Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes

Nematodes are the most damaging pathogens of cotton and one of the most important pathogens of peanut. Weeds can support nematode reproduction and reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation as a management tool. This study documents the relative host status of tropical spiderwort for (1) the reniform...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed science 2006-11, Vol.54 (6), p.1137-1141
Hauptverfasser: Davis, R. F., Webster, T. M., Brenneman, T. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1141
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1137
container_title Weed science
container_volume 54
creator Davis, R. F.
Webster, T. M.
Brenneman, T. B.
description Nematodes are the most damaging pathogens of cotton and one of the most important pathogens of peanut. Weeds can support nematode reproduction and reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation as a management tool. This study documents the relative host status of tropical spiderwort for (1) the reniform nematode and the southern and peanut root-knot nematodes and (2) the fungal pathogen southern stem rot. A reproductive factor (RF) was calculated for each nematode (final number divided by initial number). Galling was estimated (0-10 scale) for the root-knot species. The southern root-knot nematode reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 3.1 and an RF of 15.5. The peanut root-knot nematode also reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 2.1 and an RF of 7.2. Trials with the reniform nematode were analyzed independently. In the first trial with the reniform nematode, the RF was 2.4 on tropical spiderwort and 1.4 on cotton. In the second trial, the RF was 3.6 on tropical spiderwort and 13.5 on cotton. The severity of symptoms caused by southern stem rot was estimated on a scale of 0 to 10. In the first trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 4.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 1.4, and the fungus could be seen growing on 40% of the tropical spiderwort plants. In the second trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 10.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 5.0, but the fungus could be seen growing on all of the tropical spiderwort plants. It appears that tropical spiderwort is a sufficiently good host for some of the primary nematode and fungal pathogens of major crops in the southeastern United States that its presence at typical plant population densities will greatly reduce the pathogen-suppressive effects of crop rotation.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WS-06-114R.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20724209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1614_WS_06_114R_1</cupid><jstor_id>4539517</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4539517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b385t-b37a9b713d68d0e58009db9a8144cafc5bfb86ff7ca0a1f31714f071ef5595fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFL5EAQhRtZwVn15lEwp8VdzFiVdKeTowzuOiAIjuKx6STdYw9JeuzqQfz3RiLe1kvV4X1V7_EYO0GYY4H88mmVQpEi8vs57rEZCgFpJkX1g80AeJ6i5OKA_STaAGCRYTVjyxtPMaGo444Sb5MY_NY1ukto61oTXn2IyfnC973p3KCT2gzrZ92ZgRz9TqwPyWB6HX1r6IjtW92ROf7ch-zx7_XD4ia9vfu3XFzdpnVeijhOqataYt4WZQtGlABVW1e6RM4bbRtR27osrJWNBo02R4ncgkRjhaiENfkh-zX93Qb_sjMUVe-oMV2nB-N3pDKQGc-gGsGLCWyCJwrGqm1wvQ5vCkF99KWeVgoK9dGXwhE_nfANRR--WC7ySqAc5bNJttorvQ6O1OMqA8wB5JisLEdi_umn-zq4dm3Uxu_CMJbxP8c_00HtvB_M9_HeASgXjYE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20724209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Davis, R. F. ; Webster, T. M. ; Brenneman, T. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, R. F. ; Webster, T. M. ; Brenneman, T. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Nematodes are the most damaging pathogens of cotton and one of the most important pathogens of peanut. Weeds can support nematode reproduction and reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation as a management tool. This study documents the relative host status of tropical spiderwort for (1) the reniform nematode and the southern and peanut root-knot nematodes and (2) the fungal pathogen southern stem rot. A reproductive factor (RF) was calculated for each nematode (final number divided by initial number). Galling was estimated (0-10 scale) for the root-knot species. The southern root-knot nematode reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 3.1 and an RF of 15.5. The peanut root-knot nematode also reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 2.1 and an RF of 7.2. Trials with the reniform nematode were analyzed independently. In the first trial with the reniform nematode, the RF was 2.4 on tropical spiderwort and 1.4 on cotton. In the second trial, the RF was 3.6 on tropical spiderwort and 13.5 on cotton. The severity of symptoms caused by southern stem rot was estimated on a scale of 0 to 10. In the first trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 4.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 1.4, and the fungus could be seen growing on 40% of the tropical spiderwort plants. In the second trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 10.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 5.0, but the fungus could be seen growing on all of the tropical spiderwort plants. It appears that tropical spiderwort is a sufficiently good host for some of the primary nematode and fungal pathogens of major crops in the southeastern United States that its presence at typical plant population densities will greatly reduce the pathogen-suppressive effects of crop rotation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WS-06-114R.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>alternative hosts ; Arachis hypogaea ; Benghal dayflower ; Commelina benghalensis ; Corticium rolfsii ; Cotton ; crop rotation ; disease reservoirs ; fiber crops ; Gossypium hirsutum ; host plants ; host status ; Inoculation ; Meloidogyne arenaria ; Meloidogyne incognita ; Nematoda ; nematode control ; nematode reproduction ; Nematodes ; noxious weeds ; Pathogens ; peanut ; Peanuts ; plant density ; Plant diseases ; plant parasitic nematodes ; plant pathogenic fungi ; Plants ; reniform nematode ; Root knot nematodes ; root-knot nematode ; Rotylenchulus ; Rotylenchulus reniformis ; Sclerotium rolfsii ; SPECIAL TOPICS ; Tropical medicine ; weed hosts ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2006-11, Vol.54 (6), p.1137-1141</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright © Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b385t-b37a9b713d68d0e58009db9a8144cafc5bfb86ff7ca0a1f31714f071ef5595fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b385t-b37a9b713d68d0e58009db9a8144cafc5bfb86ff7ca0a1f31714f071ef5595fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/WS-06-114R.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4539517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, R. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenneman, T. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><description>Nematodes are the most damaging pathogens of cotton and one of the most important pathogens of peanut. Weeds can support nematode reproduction and reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation as a management tool. This study documents the relative host status of tropical spiderwort for (1) the reniform nematode and the southern and peanut root-knot nematodes and (2) the fungal pathogen southern stem rot. A reproductive factor (RF) was calculated for each nematode (final number divided by initial number). Galling was estimated (0-10 scale) for the root-knot species. The southern root-knot nematode reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 3.1 and an RF of 15.5. The peanut root-knot nematode also reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 2.1 and an RF of 7.2. Trials with the reniform nematode were analyzed independently. In the first trial with the reniform nematode, the RF was 2.4 on tropical spiderwort and 1.4 on cotton. In the second trial, the RF was 3.6 on tropical spiderwort and 13.5 on cotton. The severity of symptoms caused by southern stem rot was estimated on a scale of 0 to 10. In the first trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 4.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 1.4, and the fungus could be seen growing on 40% of the tropical spiderwort plants. In the second trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 10.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 5.0, but the fungus could be seen growing on all of the tropical spiderwort plants. It appears that tropical spiderwort is a sufficiently good host for some of the primary nematode and fungal pathogens of major crops in the southeastern United States that its presence at typical plant population densities will greatly reduce the pathogen-suppressive effects of crop rotation.</description><subject>alternative hosts</subject><subject>Arachis hypogaea</subject><subject>Benghal dayflower</subject><subject>Commelina benghalensis</subject><subject>Corticium rolfsii</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>crop rotation</subject><subject>disease reservoirs</subject><subject>fiber crops</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>host plants</subject><subject>host status</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Meloidogyne arenaria</subject><subject>Meloidogyne incognita</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>nematode control</subject><subject>nematode reproduction</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>noxious weeds</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>peanut</subject><subject>Peanuts</subject><subject>plant density</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>plant parasitic nematodes</subject><subject>plant pathogenic fungi</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>reniform nematode</subject><subject>Root knot nematodes</subject><subject>root-knot nematode</subject><subject>Rotylenchulus</subject><subject>Rotylenchulus reniformis</subject><subject>Sclerotium rolfsii</subject><subject>SPECIAL TOPICS</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><subject>weed hosts</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFL5EAQhRtZwVn15lEwp8VdzFiVdKeTowzuOiAIjuKx6STdYw9JeuzqQfz3RiLe1kvV4X1V7_EYO0GYY4H88mmVQpEi8vs57rEZCgFpJkX1g80AeJ6i5OKA_STaAGCRYTVjyxtPMaGo444Sb5MY_NY1ukto61oTXn2IyfnC973p3KCT2gzrZ92ZgRz9TqwPyWB6HX1r6IjtW92ROf7ch-zx7_XD4ia9vfu3XFzdpnVeijhOqataYt4WZQtGlABVW1e6RM4bbRtR27osrJWNBo02R4ncgkRjhaiENfkh-zX93Qb_sjMUVe-oMV2nB-N3pDKQGc-gGsGLCWyCJwrGqm1wvQ5vCkF99KWeVgoK9dGXwhE_nfANRR--WC7ySqAc5bNJttorvQ6O1OMqA8wB5JisLEdi_umn-zq4dm3Uxu_CMJbxP8c_00HtvB_M9_HeASgXjYE</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Davis, R. F.</creator><creator>Webster, T. M.</creator><creator>Brenneman, T. B.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes</title><author>Davis, R. F. ; Webster, T. M. ; Brenneman, T. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b385t-b37a9b713d68d0e58009db9a8144cafc5bfb86ff7ca0a1f31714f071ef5595fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>alternative hosts</topic><topic>Arachis hypogaea</topic><topic>Benghal dayflower</topic><topic>Commelina benghalensis</topic><topic>Corticium rolfsii</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>crop rotation</topic><topic>disease reservoirs</topic><topic>fiber crops</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>host plants</topic><topic>host status</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Meloidogyne arenaria</topic><topic>Meloidogyne incognita</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>nematode control</topic><topic>nematode reproduction</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>noxious weeds</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>peanut</topic><topic>Peanuts</topic><topic>plant density</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>plant parasitic nematodes</topic><topic>plant pathogenic fungi</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>reniform nematode</topic><topic>Root knot nematodes</topic><topic>root-knot nematode</topic><topic>Rotylenchulus</topic><topic>Rotylenchulus reniformis</topic><topic>Sclerotium rolfsii</topic><topic>SPECIAL TOPICS</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><topic>weed hosts</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, R. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenneman, T. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, R. F.</au><au>Webster, T. M.</au><au>Brenneman, T. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1137</spage><epage>1141</epage><pages>1137-1141</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>Nematodes are the most damaging pathogens of cotton and one of the most important pathogens of peanut. Weeds can support nematode reproduction and reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation as a management tool. This study documents the relative host status of tropical spiderwort for (1) the reniform nematode and the southern and peanut root-knot nematodes and (2) the fungal pathogen southern stem rot. A reproductive factor (RF) was calculated for each nematode (final number divided by initial number). Galling was estimated (0-10 scale) for the root-knot species. The southern root-knot nematode reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 3.1 and an RF of 15.5. The peanut root-knot nematode also reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 2.1 and an RF of 7.2. Trials with the reniform nematode were analyzed independently. In the first trial with the reniform nematode, the RF was 2.4 on tropical spiderwort and 1.4 on cotton. In the second trial, the RF was 3.6 on tropical spiderwort and 13.5 on cotton. The severity of symptoms caused by southern stem rot was estimated on a scale of 0 to 10. In the first trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 4.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 1.4, and the fungus could be seen growing on 40% of the tropical spiderwort plants. In the second trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 10.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 5.0, but the fungus could be seen growing on all of the tropical spiderwort plants. It appears that tropical spiderwort is a sufficiently good host for some of the primary nematode and fungal pathogens of major crops in the southeastern United States that its presence at typical plant population densities will greatly reduce the pathogen-suppressive effects of crop rotation.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1614/WS-06-114R.1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1745
ispartof Weed science, 2006-11, Vol.54 (6), p.1137-1141
issn 0043-1745
1550-2759
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20724209
source Jstor Complete Legacy; BioOne Complete
subjects alternative hosts
Arachis hypogaea
Benghal dayflower
Commelina benghalensis
Corticium rolfsii
Cotton
crop rotation
disease reservoirs
fiber crops
Gossypium hirsutum
host plants
host status
Inoculation
Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne incognita
Nematoda
nematode control
nematode reproduction
Nematodes
noxious weeds
Pathogens
peanut
Peanuts
plant density
Plant diseases
plant parasitic nematodes
plant pathogenic fungi
Plants
reniform nematode
Root knot nematodes
root-knot nematode
Rotylenchulus
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Sclerotium rolfsii
SPECIAL TOPICS
Tropical medicine
weed hosts
Weeds
title Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T15%3A47%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Host%20status%20of%20tropical%20spiderwort%20(Commelina%20benghalensis)%20for%20nematodes&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Davis,%20R.%20F.&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1137&rft.epage=1141&rft.pages=1137-1141&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WS-06-114R.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4539517%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20724209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1614_WS_06_114R_1&rft_jstor_id=4539517&rfr_iscdi=true