Tools for testing decision-making capacity in dementia

Abstract Background dementia is a common cause of altered decision-making capacity. Determining whether an individual has the ability to make a specific decision can be very challenging for both clinicians and researchers. The UK legislation requires that we both promote residual capacity where poss...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Age and ageing 2018-11, Vol.47 (6), p.778-784
Hauptverfasser: Pennington, Catherine, Davey, Katie, ter Meulen, Ruud, Coulthard, Elizabeth, Kehoe, Patrick Gavin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 784
container_issue 6
container_start_page 778
container_title Age and ageing
container_volume 47
creator Pennington, Catherine
Davey, Katie
ter Meulen, Ruud
Coulthard, Elizabeth
Kehoe, Patrick Gavin
description Abstract Background dementia is a common cause of altered decision-making capacity. Determining whether an individual has the ability to make a specific decision can be very challenging for both clinicians and researchers. The UK legislation requires that we both promote residual capacity where possible, and protect vulnerable adults who cannot make independent decisions. We evaluated published instruments designed to aid in the assessment of capacity, focussing on those meeting the UK legal requirements. We also consider further disease and culture-specific factors which may influence decision making. Methods a search of electronic databases was made for articles published between 2000 and 2017 detailing structured tools for the assessment of mental capacity. These were evaluated against the UK legal requirements. Results nine tools were identified which fulfilled the UK legal requirements. Their design and structure varied, as did the level of reliability and validity data available. Some instruments can be tailored for a specific decisional scenario, whilst others are designed for use by particular patient groups. Discussion a wide range of mental capacity assessment instruments is available, but not all fulfil the UK legal requirements. Healthcare professionals and researchers should be mindful of personal, cultural and disease-specific factors when assessing capacity. No gold standard for capacity assessment exists, which hampers the evaluation of different approaches. A combination of the opinion of a healthcare professional or researcher trained in capacity evaluation, plus the use of a structured assessment tool is the most robust approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ageing/afy096
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2070800550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ageing/afy096</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2070800550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-bbd412b5f9ef4629b2d1e72a17154702472b273cc83126a3f4118dcba713ee983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsqJILCyh54_Y8YgqvqRKLGW2HMepXJI4xMnQf4-rFJBYmO5O9-jVqwehawz3GCRd6q117Xapqz1IfoLmmPE8JTllp2gOACQFQeQMXYSwiyfOMDlHMxo34JLPEd94X4ek8n0y2DDEqKS0xgXn27TRH4fb6E4bN-wT18ZfY9vB6Ut0Vuk62KvjXKD3p8fN6iVdvz2_rh7WqaGSDmlRlAyTIqukrRgnsiAltoJoLHDGBBAmSEEENSanmHBNK4ZxXppCC0ytlTldoLspt-v95xgLqsYFY-tat9aPQREQkANkGUT09g-682PfxnaKUOCEZXn0tUDpRJneh9DbSnW9a3S_VxjUQaiahKpJaORvjqlj0djyh_42-NvQj90_WV_uGX6r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2306245809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tools for testing decision-making capacity in dementia</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pennington, Catherine ; Davey, Katie ; ter Meulen, Ruud ; Coulthard, Elizabeth ; Kehoe, Patrick Gavin</creator><creatorcontrib>Pennington, Catherine ; Davey, Katie ; ter Meulen, Ruud ; Coulthard, Elizabeth ; Kehoe, Patrick Gavin</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background dementia is a common cause of altered decision-making capacity. Determining whether an individual has the ability to make a specific decision can be very challenging for both clinicians and researchers. The UK legislation requires that we both promote residual capacity where possible, and protect vulnerable adults who cannot make independent decisions. We evaluated published instruments designed to aid in the assessment of capacity, focussing on those meeting the UK legal requirements. We also consider further disease and culture-specific factors which may influence decision making. Methods a search of electronic databases was made for articles published between 2000 and 2017 detailing structured tools for the assessment of mental capacity. These were evaluated against the UK legal requirements. Results nine tools were identified which fulfilled the UK legal requirements. Their design and structure varied, as did the level of reliability and validity data available. Some instruments can be tailored for a specific decisional scenario, whilst others are designed for use by particular patient groups. Discussion a wide range of mental capacity assessment instruments is available, but not all fulfil the UK legal requirements. Healthcare professionals and researchers should be mindful of personal, cultural and disease-specific factors when assessing capacity. No gold standard for capacity assessment exists, which hampers the evaluation of different approaches. A combination of the opinion of a healthcare professional or researcher trained in capacity evaluation, plus the use of a structured assessment tool is the most robust approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy096</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30010696</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Clinical assessment ; Cognitive ability ; Decision making ; Dementia ; Dementia disorders ; Health care ; Informed consent ; Legislation ; Medical personnel ; Mental competency ; Reliability ; Researchers ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2018-11, Vol.47 (6), p.778-784</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-bbd412b5f9ef4629b2d1e72a17154702472b273cc83126a3f4118dcba713ee983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-bbd412b5f9ef4629b2d1e72a17154702472b273cc83126a3f4118dcba713ee983</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0017-9595 ; 0000-0003-0675-9619</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30010696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pennington, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ter Meulen, Ruud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulthard, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehoe, Patrick Gavin</creatorcontrib><title>Tools for testing decision-making capacity in dementia</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>Abstract Background dementia is a common cause of altered decision-making capacity. Determining whether an individual has the ability to make a specific decision can be very challenging for both clinicians and researchers. The UK legislation requires that we both promote residual capacity where possible, and protect vulnerable adults who cannot make independent decisions. We evaluated published instruments designed to aid in the assessment of capacity, focussing on those meeting the UK legal requirements. We also consider further disease and culture-specific factors which may influence decision making. Methods a search of electronic databases was made for articles published between 2000 and 2017 detailing structured tools for the assessment of mental capacity. These were evaluated against the UK legal requirements. Results nine tools were identified which fulfilled the UK legal requirements. Their design and structure varied, as did the level of reliability and validity data available. Some instruments can be tailored for a specific decisional scenario, whilst others are designed for use by particular patient groups. Discussion a wide range of mental capacity assessment instruments is available, but not all fulfil the UK legal requirements. Healthcare professionals and researchers should be mindful of personal, cultural and disease-specific factors when assessing capacity. No gold standard for capacity assessment exists, which hampers the evaluation of different approaches. A combination of the opinion of a healthcare professional or researcher trained in capacity evaluation, plus the use of a structured assessment tool is the most robust approach.</description><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Mental competency</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsqJILCyh54_Y8YgqvqRKLGW2HMepXJI4xMnQf4-rFJBYmO5O9-jVqwehawz3GCRd6q117Xapqz1IfoLmmPE8JTllp2gOACQFQeQMXYSwiyfOMDlHMxo34JLPEd94X4ek8n0y2DDEqKS0xgXn27TRH4fb6E4bN-wT18ZfY9vB6Ut0Vuk62KvjXKD3p8fN6iVdvz2_rh7WqaGSDmlRlAyTIqukrRgnsiAltoJoLHDGBBAmSEEENSanmHBNK4ZxXppCC0ytlTldoLspt-v95xgLqsYFY-tat9aPQREQkANkGUT09g-682PfxnaKUOCEZXn0tUDpRJneh9DbSnW9a3S_VxjUQaiahKpJaORvjqlj0djyh_42-NvQj90_WV_uGX6r</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Pennington, Catherine</creator><creator>Davey, Katie</creator><creator>ter Meulen, Ruud</creator><creator>Coulthard, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Kehoe, Patrick Gavin</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0017-9595</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0675-9619</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Tools for testing decision-making capacity in dementia</title><author>Pennington, Catherine ; Davey, Katie ; ter Meulen, Ruud ; Coulthard, Elizabeth ; Kehoe, Patrick Gavin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-bbd412b5f9ef4629b2d1e72a17154702472b273cc83126a3f4118dcba713ee983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Mental competency</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pennington, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ter Meulen, Ruud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulthard, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehoe, Patrick Gavin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pennington, Catherine</au><au>Davey, Katie</au><au>ter Meulen, Ruud</au><au>Coulthard, Elizabeth</au><au>Kehoe, Patrick Gavin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tools for testing decision-making capacity in dementia</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>778</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>778-784</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background dementia is a common cause of altered decision-making capacity. Determining whether an individual has the ability to make a specific decision can be very challenging for both clinicians and researchers. The UK legislation requires that we both promote residual capacity where possible, and protect vulnerable adults who cannot make independent decisions. We evaluated published instruments designed to aid in the assessment of capacity, focussing on those meeting the UK legal requirements. We also consider further disease and culture-specific factors which may influence decision making. Methods a search of electronic databases was made for articles published between 2000 and 2017 detailing structured tools for the assessment of mental capacity. These were evaluated against the UK legal requirements. Results nine tools were identified which fulfilled the UK legal requirements. Their design and structure varied, as did the level of reliability and validity data available. Some instruments can be tailored for a specific decisional scenario, whilst others are designed for use by particular patient groups. Discussion a wide range of mental capacity assessment instruments is available, but not all fulfil the UK legal requirements. Healthcare professionals and researchers should be mindful of personal, cultural and disease-specific factors when assessing capacity. No gold standard for capacity assessment exists, which hampers the evaluation of different approaches. A combination of the opinion of a healthcare professional or researcher trained in capacity evaluation, plus the use of a structured assessment tool is the most robust approach.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30010696</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afy096</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0017-9595</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0675-9619</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-0729
ispartof Age and ageing, 2018-11, Vol.47 (6), p.778-784
issn 0002-0729
1468-2834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2070800550
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical assessment
Cognitive ability
Decision making
Dementia
Dementia disorders
Health care
Informed consent
Legislation
Medical personnel
Mental competency
Reliability
Researchers
Systematic review
title Tools for testing decision-making capacity in dementia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A05%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tools%20for%20testing%20decision-making%20capacity%20in%20dementia&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Pennington,%20Catherine&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=778&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=778-784&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afy096&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2070800550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2306245809&rft_id=info:pmid/30010696&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ageing/afy096&rfr_iscdi=true