H sub(2)S, voc, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems

Odour measurement via olfactometry is expensive and has a low accuracy compared with chemical or physical methods. In addition, olfactometry is not suited for online monitoring. Hence, an accurate online method for emission measurement would be an enormous improvement. There are several options to m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water science and technology 2009-01, Vol.59 (9), p.1721-1726
Hauptverfasser: Franke, W, Frechen, F-B, Giebel, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1726
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1721
container_title Water science and technology
container_volume 59
creator Franke, W
Frechen, F-B
Giebel, S
description Odour measurement via olfactometry is expensive and has a low accuracy compared with chemical or physical methods. In addition, olfactometry is not suited for online monitoring. Hence, an accurate online method for emission measurement would be an enormous improvement. There are several options to more or less replace the offline olfactometry by online measurement available today. Most common are H sub(2)S-concentration as a single gas parameter and VOC and TOC as composite parameters. A fairly new development are multi sensor arrays, usually referred to as "electronic noses" which carry out non-specific gas measurement and deliver measurement data that can visualized as a fingerprint diagram. This paper outlines the use of these different parameters and compares the results to those gained via olfactometry of several case studies.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/wst.2009.127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20690054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20690054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_206900543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM1OwzAQhH0AifJz4wH2hEBqw8Ypicq1AvXGgd4r42wko9hbdm0Qz8LLEioeoKfRzHwzxlzXWNm6be-_NFcWcVXVtjsxM7Rds6itbc7Mueo7InbNEmfmZwNa3m7t3escPtnPYfuyngON5LNwCh4SKym41AP3XAQ8J08pi8uB0yMUpUPpOe6dBOUEPEAfhoFkwmAKXaRMojCwAMWgOg0hktMiFP-YybogkIVcPgT6rZmiXprTwY1KV_96YW6en7brzWIv_FFI82568zSOLhEX3VlsV4gPy-Zo8BcEnGGr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20690054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>H sub(2)S, voc, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Franke, W ; Frechen, F-B ; Giebel, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Franke, W ; Frechen, F-B ; Giebel, S</creatorcontrib><description>Odour measurement via olfactometry is expensive and has a low accuracy compared with chemical or physical methods. In addition, olfactometry is not suited for online monitoring. Hence, an accurate online method for emission measurement would be an enormous improvement. There are several options to more or less replace the offline olfactometry by online measurement available today. Most common are H sub(2)S-concentration as a single gas parameter and VOC and TOC as composite parameters. A fairly new development are multi sensor arrays, usually referred to as "electronic noses" which carry out non-specific gas measurement and deliver measurement data that can visualized as a fingerprint diagram. This paper outlines the use of these different parameters and compares the results to those gained via olfactometry of several case studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.127</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2009-01, Vol.59 (9), p.1721-1726</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Franke, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frechen, F-B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giebel, S</creatorcontrib><title>H sub(2)S, voc, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems</title><title>Water science and technology</title><description>Odour measurement via olfactometry is expensive and has a low accuracy compared with chemical or physical methods. In addition, olfactometry is not suited for online monitoring. Hence, an accurate online method for emission measurement would be an enormous improvement. There are several options to more or less replace the offline olfactometry by online measurement available today. Most common are H sub(2)S-concentration as a single gas parameter and VOC and TOC as composite parameters. A fairly new development are multi sensor arrays, usually referred to as "electronic noses" which carry out non-specific gas measurement and deliver measurement data that can visualized as a fingerprint diagram. This paper outlines the use of these different parameters and compares the results to those gained via olfactometry of several case studies.</description><issn>0273-1223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjM1OwzAQhH0AifJz4wH2hEBqw8Ypicq1AvXGgd4r42wko9hbdm0Qz8LLEioeoKfRzHwzxlzXWNm6be-_NFcWcVXVtjsxM7Rds6itbc7Mueo7InbNEmfmZwNa3m7t3escPtnPYfuyngON5LNwCh4SKym41AP3XAQ8J08pi8uB0yMUpUPpOe6dBOUEPEAfhoFkwmAKXaRMojCwAMWgOg0hktMiFP-YybogkIVcPgT6rZmiXprTwY1KV_96YW6en7brzWIv_FFI82568zSOLhEX3VlsV4gPy-Zo8BcEnGGr</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Franke, W</creator><creator>Frechen, F-B</creator><creator>Giebel, S</creator><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>H sub(2)S, voc, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems</title><author>Franke, W ; Frechen, F-B ; Giebel, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_206900543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Franke, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frechen, F-B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giebel, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Franke, W</au><au>Frechen, F-B</au><au>Giebel, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>H sub(2)S, voc, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1721</spage><epage>1726</epage><pages>1721-1726</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><abstract>Odour measurement via olfactometry is expensive and has a low accuracy compared with chemical or physical methods. In addition, olfactometry is not suited for online monitoring. Hence, an accurate online method for emission measurement would be an enormous improvement. There are several options to more or less replace the offline olfactometry by online measurement available today. Most common are H sub(2)S-concentration as a single gas parameter and VOC and TOC as composite parameters. A fairly new development are multi sensor arrays, usually referred to as "electronic noses" which carry out non-specific gas measurement and deliver measurement data that can visualized as a fingerprint diagram. This paper outlines the use of these different parameters and compares the results to those gained via olfactometry of several case studies.</abstract><doi>10.2166/wst.2009.127</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1223
ispartof Water science and technology, 2009-01, Vol.59 (9), p.1721-1726
issn 0273-1223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20690054
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title H sub(2)S, voc, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A54%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=H%20sub(2)S,%20voc,%20TOC,%20electronic%20noses%20and%20odour%20concentration:%20use%20and%20comparison%20of%20different%20parameters%20for%20emission%20measurement%20on%20air%20treatment%20systems&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Franke,%20W&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1721&rft.epage=1726&rft.pages=1721-1726&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2009.127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E20690054%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20690054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true