Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California
The response of vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire to three scenarios of future climate change was simulated for California using the MC1 Dynamic General Vegetation Model. Under all three scenarios, Alpine/Subalpine Forest cover declined, and increases in the productivity of evergreen hardwoo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Climatic change 2008-03, Vol.87 (1), p.215-230 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 230 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 215 |
container_title | Climatic change |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Lenihan, James M Bachelet, Dominique Neilson, Ronald P Drapek, Raymond |
description | The response of vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire to three scenarios of future climate change was simulated for California using the MC1 Dynamic General Vegetation Model. Under all three scenarios, Alpine/Subalpine Forest cover declined, and increases in the productivity of evergreen hardwoods led to the displacement of Evergreen Conifer Forest by Mixed Evergreen Forest. Grassland expanded, largely at the expense of Woodland and Shrubland, even under the cooler and less dry climate scenario where increased woody plant production was offset by increased wildfire. Increases in net primary productivity under the cooler and less dry scenario contributed to a simulated carbon sink of about 321 teragrams for California by the end of the century. Declines in net primary productivity under the two warmer and drier scenarios contributed to a net loss of carbon ranging from about 76 to 129 teragrams. Total annual area burned in California increased under all three scenarios, ranging from 9-15% above the historical norm by the end of the century. Annual biomass consumption by fire by the end of the century was about 18% greater than the historical norm under the more productive cooler and less dry scenario. Under the warmer and drier scenarios, simulated biomass consumption was initially greater, but then at, or below, the historical norm by the end of the century. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10584-007-9362-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20683521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1442935721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-15649013cebe445374986341889e3e975db19349ba08dfd2f852f9ad004e35543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2LFDEUDKLguPoDPBk8eNrWl89OjjKou7AgqHsOme6XMUtPZ0zSC_PvTdMexIOnVyFVRb1XhLxm8J4B9B8KA2Vk12BnheYdPCE7pnrRMWngKdkB06r9gn1OXpTysKKe6x05f8NyTnNBmgJ9xCNWX2Oa6RhLzfGwrI9rikMql1LxRM85jctQ42Osl2vq55GGmJHWRIcpnnxFOvz08xFpGXD2OaZCQ8p076fY5hz9S_Is-Kngqz_zitx__vRjf9Pdff1yu_941w1S6NoxpaUFJgY8oJRK9NIaLSQzxqJA26vxwKyQ9uDBjGHkwSgerB8BJAqlpLgi7zbflvjXgqW6U2yZpsnPmJbiOGgjFGeN-PYf4kNa8tyyOWaN0hrY6sY20pBTKRmDO-e2br44Bm4twG0FuBWuBThoGr5pSuO2k-S_jP8jerOJgk_OH3Ms7v47b4cAMJpJLsRvgseSFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198566014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Lenihan, James M ; Bachelet, Dominique ; Neilson, Ronald P ; Drapek, Raymond</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenihan, James M ; Bachelet, Dominique ; Neilson, Ronald P ; Drapek, Raymond</creatorcontrib><description>The response of vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire to three scenarios of future climate change was simulated for California using the MC1 Dynamic General Vegetation Model. Under all three scenarios, Alpine/Subalpine Forest cover declined, and increases in the productivity of evergreen hardwoods led to the displacement of Evergreen Conifer Forest by Mixed Evergreen Forest. Grassland expanded, largely at the expense of Woodland and Shrubland, even under the cooler and less dry climate scenario where increased woody plant production was offset by increased wildfire. Increases in net primary productivity under the cooler and less dry scenario contributed to a simulated carbon sink of about 321 teragrams for California by the end of the century. Declines in net primary productivity under the two warmer and drier scenarios contributed to a net loss of carbon ranging from about 76 to 129 teragrams. Total annual area burned in California increased under all three scenarios, ranging from 9-15% above the historical norm by the end of the century. Annual biomass consumption by fire by the end of the century was about 18% greater than the historical norm under the more productive cooler and less dry scenario. Under the warmer and drier scenarios, simulated biomass consumption was initially greater, but then at, or below, the historical norm by the end of the century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10584-007-9362-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLCHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Biogeochemistry ; Biogeography ; Biomass ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sinks ; Climate change ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Coniferous forests ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecosystem studies ; Ecosystems ; Experiments ; General circulation models ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Hardwoods ; Impact analysis ; Laboratories ; Plant growth ; Plant populations ; Plant production ; Precipitation ; Productivity ; Simulation ; Vegetation ; Wildfires ; Woodlands ; Woody plants</subject><ispartof>Climatic change, 2008-03, Vol.87 (1), p.215-230</ispartof><rights>U.S.D.A. Forest Service 2007</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-15649013cebe445374986341889e3e975db19349ba08dfd2f852f9ad004e35543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-15649013cebe445374986341889e3e975db19349ba08dfd2f852f9ad004e35543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10584-007-9362-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-007-9362-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenihan, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachelet, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neilson, Ronald P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drapek, Raymond</creatorcontrib><title>Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California</title><title>Climatic change</title><addtitle>Climatic Change</addtitle><description>The response of vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire to three scenarios of future climate change was simulated for California using the MC1 Dynamic General Vegetation Model. Under all three scenarios, Alpine/Subalpine Forest cover declined, and increases in the productivity of evergreen hardwoods led to the displacement of Evergreen Conifer Forest by Mixed Evergreen Forest. Grassland expanded, largely at the expense of Woodland and Shrubland, even under the cooler and less dry climate scenario where increased woody plant production was offset by increased wildfire. Increases in net primary productivity under the cooler and less dry scenario contributed to a simulated carbon sink of about 321 teragrams for California by the end of the century. Declines in net primary productivity under the two warmer and drier scenarios contributed to a net loss of carbon ranging from about 76 to 129 teragrams. Total annual area burned in California increased under all three scenarios, ranging from 9-15% above the historical norm by the end of the century. Annual biomass consumption by fire by the end of the century was about 18% greater than the historical norm under the more productive cooler and less dry scenario. Under the warmer and drier scenarios, simulated biomass consumption was initially greater, but then at, or below, the historical norm by the end of the century.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem studies</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>General circulation models</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Plant production</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><subject>Woody plants</subject><issn>0165-0009</issn><issn>1573-1480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU2LFDEUDKLguPoDPBk8eNrWl89OjjKou7AgqHsOme6XMUtPZ0zSC_PvTdMexIOnVyFVRb1XhLxm8J4B9B8KA2Vk12BnheYdPCE7pnrRMWngKdkB06r9gn1OXpTysKKe6x05f8NyTnNBmgJ9xCNWX2Oa6RhLzfGwrI9rikMql1LxRM85jctQ42Osl2vq55GGmJHWRIcpnnxFOvz08xFpGXD2OaZCQ8p076fY5hz9S_Is-Kngqz_zitx__vRjf9Pdff1yu_941w1S6NoxpaUFJgY8oJRK9NIaLSQzxqJA26vxwKyQ9uDBjGHkwSgerB8BJAqlpLgi7zbflvjXgqW6U2yZpsnPmJbiOGgjFGeN-PYf4kNa8tyyOWaN0hrY6sY20pBTKRmDO-e2br44Bm4twG0FuBWuBThoGr5pSuO2k-S_jP8jerOJgk_OH3Ms7v47b4cAMJpJLsRvgseSFQ</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Lenihan, James M</creator><creator>Bachelet, Dominique</creator><creator>Neilson, Ronald P</creator><creator>Drapek, Raymond</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California</title><author>Lenihan, James M ; Bachelet, Dominique ; Neilson, Ronald P ; Drapek, Raymond</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-15649013cebe445374986341889e3e975db19349ba08dfd2f852f9ad004e35543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem studies</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>General circulation models</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Plant production</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><topic>Woody plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenihan, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachelet, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neilson, Ronald P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drapek, Raymond</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenihan, James M</au><au>Bachelet, Dominique</au><au>Neilson, Ronald P</au><au>Drapek, Raymond</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California</atitle><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle><stitle>Climatic Change</stitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>215-230</pages><issn>0165-0009</issn><eissn>1573-1480</eissn><coden>CLCHDX</coden><abstract>The response of vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire to three scenarios of future climate change was simulated for California using the MC1 Dynamic General Vegetation Model. Under all three scenarios, Alpine/Subalpine Forest cover declined, and increases in the productivity of evergreen hardwoods led to the displacement of Evergreen Conifer Forest by Mixed Evergreen Forest. Grassland expanded, largely at the expense of Woodland and Shrubland, even under the cooler and less dry climate scenario where increased woody plant production was offset by increased wildfire. Increases in net primary productivity under the cooler and less dry scenario contributed to a simulated carbon sink of about 321 teragrams for California by the end of the century. Declines in net primary productivity under the two warmer and drier scenarios contributed to a net loss of carbon ranging from about 76 to 129 teragrams. Total annual area burned in California increased under all three scenarios, ranging from 9-15% above the historical norm by the end of the century. Annual biomass consumption by fire by the end of the century was about 18% greater than the historical norm under the more productive cooler and less dry scenario. Under the warmer and drier scenarios, simulated biomass consumption was initially greater, but then at, or below, the historical norm by the end of the century.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10584-007-9362-0</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0009 |
ispartof | Climatic change, 2008-03, Vol.87 (1), p.215-230 |
issn | 0165-0009 1573-1480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20683521 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Atmospheric Sciences Biogeochemistry Biogeography Biomass Carbon dioxide Carbon sinks Climate change Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Coniferous forests Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Ecosystem studies Ecosystems Experiments General circulation models Grasses Grasslands Hardwoods Impact analysis Laboratories Plant growth Plant populations Plant production Precipitation Productivity Simulation Vegetation Wildfires Woodlands Woody plants |
title | Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A41%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20vegetation%20distribution,%20ecosystem%20productivity,%20and%20fire%20to%20climate%20change%20scenarios%20for%20California&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20change&rft.au=Lenihan,%20James%20M&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=215-230&rft.issn=0165-0009&rft.eissn=1573-1480&rft.coden=CLCHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10584-007-9362-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1442935721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198566014&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |