Method for preclinical pathology evaluation and analysis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device implant sites
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) typically incorporate leads that directly contact the endocardium. Post-explant pathology evaluation of formalin-fixed CIED lead implant sites and downstream organs (i.e., lungs) can provide useful safety data to the US Food and Drug Administrati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cardiovascular pathology 2018-09, Vol.36, p.44-52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 52 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 44 |
container_title | Cardiovascular pathology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Jessen, Staci L. O'Brien, Maureen T. Lancon, Trevor W. Smith, Harrison R. Suarez, Leslie L. Wilcox, Matthew D. Miller, Matthew Weeks, Brad R. Clubb, Fred J. |
description | Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) typically incorporate leads that directly contact the endocardium. Post-explant pathology evaluation of formalin-fixed CIED lead implant sites and downstream organs (i.e., lungs) can provide useful safety data to the US Food and Drug Administration; however, current regulatory guidelines do not mandate how the safety data are collected. In this paper, we outline a protocol for preclinical pathology evaluation of leads associated with CIEDs, which includes formalin fixation of the heart and lungs, gross evaluation, and qualitative and quantitative histologic evaluation. We recommend fixation of the whole heart with leads in situ alongside intratracheal formalin infusion; this enables rapid and effective preservation of target tissues and increases histologic quality to allow for accurate qualitative and quantitative pathology evaluation. Overall, we believe that our approach to pathology evaluation of leads may maximize information acquired from preclinical studies, leading to more accurate safety assessments.
Summary: This article introduces an established method for pathology evaluation and analysis of cardiac leads recommended for companies and researchers that seek approval from a regulatory body.
•A suggested protocol for pathology evaluation of CIED implant sites is proposed.•Cardiac perfusion fixation yields quality pathology analysis of CIED implant sites.•Pulmonary formalin infusion enables accurate histologic analysis.•The proposed pathology protocol increases accuracy of CIED safety assessments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.carpath.2018.05.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2071562589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1054880717302478</els_id><sourcerecordid>2071562589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-d7b480b3857d4dadaf5898a8888c0965add5cee67040f49d5dc6368be15302073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v3CAQhlGVqvlof0IijrnYHdZg41MURWkbKVUv7RlhGDesWOMAtrT_vqx202uQEEg8887wEHLNoGbA2q_b2ug46_xSb4DJGkQNsPlALpjs-oo1TXtW7iB4JSV05-QypS0ASM75J3LeADDeS3FB1p-YX4KlY4h0jmi8m5zRnh6Sgw9_9xRX7RedXZionmzZ2u-TSzSMtExgXVh1MovXkbrd7PWU9eCRokeTYyhh1OLqDL690uQyps_k46h9wi-n84r8-fb4--FH9fzr-9PD_XNlmlbkynYDlzA0UnSWW231KGQvtSzLQN8Kba0wiG0HHEbeW2FN27RyQCYa2EDXXJHbY-4cw-uCKaudSwZ9mQTDklRhmGg3JbWg4oiaGFKKOKo5up2Oe8VAHZSrrTopVwflCoQqykvdzanFMuzQ_q96c1yAuyOA5aOrw6iScTgZtK4Iz8oG906Lf5B6l9M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2071562589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Method for preclinical pathology evaluation and analysis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device implant sites</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jessen, Staci L. ; O'Brien, Maureen T. ; Lancon, Trevor W. ; Smith, Harrison R. ; Suarez, Leslie L. ; Wilcox, Matthew D. ; Miller, Matthew ; Weeks, Brad R. ; Clubb, Fred J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jessen, Staci L. ; O'Brien, Maureen T. ; Lancon, Trevor W. ; Smith, Harrison R. ; Suarez, Leslie L. ; Wilcox, Matthew D. ; Miller, Matthew ; Weeks, Brad R. ; Clubb, Fred J.</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) typically incorporate leads that directly contact the endocardium. Post-explant pathology evaluation of formalin-fixed CIED lead implant sites and downstream organs (i.e., lungs) can provide useful safety data to the US Food and Drug Administration; however, current regulatory guidelines do not mandate how the safety data are collected. In this paper, we outline a protocol for preclinical pathology evaluation of leads associated with CIEDs, which includes formalin fixation of the heart and lungs, gross evaluation, and qualitative and quantitative histologic evaluation. We recommend fixation of the whole heart with leads in situ alongside intratracheal formalin infusion; this enables rapid and effective preservation of target tissues and increases histologic quality to allow for accurate qualitative and quantitative pathology evaluation. Overall, we believe that our approach to pathology evaluation of leads may maximize information acquired from preclinical studies, leading to more accurate safety assessments.
Summary: This article introduces an established method for pathology evaluation and analysis of cardiac leads recommended for companies and researchers that seek approval from a regulatory body.
•A suggested protocol for pathology evaluation of CIED implant sites is proposed.•Cardiac perfusion fixation yields quality pathology analysis of CIED implant sites.•Pulmonary formalin infusion enables accurate histologic analysis.•The proposed pathology protocol increases accuracy of CIED safety assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-8807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1336</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.carpath.2018.05.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30014985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; CIEDs ; Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects ; Device regulation recommendations ; Device Removal ; Equipment Safety ; Fixatives - pharmacology ; Foreign-Body Reaction - diagnostic imaging ; Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology ; Formaldehyde - pharmacology ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Lung - pathology ; Microtomy ; Models, Animal ; Myocardium - pathology ; Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects ; Paraffin Embedding ; Pathology ; Perfusion ; Prosthesis Design ; Risk Assessment ; Tissue Fixation - methods ; X-Ray Microtomography</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular pathology, 2018-09, Vol.36, p.44-52</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-d7b480b3857d4dadaf5898a8888c0965add5cee67040f49d5dc6368be15302073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-d7b480b3857d4dadaf5898a8888c0965add5cee67040f49d5dc6368be15302073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054880717302478$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30014985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jessen, Staci L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Maureen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lancon, Trevor W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Harrison R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suarez, Leslie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weeks, Brad R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clubb, Fred J.</creatorcontrib><title>Method for preclinical pathology evaluation and analysis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device implant sites</title><title>Cardiovascular pathology</title><addtitle>Cardiovasc Pathol</addtitle><description>Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) typically incorporate leads that directly contact the endocardium. Post-explant pathology evaluation of formalin-fixed CIED lead implant sites and downstream organs (i.e., lungs) can provide useful safety data to the US Food and Drug Administration; however, current regulatory guidelines do not mandate how the safety data are collected. In this paper, we outline a protocol for preclinical pathology evaluation of leads associated with CIEDs, which includes formalin fixation of the heart and lungs, gross evaluation, and qualitative and quantitative histologic evaluation. We recommend fixation of the whole heart with leads in situ alongside intratracheal formalin infusion; this enables rapid and effective preservation of target tissues and increases histologic quality to allow for accurate qualitative and quantitative pathology evaluation. Overall, we believe that our approach to pathology evaluation of leads may maximize information acquired from preclinical studies, leading to more accurate safety assessments.
Summary: This article introduces an established method for pathology evaluation and analysis of cardiac leads recommended for companies and researchers that seek approval from a regulatory body.
•A suggested protocol for pathology evaluation of CIED implant sites is proposed.•Cardiac perfusion fixation yields quality pathology analysis of CIED implant sites.•Pulmonary formalin infusion enables accurate histologic analysis.•The proposed pathology protocol increases accuracy of CIED safety assessments.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>CIEDs</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects</subject><subject>Device regulation recommendations</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Fixatives - pharmacology</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Reaction - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology</subject><subject>Formaldehyde - pharmacology</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Microtomy</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Myocardium - pathology</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>Paraffin Embedding</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Tissue Fixation - methods</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography</subject><issn>1054-8807</issn><issn>1879-1336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v3CAQhlGVqvlof0IijrnYHdZg41MURWkbKVUv7RlhGDesWOMAtrT_vqx202uQEEg8887wEHLNoGbA2q_b2ug46_xSb4DJGkQNsPlALpjs-oo1TXtW7iB4JSV05-QypS0ASM75J3LeADDeS3FB1p-YX4KlY4h0jmi8m5zRnh6Sgw9_9xRX7RedXZionmzZ2u-TSzSMtExgXVh1MovXkbrd7PWU9eCRokeTYyhh1OLqDL690uQyps_k46h9wi-n84r8-fb4--FH9fzr-9PD_XNlmlbkynYDlzA0UnSWW231KGQvtSzLQN8Kba0wiG0HHEbeW2FN27RyQCYa2EDXXJHbY-4cw-uCKaudSwZ9mQTDklRhmGg3JbWg4oiaGFKKOKo5up2Oe8VAHZSrrTopVwflCoQqykvdzanFMuzQ_q96c1yAuyOA5aOrw6iScTgZtK4Iz8oG906Lf5B6l9M</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Jessen, Staci L.</creator><creator>O'Brien, Maureen T.</creator><creator>Lancon, Trevor W.</creator><creator>Smith, Harrison R.</creator><creator>Suarez, Leslie L.</creator><creator>Wilcox, Matthew D.</creator><creator>Miller, Matthew</creator><creator>Weeks, Brad R.</creator><creator>Clubb, Fred J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Method for preclinical pathology evaluation and analysis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device implant sites</title><author>Jessen, Staci L. ; O'Brien, Maureen T. ; Lancon, Trevor W. ; Smith, Harrison R. ; Suarez, Leslie L. ; Wilcox, Matthew D. ; Miller, Matthew ; Weeks, Brad R. ; Clubb, Fred J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-d7b480b3857d4dadaf5898a8888c0965add5cee67040f49d5dc6368be15302073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>CIEDs</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects</topic><topic>Device regulation recommendations</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Fixatives - pharmacology</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Reaction - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology</topic><topic>Formaldehyde - pharmacology</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Microtomy</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Myocardium - pathology</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>Paraffin Embedding</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Tissue Fixation - methods</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jessen, Staci L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Maureen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lancon, Trevor W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Harrison R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suarez, Leslie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weeks, Brad R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clubb, Fred J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jessen, Staci L.</au><au>O'Brien, Maureen T.</au><au>Lancon, Trevor W.</au><au>Smith, Harrison R.</au><au>Suarez, Leslie L.</au><au>Wilcox, Matthew D.</au><au>Miller, Matthew</au><au>Weeks, Brad R.</au><au>Clubb, Fred J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Method for preclinical pathology evaluation and analysis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device implant sites</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Pathol</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><spage>44</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>44-52</pages><issn>1054-8807</issn><eissn>1879-1336</eissn><abstract>Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) typically incorporate leads that directly contact the endocardium. Post-explant pathology evaluation of formalin-fixed CIED lead implant sites and downstream organs (i.e., lungs) can provide useful safety data to the US Food and Drug Administration; however, current regulatory guidelines do not mandate how the safety data are collected. In this paper, we outline a protocol for preclinical pathology evaluation of leads associated with CIEDs, which includes formalin fixation of the heart and lungs, gross evaluation, and qualitative and quantitative histologic evaluation. We recommend fixation of the whole heart with leads in situ alongside intratracheal formalin infusion; this enables rapid and effective preservation of target tissues and increases histologic quality to allow for accurate qualitative and quantitative pathology evaluation. Overall, we believe that our approach to pathology evaluation of leads may maximize information acquired from preclinical studies, leading to more accurate safety assessments.
Summary: This article introduces an established method for pathology evaluation and analysis of cardiac leads recommended for companies and researchers that seek approval from a regulatory body.
•A suggested protocol for pathology evaluation of CIED implant sites is proposed.•Cardiac perfusion fixation yields quality pathology analysis of CIED implant sites.•Pulmonary formalin infusion enables accurate histologic analysis.•The proposed pathology protocol increases accuracy of CIED safety assessments.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30014985</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.carpath.2018.05.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1054-8807 |
ispartof | Cardiovascular pathology, 2018-09, Vol.36, p.44-52 |
issn | 1054-8807 1879-1336 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2071562589 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals CIEDs Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects Device regulation recommendations Device Removal Equipment Safety Fixatives - pharmacology Foreign-Body Reaction - diagnostic imaging Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology Formaldehyde - pharmacology Lung - diagnostic imaging Lung - pathology Microtomy Models, Animal Myocardium - pathology Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects Paraffin Embedding Pathology Perfusion Prosthesis Design Risk Assessment Tissue Fixation - methods X-Ray Microtomography |
title | Method for preclinical pathology evaluation and analysis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device implant sites |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T09%3A36%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Method%20for%20preclinical%20pathology%20evaluation%20and%20analysis%20of%20cardiovascular%20implantable%20electronic%20device%20implant%20sites&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20pathology&rft.au=Jessen,%20Staci%20L.&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=36&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=44-52&rft.issn=1054-8807&rft.eissn=1879-1336&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.carpath.2018.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2071562589%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2071562589&rft_id=info:pmid/30014985&rft_els_id=S1054880717302478&rfr_iscdi=true |