Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (uphold): 1-year outcomes on lower urinary tract symptoms, anatomy and ultrasonography

Introduction and hypothesis Our primary objective is to determine the presence of SUI at 6–12 months after surgery. The secondary objective is to determine the objective and subjective outcomes of POP. Methods A retrospective study conducted between February 2015 and July 2016 at Chang Gung Memorial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Urogynecology Journal 2019-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1163-1172
Hauptverfasser: Lo, Tsia-Shu, Pue, Leng Boi, Tan, Yiap Loong, Hsieh, Wu-Chiao, Kao, Chuan Chi, Uy-Patrimonio, Ma. Clarissa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1172
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1163
container_title International Urogynecology Journal
container_volume 30
creator Lo, Tsia-Shu
Pue, Leng Boi
Tan, Yiap Loong
Hsieh, Wu-Chiao
Kao, Chuan Chi
Uy-Patrimonio, Ma. Clarissa
description Introduction and hypothesis Our primary objective is to determine the presence of SUI at 6–12 months after surgery. The secondary objective is to determine the objective and subjective outcomes of POP. Methods A retrospective study conducted between February 2015 and July 2016 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The subjects had had symptomatic anterior or apical prolapse with stage III or IV and undergone pelvic reconstructive surgery using Uphold™ LITE. Patients completed a 3-day voiding diary, urodynamic study, real-time ultrasonography and validated quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcome was the absence of USI. Secondary outcomes included the objective cure rate of POP , ≤ stage 1 at the anterior/apical vaginal wall, and the subjective cure rate , negative feedback to POPDI-6. Results Ninety-five women were eligible. Six were excluded because of incomplete data. The postoperative de novo USI and SUI were 22.7 and 19.7%, respectively. There was significant improvement of USI in patients who had MUS insertion (93.8%) and bladder outlet obstruction (96.7%). The objective and subjective cure rate for prolapse was 95.5 and 94.3%, respectively. POP-Q measurements pre- and postoperatively were significantly improved at all points except for Gh and Pb. There was a significant difference in the distance between the bladder neck to the distal end of the mesh during straining both at both the postoperative 3rd month and 1 year. Conclusions Uphold™ mesh has a 20% incidence of de novo USI with acceptable objective and subjective cure rates at 1 year postoperatively. The de novo USI rate was high but not bothersome enough to require surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00192-018-3691-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2070798317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2070798317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4050dc558c464b3f00457369f59d64fb03d4baf9c8ea2bae64bd2884563cfad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFrFTEQxoMo9ln9A7xIwEsFUyeb3WzWWylqhUIvvYdsNvteym6yJhtkz_7jzuNVBaGnGZjffJkvHyFvOVxygPZTBuBdxYArJmTHmXxGdrwWggmoxHOyg060TNSyOiOvcn4AgBoaeEnOBLYKWrUjv67C6pKPiZnFWzPR7MN-cswH67OPgc4uH2guae_SRi_KcojT8OEz5WxzJtFYVhsRoUhO8adLtCQfDKJrMnaleZuXNc75IzXBYLNhHWiZcJpjiPtklsP2mrwYzZTdm8d6Tu6_frm_vmG3d9--X1_dMivaamXH2wfbNMrWsu7FiG6aFn2PTTfIeuxBDHVvxs4qZ6reOISGSqm6kcKOZhDn5OIku6T4o7i86tln66bJBBdL1hW00HZK8BbR9_-hD7GkgMchJTupeCc4UvxE2RRzTm7US_Izmtcc9DEgfQpIY0D6GJCWuPPuUbn0sxv-bvxJBIHqBGQcBfz1f08_rfobj9qdLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2069681931</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (uphold): 1-year outcomes on lower urinary tract symptoms, anatomy and ultrasonography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lo, Tsia-Shu ; Pue, Leng Boi ; Tan, Yiap Loong ; Hsieh, Wu-Chiao ; Kao, Chuan Chi ; Uy-Patrimonio, Ma. Clarissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Lo, Tsia-Shu ; Pue, Leng Boi ; Tan, Yiap Loong ; Hsieh, Wu-Chiao ; Kao, Chuan Chi ; Uy-Patrimonio, Ma. Clarissa</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and hypothesis Our primary objective is to determine the presence of SUI at 6–12 months after surgery. The secondary objective is to determine the objective and subjective outcomes of POP. Methods A retrospective study conducted between February 2015 and July 2016 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The subjects had had symptomatic anterior or apical prolapse with stage III or IV and undergone pelvic reconstructive surgery using Uphold™ LITE. Patients completed a 3-day voiding diary, urodynamic study, real-time ultrasonography and validated quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcome was the absence of USI. Secondary outcomes included the objective cure rate of POP , ≤ stage 1 at the anterior/apical vaginal wall, and the subjective cure rate , negative feedback to POPDI-6. Results Ninety-five women were eligible. Six were excluded because of incomplete data. The postoperative de novo USI and SUI were 22.7 and 19.7%, respectively. There was significant improvement of USI in patients who had MUS insertion (93.8%) and bladder outlet obstruction (96.7%). The objective and subjective cure rate for prolapse was 95.5 and 94.3%, respectively. POP-Q measurements pre- and postoperatively were significantly improved at all points except for Gh and Pb. There was a significant difference in the distance between the bladder neck to the distal end of the mesh during straining both at both the postoperative 3rd month and 1 year. Conclusions Uphold™ mesh has a 20% incidence of de novo USI with acceptable objective and subjective cure rates at 1 year postoperatively. The de novo USI rate was high but not bothersome enough to require surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-3462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3691-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30008078</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bladder ; Dissection ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hysterectomy, Vaginal - methods ; Ligaments ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Morphology ; Obstetrics ; Original Article ; Pelvic organ prolapse ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery ; Plastic surgery ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical mesh ; Surgical Mesh - adverse effects ; Surgical outcomes ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Urinary Bladder - diagnostic imaging ; Urinary Bladder - pathology ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology ; Urine ; Urogenital system ; Urology</subject><ispartof>International Urogynecology Journal, 2019-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1163-1172</ispartof><rights>The International Urogynecological Association 2018</rights><rights>International Urogynecology Journal is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4050dc558c464b3f00457369f59d64fb03d4baf9c8ea2bae64bd2884563cfad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4050dc558c464b3f00457369f59d64fb03d4baf9c8ea2bae64bd2884563cfad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00192-018-3691-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00192-018-3691-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008078$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lo, Tsia-Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pue, Leng Boi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yiap Loong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Wu-Chiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Chuan Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uy-Patrimonio, Ma. Clarissa</creatorcontrib><title>Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (uphold): 1-year outcomes on lower urinary tract symptoms, anatomy and ultrasonography</title><title>International Urogynecology Journal</title><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><description>Introduction and hypothesis Our primary objective is to determine the presence of SUI at 6–12 months after surgery. The secondary objective is to determine the objective and subjective outcomes of POP. Methods A retrospective study conducted between February 2015 and July 2016 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The subjects had had symptomatic anterior or apical prolapse with stage III or IV and undergone pelvic reconstructive surgery using Uphold™ LITE. Patients completed a 3-day voiding diary, urodynamic study, real-time ultrasonography and validated quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcome was the absence of USI. Secondary outcomes included the objective cure rate of POP , ≤ stage 1 at the anterior/apical vaginal wall, and the subjective cure rate , negative feedback to POPDI-6. Results Ninety-five women were eligible. Six were excluded because of incomplete data. The postoperative de novo USI and SUI were 22.7 and 19.7%, respectively. There was significant improvement of USI in patients who had MUS insertion (93.8%) and bladder outlet obstruction (96.7%). The objective and subjective cure rate for prolapse was 95.5 and 94.3%, respectively. POP-Q measurements pre- and postoperatively were significantly improved at all points except for Gh and Pb. There was a significant difference in the distance between the bladder neck to the distal end of the mesh during straining both at both the postoperative 3rd month and 1 year. Conclusions Uphold™ mesh has a 20% incidence of de novo USI with acceptable objective and subjective cure rates at 1 year postoperatively. The de novo USI rate was high but not bothersome enough to require surgery.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy, Vaginal - methods</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pelvic organ prolapse</subject><subject>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Plastic surgery</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical mesh</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0937-3462</issn><issn>1433-3023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFrFTEQxoMo9ln9A7xIwEsFUyeb3WzWWylqhUIvvYdsNvteym6yJhtkz_7jzuNVBaGnGZjffJkvHyFvOVxygPZTBuBdxYArJmTHmXxGdrwWggmoxHOyg060TNSyOiOvcn4AgBoaeEnOBLYKWrUjv67C6pKPiZnFWzPR7MN-cswH67OPgc4uH2guae_SRi_KcojT8OEz5WxzJtFYVhsRoUhO8adLtCQfDKJrMnaleZuXNc75IzXBYLNhHWiZcJpjiPtklsP2mrwYzZTdm8d6Tu6_frm_vmG3d9--X1_dMivaamXH2wfbNMrWsu7FiG6aFn2PTTfIeuxBDHVvxs4qZ6reOISGSqm6kcKOZhDn5OIku6T4o7i86tln66bJBBdL1hW00HZK8BbR9_-hD7GkgMchJTupeCc4UvxE2RRzTm7US_Izmtcc9DEgfQpIY0D6GJCWuPPuUbn0sxv-bvxJBIHqBGQcBfz1f08_rfobj9qdLg</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Lo, Tsia-Shu</creator><creator>Pue, Leng Boi</creator><creator>Tan, Yiap Loong</creator><creator>Hsieh, Wu-Chiao</creator><creator>Kao, Chuan Chi</creator><creator>Uy-Patrimonio, Ma. Clarissa</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (uphold): 1-year outcomes on lower urinary tract symptoms, anatomy and ultrasonography</title><author>Lo, Tsia-Shu ; Pue, Leng Boi ; Tan, Yiap Loong ; Hsieh, Wu-Chiao ; Kao, Chuan Chi ; Uy-Patrimonio, Ma. Clarissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4050dc558c464b3f00457369f59d64fb03d4baf9c8ea2bae64bd2884563cfad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy, Vaginal - methods</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pelvic organ prolapse</topic><topic>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Plastic surgery</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical mesh</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lo, Tsia-Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pue, Leng Boi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yiap Loong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Wu-Chiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Chuan Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uy-Patrimonio, Ma. Clarissa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lo, Tsia-Shu</au><au>Pue, Leng Boi</au><au>Tan, Yiap Loong</au><au>Hsieh, Wu-Chiao</au><au>Kao, Chuan Chi</au><au>Uy-Patrimonio, Ma. Clarissa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (uphold): 1-year outcomes on lower urinary tract symptoms, anatomy and ultrasonography</atitle><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle><stitle>Int Urogynecol J</stitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1163</spage><epage>1172</epage><pages>1163-1172</pages><issn>0937-3462</issn><eissn>1433-3023</eissn><abstract>Introduction and hypothesis Our primary objective is to determine the presence of SUI at 6–12 months after surgery. The secondary objective is to determine the objective and subjective outcomes of POP. Methods A retrospective study conducted between February 2015 and July 2016 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The subjects had had symptomatic anterior or apical prolapse with stage III or IV and undergone pelvic reconstructive surgery using Uphold™ LITE. Patients completed a 3-day voiding diary, urodynamic study, real-time ultrasonography and validated quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcome was the absence of USI. Secondary outcomes included the objective cure rate of POP , ≤ stage 1 at the anterior/apical vaginal wall, and the subjective cure rate , negative feedback to POPDI-6. Results Ninety-five women were eligible. Six were excluded because of incomplete data. The postoperative de novo USI and SUI were 22.7 and 19.7%, respectively. There was significant improvement of USI in patients who had MUS insertion (93.8%) and bladder outlet obstruction (96.7%). The objective and subjective cure rate for prolapse was 95.5 and 94.3%, respectively. POP-Q measurements pre- and postoperatively were significantly improved at all points except for Gh and Pb. There was a significant difference in the distance between the bladder neck to the distal end of the mesh during straining both at both the postoperative 3rd month and 1 year. Conclusions Uphold™ mesh has a 20% incidence of de novo USI with acceptable objective and subjective cure rates at 1 year postoperatively. The de novo USI rate was high but not bothersome enough to require surgery.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>30008078</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00192-018-3691-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-3462
ispartof International Urogynecology Journal, 2019-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1163-1172
issn 0937-3462
1433-3023
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2070798317
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Bladder
Dissection
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecology
Hospitals
Humans
Hysterectomy, Vaginal - methods
Ligaments
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Morphology
Obstetrics
Original Article
Pelvic organ prolapse
Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery
Plastic surgery
Quality of Life
Retrospective Studies
Surgical mesh
Surgical Mesh - adverse effects
Surgical outcomes
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonic imaging
Urinary Bladder - diagnostic imaging
Urinary Bladder - pathology
Urinary incontinence
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology
Urine
Urogenital system
Urology
title Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (uphold): 1-year outcomes on lower urinary tract symptoms, anatomy and ultrasonography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A23%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anterior-apical%20single-incision%20mesh%20surgery%20(uphold):%201-year%20outcomes%20on%20lower%20urinary%20tract%20symptoms,%20anatomy%20and%20ultrasonography&rft.jtitle=International%20Urogynecology%20Journal&rft.au=Lo,%20Tsia-Shu&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1163&rft.epage=1172&rft.pages=1163-1172&rft.issn=0937-3462&rft.eissn=1433-3023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00192-018-3691-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2070798317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2069681931&rft_id=info:pmid/30008078&rfr_iscdi=true