Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer

Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and its variation by modifying factors. In this historic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2008-03, Vol.17 (3), p.605-613
Hauptverfasser: RONCKERS, Cécile M, DOODY, Michele M, LONSTEIN, John E, STOVALL, Marilyn, LAND, Charles E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 613
container_issue 3
container_start_page 605
container_title Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention
container_volume 17
creator RONCKERS, Cécile M
DOODY, Michele M
LONSTEIN, John E
STOVALL, Marilyn
LAND, Charles E
description Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and its variation by modifying factors. In this historic cohort, 95% of daily dose increments (when exposure to the breast occurred) were under 2.4 cGy, with mean 1.1 cGy. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 3,010 women, diagnosed with spinal curvature between 1912 and 1965 in 14 U.S. pediatric orthopedic centers and who completed a questionnaire by telephone interview or mail survey in 1992, were studied for risk of breast cancer by radiation dose to the breast (mean, 12 cGy) after adjustment for established breast cancer risk factors. Results: A borderline-significant radiation dose response (excess relative risk/Gy = 2.86; P = 0.058; one-tailed P = 0.029) was observed during 118,905 woman-years of follow-up (median, 35.5 years) based on 78 cases of invasive breast cancer. The dose response was significantly greater ( P = 0.03) for women who reported a family history of breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives (excess relative risk/Gy = 8.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-28.16). Radiation-related risk did not vary significantly by stage of reproductive development at exposure. Conclusions: Assuming that repair of radiation-related DNA damage requires at most a few hours, our data argue against existence of a low-dose threshold on the order of 1 to 3 cGy for radiation exposure contributing to breast carcinogenesis. The possibility that a family history of breast cancer may have enhanced a carcinogenic radiation effect requires confirmation in other studies. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):605–13)
doi_str_mv 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2628
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20727187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20727187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-9be62209c2948dc03af0cda31320ebb58a71f562dd1d14ec99588f12f9ceffd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMlOwzAQQC0EYil8AsgX4BTwUsf2EUrZVARikbhZrjNuDWlS7FSIvyehBU4z0rzZHkL7lJxQKtQpJUJkWufiZPhwkxGZsZypNbRNBVeZlEKst_kvs4V2UnojhEgtxCbaoor3NZNqG93eLcomzEvAF8FOqjo1weHXLNqvhH0d8dM8VG0N2nwWmgAJ26rAjyG949rj8wg2NXhgKwdxF214WybYW8UeerkcPg-us9H91c3gbJQ5QXmT6THkjBHtmO6rwhFuPXGF5ZQzAuOxUFZSL3JWFLSgfXBaC6U8ZV478L4QvIeOlnPnsf5YQGrMLCQHZWkrqBfJMCKZpEq2oFiCLtYpRfBmHsPMxi9Diekkmk6Q6QSZVqIh0nQS276D1YLFeAbFf9fKWgscrgCbnC19bP8P6Y9jhBPGaXfp8ZKbhsn0M0Qw7sdUhAQ2uqmh0nCTE8G_AUbLh8s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20727187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>RONCKERS, Cécile M ; DOODY, Michele M ; LONSTEIN, John E ; STOVALL, Marilyn ; LAND, Charles E</creator><creatorcontrib>RONCKERS, Cécile M ; DOODY, Michele M ; LONSTEIN, John E ; STOVALL, Marilyn ; LAND, Charles E</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and its variation by modifying factors. In this historic cohort, 95% of daily dose increments (when exposure to the breast occurred) were under 2.4 cGy, with mean 1.1 cGy. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 3,010 women, diagnosed with spinal curvature between 1912 and 1965 in 14 U.S. pediatric orthopedic centers and who completed a questionnaire by telephone interview or mail survey in 1992, were studied for risk of breast cancer by radiation dose to the breast (mean, 12 cGy) after adjustment for established breast cancer risk factors. Results: A borderline-significant radiation dose response (excess relative risk/Gy = 2.86; P = 0.058; one-tailed P = 0.029) was observed during 118,905 woman-years of follow-up (median, 35.5 years) based on 78 cases of invasive breast cancer. The dose response was significantly greater ( P = 0.03) for women who reported a family history of breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives (excess relative risk/Gy = 8.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-28.16). Radiation-related risk did not vary significantly by stage of reproductive development at exposure. Conclusions: Assuming that repair of radiation-related DNA damage requires at most a few hours, our data argue against existence of a low-dose threshold on the order of 1 to 3 cGy for radiation exposure contributing to breast carcinogenesis. The possibility that a family history of breast cancer may have enhanced a carcinogenic radiation effect requires confirmation in other studies. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):605–13)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-9965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2628</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18349278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - etiology ; DNA Damage ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology ; radiation ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiography - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; scoliosis ; Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention, 2008-03, Vol.17 (3), p.605-613</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-9be62209c2948dc03af0cda31320ebb58a71f562dd1d14ec99588f12f9ceffd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-9be62209c2948dc03af0cda31320ebb58a71f562dd1d14ec99588f12f9ceffd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3342,27902,27903</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20302315$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18349278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RONCKERS, Cécile M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOODY, Michele M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONSTEIN, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOVALL, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAND, Charles E</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer</title><title>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><description>Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and its variation by modifying factors. In this historic cohort, 95% of daily dose increments (when exposure to the breast occurred) were under 2.4 cGy, with mean 1.1 cGy. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 3,010 women, diagnosed with spinal curvature between 1912 and 1965 in 14 U.S. pediatric orthopedic centers and who completed a questionnaire by telephone interview or mail survey in 1992, were studied for risk of breast cancer by radiation dose to the breast (mean, 12 cGy) after adjustment for established breast cancer risk factors. Results: A borderline-significant radiation dose response (excess relative risk/Gy = 2.86; P = 0.058; one-tailed P = 0.029) was observed during 118,905 woman-years of follow-up (median, 35.5 years) based on 78 cases of invasive breast cancer. The dose response was significantly greater ( P = 0.03) for women who reported a family history of breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives (excess relative risk/Gy = 8.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-28.16). Radiation-related risk did not vary significantly by stage of reproductive development at exposure. Conclusions: Assuming that repair of radiation-related DNA damage requires at most a few hours, our data argue against existence of a low-dose threshold on the order of 1 to 3 cGy for radiation exposure contributing to breast carcinogenesis. The possibility that a family history of breast cancer may have enhanced a carcinogenic radiation effect requires confirmation in other studies. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):605–13)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology</subject><subject>radiation</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiography - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>scoliosis</subject><subject>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1055-9965</issn><issn>1538-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMlOwzAQQC0EYil8AsgX4BTwUsf2EUrZVARikbhZrjNuDWlS7FSIvyehBU4z0rzZHkL7lJxQKtQpJUJkWufiZPhwkxGZsZypNbRNBVeZlEKst_kvs4V2UnojhEgtxCbaoor3NZNqG93eLcomzEvAF8FOqjo1weHXLNqvhH0d8dM8VG0N2nwWmgAJ26rAjyG949rj8wg2NXhgKwdxF214WybYW8UeerkcPg-us9H91c3gbJQ5QXmT6THkjBHtmO6rwhFuPXGF5ZQzAuOxUFZSL3JWFLSgfXBaC6U8ZV478L4QvIeOlnPnsf5YQGrMLCQHZWkrqBfJMCKZpEq2oFiCLtYpRfBmHsPMxi9Diekkmk6Q6QSZVqIh0nQS276D1YLFeAbFf9fKWgscrgCbnC19bP8P6Y9jhBPGaXfp8ZKbhsn0M0Qw7sdUhAQ2uqmh0nCTE8G_AUbLh8s</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>RONCKERS, Cécile M</creator><creator>DOODY, Michele M</creator><creator>LONSTEIN, John E</creator><creator>STOVALL, Marilyn</creator><creator>LAND, Charles E</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer</title><author>RONCKERS, Cécile M ; DOODY, Michele M ; LONSTEIN, John E ; STOVALL, Marilyn ; LAND, Charles E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-9be62209c2948dc03af0cda31320ebb58a71f562dd1d14ec99588f12f9ceffd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology</topic><topic>radiation</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiography - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>scoliosis</topic><topic>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RONCKERS, Cécile M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOODY, Michele M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONSTEIN, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOVALL, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAND, Charles E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RONCKERS, Cécile M</au><au>DOODY, Michele M</au><au>LONSTEIN, John E</au><au>STOVALL, Marilyn</au><au>LAND, Charles E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>613</epage><pages>605-613</pages><issn>1055-9965</issn><eissn>1538-7755</eissn><abstract>Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and its variation by modifying factors. In this historic cohort, 95% of daily dose increments (when exposure to the breast occurred) were under 2.4 cGy, with mean 1.1 cGy. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 3,010 women, diagnosed with spinal curvature between 1912 and 1965 in 14 U.S. pediatric orthopedic centers and who completed a questionnaire by telephone interview or mail survey in 1992, were studied for risk of breast cancer by radiation dose to the breast (mean, 12 cGy) after adjustment for established breast cancer risk factors. Results: A borderline-significant radiation dose response (excess relative risk/Gy = 2.86; P = 0.058; one-tailed P = 0.029) was observed during 118,905 woman-years of follow-up (median, 35.5 years) based on 78 cases of invasive breast cancer. The dose response was significantly greater ( P = 0.03) for women who reported a family history of breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives (excess relative risk/Gy = 8.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-28.16). Radiation-related risk did not vary significantly by stage of reproductive development at exposure. Conclusions: Assuming that repair of radiation-related DNA damage requires at most a few hours, our data argue against existence of a low-dose threshold on the order of 1 to 3 cGy for radiation exposure contributing to breast carcinogenesis. The possibility that a family history of breast cancer may have enhanced a carcinogenic radiation effect requires confirmation in other studies. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):605–13)</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>18349278</pmid><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2628</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-9965
ispartof Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2008-03, Vol.17 (3), p.605-613
issn 1055-9965
1538-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20727187
source MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - etiology
DNA Damage
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology
radiation
Radiation Dosage
Radiography - adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Risk
scoliosis
Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tumors
title Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A00%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple%20Diagnostic%20X-rays%20for%20Spine%20Deformities%20and%20Risk%20of%20Breast%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology,%20biomarkers%20&%20prevention&rft.au=RONCKERS,%20C%C3%A9cile%20M&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=613&rft.pages=605-613&rft.issn=1055-9965&rft.eissn=1538-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20727187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20727187&rft_id=info:pmid/18349278&rfr_iscdi=true