposure contributing to breast carcinogenesis. The possibility
that a family history of breast cancer may have enhanced a carcinogenic radiation effect requires confirmation in other studies.
(Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):605–13)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology</subject><subject>radiation</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiography - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>scoliosis</subject><subject>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1055-9965</issn><issn>1538-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMlOwzAQQC0EYil8AsgX4BTwUsf2EUrZVARikbhZrjNuDWlS7FSIvyehBU4z0rzZHkL7lJxQKtQpJUJkWufiZPhwkxGZsZypNbRNBVeZlEKst_kvs4V2UnojhEgtxCbaoor3NZNqG93eLcomzEvAF8FOqjo1weHXLNqvhH0d8dM8VG0N2nwWmgAJ26rAjyG949rj8wg2NXhgKwdxF214WybYW8UeerkcPg-us9H91c3gbJQ5QXmT6THkjBHtmO6rwhFuPXGF5ZQzAuOxUFZSL3JWFLSgfXBaC6U8ZV478L4QvIeOlnPnsf5YQGrMLCQHZWkrqBfJMCKZpEq2oFiCLtYpRfBmHsPMxi9Diekkmk6Q6QSZVqIh0nQS276D1YLFeAbFf9fKWgscrgCbnC19bP8P6Y9jhBPGaXfp8ZKbhsn0M0Qw7sdUhAQ2uqmh0nCTE8G_AUbLh8s</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>RONCKERS, Cécile M</creator><creator>DOODY, Michele M</creator><creator>LONSTEIN, John E</creator><creator>STOVALL, Marilyn</creator><creator>LAND, Charles E</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer</title><author>RONCKERS, Cécile M ; DOODY, Michele M ; LONSTEIN, John E ; STOVALL, Marilyn ; LAND, Charles E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-9be62209c2948dc03af0cda31320ebb58a71f562dd1d14ec99588f12f9ceffd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology</topic><topic>radiation</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiography - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>scoliosis</topic><topic>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RONCKERS, Cécile M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOODY, Michele M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONSTEIN, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOVALL, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAND, Charles E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RONCKERS, Cécile M</au><au>DOODY, Michele M</au><au>LONSTEIN, John E</au><au>STOVALL, Marilyn</au><au>LAND, Charles E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>613</epage><pages>605-613</pages><issn>1055-9965</issn><eissn>1538-7755</eissn><abstract>Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography
at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and
its variation by modifying factors. In this historic cohort, 95% of daily dose increments (when exposure to the breast occurred)
were under 2.4 cGy, with mean 1.1 cGy.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of 3,010 women, diagnosed with spinal curvature between 1912 and 1965 in 14 U.S. pediatric
orthopedic centers and who completed a questionnaire by telephone interview or mail survey in 1992, were studied for risk
of breast cancer by radiation dose to the breast (mean, 12 cGy) after adjustment for established breast cancer risk factors.
Results: A borderline-significant radiation dose response (excess relative risk/Gy = 2.86; P = 0.058; one-tailed P = 0.029) was observed during 118,905 woman-years of follow-up (median, 35.5 years) based on 78 cases of invasive breast cancer.
The dose response was significantly greater ( P = 0.03) for women who reported a family history of breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives (excess relative risk/Gy
= 8.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-28.16). Radiation-related risk did not vary significantly by stage of reproductive development
at exposure.
Conclusions: Assuming that repair of radiation-related DNA damage requires at most a few hours, our data argue against existence
of a low-dose threshold on the order of 1 to 3 cGy for radiation exposure contributing to breast carcinogenesis. The possibility
that a family history of breast cancer may have enhanced a carcinogenic radiation effect requires confirmation in other studies.
(Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):605–13)</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>18349278</pmid><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2628</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-9965 |
ispartof | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2008-03, Vol.17 (3), p.605-613 |
issn | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20727187 |
source | MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - etiology DNA Damage Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Mammary gland diseases Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology radiation Radiation Dosage Radiography - adverse effects Retrospective Studies Risk scoliosis Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging Surveys and Questionnaires Tumors |
title | Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A00%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple%20Diagnostic%20X-rays%20for%20Spine%20Deformities%20and%20Risk%20of%20Breast%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology,%20biomarkers%20&%20prevention&rft.au=RONCKERS,%20C%C3%A9cile%20M&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=613&rft.pages=605-613&rft.issn=1055-9965&rft.eissn=1538-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20727187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20727187&rft_id=info:pmid/18349278&rfr_iscdi=true |