The Incidental Fertility Effects of School Condom Distribution Programs
While the fertility effects of improving teenagers' access to contraception are theoretically ambiguous, most empirical work has shown that access decreases teen fertility. In this paper, we consider the fertility effects of access to condoms—a method of contraception not considered in prior wo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of policy analysis and management 2018, Vol.37 (3), p.464-492 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 492 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 464 |
| container_title | Journal of policy analysis and management |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Buckles, Kasey S. Hungerman, Daniel M. |
| description | While the fertility effects of improving teenagers' access to contraception are theoretically ambiguous, most empirical work has shown that access decreases teen fertility. In this paper, we consider the fertility effects of access to condoms—a method of contraception not considered in prior work. We exploit variation across counties and across time in teenagers' exposure to condom distribution programs in schools. We find that access to condoms in schools increases teen fertility by about 12 percent. The results suggest that the effects of condom access varied significantly across different programs; the positive fertility estimates are driven by communities where condoms are provided without mandated counseling. Programs that mandated counseling have zero or negative fertility effects, but estimates on these counties are less robust across specifications. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pam.22060 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2068341881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1182141</ericid><jstor_id>45105290</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45105290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4650-e1c907cd0d4d638ba8bfa4e98d5c167dd8eafc011f6f5278b2f9fd1e9828eb183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1P3DAQhi0EKlvogR9QFIlLewjMOF_2EW0XCgKBVHq2HH8Ur5J4sROh_fc13WUPlTjN4X3mndFDyAnCOQLQi5XszymFGvbIDCsKeV0ztk9mQJs6Z03BD8nnGJcAUAHHT-SQcs4LStmMXD89m-xmUE6bYZRddmXC6Do3rrOFtUaNMfM2-6Weve-yuR-077MfLo7BtdPo_JA9Bv8nyD4ekwMru2i-bOcR-X21eJr_zO8erm_ml3e5KusKcoOKQ6M06FLXBWsla60sDWe6Ulg3WjMjrQJEW9uKNqyllluNCaDMtMiKI_Jt07sK_mUycRS9i8p0nRyMn6JIFlhRImOY0LP_0KWfwpC-E0kWTxynZaK-bygVfIzBWLEKrpdhLRDEm12R7Ip_dhN7um2c2t7oHfmuMwFfN4AJTu3ixS0io1i-vXSxyV9dZ9YfXxKPl_fvJ7eNyzj6sNsoK4SKcij-AtPgldA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2209683924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Incidental Fertility Effects of School Condom Distribution Programs</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Buckles, Kasey S. ; Hungerman, Daniel M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buckles, Kasey S. ; Hungerman, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><description>While the fertility effects of improving teenagers' access to contraception are theoretically ambiguous, most empirical work has shown that access decreases teen fertility. In this paper, we consider the fertility effects of access to condoms—a method of contraception not considered in prior work. We exploit variation across counties and across time in teenagers' exposure to condom distribution programs in schools. We find that access to condoms in schools increases teen fertility by about 12 percent. The results suggest that the effects of condom access varied significantly across different programs; the positive fertility estimates are driven by communities where condoms are provided without mandated counseling. Programs that mandated counseling have zero or negative fertility effects, but estimates on these counties are less robust across specifications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-8739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pam.22060</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29993228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Access ; Adolescents ; Ambiguity ; Birth control ; Condoms ; Contraception ; Counseling ; Counties ; Educational Environment ; Fertility ; Health technology assessment ; Pregnancy ; Program Effectiveness ; Schools ; Sex Education ; Sexuality</subject><ispartof>Journal of policy analysis and management, 2018, Vol.37 (3), p.464-492</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><rights>2018 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4650-e1c907cd0d4d638ba8bfa4e98d5c167dd8eafc011f6f5278b2f9fd1e9828eb183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4650-e1c907cd0d4d638ba8bfa4e98d5c167dd8eafc011f6f5278b2f9fd1e9828eb183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45105290$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45105290$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1182141$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29993228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buckles, Kasey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hungerman, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Incidental Fertility Effects of School Condom Distribution Programs</title><title>Journal of policy analysis and management</title><addtitle>J Policy Anal Manage</addtitle><description>While the fertility effects of improving teenagers' access to contraception are theoretically ambiguous, most empirical work has shown that access decreases teen fertility. In this paper, we consider the fertility effects of access to condoms—a method of contraception not considered in prior work. We exploit variation across counties and across time in teenagers' exposure to condom distribution programs in schools. We find that access to condoms in schools increases teen fertility by about 12 percent. The results suggest that the effects of condom access varied significantly across different programs; the positive fertility estimates are driven by communities where condoms are provided without mandated counseling. Programs that mandated counseling have zero or negative fertility effects, but estimates on these counties are less robust across specifications.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Condoms</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Counties</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Sex Education</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><issn>0276-8739</issn><issn>1520-6688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1P3DAQhi0EKlvogR9QFIlLewjMOF_2EW0XCgKBVHq2HH8Ur5J4sROh_fc13WUPlTjN4X3mndFDyAnCOQLQi5XszymFGvbIDCsKeV0ztk9mQJs6Z03BD8nnGJcAUAHHT-SQcs4LStmMXD89m-xmUE6bYZRddmXC6Do3rrOFtUaNMfM2-6Weve-yuR-077MfLo7BtdPo_JA9Bv8nyD4ekwMru2i-bOcR-X21eJr_zO8erm_ml3e5KusKcoOKQ6M06FLXBWsla60sDWe6Ulg3WjMjrQJEW9uKNqyllluNCaDMtMiKI_Jt07sK_mUycRS9i8p0nRyMn6JIFlhRImOY0LP_0KWfwpC-E0kWTxynZaK-bygVfIzBWLEKrpdhLRDEm12R7Ip_dhN7um2c2t7oHfmuMwFfN4AJTu3ixS0io1i-vXSxyV9dZ9YfXxKPl_fvJ7eNyzj6sNsoK4SKcij-AtPgldA</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Buckles, Kasey S.</creator><creator>Hungerman, Daniel M.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>The Incidental Fertility Effects of School Condom Distribution Programs</title><author>Buckles, Kasey S. ; Hungerman, Daniel M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4650-e1c907cd0d4d638ba8bfa4e98d5c167dd8eafc011f6f5278b2f9fd1e9828eb183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Condoms</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Counties</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Sex Education</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buckles, Kasey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hungerman, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of policy analysis and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buckles, Kasey S.</au><au>Hungerman, Daniel M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1182141</ericid><atitle>The Incidental Fertility Effects of School Condom Distribution Programs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of policy analysis and management</jtitle><addtitle>J Policy Anal Manage</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>464</spage><epage>492</epage><pages>464-492</pages><issn>0276-8739</issn><eissn>1520-6688</eissn><abstract>While the fertility effects of improving teenagers' access to contraception are theoretically ambiguous, most empirical work has shown that access decreases teen fertility. In this paper, we consider the fertility effects of access to condoms—a method of contraception not considered in prior work. We exploit variation across counties and across time in teenagers' exposure to condom distribution programs in schools. We find that access to condoms in schools increases teen fertility by about 12 percent. The results suggest that the effects of condom access varied significantly across different programs; the positive fertility estimates are driven by communities where condoms are provided without mandated counseling. Programs that mandated counseling have zero or negative fertility effects, but estimates on these counties are less robust across specifications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><pmid>29993228</pmid><doi>10.1002/pam.22060</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0276-8739 |
| ispartof | Journal of policy analysis and management, 2018, Vol.37 (3), p.464-492 |
| issn | 0276-8739 1520-6688 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2068341881 |
| source | PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Access Adolescents Ambiguity Birth control Condoms Contraception Counseling Counties Educational Environment Fertility Health technology assessment Pregnancy Program Effectiveness Schools Sex Education Sexuality |
| title | The Incidental Fertility Effects of School Condom Distribution Programs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A06%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Incidental%20Fertility%20Effects%20of%20School%20Condom%20Distribution%20Programs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20policy%20analysis%20and%20management&rft.au=Buckles,%20Kasey%20S.&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=464&rft.epage=492&rft.pages=464-492&rft.issn=0276-8739&rft.eissn=1520-6688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pam.22060&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45105290%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2209683924&rft_id=info:pmid/29993228&rft_ericid=EJ1182141&rft_jstor_id=45105290&rfr_iscdi=true |