Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes
Nematodes are the most damaging pathogens of cotton and one of the most important pathogens of peanut. Weeds can support nematode reproduction and reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation as a management tool. This study documents the relative host status of tropical spiderwort for (1) the reniform...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed science 2006-11, Vol.54 (6), p.1137-1141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1137 |
container_title | Weed science |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Davis, R. F. Webster, T. M. Brenneman, T. B. |
description | Nematodes are the most damaging pathogens of cotton and one of the most important pathogens of peanut. Weeds can support nematode reproduction and reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation as a management tool. This study documents the relative host status of tropical spiderwort for (1) the reniform nematode and the southern and peanut root-knot nematodes and (2) the fungal pathogen southern stem rot. A reproductive factor (RF) was calculated for each nematode (final number divided by initial number). Galling was estimated (0-10 scale) for the root-knot species. The southern root-knot nematode reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 3.1 and an RF of 15.5. The peanut root-knot nematode also reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 2.1 and an RF of 7.2. Trials with the reniform nematode were analyzed independently. In the first trial with the reniform nematode, the RF was 2.4 on tropical spiderwort and 1.4 on cotton. In the second trial, the RF was 3.6 on tropical spiderwort and 13.5 on cotton. The severity of symptoms caused by southern stem rot was estimated on a scale of 0 to 10. In the first trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 4.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 1.4, and the fungus could be seen growing on 40% of the tropical spiderwort plants. In the second trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 10.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 5.0, but the fungus could be seen growing on all of the tropical spiderwort plants. It appears that tropical spiderwort is a sufficiently good host for some of the primary nematode and fungal pathogens of major crops in the southeastern United States that its presence at typical plant population densities will greatly reduce the pathogen-suppressive effects of crop rotation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1614/WS-06-114R.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20724209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1614_WS_06_114R_1</cupid><jstor_id>4539517</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4539517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b385t-b37a9b713d68d0e58009db9a8144cafc5bfb86ff7ca0a1f31714f071ef5595fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFL5EAQhRtZwVn15lEwp8VdzFiVdKeTowzuOiAIjuKx6STdYw9JeuzqQfz3RiLe1kvV4X1V7_EYO0GYY4H88mmVQpEi8vs57rEZCgFpJkX1g80AeJ6i5OKA_STaAGCRYTVjyxtPMaGo444Sb5MY_NY1ukto61oTXn2IyfnC973p3KCT2gzrZ92ZgRz9TqwPyWB6HX1r6IjtW92ROf7ch-zx7_XD4ia9vfu3XFzdpnVeijhOqataYt4WZQtGlABVW1e6RM4bbRtR27osrJWNBo02R4ncgkRjhaiENfkh-zX93Qb_sjMUVe-oMV2nB-N3pDKQGc-gGsGLCWyCJwrGqm1wvQ5vCkF99KWeVgoK9dGXwhE_nfANRR--WC7ySqAc5bNJttorvQ6O1OMqA8wB5JisLEdi_umn-zq4dm3Uxu_CMJbxP8c_00HtvB_M9_HeASgXjYE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20724209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Davis, R. F. ; Webster, T. M. ; Brenneman, T. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, R. F. ; Webster, T. M. ; Brenneman, T. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Nematodes are the most damaging pathogens of cotton and one of the most important pathogens of peanut. Weeds can support nematode reproduction and reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation as a management tool. This study documents the relative host status of tropical spiderwort for (1) the reniform nematode and the southern and peanut root-knot nematodes and (2) the fungal pathogen southern stem rot. A reproductive factor (RF) was calculated for each nematode (final number divided by initial number). Galling was estimated (0-10 scale) for the root-knot species. The southern root-knot nematode reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 3.1 and an RF of 15.5. The peanut root-knot nematode also reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 2.1 and an RF of 7.2. Trials with the reniform nematode were analyzed independently. In the first trial with the reniform nematode, the RF was 2.4 on tropical spiderwort and 1.4 on cotton. In the second trial, the RF was 3.6 on tropical spiderwort and 13.5 on cotton. The severity of symptoms caused by southern stem rot was estimated on a scale of 0 to 10. In the first trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 4.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 1.4, and the fungus could be seen growing on 40% of the tropical spiderwort plants. In the second trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 10.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 5.0, but the fungus could be seen growing on all of the tropical spiderwort plants. It appears that tropical spiderwort is a sufficiently good host for some of the primary nematode and fungal pathogens of major crops in the southeastern United States that its presence at typical plant population densities will greatly reduce the pathogen-suppressive effects of crop rotation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WS-06-114R.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>alternative hosts ; Arachis hypogaea ; Benghal dayflower ; Commelina benghalensis ; Corticium rolfsii ; Cotton ; crop rotation ; disease reservoirs ; fiber crops ; Gossypium hirsutum ; host plants ; host status ; Inoculation ; Meloidogyne arenaria ; Meloidogyne incognita ; Nematoda ; nematode control ; nematode reproduction ; Nematodes ; noxious weeds ; Pathogens ; peanut ; Peanuts ; plant density ; Plant diseases ; plant parasitic nematodes ; plant pathogenic fungi ; Plants ; reniform nematode ; Root knot nematodes ; root-knot nematode ; Rotylenchulus ; Rotylenchulus reniformis ; Sclerotium rolfsii ; SPECIAL TOPICS ; Tropical medicine ; weed hosts ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2006-11, Vol.54 (6), p.1137-1141</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright © Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b385t-b37a9b713d68d0e58009db9a8144cafc5bfb86ff7ca0a1f31714f071ef5595fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b385t-b37a9b713d68d0e58009db9a8144cafc5bfb86ff7ca0a1f31714f071ef5595fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/WS-06-114R.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4539517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, R. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenneman, T. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><description>Nematodes are the most damaging pathogens of cotton and one of the most important pathogens of peanut. Weeds can support nematode reproduction and reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation as a management tool. This study documents the relative host status of tropical spiderwort for (1) the reniform nematode and the southern and peanut root-knot nematodes and (2) the fungal pathogen southern stem rot. A reproductive factor (RF) was calculated for each nematode (final number divided by initial number). Galling was estimated (0-10 scale) for the root-knot species. The southern root-knot nematode reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 3.1 and an RF of 15.5. The peanut root-knot nematode also reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 2.1 and an RF of 7.2. Trials with the reniform nematode were analyzed independently. In the first trial with the reniform nematode, the RF was 2.4 on tropical spiderwort and 1.4 on cotton. In the second trial, the RF was 3.6 on tropical spiderwort and 13.5 on cotton. The severity of symptoms caused by southern stem rot was estimated on a scale of 0 to 10. In the first trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 4.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 1.4, and the fungus could be seen growing on 40% of the tropical spiderwort plants. In the second trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 10.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 5.0, but the fungus could be seen growing on all of the tropical spiderwort plants. It appears that tropical spiderwort is a sufficiently good host for some of the primary nematode and fungal pathogens of major crops in the southeastern United States that its presence at typical plant population densities will greatly reduce the pathogen-suppressive effects of crop rotation.</description><subject>alternative hosts</subject><subject>Arachis hypogaea</subject><subject>Benghal dayflower</subject><subject>Commelina benghalensis</subject><subject>Corticium rolfsii</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>crop rotation</subject><subject>disease reservoirs</subject><subject>fiber crops</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>host plants</subject><subject>host status</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Meloidogyne arenaria</subject><subject>Meloidogyne incognita</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>nematode control</subject><subject>nematode reproduction</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>noxious weeds</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>peanut</subject><subject>Peanuts</subject><subject>plant density</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>plant parasitic nematodes</subject><subject>plant pathogenic fungi</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>reniform nematode</subject><subject>Root knot nematodes</subject><subject>root-knot nematode</subject><subject>Rotylenchulus</subject><subject>Rotylenchulus reniformis</subject><subject>Sclerotium rolfsii</subject><subject>SPECIAL TOPICS</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><subject>weed hosts</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFL5EAQhRtZwVn15lEwp8VdzFiVdKeTowzuOiAIjuKx6STdYw9JeuzqQfz3RiLe1kvV4X1V7_EYO0GYY4H88mmVQpEi8vs57rEZCgFpJkX1g80AeJ6i5OKA_STaAGCRYTVjyxtPMaGo444Sb5MY_NY1ukto61oTXn2IyfnC973p3KCT2gzrZ92ZgRz9TqwPyWB6HX1r6IjtW92ROf7ch-zx7_XD4ia9vfu3XFzdpnVeijhOqataYt4WZQtGlABVW1e6RM4bbRtR27osrJWNBo02R4ncgkRjhaiENfkh-zX93Qb_sjMUVe-oMV2nB-N3pDKQGc-gGsGLCWyCJwrGqm1wvQ5vCkF99KWeVgoK9dGXwhE_nfANRR--WC7ySqAc5bNJttorvQ6O1OMqA8wB5JisLEdi_umn-zq4dm3Uxu_CMJbxP8c_00HtvB_M9_HeASgXjYE</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Davis, R. F.</creator><creator>Webster, T. M.</creator><creator>Brenneman, T. B.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes</title><author>Davis, R. F. ; Webster, T. M. ; Brenneman, T. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b385t-b37a9b713d68d0e58009db9a8144cafc5bfb86ff7ca0a1f31714f071ef5595fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>alternative hosts</topic><topic>Arachis hypogaea</topic><topic>Benghal dayflower</topic><topic>Commelina benghalensis</topic><topic>Corticium rolfsii</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>crop rotation</topic><topic>disease reservoirs</topic><topic>fiber crops</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>host plants</topic><topic>host status</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Meloidogyne arenaria</topic><topic>Meloidogyne incognita</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>nematode control</topic><topic>nematode reproduction</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>noxious weeds</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>peanut</topic><topic>Peanuts</topic><topic>plant density</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>plant parasitic nematodes</topic><topic>plant pathogenic fungi</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>reniform nematode</topic><topic>Root knot nematodes</topic><topic>root-knot nematode</topic><topic>Rotylenchulus</topic><topic>Rotylenchulus reniformis</topic><topic>Sclerotium rolfsii</topic><topic>SPECIAL TOPICS</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><topic>weed hosts</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, R. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenneman, T. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, R. F.</au><au>Webster, T. M.</au><au>Brenneman, T. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1137</spage><epage>1141</epage><pages>1137-1141</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>Nematodes are the most damaging pathogens of cotton and one of the most important pathogens of peanut. Weeds can support nematode reproduction and reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation as a management tool. This study documents the relative host status of tropical spiderwort for (1) the reniform nematode and the southern and peanut root-knot nematodes and (2) the fungal pathogen southern stem rot. A reproductive factor (RF) was calculated for each nematode (final number divided by initial number). Galling was estimated (0-10 scale) for the root-knot species. The southern root-knot nematode reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 3.1 and an RF of 15.5. The peanut root-knot nematode also reproduced well on tropical spiderwort, with a gall rating of 2.1 and an RF of 7.2. Trials with the reniform nematode were analyzed independently. In the first trial with the reniform nematode, the RF was 2.4 on tropical spiderwort and 1.4 on cotton. In the second trial, the RF was 3.6 on tropical spiderwort and 13.5 on cotton. The severity of symptoms caused by southern stem rot was estimated on a scale of 0 to 10. In the first trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 4.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 1.4, and the fungus could be seen growing on 40% of the tropical spiderwort plants. In the second trial, peanut had a disease severity rating of 10.0 and tropical spiderwort had a rating of 5.0, but the fungus could be seen growing on all of the tropical spiderwort plants. It appears that tropical spiderwort is a sufficiently good host for some of the primary nematode and fungal pathogens of major crops in the southeastern United States that its presence at typical plant population densities will greatly reduce the pathogen-suppressive effects of crop rotation.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1614/WS-06-114R.1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1745 |
ispartof | Weed science, 2006-11, Vol.54 (6), p.1137-1141 |
issn | 0043-1745 1550-2759 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20724209 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; BioOne Complete |
subjects | alternative hosts Arachis hypogaea Benghal dayflower Commelina benghalensis Corticium rolfsii Cotton crop rotation disease reservoirs fiber crops Gossypium hirsutum host plants host status Inoculation Meloidogyne arenaria Meloidogyne incognita Nematoda nematode control nematode reproduction Nematodes noxious weeds Pathogens peanut Peanuts plant density Plant diseases plant parasitic nematodes plant pathogenic fungi Plants reniform nematode Root knot nematodes root-knot nematode Rotylenchulus Rotylenchulus reniformis Sclerotium rolfsii SPECIAL TOPICS Tropical medicine weed hosts Weeds |
title | Host status of tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) for nematodes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T15%3A47%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Host%20status%20of%20tropical%20spiderwort%20(Commelina%20benghalensis)%20for%20nematodes&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Davis,%20R.%20F.&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1137&rft.epage=1141&rft.pages=1137-1141&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WS-06-114R.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4539517%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20724209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1614_WS_06_114R_1&rft_jstor_id=4539517&rfr_iscdi=true |